Langley Air Force Base PFAS Lawsuit

Published By:
Jessica Paluch-Hoerman
Jessica Paluch-Hoerman

Attorney Jessica Paluch-Hoerman, founder of TruLaw, has over 28 years of experience as a personal injury and mass tort attorney, and previously worked as an international tax attorney at Deloitte. Jessie collaborates with attorneys nationwide — enabling her to share reliable, up-to-date legal information with our readers.

This article has been written and reviewed for legal accuracy and clarity by the team of writers and legal experts at TruLaw and is as accurate as possible. This content should not be taken as legal advice from an attorney. If you would like to learn more about our owner and experienced injury lawyer, Jessie Paluch, you can do so here.

TruLaw does everything possible to make sure the information in this article is up to date and accurate. If you need specific legal advice about your case, contact us by using the chat on the bottom of this page. This article should not be taken as advice from an attorney.

Key takeaways:

  • Extreme Contamination Levels: Langley Air Force Base PFAS lawsuit cases involve groundwater contamination levels reaching 2,225,000 parts per trillion (over 556,000 times higher than EPA safety levels).
  • Recent PFAS Settlements: Recent PFAS litigation has secured individual settlements ranging from $175,000 to $350,000 – with over $14 billion in total industry settlements providing strong precedent.
  • Qualification Criteria: Eligibility requires minimum 6-month exposure near the base plus qualifying health conditions. These may include (but are not limited to) kidney cancer, testicular cancer, thyroid disease, or ulcerative colitis.

Understanding PFAS Contamination at Langley Air Force Base

The Langley Air Force Base PFAS Lawsuit investigation addresses one of the most severe cases of forever chemical contamination at any U.S. military installation, with groundwater levels reaching 2,225,000 parts per trillion (ppt) — over 556,000 times the EPA’s newly established 2024 safety limit.

TruLaw is actively investigating PFAS Contamination Lawsuits as part of the broader military base water contamination crisis affecting over 700 Department of Defense installations nationwide.

On this page, we’ll provide an overview of the Langley Air Force Base PFAS Lawsuit, health impacts of PFAS exposure at Langley AFB, legal process of filing a Langley AFB PFAS Claim, and much more.

Legal Experts Investigating Langley Air Force Base Contamination

Langley Air Force Base was founded in 1916 in in Hampton, Virginia, and continues to operate as one of the oldest continuously active air bases in the United States.

Langley AFB joins over 500 additional military installations listed for “advanced cleanup” with the Pentagon increasing its 2024 PFAS remediation budget by $100 million dollars.

The elevated PFAS and AFFF levels measured by the Environmental Protection Agency pose potential health risks to base personnel and surrounding communities, including increased chances of cancer, thyroid disease, and  other immune system disorders.

Similar to many military installations, the contamination at Langley AFB was caused by extensive use of Aqueous Film Forming Foam (AFFF) in firefighting training and emergency responses to suppress fuel fires.

If you or a loved one served, worked, or lived at Langley Air Force Base between 1970 and present, you may qualify to seek compensation.

Contact TruLaw using the chat on this page to receive an instant case evaluation that can determine your eligibility to join others in filing a PFAS lawsuit today.

Table of Contents

Health Impacts of PFAS Exposure from Langley AFB

PFAS exposure from Langley Air Force Base contamination has been linked to numerous serious health conditions that form the foundation of current litigation efforts.

These health issues affect multiple organ systems and can develop years or decades after initial exposure.

Our analysis of scientific research shows that individuals exposed to PFAS-contaminated water face significant health risks including cancer, reproductive problems, and immune system disorders.

Prolonged PFAS exposure creates additional concerns as these chemicals accumulate in the human body over time.

Health Impacts of PFAS Exposure from Langley AFB

The extremely high contamination levels at Langley (exceeding 2 million parts per trillion) represent exposure concentrations far above those studied in most health research, potentially leading to more severe health outcomes for affected individuals.

These serious health issues may require lifelong medical monitoring and treatment.

Cancer and Serious Health Conditions

Research consistently demonstrates strong connections between PFAS exposure and several types of cancer that qualify for compensation in current lawsuits.

These adverse health effects can devastate families and require extensive medical treatment.

Kidney cancer shows the most robust scientific evidence, with studies indicating that individuals with elevated PFAS blood levels face more than double the risk of developing renal cell carcinoma compared to those with lower exposure levels.

Testicular cancer represents another well-established link to PFAS exposure, particularly among military personnel.

