Attorney Jessica Paluch-Hoerman, founder of TruLaw, has over 28 years of experience as a personal injury and mass tort attorney, and previously worked as an international tax attorney at Deloitte. Jessie collaborates with attorneys nationwide — enabling her to share reliable, up-to-date legal information with our readers.
This article has been written and reviewed for legal accuracy and clarity by the team of writers and legal experts at TruLaw and is as accurate as possible. This content should not be taken as legal advice from an attorney. If you would like to learn more about our owner and experienced injury lawyer, Jessie Paluch, you can do so here.
TruLaw does everything possible to make sure the information in this article is up to date and accurate. If you need specific legal advice about your case, contact us by using the chat on the bottom of this page. This article should not be taken as advice from an attorney.
Question: What is the Rainbow Six Siege addiction lawsuit?
Answer: The Rainbow Six Siege Addiction lawsuit represents part of broader video game addiction litigation targeting Ubisoft for allegedly designing the game with manipulative mechanics that foster compulsive gaming behaviors, particularly in young players.
These lawsuits claim that Ubisoft intentionally incorporated addictive design elements similar to gambling mechanisms, failed to warn consumers about addiction risks, and specifically targeted vulnerable adolescents whose developing brains are more susceptible to psychological manipulation.
TruLaw partners with video game addiction litigation leaders to provide clients with the legal resources and support necessary for a successful outcome in these cases.
The growing recognition of gaming disorders by medical professionals and courts has established this as a legitimate area of product liability law rather than frivolous litigation.
In 2018, the World Health Organization officially included Gaming Disorder in the 11th revision of the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-11), defining it as a pattern of gaming behavior characterized by impaired control, increasing priority given to gaming over other activities, and continuation despite negative consequences.
This medical recognition provides the foundation for legal claims that gaming companies like Ubisoft have created products that can cause recognized medical conditions, particularly in minors whose prefrontal cortex development continues until age 25.
The core allegations against the prominent video game developer (Ubisoft) center on the intentional design of addictive features, failure to warn about addiction risks, and targeting vulnerable young players with psychological manipulation tactics that mirror regulated gambling systems.
Plaintiffs argue that while gambling has age restrictions and mandatory warning requirements, video games with similar psychological mechanisms operate without comparable safeguards, allowing companies to exploit minors without accountability.
These cases seek to establish that Ubisoft knew or should have known about the addictive potential of their game design choices and failed to implement adequate protections for vulnerable users.
The specific legal theories being pursued against Ubisoft involve:
The May 2025 consolidation of video game addiction cases into Judicial Council Coordination Proceeding (JCCP) No. 5363 in California courts marks an important development in gaming addiction litigation.
This coordination, similar to federal multidistrict litigation but operating within California’s judicial system, allows for more efficient discovery, consistent rulings across multiple cases, and pooled resources among plaintiffs pursuing claims against major gaming companies.
The consolidation specifically addresses allegations that certain video games, including Tom Clancy’s Rainbow Six Siege, are intentionally designed to be addictive, particularly affecting minors through sophisticated psychological manipulation techniques borrowed from behavioral psychology and gambling industries.
If you or a loved one experienced mental health issues, academic performance decline, or financial harm from excessive Rainbow Six Siege gameplay, you may be eligible to seek compensation.
Contact TruLaw using the chat on this page to receive an instant case evaluation and determine whether you qualify to join others in filing a Rainbow Six Siege addiction lawsuit today.
The consolidation of cases under Judge Samantha P. Jessner in Los Angeles Superior Court represents the judiciary’s recognition of these claims’ legitimacy and the need for coordinated legal proceedings.
As of August 2025, over 100 video game addiction cases have been consolidated in JCCP No. 5363, with Rainbow Six Siege cases joining litigation against other major titles including Fortnite, Call of Duty, Minecraft, and Roblox.
This coordinated proceeding streamlines pretrial processes, allowing plaintiffs to benefit from shared expert testimony, scientific studies, and medical evidence while maintaining individual claims for specific damages.
Key litigation milestones in the Rainbow Six Siege cases feature:
Cases continue to be filed with increasing frequency as more families become aware of their legal rights and the legitimacy of gaming addiction claims gains judicial recognition.
