Attorney Jessie Paluch, founder of TruLaw, has over 25 years of experience as a personal injury and mass tort attorney, and previously worked as an international tax attorney at Deloitte. Jessie collaborates with attorneys nationwide — enabling her to share reliable, up-to-date legal information with our readers.
This article has been written and reviewed for legal accuracy and clarity by the team of writers and legal experts at TruLaw and is as accurate as possible. This content should not be taken as legal advice from an attorney. If you would like to learn more about our owner and experienced injury lawyer, Jessie Paluch, you can do so here.
TruLaw does everything possible to make sure the information in this article is up to date and accurate. If you need specific legal advice about your case, contact us by using the chat on the bottom of this page. This article should not be taken as advice from an attorney.
The process of determining SSDI physical health conditions requires evaluating how severe physical impairments affect an individual’s ability to work.
State agencies, known as disability determination services, are responsible for evaluating disability claims based on medical evidence and making initial determinations regarding eligibility.
On this page, we’ll provide you with an overview of SSDI physical health eligibility, medical evidence for SSDI physical condition claims, reassessment of SSDI physical health benefits, and much more.
Individuals suffering from physical health conditions, including those affecting the musculoskeletal system such as bones, joints, and related tissues, may qualify for SSDI if their impairment meets the severity outlined by the Social Security Administration (SSA).
Conditions must be medically determinable physical impairments confirmed through clinical and laboratory diagnostics.
The SSA evaluates physical health conditions through its Blue Book Adult Listing of Impairments, which details specific medical criteria for evaluating the severity of physical impairments under Part A for adults.
Qualifying physical disabilities can stem from the following conditions:
Physical disability claims for SSDI must be supported by medically acceptable clinical evidence that aligns with the SSA’s disability criteria.
If you or someone you love has experienced one of these physical health conditions, you may qualify to seek compensation.
Contact TruLaw using the chat on this page to receive an instant case evaluation that can determine your eligibility to file for SSDI benefits today.
The SSA evaluates the severity of physical health disabilities by examining how the condition limits an individual’s ability to perform work-related activities and maintain gainful employment.
This includes analyzing medical documentation, objective clinical findings, and detailed functional capacity assessments.
Many denied applicants are approved after their cases are heard by an Administrative Law Judge (ALJ), indicating the importance of this judicial role in the multi-level appeals process.
A medically determinable physical or mental impairment must significantly restrict essential work functions, such as lifting, standing, walking, or performing other job-related tasks, to meet the SSA’s rigorous disability criteria.
Applicants undergo evaluation based on both medical evidence and their demonstrated physical limitations.
The SSA requires that the condition has lasted, or is expected to last, for at least 12 months or result in death.
When reviewing claims, the SSA considers both objective medical findings and documented functional restrictions for physical conditions that qualify for disability.
Severe functional limitations are also a key criterion for establishing disability, especially for children under the Supplemental Security Income (SSI) program.
A diagnosis alone cannot establish disability; applicants must provide evidence of ongoing physical limitations that prevent substantial gainful activity.
This includes mental disorders, such as depression and anxiety, which are recognized by the SSA as qualifying conditions for disability benefits.
Assessments typically include physical examinations, diagnostic test results, and documentation of symptoms that interfere with workplace activities.
Functional limitations—such as inability to lift certain weights, chronic pain symptoms, or difficulty maintaining prolonged positions—are crucial in establishing the severity of the impairment.
The SSA uses the following key factors to assess physical health conditions:
These factors help determine whether an applicant qualifies for social security disability insurance benefits.
Physical limitations, such as reduced mobility or diminished strength, play a crucial role in establishing the severity of the condition.
The SSA’s evaluation process aims to identify individuals whose physical conditions prevent them from maintaining substantial gainful employment.
The SSA requires medical evidence from qualified healthcare providers who can document the nature, severity, and impact of physical health conditions on work capacity.
Disability payments provided by Social Security Disability Insurance (SSDI) depend heavily on this documentation.
This includes obtaining records from both primary care physicians and specialists who have treated the condition over time.
Social security’s disability programs, including SSDI and Supplemental Security Income (SSI), rely on comprehensive medical records to determine eligibility.
Medical source documentation must provide a clear picture of how the physical impairment affects daily activities and work-related functions.
The quality and completeness of medical source documentation can significantly influence the success of disability claims.
Healthcare providers must detail both objective findings and observed functional limitations.
When building a disability claim, the SSA places significant weight on medical records from qualified healthcare professionals who have an established treatment relationship with the applicant.
Documentation must come from licensed medical professionals who can provide detailed insights into the condition’s severity and progression.
Medical sources should include comprehensive treatment notes, diagnostic test results, and professional observations about functional capacity.
Regular documentation from treating physicians—particularly specialists in relevant fields—carries substantial weight in disability determinations.
The SSA considers the following medical sources essential for physical health claims:
These medical sources help establish the validity of social security disability insurance claims.
The SSA monitors ongoing disability claims through regular reviews of medical evidence to ensure continued eligibility for benefits.
The Supplemental Security Income (SSI) program, administered by the SSA, provides crucial financial support to disabled individuals with limited income and resources.
This process requires consistent documentation of physical health conditions and their impact on work capacity over time.