Similar patterns have been documented at other contaminated installations including Ellsworth Air Force Base, Altus Air Force Base, and Holloman Air Force Base.

Studies of Air Force servicemen found that elevated blood levels of PFOS substantially increased testicular cancer risk, with the strongest associations observed among firefighters and personnel stationed at bases with high water contamination levels.

Additional types of cancer linked to PFAS exposure include, but are not limited to:

  • Thyroid cancer, with recent studies showing a 56% increased risk per doubling of PFOS blood levels
  • Liver cancer, demonstrated in large population studies of diverse ethnic groups
  • Pancreatic cancer, identified in county-level cancer incidence studies

Beyond cancer, PFAS exposure causes thyroid disease, ulcerative colitis, and elevated cholesterol levels.

These serious health problems often develop years before cancer diagnoses and may serve as early indicators of PFAS-related health impacts in affected populations.

Reproductive and Developmental Effects

PFAS contamination poses particular risks to pregnant women and developing children in families stationed at or living near Langley AFB.

The Environmental Working Group has documented similar reproductive health impacts at military installations nationwide.

Our research shows that PFAS exposure during pregnancy increases risks of conditions including, but not limited to:

  • Preeclampsia
  • Gestational diabetes
  • Pregnancy-induced hypertension

These conditions can threaten both maternal and fetal health, creating lasting human health impacts for both mother and child.

Infants born to mothers with PFAS exposure face increased risks of low birth weight, developmental delays, and altered immune system function. Immune system suppression represents one of the most concerning long-term effects of PFAS exposure in children.

Children exposed to PFAS may experience accelerated puberty, behavioral changes, and reduced vaccine effectiveness – potentially compromising their long-term health outcomes.

Military families face unique reproductive health challenges due to potential multiple base assignments and cumulative PFAS exposure over extended periods. Families stationed at installations like Wurtsmith Air Force Base, Naval Air Station Jacksonville, and Vandenberg Air Force Base may experience similar health impacts from prolonged exposure to contaminated water.

These families may experience fertility problems, hormonal disruptions, and intergenerational health effects that impact multiple family members across different life stages. Food packaging contamination can create additional exposure pathways for military families living on base.

Exposure Pathways and Duration

Drinking contaminated water represents the primary exposure route for individuals near Langley AFB, with daily consumption leading to bioaccumulation of PFAS in blood and organs.

We calculate that residents consuming water with PFAS levels found at Langley could accumulate dangerous body burdens within months of initial exposure.

Secondary exposure pathways include, but are not limited to:

  • Dermal absorption during showering, bathing, and swimming in contaminated water sources
  • Direct occupational contact with firefighting foam during training exercises or emergency responses for base personnel and contractors

PFAS bioaccumulate over time, meaning that even relatively brief exposure periods can result in elevated blood levels that persist for years after exposure ends. Military personnel at installations like Horsham Air Guard Station, Grand Prairie Armed Forces, and Air National Guard Base locations face similar occupational exposure risks.

Current Status of Langley AFB PFAS Litigation

The legal landscape surrounding Langley AFB PFAS contamination involves multiple court proceedings at both federal and state levels, with affected individuals pursuing compensation through various legal avenues.

These PFAS water contamination lawsuits represent some of the largest environmental litigation cases in recent history.

We’re currently tracking thousands of PFAS-related lawsuits consolidated in federal court, along with individual state court actions and administrative claims against the federal government.

Health Impacts of PFAS Exposure from Langley AFB; Current Status of Langley AFB PFAS Litigation

The litigation environment has evolved rapidly since 2018, with recent major settlements totaling over $14 billion providing a framework for resolving these challenging contamination cases.

Similar cases involving Tyndall Air Force Base and other Air Reserve Station locations follow parallel legal pathways.

Multi-District Litigation (MDL) Proceedings

The majority of PFAS firefighting foam cases (including those involving Langley AFB exposure) are consolidated under MDL 2873 in the U.S. District Court for the District of South Carolina.

Recent developments in the MDL include, but are not limited to:

  • Bellwether trial selections focusing on kidney cancer, testicular cancer, thyroid disease, and ulcerative colitis cases
  • Discovery pools with 25 representative cases to help determine the strength of scientific evidence linking PFAS exposure to various health conditions
  • Important rulings rejecting the government contractor defense – meaning AFFF manufacturers cannot claim immunity for following military specifications

These bellwether trials serve as test cases that often influence settlement negotiations for the remaining thousands of pending claims.