The transition to free-to-play in June 2025 through the “Siege X” update may actually strengthen plaintiffs’ claims by demonstrating Ubisoft’s increased reliance on addictive monetization strategies, as the free-access model depends entirely on keeping users engaged long enough to convert them to paying customers.
This business model shift provides additional evidence that player retention through psychological manipulation is central to Ubisoft’s revenue strategy, potentially supporting claims of intentional design choices that prioritize profit over player wellbeing.
Rainbow Six Siege cases fit within the larger pattern of litigation against major gaming companies including Epic Games (Fortnite), Activision Blizzard (Call of Duty), Microsoft (Minecraft), EA Sports (FIFA), and Roblox Corporation.
These coordinated proceedings allow families across the United States to pursue justice against an industry that allegedly prioritizes engagement metrics and revenue over the mental health and wellbeing of young players.
The consolidated approach enables plaintiffs to leverage collective legal expertise, share discovery materials, and develop consistent theories of liability that address industry-wide practices rather than isolated incidents.
Parallel video game addiction litigations currently proceeding (among others):
The coordinated approach allows plaintiffs to pool resources, share expert witnesses specializing in addiction psychology and neuroscience, and develop consistent legal theories addressing common industry practices.
These cases may establish important precedents for the gaming industry’s duty of care toward vulnerable players, particularly minors whose developing brains make them especially susceptible to addiction mechanics.
As litigation progresses, the combined evidence from multiple gaming platforms demonstrates a pattern of industry knowledge about addiction risks and deliberate implementation of harmful design features across competing companies, suggesting coordinated exploitation of psychological vulnerabilities for profit.
Rainbow Six Siege allegedly employs sophisticated psychological manipulation tactics that exploit vulnerability in developing adolescent brains through variable reward schedules, competitive pressure systems, and social dependency mechanics.
These design features mirror techniques used in regulated gambling industries, triggering dopamine responses and creating behavioral patterns consistent with addiction.
The game’s mechanics specifically target the underdeveloped prefrontal cortex in young players, making them particularly susceptible to compulsive gaming behaviors that prioritize in-game achievements while they ignore real-world responsibilities and wellbeing.
While gambling industries face strict age restrictions, mandatory warning labels, and regulatory oversight, video games employing identical psychological mechanisms operate without comparable safeguards despite targeting minors.
The June 2025 transition to free-to-play further intensifies these concerns, as Ubisoft’s revenue model now depends entirely on keeping players psychologically engaged long enough to convert them into paying customers through addiction-driven monetization strategies.
Rainbow Six Siege’s ranking system employs eight tiers from Copper through Champion, with each tier except Champion containing five sub-divisions, creating 36 total ranks that demand constant progression to maintain status.
The Ranked 2.0 system, introduced in December 2022, separates visible ranks from hidden Matchmaking Rating (MMR), creating dual progression systems that obscure true skill levels while maximizing engagement through unpredictable advancement patterns.
This multi-layered ranking structure ensures players never feel satisfied with their current position, as seasonal resets every three months force complete rank regression to Copper V, regardless of previous achievement levels.
The game’s addictive progression mechanics consist of:
Research on variable-ratio reward schedules demonstrates that Alpha Packs’ randomized loot system creates the strongest possible behavioral reinforcement patterns, identical to those employed by slot machines in casinos.
The system’s predetermined drop rates, disguised by a spinning wheel animation that suggests player control, exploit the adolescent brain’s heightened reward sensitivity and underdeveloped impulse control mechanisms.
If you or a loved one has experienced mental health issues, academic decline, or financial harm from Rainbow Six Siege’s addictive mechanics, you may be eligible to seek compensation.
Contact TruLaw using the chat on this page to receive an instant case evaluation and determine whether you qualify to join others in filing a Rainbow Six Siege addiction lawsuit today.
Ubisoft’s content release schedule deliberately manufactures fear of missing out through quarterly seasonal updates, time-limited events lasting 2-3 weeks, and exclusive cosmetics that disappear permanently after brief availability windows.
The Battle Pass system, containing over 100 tiers of rewards that expire every three months, creates artificial scarcity that pressures players to maintain daily engagement or lose access to content forever.
