Attorney Jessica Paluch-Hoerman, founder of TruLaw, has over 28 years of experience as a personal injury and mass tort attorney, and previously worked as an international tax attorney at Deloitte. Jessie collaborates with attorneys nationwide — enabling her to share reliable, up-to-date legal information with our readers.
This article has been written and reviewed for legal accuracy and clarity by the team of writers and legal experts at TruLaw and is as accurate as possible. This content should not be taken as legal advice from an attorney. If you would like to learn more about our owner and experienced injury lawyer, Jessie Paluch, you can do so here.
TruLaw does everything possible to make sure the information in this article is up to date and accurate. If you need specific legal advice about your case, contact us by using the chat on the bottom of this page. This article should not be taken as advice from an attorney.
PFAS contamination lawsuits are being filed against manufacturers and suppliers of PFAS chemicals, including those related to military bases like Warren Air Force Base and other installations nationwide.
These lawsuits allege that PFAS substances have contaminated water sources and products, leading to severe health issues such as cancers, thyroid disease, and immune system disorders.
Individuals exposed to PFAS through military duties or contaminated drinking water in surrounding communities may be eligible to pursue financial compensation.
On this page, we’ll provide an overview of health effects of PFAS exposure from Randolph AFB, building your PFAS exposure case, and much more.
The Environmental Protection Agency has set safety limits for PFAS levels in water, which have been exceeded at some military installations including Sawyer Air Force Base and other locations.
AFFF firefighting foam, which contains PFAS, is a particular focus of many lawsuits, with plaintiffs claiming manufacturers knew about health risks but failed to warn the public.
Randolph Air Force Base, established in 1930 as the “West Point of the Air,” faces severe environmental contamination from decades of firefighting foam use containing toxic chemicals now recognized as persistent environmental hazards.
Testing has revealed groundwater contamination levels reaching 182,000 parts per trillion—more than 45,000 times higher than current federal safety standards affecting drinking water supplies throughout the region.
The base, now part of Joint Base San Antonio, served as a primary pilot training facility where routine firefighting exercises and emergency responses released these “forever chemicals” into soil and water systems affecting military personnel, families, and surrounding communities.
Military installations across the United States, from England Air Force Base to Ellsworth Air Force Base, began using Aqueous Film Forming Foam (AFFF) in the 1970s as the primary agent for suppressing petroleum and jet fuel fires.
At Randolph AFB, firefighters and training personnel regularly deployed AFFF during aircraft crash simulations, hangar system testing, and actual emergency responses throughout the base’s operational areas.
The foam’s effectiveness in rapidly extinguishing Class B fires made it standard equipment for military fire departments, with stockpiles maintained in fire trucks, hangar suppression systems, and training facilities.
Regular use of AFFF occurred across multiple operational areas at Randolph AFB:
Through 2001, manufacturers produced AFFF containing high concentrations of perfluorooctane sulfonic acid (PFOS) and perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA), the most toxic PFAS compounds now regulated by federal agencies.
Despite manufacturers phasing out these specific chemicals by 2015, existing stockpiles remained in use at military bases while replacement formulations still contained other harmful PFAS variants.
Environmental testing at Randolph AFB has documented alarming PFAS concentrations that pose serious risks to human health and environmental safety, similar to findings at Holloman Air Force Base and other installations.
Groundwater sampling revealed PFOS levels of 120,000 parts per trillion and combined PFOS/PFOA concentrations reaching 182,000 ppt—astronomical figures compared to the Environmental Protection Agency’s 2024 enforceable limit of 4 ppt for drinking water.
The contamination plume extends beyond base boundaries, affecting private wells and potentially reaching municipal water supplies serving thousands of residents in surrounding Bexar County communities (including areas near San Antonio International Airport where similar AFFF use occurred).
Testing has identified multiple areas of concern across the installation and neighboring properties:
The Environmental Working Group’s analysis ranks Randolph AFB among military installations with the highest documented PFAS contamination nationwide, alongside Wurtsmith Air Force Base and other heavily contaminated sites.