Judge Gergel’s decision to reject the government contractor defense strengthens the legal position for military base contamination cases by holding manufacturers accountable for the health and environmental impacts of their products.

Individual Lawsuits and State Court Actions

Beyond the federal MDL, we’re seeing individual PFAS lawsuits filed in Virginia state courts by Langley AFB-affected individuals seeking compensation for personal injuries and property damage.

These state court cases often focus on local contamination issues and may proceed on different timelines than the federal consolidation. Serious health concerns drive many families to pursue immediate legal action rather than wait for MDL resolution.

Virginia tort law provides advantages for plaintiffs in state court, including but not limited to:

  • Different statutes of limitations that may benefit individuals with older exposure histories
  • Discovery rules that can be more favorable than federal court procedures
  • Faster resolution timelines compared to the slower pace of federal MDL proceedings

Some attorneys are pursuing state court strategies specifically for clients with urgent medical needs. Those seeking financial compensation often benefit from the more streamlined state court process.

The coordination between state and federal proceedings requires careful legal strategy, as plaintiffs must choose whether to participate in the federal MDL or pursue individual state court litigation.

Our analysis shows that both approaches have merits depending on specific case circumstances and the plaintiff’s particular health conditions.

Government Liability and Sovereign Immunity

Military base PFAS cases face unique challenges related to suing the federal government under the Federal Tort Claims Act (FTCA).

Affected individuals must first file administrative claims with the Air Force within two years of discovering their injuries – providing detailed documentation of exposure and health impacts.

The FTCA process requires exhausting administrative remedies before filing federal court lawsuits, often adding 6-12 months to case timelines.

However, recent court decisions have strengthened plaintiffs’ positions by limiting sovereign immunity defenses and establishing that environmental contamination claims can proceed against the government.

We’re also tracking different types of liability cases, including but not limited to:

  • Direct government liability under the FTCA for base contamination
  • Contractor liability cases where private companies performed services at Langley AFB and may share responsibility for PFAS contamination

These contractor cases often involve challenging issues of government contractor immunity and shared liability between federal agencies and private entities.

Qualifying for a Langley AFB PFAS Lawsuit

Determining eligibility for a Langley AFB PFAS lawsuit requires demonstrating both exposure to contaminated water and resulting health impacts or property damage.

Health Impacts of PFAS Exposure from Langley AFB; Current Status of Langley AFB PFAS Litigation; Qualifying for a Langley AFB PFAS Lawsuit

We evaluate potential claims based on specific exposure criteria, medical documentation requirements, and geographic proximity to the contaminated areas.

Our experience shows that individuals with documented exposure periods of six months or longer combined with qualifying medical diagnoses have the strongest foundation for successful legal action.

Exposure Requirements and Documentation

Establishing PFAS exposure from Langley AFB requires documentation of residence or work within the affected contamination zone for a minimum duration – typically six months to one year depending on proximity to the base.

We help clients gather utility records, lease agreements, and military assignment documents to prove their presence in contaminated areas during relevant time periods.

Blood testing for PFAS levels provides direct evidence of exposure, though interpretation requires careful analysis since these chemicals remain in the body for years.

Current blood tests typically cost several hundred dollars and measure PFOA, PFOS, and other PFAS compounds.

We coordinate with specialized laboratories to ensure proper testing protocols and work with clients whose exposure occurred years ago when blood levels may no longer reflect historical contamination.

Military service members and civilian employees need additional documentation including, but not limited to:

  • Official duty station records from Langley AFB
  • Base housing assignments and dates of residence
  • Work assignments in areas with known AFFF use
  • Training records showing firefighting foam exposure

Water supply verification through utility records helps establish the contamination source and duration of exposure.

Private well testing results and municipal water quality reports provide additional evidence of PFAS presence in drinking water sources.

Medical Diagnosis Requirements

Qualifying medical conditions must be supported by detailed medical documentation including pathology reports, diagnostic imaging, and physician treatment records.

The strongest cases involve conditions with established scientific links to PFAS exposure – particularly kidney cancer, testicular cancer, thyroid disease, and ulcerative colitis.

Cancer diagnoses require pathology reports confirming the specific cancer type and staging information.

We work with medical experts to establish causation opinions linking PFAS exposure to cancer development, particularly important for cases involving multiple potential risk factors.