Limited-time game modes like Doktor’s Curse, Sugar Fright, and Road to S.I. events offer exclusive rewards unavailable through any other means, forcing players to prioritize gaming during specific windows regardless of real-world obligations.
FOMO-inducing mechanics designed to create compulsive play feature:
Rainbow Six Siege’s 5v5 tactical format creates powerful social obligations through squad-based gameplay that punishes individual players for prioritizing real-world responsibilities over gaming commitments.
The ranked system imposes escalating abandonment penalties starting at 30 minutes and increasing with repeated offenses, effectively trapping players in matches even when they need to attend to school, family, or health needs.
Voice chat integration and visible rank displays create peer pressure dynamics where adolescents feel compelled to maintain consistent play schedules in an effort to avoid disappointing teammates or losing social standing within their gaming communities.
Social manipulation mechanics that foster dependency involve methods such as:
These social dynamics exploit adolescents’ developmental need for peer acceptance and belonging, with research showing that online gaming relationships increasingly replace real-world social connections in addicted players.
The game’s emphasis on team coordination and communication creates dependency relationships where players fear losing their primary social network if they reduce gaming time.
Studies demonstrate that competitive team-based games like Rainbow Six Siege show higher addiction rates than single-player titles, with the social pressure component identified as the primary differentiating factor in creating pathological gaming behaviors that persist despite negative consequences.
The documented health consequences of Rainbow Six Siege addiction encompass severe psychological, physical, and cognitive impairments that particularly devastate adolescent players whose developing brains lack the neurological maturity to resist addiction mechanisms.
The combination of high-intensity competitive gameplay, social pressure, and ranking systems in Rainbow Six Siege creates a perfect storm of addiction factors that manifest in measurable mental health deterioration, physical disability, and academic failure.
Medical professionals increasingly recognize gaming disorder as a legitimate mental health condition requiring clinical intervention, with the American Psychiatric Association including Internet Gaming Disorder in the DSM-5-TR as a condition warranting further study.
The bidirectional relationship between gaming addiction and mental health problems creates a destructive cycle where gaming initially serves as an escape from anxiety or depression, but excessive play ultimately exacerbates these conditions while creating new psychological dependencies.
Studies specifically examining competitive gaming environments like Rainbow Six Siege demonstrate higher rates of comorbid mental health conditions compared to casual gaming, with the pressure to maintain rank and social standing within teams creating additional psychological strain beyond the addiction itself.
Research reveals that adolescents addicted to competitive gaming experience major depressive disorder at rates 1.5 times higher than non-gaming peers, with Rainbow Six Siege’s ranking system and seasonal resets creating particular vulnerability to mood disorders.
The constant pressure to maintain rank, combined with toxic voice chat environments and performance anxiety, creates a breeding ground for severe psychological distress that often requires professional intervention.
Documented psychological impacts of gaming addiction feature:
Saudi Arabian studies found 62.1% prevalence of video game addiction among children and adolescents, with strong positive correlations between addiction scores and depression, anxiety, and inattention symptoms.
Research examining the symptom network of Internet Gaming Disorder reveals that “withdrawal,” “tolerance,” and “conflict” serve as core symptoms that predict deterioration across all domains of functioning.
The immersive nature of tactical shooters like Rainbow Six Siege, requiring intense concentration and emotional investment, creates particularly severe psychological consequences as players lose the ability to regulate emotions or cope with real-world stressors without gaming as an escape mechanism.
If you or a loved one has experienced depression, anxiety, or other mental health issues from Rainbow Six Siege addiction, you may be eligible to seek compensation.
Contact TruLaw using the chat on this page to receive an instant case evaluation and determine whether you qualify to join others in filing a Rainbow Six Siege addiction lawsuit today.
Prolonged Rainbow Six Siege sessions lasting 4-10 hours create cascading physical health problems, with 70% of heavy gamers experiencing Computer Vision Syndrome characterized by eye strain, headaches, and blurred vision requiring medical intervention.
Harvard Medical School research confirms that gaming addiction leads to multiple repetitive stress injuries, with carpal tunnel syndrome affecting PC gamers at higher rates due to prolonged wrist extension while using mouse controls, and “Gamer’s thumb” (De Quervain’s tenosynovitis) causing chronic inflammation requiring cortisone injections or surgery.
