Attorney Jessica Paluch-Hoerman, founder of TruLaw, has over 28 years of experience as a personal injury and mass tort attorney, and previously worked as an international tax attorney at Deloitte. Jessie collaborates with attorneys nationwide — enabling her to share reliable, up-to-date legal information with our readers.
This article has been written and reviewed for legal accuracy and clarity by the team of writers and legal experts at TruLaw and is as accurate as possible. This content should not be taken as legal advice from an attorney. If you would like to learn more about our owner and experienced injury lawyer, Jessie Paluch, you can do so here.
TruLaw does everything possible to make sure the information in this article is up to date and accurate. If you need specific legal advice about your case, contact us by using the chat on the bottom of this page. This article should not be taken as advice from an attorney.
Question: Who qualifies for the Tinker Air Force Base PFAS lawsuit?
Answer: If you lived or worked at Tinker Air Force Base and were exposed to PFAS contamination, you may be eligible to file a lawsuit seeking compensation for health issues and damages related to this exposure.
On this page, we’ll answer this question in further depth, health risks for military personnel exposed to PFAS at Tinker Air Force Base, legal actions for PFAS pollution, and much more.
The Tinker Air Force Base PFAS lawsuit addresses widespread contamination from toxic per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances that have polluted groundwater and drinking water supplies on and around the Oklahoma military installation.
These toxic chemicals entered the environment through decades of use in aqueous film forming foam (AFFF) used in firefighting training exercises and emergency response at the base.
Testing has revealed PFAS levels at Tinker Air Force Base that far exceed safety thresholds established by the Environmental Protection Agency.
If you or someone you love has suffered health problems after exposure to PFAS contamination at Tinker Air Force Base, you may qualify to seek compensation for medical expenses and other damages.
Contact TruLaw using the chat on this page to receive an instant case evaluation that can determine your eligibility to join others in filing a Tinker Air Force Base PFAS lawsuit today.
Our PFAS Contamination attorney at TruLaw is dedicated to supporting clients through the process of filing a PFAS Contamination lawsuit.
With extensive experience in chemical exposure cases, Jessica Paluch-Hoerman and our partner law firms work with litigation leaders to prove how synthetic chemicals in water supplies caused you harm.
TruLaw focuses on securing compensation for medical expenses, pain and suffering, property damage, lost income, and ongoing health monitoring resulting from your PFAS exposure.
We understand the health and environmental impacts of PFAS exposure on your life and provide the personalized guidance you need when seeking justice.
Meet our lead PFAS Contamination attorney:
At TruLaw, we believe financial concerns should never stand in the way of justice.
That’s why we operate on a contingency fee basis—with this approach, you only pay legal fees after you’ve been awarded compensation for your injuries.
If you or a loved one experienced health complications from exposure to PFAS-contaminated water that include forms of cancer, immune disorders, liver damage, or thyroid disease, you may be eligible to seek compensation.
Contact TruLaw using the chat on this page to receive an instant case evaluation and determine whether you qualify to join others in filing a PFAS Contamination Lawsuit today.
Tinker Air Force Base in Oklahoma City has become a focal point for concerns about toxic PFAS chemicals in drinking water and groundwater.
Testing has revealed alarmingly high concentrations of these hazardous substances, with PFOA levels measured at 4,625 times higher than the EPA’s threshold and PFOS levels 65,000 times higher than the standard.
These findings have prompted investigations by the Department of Defense and legal action by affected individuals, including military personnel and their family members.
The base ranks 52nd on the Environmental Working Group’s list of top 100 most polluted U.S. military bases, with an onsite PFAS concentration of 170,000 parts per trillion according to testing done in 2017.
This level of contamination poses substantial dangers to military personnel, their families, and nearby communities who may have consumed the water without knowledge of its toxicity.
The PFAS chemicals found at Tinker Air Force Base have been associated with numerous harmful health outcomes that can develop years after exposure, often documented in medical records.
Research continues to uncover connections between these “forever chemicals” and serious medical conditions.
PFAS exposure has been linked to several forms of cancer, thyroid disease, immune system suppression, and developmental issues in children.