Timing between exposure and diagnosis plays a role in establishing causation, though PFAS-related cancers can develop decades after initial exposure. Individuals experiencing any concerning symptoms should seek medical attention immediately for proper evaluation and documentation.

Non-cancer conditions including thyroid disease, high cholesterol, and immune system disorders may also qualify for compensation with proper medical documentation.

These conditions often serve as early indicators of PFAS exposure and may strengthen claims even when more serious conditions develop later.

Property Damage Claims

Property owners near Langley AFB may pursue compensation for diminished property values caused by PFAS contamination disclosure and ongoing environmental concerns.

Professional appraisals documenting property value impacts before and after contamination discovery provide the foundation for these claims.

Property damage compensation may include, but is not limited to:

  • Well contamination remediation costs, including filtration system installation and alternative water supply expenses
  • Ongoing expenses related to PFAS contamination mitigation efforts
  • Stigma damages for decreased marketability and buyer reluctance even after remediation efforts

We help property owners document historical costs and ongoing expenses related to contamination mitigation.

These stigma damage claims often require expert testimony on real estate market impacts and community perception of contaminated properties.

Legal Process for Filing a Langley AFB PFAS Claim

Filing a PFAS claim related to Langley Air Force Base contamination involves multiple procedural steps that must be completed in the correct sequence to preserve your legal rights.

We guide clients through this process, which typically begins with case evaluation and evidence gathering, progresses through administrative claim filing requirements, and may culminate in federal court litigation.

The timeline for resolving these claims ranges from 18 months to several years, depending on whether administrative settlement is achieved or court proceedings become necessary.

Health Impacts of PFAS Exposure from Langley AFB; Current Status of Langley AFB PFAS Litigation; Qualifying for a Langley AFB PFAS Lawsuit; Legal Process for Filing a Langley AFB PFAS Claim (2)

Initial Case Evaluation and Evidence Gathering

Our initial case evaluation process involves detailed review of exposure history, medical records, and available documentation to assess the strength of potential claims.

We coordinate blood testing for PFAS levels when appropriate, often covering testing costs for qualified cases.

This testing provides baseline evidence of exposure, though results must be interpreted carefully since PFAS levels can decline over time.

Medical record collection requires authorization forms allowing us to gather detailed documentation from all treating physicians, hospitals, and specialists involved in diagnosing and treating PFAS-related conditions.

We also obtain military service records through the National Personnel Records Center, which can take several months but provides vital documentation of duty station assignments and potential occupational exposure.

Property records compilation includes, but is not limited to:

  • Utility bills showing water service dates and locations
  • Lease agreements or property deeds establishing residence periods
  • Well testing results and water quality reports
  • Property appraisals documenting value impacts from contamination

We also gather employment records for civilian workers at Langley AFB – including contractor assignments and specific work locations that may have involved AFFF exposure during the relevant time periods.

Filing Your Claim

Military base PFAS cases require filing administrative claims with the Air Force Judge Advocate General’s office within two years of discovering the injury and its connection to base contamination.

This Federal Tort Claims Act requirement must be satisfied before pursuing federal court litigation, and failure to meet the deadline can bar future legal action.

The administrative claim must include detailed exposure history, thorough medical documentation, and a specific monetary demand for damages.

We prepare these claims with sufficient detail to support the requested compensation while preserving the right to seek additional damages if conditions worsen or new injuries develop.

If the Air Force denies the administrative claim or fails to respond within six months, we can proceed with federal court litigation.

Many cases are also consolidated into the ongoing MDL proceedings, which may provide advantages through coordinated discovery and potential settlement opportunities with AFFF manufacturers.

Discovery and Case Development

The discovery phase involves extensive document production from the Department of Defense, base environmental managers, and AFFF manufacturers.

This process typically takes 12-18 months and includes base environmental records, contamination monitoring data, and internal communications about PFAS risks and contamination response.

Expert witness selection plays a vital role in PFAS cases, requiring specialists including but not limited to:

  • Toxicology experts who can establish health impact connections
  • Hydrogeology specialists for groundwater contamination analysis
  • Medical causation experts to link base contamination and health impacts

We work with nationally recognized experts who have testified in similar military contamination cases and handle the unique challenges of proving causation in PFAS litigation.

Depositions of key witnesses include base environmental personnel, military officials responsible for AFFF procurement and use, and treating physicians who can testify about the connection between PFAS exposure and diagnosed health conditions.