Physical health deterioration from gaming addiction (notably):
Studies demonstrate that competitive games like Rainbow Six Siege maintain elevated cortisol levels and sympathetic nervous system activation for hours, creating a chronic stress state equivalent to continuous “fight-or-flight” response.
Research published in the Journal of Clinical Nutrition shows single gaming sessions increase food intake regardless of hunger, with gamers consuming 500-1000 additional calories per session while experiencing impaired satiety signals.
The combination of sleep deprivation, poor nutrition, and chronic stress creates a metabolic disaster that increases risk for diabetes, cardiovascular disease, and stroke even in young players.
Specific criteria determine eligibility for legal action against Ubisoft, with requirements focusing on age at addiction onset, documented gaming duration, and evidence of harm resulting from Rainbow Six Siege’s allegedly addictive design features.
TruLaw gives immediate answers to individuals about their eligibility for Rainbow Six Siege litigation based on the details they share through their instant case evaluation system, providing clarity on qualification requirements without obligation or upfront costs.
Eligibility requirements may expand as litigation develops and new scientific research helps everyone better recognize gaming addiction’s full impact, with current criteria representing minimum thresholds rather than absolute limitations.
The consolidation of cases under JCCP No. 5363 has established clearer frameworks for case evaluation, though circumstances vary from person to person and require professional legal assessment to determine qualification for compensation.
Consultation with TruLaw provides the most current qualification criteria, as eligibility standards continue to evolve with new medical research, court rulings, and evidence discovered during the litigation process, ensuring potential plaintiffs receive accurate, up-to-date information about their legal rights.
The age restriction of 24 or younger when addiction symptoms began reflects extensive neuroscience research demonstrating that the prefrontal cortex, responsible for impulse control and decision-making, continues developing until approximately age 25.
This biological vulnerability makes young people particularly susceptible to Rainbow Six Siege’s dopamine-driven reward systems and social pressure mechanics, as their brains lack the neurological maturity to resist addiction triggers effectively.
Gaming duration requirements of at least 3 hours daily for 5 consecutive weeks represent minimum thresholds, with many successful cases involving higher usage patterns that demonstrate the game’s ability to override normal behavioral controls and create dependency.
Specific eligibility criteria for Rainbow Six Siege lawsuits feature:
The scientific basis for the age cutoff stems from research showing that the prefrontal cortex, which governs executive function and impulse control, remains underdeveloped until the mid-twenties, making younger individuals neurologically incapable of resisting addiction mechanisms designed by gaming companies.
Usage requirements may be adjusted based on severity of harm and individual circumstances, with cases involving documented mental health crises, academic failure, or physical injury potentially qualifying with lower gameplay thresholds.
The transition to free-to-play in June 2025 may affect eligibility criteria going forward, as the removal of financial barriers potentially expands the pool of affected players and strengthens claims about Ubisoft’s reliance on addiction-based monetization.
Medical documentation establishing a causal link between Rainbow Six Siege gameplay and diagnosed conditions forms the cornerstone of successful litigation, though formal gaming disorder diagnosis is not mandatory if other evidence demonstrates addiction-related harm.
Mental health professionals increasingly recognize gaming disorder as a legitimate condition requiring treatment, with documentation from therapists, psychiatrists, school counselors, or pediatricians providing evidence of the game’s impact on psychological and physical wellbeing.
The strength of medical evidence directly correlates with potential compensation, as comprehensive documentation demonstrates both the severity of harm and the resources required for recovery.
Qualifying diagnoses and documentation for lawsuits involve:
Multiple forms of documentation strengthen cases even without formal Internet Gaming Disorder diagnosis, as courts recognize that gaming addiction manifests through various mental health conditions and behavioral problems.
Treatment attempts, whether successful or unsuccessful, demonstrate the severity and persistence of addiction while establishing the financial burden families bear in addressing gaming-related harm.
Documentation spanning extended periods shows the chronic nature of addiction and counters potential arguments that problems were temporary or unrelated to gaming, making longitudinal mental health records particularly valuable in establishing causation and calculating damages.