Geographic spread data indicates the contamination plume may extend several miles from source areas, with PFAS chemicals continuing to migrate through groundwater systems decades after initial releases.
The path to recognizing and addressing PFAS contamination at Randolph AFB reflects a broader pattern across military installations nationwide, from Lackland Air Force Base to Eielson Air Force Base.
In 2016, the Department of Defense initiated systematic testing for PFOA and PFOS in drinking water systems at military bases following growing scientific evidence of health risks.
Initial sampling at Joint Base San Antonio facilities, including Randolph AFB, began identifying contamination that far exceeded provisional health advisory levels then in effect.
The following timeline shows key milestones in the discovery and response process:
Public notification efforts faced criticism for delays in alerting affected communities about contamination risks, putting service members and families at increased exposure.
Many residents consumed contaminated water for years or decades before learning about PFAS exposure, raising concerns about transparency and the military’s responsibility to protect public health.
Ongoing remediation efforts include installing filtration systems, providing bottled water, and developing long-term cleanup strategies, though complete remediation may take decades given the persistent nature of these chemicals.
Military personnel, families, and residents near Randolph AFB face serious health risks from decades of PFAS-contaminated drinking water exposure causing adverse health effects throughout the community.
Scientific research, including the landmark C8 Health Project that studied over 69,000 individuals exposed to PFAS, has established clear links between these chemicals and multiple cancers, chronic diseases, and developmental disorders.
The bioaccumulative nature of PFAS means that even past exposures continue to pose health threats, as these “forever chemicals” remain in the human body for years, accumulating in blood, liver, and kidney tissues.
The C8 Science Panel, following years of epidemiological research, concluded that PFAS exposure has a probable link to kidney and testicular cancers, findings that have been reinforced by subsequent studies of military and civilian populations.
Research published by the National Cancer Institute indicates that individuals with elevated PFAS blood levels face substantially increased cancer risks, with testicular cancer rates doubling among those with the highest exposure levels.
Recent investigations at military bases have documented cancer clusters among firefighters and personnel who worked directly with AFFF, providing further evidence of the carcinogenic properties of these hazardous substances.
The biological mechanisms underlying PFAS-related cancers include, but are not limited to:
Beyond kidney and testicular cancers, emerging research suggests potential links to prostate, bladder, thyroid, and pancreatic cancer, though these associations require further investigation.
The latency period between PFAS exposure and cancer diagnosis often spans decades, meaning that individuals exposed at Randolph AFB may only now be developing symptoms from historical contamination.
The C8 Science Panel and subsequent research have identified multiple non-cancer conditions strongly associated with PFAS exposure, affecting nearly every major organ system in the body.
Thyroid disease represents one of the most consistent findings, with exposed populations showing substantially elevated rates of hypothyroidism and other thyroid disorders that can affect metabolism, energy levels, and overall health.
High cholesterol levels occur at dramatically increased rates among PFAS-exposed individuals, with studies showing dose-dependent relationships between PFAS blood levels and lipid abnormalities.
Additional health conditions linked to PFAS exposure may include:
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has documented immune system suppression as a particularly concerning effect of PFAS exposure, with studies showing decreased antibody response to vaccines and increased susceptibility to infections.
Military families exposed to contaminated water at Randolph AFB may experience reduced vaccine effectiveness, leaving them more vulnerable to preventable diseases despite following standard immunization schedules similar to concerns at Horsham Air Guard Station and other affected installations.
Pregnant women and developing children represent the most vulnerable populations to PFAS exposure, facing unique risks that can affect multiple generations of military families.
PFAS chemicals readily cross the placental barrier, posing a significant health risk to developing fetuses during critical periods of organ formation and neurological development.
Studies have documented that maternal PFAS exposure increases risks of pregnancy complications, including gestational diabetes, preeclampsia, and pregnancy-induced hypertension, conditions that threaten both maternal and infant health.
The developmental impacts on children exposed to PFAS in utero or through contaminated water include:
PFAS chemicals also transfer through breast milk, creating an additional exposure pathway for infants whose mothers consumed contaminated water at Randolph AFB.