Compensation Available in Langley AFB PFAS Cases

Langley AFB PFAS lawsuit compensation addresses the full spectrum of damages resulting from toxic exposure, including medical expenses, lost income, pain and suffering, and property-related losses.

Those seeking financial compensation should understand that maximum compensation typically requires comprehensive documentation of all exposure-related damages.

The total compensation depends on factors including exposure duration, health condition severity, age at diagnosis, and documented economic losses.

Health Impacts of PFAS Exposure from Langley AFB; Current Status of Langley AFB PFAS Litigation; Qualifying for a Langley AFB PFAS Lawsuit; Legal Process for Filing a Langley AFB PFAS Claim (2); Compensation Available in Langley AFB PFAS Cases

Medical Expenses and Future Treatment

Medical expense compensation covers thorough treatment costs related to PFAS exposure – beginning with cancer treatment expenses that can exceed $200,000 for challenging cases requiring surgery, chemotherapy, and radiation therapy.

We document all past medical bills including diagnostic testing, specialist consultations, hospital stays, and prescription medications related to PFAS-linked health conditions.

Future medical care projections require expert testimony from oncologists and other specialists to estimate lifetime treatment costs for ongoing conditions.

Cancer patients may require decades of follow-up care, including regular monitoring, additional treatments if cancer recurs, and management of treatment-related side effects that can persist long after initial therapy completion.

Medical monitoring compensation provides funds for enhanced screening programs that may include, but are not limited to:

  • Annual blood panels and organ function testing
  • Enhanced cancer screening beyond standard recommendations
  • Specialized cardiac and liver function monitoring
  • Thyroid function testing and hormone level monitoring

Travel expenses for specialized treatment at major medical centers receive compensation when local providers lack expertise in PFAS-related conditions.

This includes transportation costs, lodging, and lost wages for family members providing support during treatment periods.

Non-Economic Damages

Pain and suffering compensation addresses the physical discomfort, emotional distress, and reduced quality of life resulting from PFAS-related health conditions.

Cancer patients typically receive substantial awards for pain and suffering – reflecting the severity of diagnosis impact, treatment side effects, and ongoing fear of cancer recurrence.

Loss of life enjoyment compensation recognizes how PFAS-related illnesses limit participation in activities, hobbies, and relationships that previously provided fulfillment.

We document specific lifestyle changes, recreational limitations, and social impacts to support these damage claims.

Non-economic damages that may be available include, but are not limited to:

  • Emotional distress damages for the psychological impact of learning about toxic exposure and developing serious health conditions
  • Mental health treatment costs and psychological impact compensation for anxiety, depression, and post-traumatic stress related to diagnosis and uncertain prognosis
  • Loss of consortium compensation to spouses for the impact on marital relationships, including physical intimacy, companionship, and emotional support

These damages recognize that toxic exposure affects entire families – not just the directly exposed individual.

Property-Related Compensation

Property value diminishment compensation addresses market value decreases resulting from PFAS contamination disclosure and ongoing environmental concerns.

Professional appraisals typically show 10-30% property value decreases in areas with known contamination, though impacts vary based on contamination severity and community response.

Property-related compensation may include, but is not limited to:

  • Well replacement and water treatment system installation costs, including ongoing maintenance expenses and utility cost increases
  • Alternative water supply expenses including bottled water costs, water delivery services, and temporary housing expenses when properties become uninhabitable
  • Historical expenses and projected future costs until permanent remediation occurs

Many property owners have spent $15,000-$50,000 on filtration systems and alternative water supplies while awaiting cleanup completion.

We can track these expenses and project future costs until permanent remediation occurs.

Timeline and Next Steps for Affected Residents

Affected Langley AFB residents should take immediate action to protect their legal rights while the litigation process unfolds over the next 2-4 years.

We recommend specific steps to preserve evidence, document ongoing health impacts, and stay informed about case developments that could affect compensation opportunities.

Health Impacts of PFAS Exposure from Langley AFB; Current Status of Langley AFB PFAS Litigation; Qualifying for a Langley AFB PFAS Lawsuit; Legal Process for Filing a Langley AFB PFAS Claim (2); Compensation Available in Langley AFB PFAS Cases; Timeline and Next Steps for Affected Residents

The current litigation timeline suggests that individual cases may begin resolving through settlements or trials by late 2025, with most cases reaching resolution by 2027-2028.

Immediate Actions to Protect Your Rights

Blood testing for PFAS levels should occur as soon as possible, since these chemicals have half-lives of several years and blood concentrations decline over time.