If you or a loved one meets these eligibility criteria and has suffered from Rainbow Six Siege addiction, you may be eligible to seek compensation.
Contact TruLaw using the chat on this page to receive an instant case evaluation and determine whether you qualify to join others in filing a Rainbow Six Siege addiction lawsuit today.
The path from recognizing Rainbow Six Siege addiction to securing compensation involves multiple legal steps, each designed to build a compelling case demonstrating how Ubisoft’s allegedly manipulative game design caused measurable harm.
The process begins with TruLaw’s instant case evaluation system, which provides immediate feedback on eligibility without obligation, then progresses through evidence gathering, filing, discovery, and ultimately resolution through settlement or trial.
TruLaw partners with Rainbow Six Siege litigation leaders who recognize the technical aspects of gaming addiction, the psychological mechanisms involved, and the legal strategies necessary to hold Ubisoft accountable for prioritizing engagement metrics and profit over player wellbeing.
The contingency fee structure ensures no upfront costs or hourly fees, making legal representation accessible to all affected families regardless of financial circumstances, with attorneys only receiving payment if they successfully secure compensation.
This arrangement aligns attorney and client interests, as legal teams invest their own resources in building strong cases, knowing they only recover costs through successful outcomes.
The consolidation of cases under JCCP No. 5363 provides additional advantages, allowing plaintiffs to benefit from shared discovery, expert witnesses, and coordinated legal strategies while maintaining individual claims for specific damages based on unique circumstances.
The initial consultation process with TruLaw involves comprehensive case evaluation through their instant assessment system, where potential plaintiffs provide details about gaming history, medical conditions, and impacts on daily life to determine eligibility.
During this free consultation, experienced attorneys review documentation, explain legal options, assess potential compensation ranges, and outline the litigation timeline without any obligation to proceed.
Following eligibility confirmation, the legal team begins systematic evidence collection, working with families to gather medical records, gaming logs, financial documentation, and witness statements that establish both the extent of addiction and its connection to Rainbow Six Siege’s design features.
The comprehensive filing process consists of:
The statute of limitations for Rainbow Six Siege addiction claims varies by state, typically ranging from 1-6 years from discovery of harm, though ongoing addiction may toll these periods under continuing violation doctrine.
California’s discovery rule means the clock starts when plaintiffs knew or should have known that Rainbow Six Siege caused their injuries, potentially extending filing deadlines for those who only recently connected their mental health issues to gaming.
Immediate consultation with TruLaw protects all potential claims and ensures compliance with procedural requirements, as missing deadlines permanently bars recovery regardless of case merit.
Settlement expectations for Rainbow Six Siege addiction cases reflect the severity of harm, strength of evidence, and degree of corporate culpability, with current estimates ranging from $25,000 for minor disruption to over $300,000 for cases involving permanent disability or life-threatening consequences.
The categories of compensation available encompass both economic losses that can be calculated precisely and non-economic damages that reflect the profound impact addiction has on quality of life, relationships, and future potential.
Punitive damages remain possible in cases demonstrating particularly egregious corporate conduct, such as internal documents showing Ubisoft knew about addiction risks but prioritized profit.
Comprehensive damages breakdown for Rainbow Six Siege cases feature tactics like:
Economic Damages (Calculable Losses):
Non-Economic Damages (Quality of Life Impact):
Early case resolution may result in lower settlements as defendants seek to avoid precedent-setting verdicts, while later cases benefit from developed evidence, established liability findings, and jury awards that demonstrate the seriousness with which courts view gaming addiction claims against companies that deliberately exploit vulnerable populations for profit.
Please be advised that any projected or estimated settlement amounts mentioned above are general estimations and are not guaranteed.
These figures are meant to provide a general idea of what settlement ranges could look like and should not be taken as definitive expectations for your case.
Individual results will vary significantly based on specific circumstances, quality of evidence, and unique damages suffered.
Contact TruLaw using the chat on this page to receive an instant case evaluation tailored to your specific situation.
Our Video Game addiction attorney at TruLaw is dedicated to supporting clients through the process of filing a Video Game Addiction lawsuit.