The persistence of these chemicals means that women exposed years before pregnancy may still carry PFAS levels sufficient to affect their children, creating a multigenerational legacy of contamination that extends far beyond the initial exposure period.
Individuals who lived, worked, or served at Randolph Air Force Base during periods of PFAS contamination may have legal claims against chemical manufacturers and other responsible parties for health damages and exposure-related costs.
The scope of potential plaintiffs extends beyond active-duty military personnel to include veterans, family members, civilian employees, and contractors who consumed contaminated water or had direct contact with AFFF during their time at the base.
Legal eligibility depends on several factors including exposure duration, health conditions that developed cancer or other ailments, and the timing of diagnosis, making consultation with experienced PFAS attorneys the most reliable way to determine individual claim viability.
Active-duty service members and veterans who served at Randolph AFB represent a primary group of potential plaintiffs in PFAS litigation, though unique legal considerations apply to their claims.
The Feres Doctrine, which generally prevents active-duty military from suing the government for injuries incident to service, does not bar claims against chemical manufacturers like 3M, DuPont, and other AFFF producers who knowingly sold dangerous PFAS containing products.
Veterans who have separated from service face no Feres Doctrine restrictions and may pursue full legal remedies for PFAS-related health conditions.
Key factors for military plaintiff eligibility include:
Veterans pursuing PFAS lawsuits should know that compensation from civil litigation does not affect VA disability benefits, allowing them to seek financial compensation through both channels simultaneously.
Each military service member who worked directly with AFFF in crash crew training, hangar operations, or emergency response roles may have particularly strong claims due to their elevated exposure levels through both occupational contact and contaminated drinking water consumption.
Spouses and children of service members stationed at Randolph AFB constitute another major category of PFAS lawsuit eligibility, often facing unique health impacts from residential exposure similar to families at Tyndall Air Force Base and other contaminated installations.
Family members who lived in base housing or attended base schools consumed the same contaminated water as military personnel but without the occupational protections or medical monitoring provided to service members.
Children exposed to PFAS face particularly severe consequences due to their developing bodies and longer lifetime exposure burden.
Eligibility considerations for family member claims include:
Prenatal exposure cases deserve special attention, as mothers who consumed contaminated water while pregnant at Randolph AFB may have claims on behalf of children born with developmental delays, low birth weight, or other PFAS-related conditions.
Documentation requirements for family claims often include military housing records, dependent ID cards, school enrollment records, and medical documentation linking health conditions to the exposure period at Randolph AFB or nearby Kelly Air Force Base where families may have also spent time.
Department of Defense civilian employees, contractors, and other non-military workers at Randolph AFB represent a large population with potential PFAS claims based on occupational and environmental exposure.
These workers often spent decades at the base, consuming contaminated water daily while performing their duties, yet lacked access to military medical care that might have detected PFAS-related health issues earlier.
Firefighters, maintenance personnel, and others who worked directly with AFFF face the highest exposure risks from both direct chemical contact and contaminated water consumption at any Air National Guard Base or Air Reserve Station facility.
Categories of eligible civilian workers include:
Civilian workers pursuing PFAS claims should document their employment history through personnel records, pay stubs, or contractor agreements showing work location and duration at Randolph AFB.
Those in high-exposure occupations like firefighting or aircraft maintenance should emphasize their direct AFFF contact in addition to water consumption, as occupational exposure often resulted in substantially higher PFAS blood levels than drinking water alone.
Constructing a strong PFAS lawsuit requires comprehensive documentation demonstrating your connection to Randolph AFB, medical evidence of PFAS-related health conditions, and careful calculation of damages resulting from exposure.
Attorneys experienced in PFAS litigation know how to gather and present evidence that establishes both exposure pathways and resulting health impacts, working with environmental experts and medical professionals to build compelling cases.
While perfect documentation is not always available, especially for exposures dating back decades, skilled legal teams can often reconstruct exposure histories through alternative sources and witness testimony.
Establishing your presence at Randolph AFB during periods of PFAS contamination forms the foundation of any exposure claim, requiring various forms of military, employment, or residential documentation.