Recipients must maintain regular medical treatment and provide updated evidence showing their condition continues to prevent substantial gainful activity.
The SSA conducts periodic reviews to assess whether medical improvement has occurred.
Maintaining SSDI benefits requires ongoing participation in medical treatment and regular documentation of physical limitations that affect workability.
Recipients must demonstrate continued compliance with prescribed treatments and therapies to maintain their disability status.
Regular medical appointments and updated assessments help document the persistence or progression of physical impairments.
Failure to maintain adequate medical documentation can result in a review of benefit eligibility.
The SSA requires the following for ongoing benefit eligibility:
These requirements ensure that Social Security disability benefits continue only for those who remain unable to work.
Recipients should maintain detailed records of all medical visits, treatments, and changes in their condition.
Physical health conditions that qualify for SSDI include musculoskeletal disorders, cardiovascular conditions, respiratory disorders, and other impairments listed in the SSA Blue Book.
These conditions must be medically determinable and severe enough to limit an individual’s ability to work for at least 12 months or result in death.
The Social Security Administration evaluates severity by examining how the condition limits an individual’s ability to perform work-related activities through medical documentation and functional capacity assessments.
The evaluation process requires that the impairment significantly restricts essential work functions like lifting, standing, or walking.
SSDI claims require comprehensive medical evidence from qualified healthcare providers, including records from both primary care physicians and specialists who have treated the condition.
The documentation must include detailed treatment notes, diagnostic test results, and professional observations about functional capacity.
The SSA conducts periodic reviews to assess whether medical improvement has occurred in benefit recipients.
Recipients must maintain regular medical treatment and provide updated evidence showing their condition continues to prevent substantial gainful activity.
State disability determination services are responsible for evaluating disability claims and developing medical evidence.
These agencies play a crucial role in making initial determinations regarding eligibility for SSDI benefits.
Failure to maintain adequate medical documentation can trigger a review of your benefit eligibility by the SSA.
Recipients must demonstrate continued compliance with prescribed treatments and therapies to maintain their disability status.
Experienced Attorney & Legal SaaS CEO
With over 25 years of legal experience, Jessie is an Illinois lawyer, a CPA, and a mother of three. She spent the first decade of her career working as an international tax attorney at Deloitte.
In 2009, Jessie co-founded her own law firm with her husband – which has scaled to over 30 employees since its conception.
In 2016, Jessie founded TruLaw, which allows her to collaborate with attorneys and legal experts across the United States on a daily basis. This hypervaluable network of experts is what enables her to share reliable legal information with her readers!
You can learn more about the Social Security Disability Insurance by visiting any of our pages listed below:
Here, at TruLaw, we’re committed to helping victims get the justice they deserve.
Alongside our partner law firms, we have successfully collected over $3 Billion in verdicts and settlements on behalf of injured individuals.
Would you like our help?
At TruLaw, we fiercely combat corporations that endanger individuals’ well-being. If you’ve suffered injuries and believe these well-funded entities should be held accountable, we’re here for you.
With TruLaw, you gain access to successful and seasoned lawyers who maximize your chances of success. Our lawyers invest in you—they do not receive a dime until your lawsuit reaches a successful resolution!
Do you believe you’re entitled to compensation?
Use our Instant Case Evaluator to find out in as little as 60 seconds!
AFFF Lawsuit claims are being filed against manufacturers of aqueous film-forming foam (AFFF), commonly used in firefighting.
Claims allege that companies such as 3M, DuPont, and Tyco Fire Products failed to adequately warn users about the potential dangers of AFFF exposure — including increased risks of various cancers and diseases.
Suboxone Tooth Decay Lawsuit claims are being filed against Indivior, the manufacturer of Suboxone, a medication used to treat opioid addiction.
Claims allege that Indivior failed to adequately warn users about the potential dangers of severe tooth decay and dental injuries associated with Suboxone’s sublingual film version.
Social Media Harm Lawsuits are being filed against social media companies for allegedly causing mental health issues in children and teens.
Claims allege that companies like Meta, Google, ByteDance, and Snap designed addictive platforms that led to anxiety, depression, and other mental health issues without adequately warning users or parents.
Transvaginal Mesh Lawsuits are being filed against manufacturers of transvaginal mesh products used to treat pelvic organ prolapse (POP) and stress urinary incontinence (SUI).
Claims allege that companies like Ethicon, C.R. Bard, and Boston Scientific failed to adequately warn about potential dangers — including erosion, pain, and infection.
Bair Hugger Warming Blanket Lawsuits involve claims against 3M — alleging their surgical warming blankets caused severe infections and complications (particularly in hip and knee replacement surgeries).
Plaintiffs claim 3M failed to warn about potential risks — despite knowing about increased risk of deep joint infections since 2011.
Baby Formula NEC Lawsuit claims are being filed against manufacturers of cow’s milk-based baby formula products.
Claims allege that companies like Abbott Laboratories (Similac) and Mead Johnson & Company (Enfamil) failed to warn about the increased risk of necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) in premature infants.
Here, at TruLaw, we’re committed to helping victims get the justice they deserve.
Alongside our partner law firms, we have successfully collected over $3 Billion in verdicts and settlements on behalf of injured individuals.
Would you like our help?