With extensive experience in product liability cases, Jessica Paluch-Hoerman and our partner law firms work with litigation leaders and mental health professionals to prove how video games with deliberately addictive features caused you harm.
TruLaw focuses on securing compensation for mental health treatment expenses, academic and career setbacks, family relationship damages, and other losses resulting from your video game addiction injuries.
We know the psychological and social toll that Video Game Addiction issues have on your life and provide the personalized guidance you need when seeking justice.
Meet our lead Video Game Addiction attorney:
At TruLaw, we believe financial concerns should never stand in the way of justice.
That’s why we operate on a contingency fee basis with this approach, you only pay legal fees after you’ve been awarded compensation for your injuries.
If you or a loved one experienced addiction, depression, sleep disorders, social isolation, or other mental health problems from excessive gaming, you may be eligible to seek compensation.
You can talk to a member of the TruLaw team by using the chat on this page to receive an instant case evaluation and determine whether you qualify to join others in filing a Video Game Addiction lawsuit today.
Video game addiction lawsuits are being filed by individuals and families across the country who suffered mental health injuries and addiction from video games designed with manipulative features.
TruLaw is currently accepting clients for the video game addiction lawsuit.
A few reasons to choose TruLaw for your video game addiction lawsuit include:
If you or a loved one suffered from video game addiction or related mental health problems, you may be eligible to seek compensation.
Contact TruLaw using the chat on this page to receive an instant case evaluation that can determine if you qualify for the video game addiction lawsuit today.
Eligibility is currently limited to individuals who were 24 or younger when they developed Rainbow Six Siege addiction symptoms, as scientific research demonstrates that young brains are particularly vulnerable to the game’s dopamine-driven mechanics and social pressure systems.
The age restriction reflects neuroscience findings that the prefrontal cortex, responsible for impulse control and decision-making, continues developing until approximately age 25, making younger players biologically incapable of resisting addiction mechanisms.
However, parents and legal guardians can file lawsuits on behalf of affected children regardless of the parent’s age, and eligibility criteria may expand as litigation progresses and courts recognize the broader impact of predatory gaming design on vulnerable populations.
Evidence requirements include medical records showing diagnosis and treatment for gaming-related conditions such as depression, anxiety, or gaming disorder, along with documentation of playing time exceeding 3 hours daily for 5+ weeks through Ubisoft account logs or screenshots.
Additional supporting evidence encompasses academic records showing grade decline or school withdrawal, employment history demonstrating job loss or reduced productivity, financial statements documenting in-game purchases, and witness testimony from family members about behavioral changes and social withdrawal.
The stronger and more comprehensive the documentation particularly when it spans extended periods and shows escalating problems the more compelling the case becomes, with expert testimony potentially linking Rainbow Six Siege’s specific design features to documented harm.
Statutes of limitations vary by state, typically ranging from 1 to 6 years from when the harm was discovered or reasonably should have been discovered, with California’s discovery rule potentially extending deadlines for those who only recently connected their injuries to gaming.
Since Rainbow Six Siege addiction involves ongoing harm with continuing violations as many players remain trapped in addictive patterns, limitation periods may be tolled until the addiction ends or treatment begins.
Immediate consultation with TruLaw protects all potential claims and ensures compliance with procedural requirements, as missing filing deadlines permanently bars recovery regardless of case merit or severity of harm.
While multiple cases have been consolidated for coordinated proceedings under JCCP No.
5363 in California, these are individual lawsuits rather than class actions, allowing for personalized damage assessment based on each plaintiff’s specific circumstances.
The judicial panel rejected class action certification because injuries vary between plaintiffs from mild academic disruption to severe mental health crises making individual treatment more appropriate than collective resolution.
This individual approach benefits plaintiffs by allowing full compensation for unique damages rather than predetermined class settlement amounts, while still providing the efficiency advantages of coordinated discovery, shared expert witnesses, and consistent legal rulings across similar cases.
Active addiction doesn’t prevent filing a lawsuit and actually demonstrates the game’s addictive nature and ongoing harm, as the compulsion to continue playing despite negative effects is a defining characteristic of gaming disorder.
