Attorney Jessie Paluch, founder of TruLaw, has over 25 years of experience as a personal injury and mass tort attorney, and previously worked as an international tax attorney at Deloitte. Jessie collaborates with attorneys nationwide — enabling her to share reliable, up-to-date legal information with our readers.
This article has been written and reviewed for legal accuracy and clarity by the team of writers and legal experts at TruLaw and is as accurate as possible. This content should not be taken as legal advice from an attorney. If you would like to learn more about our owner and experienced injury lawyer, Jessie Paluch, you can do so here.
TruLaw does everything possible to make sure the information in this article is up to date and accurate. If you need specific legal advice about your case, contact us by using the chat on the bottom of this page. This article should not be taken as advice from an attorney.
On this page, we’ll provide an overview of the PFAS thyroid cancer lawsuit, links between PFAS exposure and thyroid cancer, how to file a PFAS thyroid cancer lawsuit, and much more.
Key aspects of the PFAS thyroid cancer lawsuit include, but are not limited to:
If you or a loved one has developed thyroid cancer after being exposed to PFAS chemicals, you may be eligible for compensation.
Contact TruLaw using the chat on this page to receive an instant case evaluation to see if you qualify to file a PFAS thyroid cancer lawsuit today.
The PFAS thyroid cancer lawsuit represents a significant legal battle against major chemical corporations, seeking to hold them accountable for the production and widespread use of per- and poly-fluoroalkyl substances (PFAS), also known as “forever chemicals,” and their alleged link to thyroid disease and thyroid cancer.
As the number of individuals affected by PFAS-related health risks continues to rise, this lawsuit aims to secure justice for those who have developed thyroid cancer due to PFAS exposure.
Several prominent companies, including 3M, DuPont, and Chemours, have been named as defendants in the PFAS thyroid cancer lawsuit.
These corporations have been involved in the manufacture and distribution of PFAS-containing products, such as firefighting foam, non-stick cookware, and water-resistant textiles.
The lawsuit alleges that these companies were aware of the potential serious health risks associated with PFAS exposure but failed to adequately warn consumers and take appropriate measures to mitigate the dangers.
At the core of the PFAS thyroid cancer lawsuit are allegations of negligence and failure to warn against the defendant corporations.
Plaintiffs argue that these companies had a duty to ensure the safety of their products and to inform the public about any potential hazards, including the risk of developing thyroid cancer.
The lawsuit contends that the defendants endangered the health of countless individuals who were exposed to PFAS chemicals through contaminated water, food, and consumer products by failing to do so.
The allegations in the PFAS thyroid cancer lawsuit include:
These allegations form the foundation of the personal injury claims and toxic exposure claims against the chemical manufacturers, seeking to hold them responsible for the harm caused by PFAS and the development of thyroid cancer in affected individuals.
The PFAS thyroid cancer lawsuit relies heavily on scientific evidence linking exposure to PFAS to an increased risk of developing cancer in the thyroid gland.
Numerous studies have investigated the relationship between these toxic chemicals and thyroid follicular cells, providing a strong foundation for the legal claims.
A growing body of research has demonstrated a significant association between PFAS exposure and thyroid cancer.
Studies have found that individuals with higher levels of PFAS chemicals in their blood have a significantly increased risk of developing malignant cells in the thyroid gland compared to those with lower levels of exposure.
Other studies have identified specific PFAS compounds, such as perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) and perfluorooctanesulfonic acid (PFOS), as particularly harmful to thyroid function and potentially contributing to the development of thyroid cancer.
The scientific evidence supporting the link between PFAS and thyroid cancer includes:
This growing body of scientific evidence strengthens the case for a causal link between PFAS exposure and thyroid cancer, supporting the claims made in the PFAS thyroid cancer lawsuit.
Expert testimonies play a crucial role in the PFAS thyroid cancer lawsuit, providing the court with a comprehensive understanding of the scientific evidence.
Medical professionals, including endocrinologists and oncologists, have been called upon to explain the mechanisms by which PFAS exposure can lead to thyroid dysfunction and cancer.
These experts also highlight the consistencies across various studies, strengthening the case for a causal relationship between PFAS and thyroid cancer.
Their testimonies help to:
The inclusion of expert testimonies in the PFAS thyroid cancer litigation underscores the importance of scientific evidence in supporting the plaintiffs’ claims and holding the defendant corporations accountable for their actions.
The PFAS thyroid cancer lawsuit has made significant progress in recent years, with several key developments shaping the course of the litigation.
In 2024, a federal judge issued a landmark ruling in the PFAS thyroid cancer lawsuits, denying the defendants’ motion to dismiss the case.
This decision allowed the lawsuit to proceed, recognizing the validity of the plaintiff’s claims and the strength of the scientific evidence linking PFAS exposure to thyroid cancer.
The ruling also set an important precedent for future PFAS litigation, paving the way for more individuals to seek justice for the harm caused by these forever chemicals.