For military personnel and veterans, the DD-214 Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty serves as primary evidence, detailing service dates, unit assignments, and duty stations that place individuals at the contaminated base.
Beyond the DD-214, comprehensive documentation strengthens claims by providing detailed exposure timelines and specific locations within the base similar to documentation needed for exposure at nearby Phoenix Military Reservation or other military installations (such as Naval Station Newport).
Necessary documentation includes:
When original records are unavailable due to loss or destruction, alternative proof methods can establish presence at Randolph AFB, including witness affidavits from fellow service members, utility bills showing base addresses, or photographs documenting time at the installation.
Veterans can request military records through the National Archives using Standard Form 180 (SF-180), while civilian employees may obtain personnel records through their former employing agencies or the National Personnel Records Center.
Documenting the health impacts of PFAS exposure requires comprehensive medical evidence linking contamination to specific conditions, with blood testing serving as direct proof of chemical exposure levels.
While PFAS blood tests are not widely available through standard medical providers, specialized laboratories can measure levels of PFOA, PFOS, and other PFAS compounds that persist in the body for years after exposure.
The CDC and ATSDR recommend clinical follow-up for individuals with PFAS blood levels exceeding general population averages, particularly those from contaminated military bases.
Key medical documentation includes:
Establishing a clear timeline between Randolph AFB exposure and health condition onset strengthens causation arguments, particularly when symptoms appeared during or shortly after base residence.
Medical expert testimony from toxicologists, oncologists, or environmental medicine specialists can provide professional opinions on the relationship between documented PFAS blood levels and specific health conditions, adding scientific credibility to individual claims like those filed in class action lawsuits across the country.
PFAS lawsuit damages encompass both economic losses and non-economic suffering resulting from exposure to contaminated water at Randolph AFB, with compensation amounts varying based on the severity of health impacts and individual circumstances.
Recent PFAS settlements and verdicts suggest that individual plaintiffs with serious health conditions may receive compensation ranging from $150,000 to $375,000 or more, with factors like cancer diagnosis, age at exposure, and ongoing treatment needs influencing final amounts.
Compensable damages in PFAS lawsuits typically include:
Punitive damages may apply in cases where evidence shows chemical manufacturers knowingly concealed PFAS dangers or military officials failed to promptly notify affected communities about contamination risks.
The calculation process considers both immediate costs like cancer treatment and long-term expenses such as lifetime medical monitoring for conditions that may develop years after exposure, ensuring comprehensive compensation for the full impact of PFAS contamination on victims’ lives similar to settlements at Naval Air Station facilities nationwide.
Pursuing compensation for PFAS exposure at Randolph AFB involves several legal pathways and procedural considerations that affected individuals must know to protect their rights and optimize potential recovery.
The litigation landscape continues to evolve as thousands of plaintiffs nationwide seek justice for contamination-related health problems, with cases consolidating into large-scale proceedings that streamline discovery and promote consistent outcomes.
Time limits for filing PFAS lawsuits vary substantially by state and claim type, making immediate consultation with qualified attorneys necessary for preserving legal rights before deadlines expire.
Texas personal injury claims generally carry a two-year statute of limitations from the date of injury discovery, though environmental contamination cases often benefit from the discovery rule, which delays the clock until plaintiffs knew or reasonably should have known about both their injury and its connection to PFAS exposure.
This extension proves particularly important for PFAS cases where health effects may not manifest until years or decades after initial exposure similar to patterns at Deseret Chemical Depot and other contaminated facilities.
Statute of limitation considerations include, but are not limited to:
The difficulty of determining when the statute of limitations began running in PFAS cases requires careful legal analysis, as courts must balance when contamination occurred, when health effects appeared, and when the connection between exposure and illness became reasonably discoverable.
Missing these deadlines permanently bars recovery regardless of claim strength, making prompt legal consultation the safest approach for anyone suspecting PFAS-related health problems from Randolph AFB exposure.
PFAS lawsuits from military bases across the country, including potential claims from Randolph AFB, often consolidate into Multidistrict Litigation (MDL) proceedings that centralize pretrial activities before a single federal judge.