The chemicals persist in the human body for years after exposure, gradually accumulating and potentially causing long-term damage to organs and biological systems.
A recent study reported associations between PFAS exposure and increased rates of thyroid cancer, particularly papillary thyroid cancer, with strong biological plausibility for this connection.
Thyroid function disruption represents one of the most documented health effects.
PFAS are believed to be endocrine disruptors that interfere with the thyroid hormone system, with prolonged exposure linked to both hyperthyroidism and hypothyroidism.
This disruption can lead to numerous symptoms including fatigue, weight changes, and mood disturbances.
Additional health risks from PFAS exposure include:
According to experts, the severity of health effects depends on exposure levels, with higher amounts potentially causing more acute problems.
The dangers primarily come from ingesting contaminated water, though contact exposure and inhaling contaminated water vapor can also contribute to overall exposure.
Personnel who lived or worked at Tinker Air Force Base face heightened risks of developing PFAS-related conditions due to their proximity to the contamination source and duration of potential exposure.
Military members stationed at Tinker Air Force Base may have experienced constant exposure to AFFF (firefighting foam) and contaminated water supplies, leading to severe health conditions in both service members and civilians.
The greatest concern exists for those who spent extended periods at the base, particularly during training exercises or long-term assignments that would have increased their cumulative exposure.
Veterans who served at Tinker should watch for potential symptoms of PFAS-related conditions, including:
The PFAS Action Act was introduced to address these concerns, establishing monitoring standards for PFAS in drinking water and funding studies on health risks, with proponents stating that access to clean drinking water is “a basic right.”
For those who lived or worked at Tinker Air Force Base and now experience health problems, legal options exist to seek compensation for medical expenses and other damages.
Individuals who can demonstrate exposure to contaminated water and resulting adverse effects may qualify for legal action, particularly if they have incurred significant medical expenses or suffered financial losses due to PFAS-related health conditions.
Working with an attorney experienced in military contamination cases offers the best path toward potential compensation.
PFAS contamination extends well beyond Eaker Air Force Base, affecting hundreds of military installations across the United States.
The widespread use of AFFF firefighting foam has created a national contamination crisis at bases operated by all branches of the armed forces.
Additional military installations that contain PFAS contamination include, but are not limited to:
Testing at these facilities has revealed PFAS levels that frequently exceed safety standards by significant margins.
The Department of Defense faces growing pressure to expedite cleanup efforts, provide alternative water sources for affected communities, and take responsibility for decades of contamination.
Coordinated remediation plans now represent one of the largest environmental cleanup challenges in U.S. military history.
PFAS contamination lawsuits are being filed by individuals nationwide who experienced health problems from exposure to PFAS chemicals in drinking water.
TruLaw is currently accepting clients for the PFAS contamination lawsuit.
A few reasons to choose TruLaw for your PFAS contamination lawsuit include:
If you or a loved one suffered health problems related to PFAS-contaminated water, you may be eligible to seek compensation.
Contact TruLaw using the chat on this page to receive an instant case evaluation that can determine if you qualify for the PFAS Contamination Lawsuit today.
While specific Tinker Air Force Base settlement amounts aren’t finalized, the notable nationwide PFAS class action settlement approved in April 2024 ranged from $10.5 to $12.5 billion.
Individual compensation varies based on exposure level, health impacts, and property damage related to PFAS contamination in military installations.
Yes, Tinker Air Force Base is among the 455 military installations confirmed with PFAS contamination.
While specific concentration levels vary, the base’s contamination is significant enough to warrant inclusion in legal proceedings.
Other bases with extremely high levels include Fort Moore (Georgia), Military Ocean Terminal Concord (California), and Fort Lee (Virginia).
Tinker Air Force Base contamination includes PFAS chemicals along with acetone, toluene, benzene, xylene, lead, nickel, and barium.
The base’s location in the Garber-Wellington Aquifer recharge zone is particularly concerning as groundwater can be found at depths as shallow as 20 feet, increasing contamination risks to surrounding communities.
The Tinker AFB PFAS lawsuit shares similarities with other high-profile cases like Camp Lejeune, where water contamination occurred over decades.