Other notable court developments include:
These court rulings and developments demonstrate the progress being made in the PFAS thyroid cancer lawsuit and the increasing recognition of the need to hold chemical manufacturers accountable for the harm caused by their products.
Due to the widespread impact of PFAS contamination and the large number of individuals affected by related health problems, multiple PFAS lawsuits have been consolidated into multi-district litigation (MDL).
The MDL process allows for coordinated pre-trial proceedings, streamlining the legal process and ensuring consistent rulings across cases.
The consolidation of PFAS lawsuits, including those focused on thyroid cancer, strengthens the plaintiffs’ collective voice and increases the potential for significant settlements or judgments in their favor.
Benefits of MDL consolidation in the PFAS thyroid cancer lawsuit include:
The consolidation of PFAS lawsuits in multi-district litigation represents a significant step forward in the pursuit of justice for individuals affected by PFAS-related health issues, including thyroid cancer.
The PFAS thyroid cancer lawsuit sheds light on the far-reaching health implications and environmental impact of these toxic chemicals.
Exposure to PFAS has been linked to a range of long-term health effects, particularly on the thyroid cells and gland.
In addition to an increased risk of developing thyroid cancer, PFAS exposure has been associated with various thyroid disorders, such as hypothyroidism and hyperthyroidism.
These conditions can have a profound impact on an individual’s quality of life, affecting metabolism, energy levels, and overall well-being.
The long-term health effects of PFAS exposure on the thyroid include:
The recognition of these long-term health effects in the PFAS thyroid cancer lawsuit underscores the importance of addressing PFAS contamination and holding responsible parties accountable for their actions.
One of the primary routes of PFAS exposure is through contaminated water sources, including drinking water supplies and groundwater near industrial sites and military bases where PFAS-containing products, such as aqueous film-forming foam (AFFF), were used extensively.
The PFAS thyroid cancer lawsuit highlights the role of this widespread contamination in the development of thyroid cancer, emphasizing the need for stricter regulations and remediation efforts to protect public health.
The impact of PFAS water contamination on thyroid cancer risk is significant:
Addressing PFAS water contamination is a critical component of the PFAS thyroid cancer lawsuit, as it seeks to hold chemical manufacturers responsible for the environmental damage and human health consequences of their actions.
The PFAS thyroid cancer lawsuit aims to secure compensation for individuals who have developed thyroid cancer as a result of exposure to PFAS chemicals.
If successful, the PFAS thyroid cancer lawsuit could result in significant compensation for affected individuals.
This compensation may cover medical expenses related to thyroid cancer treatment, lost wages, pain and suffering, and other damages associated with the diagnosis and management of this serious health condition.
In some cases, punitive damages may also be awarded to punish the defendant corporations for their negligence and disregard for public safety.
Compensation in the PFAS thyroid cancer lawsuit may include:
The pursuit of fair compensation for PFAS-related thyroid cancer victims is a central goal of the PFAS thyroid cancer lawsuit, seeking to provide financial support and a sense of justice for those affected by these toxic chemicals.
To be eligible to join the PFAS thyroid cancer lawsuit, individuals must meet certain criteria.
These may include a documented diagnosis of thyroid cancer, evidence of PFAS exposure (such as living in an area with known PFAS contamination or working with PFAS-containing products), and a temporal relationship between exposure and the development of cancer.
An experienced law firm specializing in toxic exposure claims and personal injury cases can help determine whether an individual qualifies to participate in the PFAS lawsuit and guide them through the legal process.
Individuals who believe they may qualify for the PFAS thyroid cancer lawsuit should consult with a knowledgeable law firm to assess their case and determine the best course of action.
As the PFAS thyroid cancer lawsuit progresses, it has the potential to shape the future of PFAS litigation and influence public health initiatives.
The outcome of the PFAS thyroid cancer lawsuit could have significant implications for the chemical industry and the regulation of PFAS chemicals.
If the plaintiffs prevail, it may lead to substantial financial penalties for the defendant corporations and increased pressure on manufacturers to phase out the use of PFAS in their products.
This, in turn, could drive innovation in the development of safer alternatives and encourage more responsible corporate practices.
The resolution of the PFAS thyroid cancer lawsuit has the potential to create a powerful precedent for holding chemical manufacturers accountable for the health and environmental consequences of their actions.
The PFAS thyroid cancer lawsuit has already sparked a broader conversation about the need for more comprehensive public health initiatives to address PFAS contamination.
In response to the growing concerns raised by this and other PFAS-related lawsuits, government agencies like the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and public health organizations are investing in research, monitoring, and remediation efforts.
These initiatives aim to better understand the health risks associated with PFAS exposure, identify contaminated sites, and develop effective strategies for protecting communities from these toxic substances.
Public health initiatives following PFAS lawsuits may include:
The PFAS thyroid cancer lawsuit catalyzes these public health initiatives, highlighting the urgent need for action to protect communities from the harmful effects of PFAS contamination.
As the litigation progresses and more information comes to light, these initiatives are likely to continue evolving and expanding, driven by a growing public demand for accountability and change.