The AFFF MDL currently pending in South Carolina has grown to over 10,000 cases as of 2025, demonstrating the massive scale of PFAS litigation against manufacturers like 3M, DuPont, and other chemical companies.
MDL consolidation offers notable advantages for plaintiffs while preserving individual case characteristics.
Benefits of MDL participation include:
The MDL judge selects representative bellwether cases for early trials, with the first PFAS personal injury bellwether focusing on kidney cancer claims to test how juries respond to evidence and establish potential verdict ranges.
These test trials provide important data for both sides to evaluate case values and often catalyze global settlement negotiations that benefit all MDL participants while allowing individual circumstances to influence final compensation amounts.
The decision between accepting settlement offers or proceeding to trial represents an important strategic choice that depends on individual case strength, health needs, and risk tolerance.
Recent PFAS settlements demonstrate the potential for substantial compensation through negotiated resolutions, with 3M agreeing to pay $10.3 billion and DuPont companies paying $1.19 billion to resolve water system contamination claims, suggesting resources available for individual injury settlements.
Settlement advantages include certainty of recovery, faster compensation, and avoiding trial risks, while trials offer potential for higher awards and public accountability.
Key factors influencing the settlement versus trial decision include:
Most PFAS cases ultimately resolve through settlement negotiations informed by bellwether trial outcomes, with individual settlements for serious health conditions ranging from $150,000 to over $375,000 based on factors like cancer diagnosis, exposure duration, and age at exposure.
The presence of multi-billion-dollar settlement funds from major manufacturers indicates substantial resources available for compensating legitimate claims, though individual case evaluation remains necessary to determine optimal resolution strategies for each plaintiff’s unique circumstances.
The PFAS contamination crisis at Randolph Air Force Base remains an active environmental and public health challenge, with ongoing remediation efforts attempting to address decades of chemical accumulation in groundwater systems.
While the Department of Defense has implemented various cleanup measures and water treatment technologies, the persistent nature of PFAS chemicals means that contamination continues to affect both on-base and surrounding communities.
Knowing current conditions, remediation progress, and available health monitoring programs helps affected individuals make informed decisions about their health and potential legal actions.
The Air Force Civil Engineer Center has initiated comprehensive remediation strategies at Randolph AFB, implementing multiple technologies to contain and treat PFAS-contaminated groundwater that continues to threaten public health.
As of 2024, the Department of Defense has completed preliminary assessments and site investigations at over 700 military installations nationwide, with 581 sites, potentially including Randolph AFB, proceeding to active cleanup phases under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) process.
Current remediation activities at contaminated military bases employ various approaches to address PFAS pollution across many military installations.
Active cleanup measures include:
The difficulty of PFAS remediation presents major technical challenges, as these chemicals resist traditional treatment methods and require specialized technologies for effective removal.
Pilot studies at various Air Force installations have demonstrated that while treatment systems can reduce PFAS concentrations, complete cleanup may take decades due to the chemicals’ persistence and continued migration through groundwater systems, requiring long-term commitment to environmental restoration.
Current water quality monitoring at Randolph AFB and surrounding areas reflects new federal standards implemented in 2024, with the EPA establishing enforceable Maximum Contaminant Levels of 4 parts per trillion for PFOA and PFOS in drinking water.
Regular testing protocols now include quarterly sampling of on-base water systems and monitoring of private wells in potentially affected neighborhoods, providing ongoing assessment of contamination levels and treatment effectiveness.
The Air Force has implemented multiple measures to ensure safe drinking water for affected populations.
Water safety initiatives include:
Point-of-use treatment systems using reverse osmosis or activated carbon have proven over 90 percent effective at removing PFAS from drinking water, though these systems require regular maintenance and filter replacement to maintain effectiveness.
Residents concerned about current water quality should request recent testing results from base environmental offices and consider installing certified PFAS removal systems, particularly those living in areas with historical contamination or relying on private wells near the base.
The Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR), in partnership with the CDC, has developed comprehensive health assessment programs for communities near military installations with documented PFAS contamination.