Current blood levels provide the strongest evidence of exposure, particularly for individuals whose contamination occurred years ago.

We coordinate with specialized laboratories to ensure proper testing protocols and can often arrange testing at reduced costs for qualifying cases.

Document preservation requires maintaining all medical records, water bills, utility statements, and property records related to your time near Langley AFB.

Create digital copies of important documents and store them securely, as original records may be needed for expert review and court proceedings.

Military personnel should request complete service records through the National Personnel Records Center, which can take several months to obtain.

Health Impacts of PFAS Exposure from Langley AFB; Current Status of Langley AFB PFAS Litigation; Qualifying for a Langley AFB PFAS Lawsuit; Legal Process for Filing a Langley AFB PFAS Claim (2); Compensation Available in Langley AFB PFAS Cases; Timeline and Next Steps for Affected Residents; Immediate Actions to Protect Your Rights

Key documents to preserve include, but are not limited to:

  • Medical records from all treating physicians
  • Prescription medication records and pharmacy receipts
  • Water utility bills showing service addresses and dates
  • Property deeds, lease agreements, and residency documentation
  • Military assignment orders and duty station records

Avoid discussing your case details on social media platforms, as these communications may be discoverable in litigation and could potentially harm your case.

Register for environmental update notifications from Langley AFB and Virginia environmental agencies to stay informed about contamination monitoring and cleanup progress.

Expected Case Timeline

Administrative claim processing with the Air Force typically takes 6-12 months from filing to resolution, though challenging cases involving multiple health conditions may require additional time for medical record review and expert analysis.

If administrative settlement negotiations are unsuccessful, federal court litigation adds 18-24 months to the overall timeline.

Discovery phase proceedings in federal court extend 12-18 months and involve extensive document production from military records, environmental monitoring data, and medical treatment files.

Expert witness preparation and deposition scheduling often require additional months, particularly in cases involving multiple plaintiffs with similar exposure histories.

Bellwether trial outcomes in the ongoing MDL will likely influence settlement negotiations for individual Langley AFB cases, with initial trial results expected in 2025. These test cases help establish precedent for compensation amounts and causation standards that affect thousands of similar claims.

Individual case resolution typically occurs 2-4 years from initial case filing, though cases involving severe health conditions or clear liability may settle more quickly.

Settlement negotiations often accelerate as trial dates approach – providing leverage for favorable resolution terms.

Staying Informed and Connected

Court docket monitoring through PACER or legal news services provides updates on important rulings, settlement approvals, and trial scheduling that may affect individual cases.

We provide regular case updates to our clients and maintain communication about important developments in the broader PFAS litigation landscape.

Resources for staying informed and connected include, but are not limited to:

  • Community support groups that offer valuable resources for affected families dealing with health concerns and legal proceedings
  • Local organizations that provide information about medical monitoring programs, alternative water supplies, and advocacy efforts to expedite cleanup and compensation processes
  • Base Restoration Advisory Board meetings that provide forums for community input on cleanup priorities and timelines

These meetings offer opportunities to learn about environmental monitoring results and voice concerns about ongoing contamination risks.

How Can A PFAS Contamination Attorney from TruLaw Help You?

Our PFAS Contamination attorney at TruLaw is dedicated to supporting clients through the process of filing a PFAS Contamination lawsuit.

With extensive experience in chemical exposure cases, Jessica Paluch-Hoerman and our partner law firms work with litigation leaders to prove how toxic PFAS chemicals in water supplies caused you harm.

TruLaw focuses on securing compensation for medical expenses, pain and suffering, property damage, lost income, and ongoing health monitoring resulting from your PFAS exposure.

Health Impacts of PFAS Exposure from Langley AFB; Current Status of Langley AFB PFAS Litigation; Qualifying for a Langley AFB PFAS Lawsuit; Legal Process for Filing a Langley AFB PFAS Claim (2); Compensation Available in Langley AFB PFAS Cases; Timeline and Next Steps for Affected Residents; Immediate Actions to Protect Your Rights; How Can A PFAS Contamination Attorney from TruLaw Help You

We recognize the health and environmental impacts of PFAS exposure on your life and provide the personalized guidance you need when seeking justice.