The PFAS thyroid cancer lawsuit is a legal battle against major chemical corporations, seeking to hold them accountable for the production and widespread use of PFAS chemicals and their alleged link to thyroid disease and thyroid cancer.
The lawsuit aims to secure justice and compensation for individuals who have developed thyroid cancer due to PFAS exposure.
The PFAS thyroid cancer lawsuit alleges that chemical manufacturers, such as 3M, DuPont, and Chemours, were aware of the potential serious health risks associated with PFAS exposure but failed to adequately warn consumers and take appropriate measures to mitigate the dangers.
Plaintiffs argue that these companies had a duty to ensure the safety of their products and to inform the public about any potential hazards, including the risk of developing thyroid cancer.
Numerous studies have investigated the relationship between PFAS chemicals and thyroid cancer, finding that individuals with higher levels of PFAS in their blood have a significantly increased risk of developing malignant cells in the thyroid gland compared to those with lower levels of exposure.
Expert testimonies from medical professionals, including endocrinologists and oncologists, help to interpret the scientific evidence and strengthen the case for a causal link between PFAS exposure and thyroid cancer.
Individuals who have developed thyroid cancer as a result of PFAS exposure may be eligible to join the PFAS thyroid cancer lawsuit and seek compensation for medical expenses, lost wages, pain and suffering, and other damages associated with their diagnosis and treatment.
To determine eligibility, affected individuals should consult with an experienced law firm specializing in toxic exposure claims and personal injury cases.
The PFAS thyroid cancer lawsuit has sparked a broader conversation about the need for more comprehensive public health initiatives to address PFAS contamination, including increased monitoring of water sources, remediation efforts to clean up contaminated sites, and public education campaigns to raise awareness about the health risks associated with PFAS exposure.
Experienced Attorney & Legal SaaS CEO
With over 25 years of legal experience, Jessie is an Illinois lawyer, a CPA, and a mother of three. She spent the first decade of her career working as an international tax attorney at Deloitte.
In 2009, Jessie co-founded her own law firm with her husband – which has scaled to over 30 employees since its conception.
In 2016, Jessie founded TruLaw, which allows her to collaborate with attorneys and legal experts across the United States on a daily basis. This hypervaluable network of experts is what enables her to share reliable legal information with her readers!
You can learn more about the PFAS Contamination Lawsuit by visiting any of our pages listed below:
Here, at TruLaw, we’re committed to helping victims get the justice they deserve.
Alongside our partner law firms, we have successfully collected over $3 Billion in verdicts and settlements on behalf of injured individuals.
Would you like our help?
At TruLaw, we fiercely combat corporations that endanger individuals’ well-being. If you’ve suffered injuries and believe these well-funded entities should be held accountable, we’re here for you.
With TruLaw, you gain access to successful and seasoned lawyers who maximize your chances of success. Our lawyers invest in you—they do not receive a dime until your lawsuit reaches a successful resolution!
Do you believe you’re entitled to compensation?
Use our Instant Case Evaluator to find out in as little as 60 seconds!
AFFF Lawsuit claims are being filed against manufacturers of aqueous film-forming foam (AFFF), commonly used in firefighting.
Claims allege that companies such as 3M, DuPont, and Tyco Fire Products failed to adequately warn users about the potential dangers of AFFF exposure — including increased risks of various cancers and diseases.
Suboxone Tooth Decay Lawsuit claims are being filed against Indivior, the manufacturer of Suboxone, a medication used to treat opioid addiction.
Claims allege that Indivior failed to adequately warn users about the potential dangers of severe tooth decay and dental injuries associated with Suboxone’s sublingual film version.
Social Media Harm Lawsuits are being filed against social media companies for allegedly causing mental health issues in children and teens.
Claims allege that companies like Meta, Google, ByteDance, and Snap designed addictive platforms that led to anxiety, depression, and other mental health issues without adequately warning users or parents.
Transvaginal Mesh Lawsuits are being filed against manufacturers of transvaginal mesh products used to treat pelvic organ prolapse (POP) and stress urinary incontinence (SUI).
Claims allege that companies like Ethicon, C.R. Bard, and Boston Scientific failed to adequately warn about potential dangers — including erosion, pain, and infection.
Bair Hugger Warming Blanket Lawsuits involve claims against 3M — alleging their surgical warming blankets caused severe infections and complications (particularly in hip and knee replacement surgeries).
Plaintiffs claim 3M failed to warn about potential risks — despite knowing about increased risk of deep joint infections since 2011.
Baby Formula NEC Lawsuit claims are being filed against manufacturers of cow’s milk-based baby formula products.
Claims allege that companies like Abbott Laboratories (Similac) and Mead Johnson & Company (Enfamil) failed to warn about the increased risk of necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) in premature infants.
Here, at TruLaw, we’re committed to helping victims get the justice they deserve.
Alongside our partner law firms, we have successfully collected over $3 Billion in verdicts and settlements on behalf of injured individuals.
Would you like our help?