These programs include the PFAS Exposure Assessment Technical Tools (PEATT), designed to help state and local health departments conduct biomonitoring activities that measure PFAS levels in residents’ blood and assess health impacts from long-term exposure.
Available health monitoring opportunities for Randolph AFB communities include:
Participating in these health studies serves dual purposes: providing individuals with valuable information about their PFAS exposure levels and potential health risks while contributing to scientific knowledge of PFAS impacts on military communities.
Blood test results showing elevated PFAS levels can strengthen legal claims by providing direct evidence of exposure, while participation in health registries ensures ongoing monitoring for conditions that may develop years after initial contamination, supporting both individual health management and potential future compensation claims.
Moving forward with a PFAS claim requires decisive action and informed decision-making to protect your legal rights and pursue appropriate compensation for contamination-related damages.
The process begins with selecting qualified legal representation, continues through careful preparation for initial consultations, and extends through active participation in your case as it progresses through the legal system.
Taking prompt action ensures preservation of evidence, compliance with filing deadlines, and the best opportunity to recover compensation for health impacts and other losses resulting from PFAS exposure at Randolph AFB.
Selecting an attorney with specific experience in environmental litigation and PFAS contamination cases substantially impacts the likelihood of successful compensation recovery.
The difficulty of PFAS litigation requires legal teams with substantial resources, scientific expertise, and proven track records handling cases against major chemical manufacturers and government entities.
Most PFAS attorneys work on contingency fee arrangements, typically charging 30-40 percent of any recovery, meaning clients pay no upfront costs and attorneys only collect fees if they secure compensation.
Key factors to evaluate when selecting PFAS legal representation include:
Red flags to avoid include attorneys demanding upfront payments, guaranteeing specific settlement amounts, or lacking experience with environmental litigation challenges.
Reputable firms offer free initial consultations to evaluate case strength and explain the legal process without obligation, allowing potential clients to make informed decisions about representation while recognizing that successful PFAS litigation requires attorneys capable of battling well-funded corporate defendants through potentially years-long proceedings.
Thorough preparation for your initial attorney consultation optimizes the value of this meeting and helps lawyers accurately assess claim viability and potential compensation.
Gathering comprehensive documentation before the consultation allows attorneys to provide specific guidance about case strength, identify additional evidence needs, and develop initial litigation strategies tailored to individual circumstances.
Necessary documents to compile for your PFAS consultation include:
During the consultation, expect attorneys to ask detailed questions about your time at Randolph AFB, water consumption patterns, health conditions developed, and impacts on your life and family.
Honest discussion about medical history, including pre-existing conditions, helps attorneys develop realistic case assessments and identify strongest legal arguments while addressing potential defense challenges to causation claims.
Once your PFAS claim is formally filed, the litigation process enters an active phase requiring ongoing participation and patience as cases move through various procedural stages.
The discovery process allows both sides to gather evidence through document requests, interrogatories, and depositions, with plaintiffs potentially providing testimony about their exposure history, health impacts, and damages suffered from PFAS contamination.
The post-filing process typically includes:
Throughout this process, maintaining ongoing medical care and documenting continuing health impacts remains necessary, as updated medical records strengthen damage claims and support requests for future medical monitoring.
Plaintiffs should communicate with their attorneys about any new diagnoses, worsening conditions, or life changes affecting their damages, while recognizing that PFAS litigation often takes 2-4 years to resolve through settlement or trial, requiring patience and trust in the legal process designed to secure fair compensation for those harmed by decades of chemical contamination.
Our PFAS Contamination attorney at TruLaw is dedicated to supporting clients through the process of filing a PFAS Contamination lawsuit.
With extensive experience in chemical exposure cases, Jessica Paluch-Hoerman and our partner law firms work with litigation leaders to prove how toxic PFAS chemicals in water supplies caused you harm.
TruLaw focuses on securing compensation for medical expenses, pain and suffering, property damage, lost income, and ongoing health monitoring resulting from your PFAS exposure.
