Attorney Jessie Paluch, founder of TruLaw, has over 25 years of experience as a personal injury and mass tort attorney, and previously worked as an international tax attorney at Deloitte. Jessie collaborates with attorneys nationwide — enabling her to share reliable, up-to-date legal information with our readers.
This article has been written and reviewed for legal accuracy and clarity by the team of writers and legal experts at TruLaw and is as accurate as possible. This content should not be taken as legal advice from an attorney. If you would like to learn more about our owner and experienced injury lawyer, Jessie Paluch, you can do so here.
TruLaw does everything possible to make sure the information in this article is up to date and accurate. If you need specific legal advice about your case, contact us by using the chat on the bottom of this page. This article should not be taken as advice from an attorney.
The process of determining SSDI neurological conditions eligibility requires evaluating how severe a neurological disorder impacts an individual’s ability to work.
These neurological conditions can lead to significant impairments that disrupt daily life, such as motor function problems, cognitive decline, or other complications.
On this page, we’ll provide you with an overview of SSDI neurological eligibility, medical evidence for SSDI neurological claims, reassessment of SSDI neurological benefits, and much more.
Individuals suffering from neurological conditions may qualify for SSDI if their impairment meets the severity outlined by the Social Security Administration (SSA).
The SSA evaluates neurological conditions under Section 11.00 of the Blue Book, which provides specific criteria for evaluating the severity of neurological disorders in adults.
Common examples of SSDI neurological conditions may include, but are not limited to:
Neurological disability claims for SSDI require detailed medical testing and specialist documentation that aligns with the SSA’s evaluation criteria
If you or someone you love has experienced one of these neurological conditions, you may qualify to seek compensation.
Contact TruLaw using the chat on this page to receive an instant case evaluation that can determine your eligibility to file for SSDI benefits today.
Establishing eligibility for social security disability benefits for neurological conditions requires comprehensive and specific medical documentation.
If a neurological condition results in only mental impairment, the evaluation will be conducted under the mental disorders body system, specifically Section 12.00.
The Social Security Administration (SSA) evaluates claims based on evidence of functional limitations caused by conditions affecting the central or peripheral nervous system.
Neurological impairments may range from conditions such as traumatic brain injury or cerebral palsy to spinal cord disorders and neuropathies.
To qualify, applicants must provide relevant medical evidence that clearly demonstrates the severity of their condition through detailed diagnostic testing, clinical observations, and functional assessments.
Properly documenting a neurological condition involves the use of advanced diagnostic tools and clinical examinations.
These evaluations help demonstrate the specific nature and severity of the impairment and establish its disabling effects on physical and mental functioning.
Key medical evidence required to support neurological claims includes:
These forms of medical evidence demonstrate not only the presence of a neurological impairment but also how it disrupts the claimant’s ability to perform work or daily activities.
Applicants should work with their medical providers to ensure all diagnostic and clinical findings are thoroughly documented.
Detailed and consistent records are essential to increasing the chances of approval for disability benefits.
The SSA evaluates neurological impairments based on their impact on physical and mental functioning, including sensory and cognitive abilities.
The severity of the impairment must prevent the claimant from performing substantial gainful activity.
Conditions are assessed through detailed examinations and functional capacity evaluations, with the SSA referencing the mental disorders body system and other relevant sections in its Listing of Impairments.
Applicants must provide medical evidence that proves the condition meets or equals these requirements, demonstrating both physical and mental functioning effects.
The SSA relies on specific criteria to evaluate neurological impairments, considering both medical findings and functional limitations.
Neurological evaluations measure the extent of damage to the nervous system and its impact on essential work-related abilities.
Factors the SSA considers when evaluating neurological severity include:
This combination of diagnostic findings and functional assessments allows the SSA to determine how the neurological condition limits work-related abilities.
Applicants with neurological impairments should focus on presenting clear medical evidence that highlights their physical and mental functioning limitations.
These evaluations are necessary for demonstrating how the condition affects their daily life and employment potential.
Proper documentation from qualified medical professionals is essential for proving a claim involving a neurological impairment.
Neurological conditions often require highly specialized diagnostic and treatment protocols.
The SSA prioritizes medical records from neurologists or other specialists who have detailed knowledge of the condition.
A consistent timeline of evaluations, tests, and treatment efforts further strengthens the claim, demonstrating the progressive nature of the impairment and its disabling effects.
Applicants seeking social security disability benefits for neurological conditions must provide records from specialists with expertise in diagnosing and treating neurological disorders.
These specialists use advanced diagnostic tools and long-term monitoring to assess the claimant’s limitations.
Key research, evaluations, and evidence required for neurological claims include:
Such evidence is essential for building a strong social security disability benefits claim.
It demonstrates not only the severity of the condition but also the claimant’s efforts to manage it through treatment and regular medical care.
To increase the likelihood of approval, applicants should work closely with neurologists and ensure all testing and treatment records are submitted with their application.
Neurological conditions often require long-term management, as they may progress over time or fluctuate in severity.
To maintain social security disability benefits, claimants must comply with periodic SSA reviews and provide updated medical evidence of their condition’s persistence.
Maintaining thorough and updated medical documentation is essential for demonstrating ongoing eligibility and proving that the condition remains disabling despite treatment.