While Camp Lejeune’s case (1950s-1980s) is further along in the litigation process, the Tinker lawsuit addresses the more recently recognized PFAS “forever chemicals” that persist in the environment.
Individuals who lived or worked at Tinker Air Force Base and experienced PFAS exposure may qualify for the lawsuit.
Eligibility typically requires proof of residence or employment during the contamination period, evidence of exposure, and documentation of related health issues or property damage caused by the PFAS chemicals.
While precise timelines vary, PFAS lawsuits typically take several years to resolve.
The Tinker Air Force Base case is part of broader military PFAS litigation that continues to develop.
Those affected should consult with environmental attorneys specializing in PFAS cases to understand the current status and potential settlement timeframes.
Managing Attorney & Owner
With over 25 years of legal experience, Jessica Paluch-Hoerman is an Illinois lawyer, a CPA, and a mother of three. She spent the first decade of her career working as an international tax attorney at Deloitte.
In 2009, Jessie co-founded her own law firm with her husband – which has scaled to over 30 employees since its conception.
In 2016, Jessie founded TruLaw, which allows her to collaborate with attorneys and legal experts across the United States on a daily basis. This hypervaluable network of experts is what enables her to share the most reliable, accurate, and up-to-date legal information with our readers!
You can learn more about the PFAS Contamination Lawsuit by visiting any of our pages listed below:
Here, at TruLaw, we’re committed to helping victims get the justice they deserve.
Alongside our partner law firms, we have successfully collected over $3 Billion in verdicts and settlements on behalf of injured individuals.
Would you like our help?
At TruLaw, we fiercely combat corporations that endanger individuals’ well-being. If you’ve suffered injuries and believe these well-funded entities should be held accountable, we’re here for you.
With TruLaw, you gain access to successful and seasoned lawyers who maximize your chances of success. Our lawyers invest in you—they do not receive a dime until your lawsuit reaches a successful resolution!
AFFF Lawsuit claims are being filed against manufacturers of aqueous film-forming foam (AFFF), commonly used in firefighting.
Claims allege that companies such as 3M, DuPont, and Tyco Fire Products failed to adequately warn users about the potential dangers of AFFF exposure — including increased risks of various cancers and diseases.
Depo Provera Lawsuit claims are being filed by individuals who allege they developed meningioma (a type of brain tumor) after receiving Depo-Provera birth control injections.
A 2024 study found that women using Depo-Provera for at least 1 year are five times more likely to develop meningioma brain tumors compared to those not using the drug.
Suboxone Tooth Decay Lawsuit claims are being filed against Indivior, the manufacturer of Suboxone, a medication used to treat opioid addiction.
Claims allege that Indivior failed to adequately warn users about the potential dangers of severe tooth decay and dental injuries associated with Suboxone’s sublingual film version.
Social Media Harm Lawsuits are being filed against social media companies for allegedly causing mental health issues in children and teens.
Claims allege that companies like Meta, Google, ByteDance, and Snap designed addictive platforms that led to anxiety, depression, and other mental health issues without adequately warning users or parents.
Transvaginal Mesh Lawsuits are being filed against manufacturers of transvaginal mesh products used to treat pelvic organ prolapse (POP) and stress urinary incontinence (SUI).
Claims allege that companies like Ethicon, C.R. Bard, and Boston Scientific failed to adequately warn about potential dangers — including erosion, pain, and infection.
Bair Hugger Warming Blanket Lawsuits involve claims against 3M — alleging their surgical warming blankets caused severe infections and complications (particularly in hip and knee replacement surgeries).
Plaintiffs claim 3M failed to warn about potential risks — despite knowing about increased risk of deep joint infections since 2011.
Baby Formula NEC Lawsuit claims are being filed against manufacturers of cow’s milk-based baby formula products.
Claims allege that companies like Abbott Laboratories (Similac) and Mead Johnson & Company (Enfamil) failed to warn about the increased risk of necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) in premature infants.
Here, at TruLaw, we’re committed to helping victims get the justice they deserve.
Alongside our partner law firms, we have successfully collected over $3 Billion in verdicts and settlements on behalf of injured individuals.
Would you like our help?