Meet the Lead PFAS Contamination Attorney at TruLaw

Meet our lead PFAS Contamination attorney:

  • Jessica Paluch-Hoerman: As founder and managing attorney of TruLaw, Jessica brings her experience in product liability and personal injury litigation to her client-centered approach by prioritizing open communication and personalized attention with her clients. Through TruLaw and partner law firms, Jessica has helped collect over $3 billion dollars on behalf of injured individuals across all 50 states through verdicts and negotiated settlements.

How much does hiring a PFAS Contamination lawyer from TruLaw cost?

At TruLaw, we believe financial concerns should never stand in the way of justice.

That’s why we operate on a contingency fee basis—with this approach, you only pay legal fees after you’ve been awarded compensation for your injuries.

If you or a loved one experienced health complications from exposure to PFAS-contaminated water that include forms of cancer, immune disorders, liver damage, or thyroid disease, you may be eligible to seek compensation.

Contact TruLaw using the chat on this page to receive an instant case evaluation and determine whether you qualify to join others in filing a PFAS Contamination Lawsuit today.

TruLaw: Accepting Clients with Langley Air Force Base PFAS Lawsuit Claims

PFAS contamination lawsuits are being filed by individuals nationwide who experienced health problems from exposure to PFAS chemicals in drinking water.

TruLaw is currently accepting clients for the PFAS contamination lawsuit.

A few reasons to choose TruLaw for your PFAS contamination lawsuit include:

  • If We Don’t Win, You Don’t Pay: The PFAS contamination lawyers at TruLaw and our partner firms operate on a contingency fee basis, meaning we only get paid if you win.
  • Expertise: We have decades of experience handling toxic exposure cases similar to the PFAS contamination lawsuit.
  • Successful Track Record: TruLaw and our partner law firms have helped our clients recover billions of dollars in compensation through verdicts and negotiated settlements.

If you or a loved one suffered health problems related to PFAS-contaminated water, you may be eligible to seek compensation.

Contact TruLaw using the chat on this page to receive an instant case evaluation that can determine if you qualify for the PFAS Contamination Lawsuit today.

PFAS Contamination Lawsuit Frequently Asked Questions

  • How long must I have lived near Langley AFB to qualify for a lawsuit?

    Most PFAS lawsuits require a minimum exposure duration of 6 months to 1 year, depending on your proximity to the base and the contamination levels in your specific area.

    Individuals who lived within 5 miles of Langley AFB typically need at least 6 months of continuous residence, while those living farther away may need longer exposure periods to establish sufficient contamination levels.

    Military personnel stationed at Langley may qualify with shorter exposure periods due to higher occupational exposure risks from direct contact with firefighting foam during training exercises or emergency responses.

    We evaluate each case individually – considering factors such as housing location on base, work assignments, and documented exposure incidents.

    Documentation through lease agreements, utility bills, military orders, and base housing records strengthens exposure claims regardless of duration.

    Even brief exposure periods may qualify if you can demonstrate high-level contamination through blood testing or specific occupational exposure incidents.

  • Can I file a claim if I'm still active military or working at Langley?

    Active duty personnel can file PFAS claims, but must follow Federal Tort Claims Act procedures by first submitting administrative claims to the Air Force Judge Advocate General’s office.

    This requirement applies to all military members regardless of current duty status, and failure to exhaust administrative remedies can bar future federal court litigation.

    Civilian employees and contractors working at Langley have different filing pathways than military members and may pursue both administrative claims and direct litigation against AFFF manufacturers.

    Current employment status does not prevent filing PFAS lawsuits, though coordination with military legal offices may be advisable to avoid potential conflicts.

    No retaliation protections exist specifically for filing environmental contamination claims, but military whistleblower protections may apply in certain circumstances.

    We recommend confidential consultation to discuss your specific situation and the best approach for protecting both your legal rights and career interests.

  • What if I moved away from Langley years ago but was recently diagnosed?

    Virginia’s discovery rule may extend filing deadlines from the date of diagnosis rather than the date of exposure, particularly for PFAS-related cancers that can develop 10-20 years after initial contamination.

    Recent cancer diagnoses may qualify for compensation even if exposure occurred decades ago, provided you can establish the connection between Langley AFB contamination and your current health condition.

    Medical records must demonstrate a probable connection between past PFAS exposure and your current diagnosis – often requiring expert medical testimony to establish causation.

    Blood testing becomes less useful after years away from contamination sources due to PFAS half-lives, but historical exposure documentation can still support your claim.

    We help clients gather historical evidence including past water testing results, base environmental records, and medical documentation to establish the timeline between exposure and diagnosis.