We know the health and environmental impacts of PFAS exposure on your life and provide the personalized guidance you need when seeking justice.
Meet our lead PFAS Contamination attorney:
At TruLaw, we believe financial concerns should never stand in the way of justice.
That’s why we operate on a contingency fee basis—with this approach, you only pay legal fees after you’ve been awarded compensation for your injuries.
If you or a loved one experienced health complications from exposure to PFAS-contaminated water that include forms of cancer, immune disorders, liver damage, or thyroid disease, you may be eligible to seek compensation.
Contact TruLaw using the chat on this page to receive an instant case evaluation and determine whether you qualify to join others in filing a PFAS Contamination Lawsuit today.
PFAS contamination lawsuits are being filed by individuals nationwide who experienced health problems from exposure to PFAS chemicals in drinking water.
TruLaw is currently accepting clients for the PFAS contamination lawsuit.
A few reasons to choose TruLaw for your PFAS contamination lawsuit include:
If you or a loved one suffered health problems related to PFAS-contaminated water, you may be eligible to seek compensation.
Contact TruLaw using the chat on this page to receive an instant case evaluation that can determine if you qualify for the PFAS Contamination Lawsuit today.
The statute of limitations for PFAS lawsuits varies by state but typically ranges from 2-6 years from the date you discovered or reasonably should have discovered your injury and its connection to PFAS exposure.
Texas personal injury claims generally carry a two-year limitation period, though the discovery rule often extends this deadline for PFAS cases since health effects may not appear until years after exposure.
Because determining when the clock started running can be legally challenging, and missing the deadline permanently bars your claim regardless of its merit, you should consult with an experienced PFAS attorney immediately to evaluate your specific filing deadlines and preserve your legal rights.
No, reputable PFAS attorneys work on a contingency fee basis, meaning you pay no upfront costs, hourly fees, or expenses to pursue your claim.
Attorneys typically collect 30-40 percent of any settlement or verdict as their fee, but only if they successfully recover compensation for you—if there’s no recovery, you owe nothing.
Law firms also advance all case expenses including expert witnesses, medical record retrieval, and court costs, which are reimbursed from any eventual recovery, and initial consultations are free with no obligation to hire the firm, allowing you to explore your legal options without financial risk.
Primary qualifying conditions based on scientific studies and the C8 Science Panel findings include kidney cancer, testicular cancer, thyroid disease, ulcerative colitis, high cholesterol, and pregnancy-induced hypertension.
Additional conditions that may qualify include liver damage, immune system disorders, certain birth defects, developmental delays in children, and other cancers such as prostate or bladder cancer if medical evidence supports the connection to PFAS exposure.
Each case is evaluated individually with input from medical experts to establish causation between your specific health conditions and PFAS exposure at Randolph AFB, and having multiple PFAS-related conditions typically strengthens your claim and may increase potential compensation.
Yes, receiving VA disability benefits does not prevent you from filing a PFAS lawsuit against chemical manufacturers like 3M, DuPont, and other responsible parties.
VA benefits and civil lawsuit compensation serve different purposes and can be pursued simultaneously.
VA benefits provide ongoing support for service-connected disabilities while PFAS lawsuits seek damages from companies that manufactured and sold dangerous chemicals.
Your compensation from a PFAS lawsuit will not affect your VA disability rating or monthly benefit payments, though certain needs-based VA benefits might require coordination, and attorneys experienced in military contamination cases can help you pursue both forms of relief while ensuring compliance with all applicable regulations.
PFAS lawsuits typically take 2-4 years from filing to resolution, though individual timelines vary based on case details, whether your case joins multidistrict litigation, defendant cooperation, and whether settlement negotiations succeed or trial becomes necessary.
Cases that join the PFAS MDL may benefit from coordinated discovery and bellwether trial results that establish settlement values, potentially speeding resolution, while individual trials can extend timelines but may result in higher compensation.
Courts are developing expedited tracks for plaintiffs with terminal conditions to ensure they receive compensation while still able to benefit from it, and throughout the process, your attorneys handle the legal work while keeping you informed of developments, allowing you to focus on your health and family while pursuing the justice and compensation you deserve.