For individuals with neurological conditions, ongoing monitoring and documentation are necessary for maintaining disability benefits.
The SSA requires claimants to show how the condition affects their functional abilities and to provide updates on any changes in their health status.
Factors the SSA considers during long-term benefits assessments include:
By presenting this documentation, claimants can demonstrate that their condition remains disabling and continues to meet SSA standards for eligibility.
Applicants should be proactive in maintaining regular communication with their healthcare providers and ensuring that all medical updates are well-documented.
A thorough record of disease progression and treatment efforts helps safeguard long-term social security disability benefits.
Neurological test results should typically be no more than 90 days old when submitting your SSDI claim.
However, the SSA may accept older test results for chronic conditions like multiple sclerosis or ALS if they show a clear pattern of progression.
You should include both recent and historical test results to demonstrate the ongoing nature of your condition.
The SSA accepts multiple types of neurological imaging tests including MRI scans, CT scans, EEG readings, and nerve conduction studies.
Brain imaging must show clear evidence of neurological impairment.
PET scans and SPECT scans may provide supporting evidence but are not typically sufficient on their own for disability determination.
The SSA uses several methods to measure the progression of neurological conditions including comparative testing, functional assessments, and medical documentation.
They require detailed records showing changes in symptoms over time, response to treatments, and impact on daily activities.
Your neurologist must provide objective evidence of disease progression through regular examinations and standardized assessments.
The SSA requires comprehensive documentation for episodic neurological conditions including detailed medical records and symptom logs.
Your application should include emergency room visits, medication records, and witness statements describing episodes.
Treatment records must show both frequency and severity of episodes along with their impact on your ability to work.
The SSA primarily relies on documentation from board-certified neurologists and other qualified medical professionals for neurological claims.
Your medical team should include specialists who regularly treat your specific condition and can provide detailed evidence of impairment.
Supporting documentation from other healthcare providers may strengthen your claim.
The SSA conducts regular reviews of neurological disability claims based on the severity and prognosis of your condition.
Review periods typically range from 18 months to 7 years, depending on the likelihood of medical improvement.
Your specific review schedule will be determined by your condition’s nature and documented stability.
Experienced Attorney & Legal SaaS CEO
With over 25 years of legal experience, Jessie is an Illinois lawyer, a CPA, and a mother of three. She spent the first decade of her career working as an international tax attorney at Deloitte.
In 2009, Jessie co-founded her own law firm with her husband – which has scaled to over 30 employees since its conception.
In 2016, Jessie founded TruLaw, which allows her to collaborate with attorneys and legal experts across the United States on a daily basis. This hypervaluable network of experts is what enables her to share reliable legal information with her readers!
You can learn more about the Social Security Disability Insurance by visiting any of our pages listed below:
Here, at TruLaw, we’re committed to helping victims get the justice they deserve.
Alongside our partner law firms, we have successfully collected over $3 Billion in verdicts and settlements on behalf of injured individuals.
Would you like our help?
At TruLaw, we fiercely combat corporations that endanger individuals’ well-being. If you’ve suffered injuries and believe these well-funded entities should be held accountable, we’re here for you.
With TruLaw, you gain access to successful and seasoned lawyers who maximize your chances of success. Our lawyers invest in you—they do not receive a dime until your lawsuit reaches a successful resolution!
Do you believe you’re entitled to compensation?
Use our Instant Case Evaluator to find out in as little as 60 seconds!
AFFF Lawsuit claims are being filed against manufacturers of aqueous film-forming foam (AFFF), commonly used in firefighting.
Claims allege that companies such as 3M, DuPont, and Tyco Fire Products failed to adequately warn users about the potential dangers of AFFF exposure — including increased risks of various cancers and diseases.
Suboxone Tooth Decay Lawsuit claims are being filed against Indivior, the manufacturer of Suboxone, a medication used to treat opioid addiction.
Claims allege that Indivior failed to adequately warn users about the potential dangers of severe tooth decay and dental injuries associated with Suboxone’s sublingual film version.
Social Media Harm Lawsuits are being filed against social media companies for allegedly causing mental health issues in children and teens.
Claims allege that companies like Meta, Google, ByteDance, and Snap designed addictive platforms that led to anxiety, depression, and other mental health issues without adequately warning users or parents.
Transvaginal Mesh Lawsuits are being filed against manufacturers of transvaginal mesh products used to treat pelvic organ prolapse (POP) and stress urinary incontinence (SUI).
Claims allege that companies like Ethicon, C.R. Bard, and Boston Scientific failed to adequately warn about potential dangers — including erosion, pain, and infection.
Bair Hugger Warming Blanket Lawsuits involve claims against 3M — alleging their surgical warming blankets caused severe infections and complications (particularly in hip and knee replacement surgeries).
Plaintiffs claim 3M failed to warn about potential risks — despite knowing about increased risk of deep joint infections since 2011.
Baby Formula NEC Lawsuit claims are being filed against manufacturers of cow’s milk-based baby formula products.
Claims allege that companies like Abbott Laboratories (Similac) and Mead Johnson & Company (Enfamil) failed to warn about the increased risk of necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) in premature infants.
Here, at TruLaw, we’re committed to helping victims get the justice they deserve.
Alongside our partner law firms, we have successfully collected over $3 Billion in verdicts and settlements on behalf of injured individuals.
Would you like our help?