Many successful addiction cases involve plaintiffs still struggling with compulsive gaming at the time of filing, as this ongoing behavior proves the power of the addiction mechanisms and the need for legal intervention.
TruLaw can connect families with both legal resources and treatment support, addressing the immediate need for accountability through litigation while also working to break the addiction cycle through professional intervention and recovery resources.
Most attorneys, including those working with TruLaw, handle these cases on a contingency fee basis with no upfront costs, hourly fees, or out-of-pocket expenses, making legal action accessible regardless of financial circumstances.
Attorneys only receive payment if they successfully secure compensation through settlement or verdict, typically taking 33-40% of the recovery, which aligns their interests with achieving maximum compensation for clients.
This arrangement means families can pursue justice without financial risk, as law firms invest their own resources in building cases, covering expert witness fees, discovery costs, and trial expenses, only recouping these investments through successful outcomes that benefit both client and counsel.
Managing Attorney & Owner
With over 25 years of legal experience, Jessica Paluch-Hoerman is an Illinois lawyer, a CPA, and a mother of three. She spent the first decade of her career working as an international tax attorney at Deloitte.
In 2009, Jessie co-founded her own law firm with her husband – which has scaled to over 30 employees since its conception.
In 2016, Jessie founded TruLaw, which allows her to collaborate with attorneys and legal experts across the United States on a daily basis. This hypervaluable network of experts is what enables her to share the most reliable, accurate, and up-to-date legal information with our readers!
Here, at TruLaw, we’re committed to helping victims get the justice they deserve.
Alongside our partner law firms, we have successfully collected over $3 Billion in verdicts and settlements on behalf of injured individuals.
Would you like our help?
At TruLaw, we fiercely combat corporations that endanger individuals’ well-being. If you’ve suffered injuries and believe these well-funded entities should be held accountable, we’re here for you.
With TruLaw, you gain access to successful and seasoned lawyers who maximize your chances of success. Our lawyers invest in you—they do not receive a dime until your lawsuit reaches a successful resolution!
AFFF Lawsuit claims are being filed against manufacturers of aqueous film-forming foam (AFFF), commonly used in firefighting.
Claims allege that companies such as 3M, DuPont, and Tyco Fire Products failed to adequately warn users about the potential dangers of AFFF exposure — including increased risks of various cancers and diseases.
Depo Provera Lawsuit claims are being filed by individuals who allege they developed meningioma (a type of brain tumor) after receiving Depo-Provera birth control injections.
A 2024 study found that women using Depo-Provera for at least 1 year are five times more likely to develop meningioma brain tumors compared to those not using the drug.
Suboxone Tooth Decay Lawsuit claims are being filed against Indivior, the manufacturer of Suboxone, a medication used to treat opioid addiction.
Claims allege that Indivior failed to adequately warn users about the potential dangers of severe tooth decay and dental injuries associated with Suboxone’s sublingual film version.
Social Media Harm Lawsuits are being filed against social media companies for allegedly causing mental health issues in children and teens.
Claims allege that companies like Meta, Google, ByteDance, and Snap designed addictive platforms that led to anxiety, depression, and other mental health issues without adequately warning users or parents.
Transvaginal Mesh Lawsuits are being filed against manufacturers of transvaginal mesh products used to treat pelvic organ prolapse (POP) and stress urinary incontinence (SUI).
Claims allege that companies like Ethicon, C.R. Bard, and Boston Scientific failed to adequately warn about potential dangers — including erosion, pain, and infection.
Bair Hugger Warming Blanket Lawsuits involve claims against 3M — alleging their surgical warming blankets caused severe infections and complications (particularly in hip and knee replacement surgeries).
Plaintiffs claim 3M failed to warn about potential risks — despite knowing about increased risk of deep joint infections since 2011.
Baby Formula NEC Lawsuit claims are being filed against manufacturers of cow’s milk-based baby formula products.
Claims allege that companies like Abbott Laboratories (Similac) and Mead Johnson & Company (Enfamil) failed to warn about the increased risk of necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) in premature infants.
Here, at TruLaw, we’re committed to helping victims get the justice they deserve.
Alongside our partner law firms, we have successfully collected over $3 Billion in verdicts and settlements on behalf of injured individuals.
Would you like our help?