Necessary documentation includes military orders, DD-214 forms, base housing records, dependent ID cards, or employment records proving your presence at Randolph AFB during contamination periods, along with evidence of water consumption through residence, work, or recreational activities on base.
Medical evidence strengthens your claim, including PFAS blood test results showing elevated levels, medical records documenting PFAS-related health conditions, and expert testimony linking your exposure to specific illnesses.
If original records are unavailable, alternative proof such as witness affidavits from fellow service members, utility bills, photographs, or other circumstantial evidence can establish your connection to the base, and experienced PFAS attorneys can help obtain military records through proper channels and work with incomplete documentation to build the strongest possible case for compensation.
Managing Attorney & Owner
With over 25 years of legal experience, Jessica Paluch-Hoerman is an Illinois lawyer, a CPA, and a mother of three. She spent the first decade of her career working as an international tax attorney at Deloitte.
In 2009, Jessie co-founded her own law firm with her husband – which has scaled to over 30 employees since its conception.
In 2016, Jessie founded TruLaw, which allows her to collaborate with attorneys and legal experts across the United States on a daily basis. This hypervaluable network of experts is what enables her to share the most reliable, accurate, and up-to-date legal information with our readers!
Here, at TruLaw, we’re committed to helping victims get the justice they deserve.
Alongside our partner law firms, we have successfully collected over $3 Billion in verdicts and settlements on behalf of injured individuals.
Would you like our help?
At TruLaw, we fiercely combat corporations that endanger individuals’ well-being. If you’ve suffered injuries and believe these well-funded entities should be held accountable, we’re here for you.
With TruLaw, you gain access to successful and seasoned lawyers who maximize your chances of success. Our lawyers invest in you—they do not receive a dime until your lawsuit reaches a successful resolution!
AFFF Lawsuit claims are being filed against manufacturers of aqueous film-forming foam (AFFF), commonly used in firefighting.
Claims allege that companies such as 3M, DuPont, and Tyco Fire Products failed to adequately warn users about the potential dangers of AFFF exposure — including increased risks of various cancers and diseases.
Depo Provera Lawsuit claims are being filed by individuals who allege they developed meningioma (a type of brain tumor) after receiving Depo-Provera birth control injections.
A 2024 study found that women using Depo-Provera for at least 1 year are five times more likely to develop meningioma brain tumors compared to those not using the drug.
Suboxone Tooth Decay Lawsuit claims are being filed against Indivior, the manufacturer of Suboxone, a medication used to treat opioid addiction.
Claims allege that Indivior failed to adequately warn users about the potential dangers of severe tooth decay and dental injuries associated with Suboxone’s sublingual film version.
Social Media Harm Lawsuits are being filed against social media companies for allegedly causing mental health issues in children and teens.
Claims allege that companies like Meta, Google, ByteDance, and Snap designed addictive platforms that led to anxiety, depression, and other mental health issues without adequately warning users or parents.
Transvaginal Mesh Lawsuits are being filed against manufacturers of transvaginal mesh products used to treat pelvic organ prolapse (POP) and stress urinary incontinence (SUI).
Claims allege that companies like Ethicon, C.R. Bard, and Boston Scientific failed to adequately warn about potential dangers — including erosion, pain, and infection.
Bair Hugger Warming Blanket Lawsuits involve claims against 3M — alleging their surgical warming blankets caused severe infections and complications (particularly in hip and knee replacement surgeries).
Plaintiffs claim 3M failed to warn about potential risks — despite knowing about increased risk of deep joint infections since 2011.
Baby Formula NEC Lawsuit claims are being filed against manufacturers of cow’s milk-based baby formula products.
Claims allege that companies like Abbott Laboratories (Similac) and Mead Johnson & Company (Enfamil) failed to warn about the increased risk of necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) in premature infants.
Here, at TruLaw, we’re committed to helping victims get the justice they deserve.
Alongside our partner law firms, we have successfully collected over $3 Billion in verdicts and settlements on behalf of injured individuals.
Would you like our help?