    Early consultation is important to ensure all relevant evidence is preserved and deadlines are met.

  • How much does hiring a lawyer cost for a PFAS lawsuit?

    Most PFAS attorneys work on contingency fee basis, typically charging 33-40% of any settlement or verdict amount, with no upfront costs for case filing or expert witness fees.

    This arrangement means you pay legal fees only if your case results in compensation – making legal representation accessible regardless of your current financial situation.

    Law firms advance all litigation expenses including court filing fees, expert witness costs, medical record retrieval, and deposition expenses, recovering these costs from any eventual settlement or judgment.

    Free consultations are standard practice to evaluate case merits before any financial commitment.

    Federal Tort Claims Act cases have attorney fee limitations of 25% for court settlements and 20% for administrative settlements, which may be lower than standard contingency rates but ensure you receive a larger portion of any recovery.

  • Which health conditions qualify for compensation in Langley PFAS cases?

    Health conditions with strong scientific support for PFAS causation include, but are not limited to:

    • Kidney cancer and testicular cancer – showing consistent associations with PFAS exposure across multiple studies and typically resulting in substantial compensation awards
    • Thyroid disease and ulcerative colitis – commonly accepted conditions with growing scientific evidence supporting PFAS causation
    • Thyroid cancer – demonstrating strong associations with PFAS exposure in recent studies
    • Pregnancy complications including preeclampsia and gestational diabetes (with proper medical documentation linking these conditions to PFAS exposure)

    High cholesterol alone is typically insufficient for substantial compensation without other qualifying conditions, though it may strengthen claims when combined with more serious health impacts.

    The list of compensable conditions continues expanding as new research emerges, so conditions not currently included may become eligible as scientific knowledge advances.

  • Can my children file claims for PFAS exposure at Langley?

    Minor children can file PFAS claims through parent or guardian representation, with particular focus on birth defects, developmental delays, and pediatric cancers that may result from prenatal or early childhood exposure.

    Children’s PFAS claims may involve conditions including, but are not limited to:

    • Birth defects and low birth weight for infants born to mothers exposed during pregnancy
    • Developmental disorders and immune system impacts from prenatal or early exposure
    • Pediatric cancers (which have strong causation arguments due to limited alternative risk factors in young patients)
    • Long-term health monitoring needs for children with documented exposure

    Claims for minor children must be preserved until the child reaches majority age – ensuring legal rights are protected even if immediate health impacts are not apparent.

    Special trust provisions often apply to minor settlements, requiring court approval and establishing protected accounts for the child’s benefit.

    We coordinate with pediatric specialists and child advocates to ensure minor plaintiffs receive appropriate medical monitoring and compensation for both current and future needs related to PFAS exposure.

Published By:
Jessica Paluch-Hoerman
Jessica Paluch-Hoerman

Managing Attorney & Owner

With over 25 years of legal experience, Jessica Paluch-Hoerman is an Illinois lawyer, a CPA, and a mother of three.  She spent the first decade of her career working as an international tax attorney at Deloitte.

In 2009, Jessie co-founded her own law firm with her husband – which has scaled to over 30 employees since its conception.

In 2016, Jessie founded TruLaw, which allows her to collaborate with attorneys and legal experts across the United States on a daily basis. This hypervaluable network of experts is what enables her to share the most reliable, accurate, and up-to-date legal information with our readers!

Additional PFAS Contamination Lawsuit resources on our website:
All
FAQs
Injuries & Conditions
Legal Help
Military
Other Resources
Settlements & Compensation
You can learn more about this topic by visiting any of our PFAS Contamination Lawsuit pages listed below:
Barksdale Air Force Base PFAS Lawsuit
Buckley Air Force Base PFAS Lawsuit
Dyess Air Force Base PFAS Lawsuit
Eaker Air Force Base PFAS Lawsuit
Eglin Air Force Base PFAS Lawsuit
Ellsworth Air Force Base PFAS Lawsuit
Fort Campbell PFAS Lawsuit
Great Lakes Naval Station PFAS Lawsuit
List of Military Bases with Contaminated Water
Maxwell Air Force Base PFAS Lawsuit
Moody Air Force Base PFAS Lawsuit
Patrick Air Force Base PFAS Lawsuit
PFAS Kidney Cancer Lawsuit
PFAS Lawsuit for Water Contamination
PFAS Lawsuit Settlement Amounts for Water Contamination
PFAS Liver Cancer Lawsuit
PFAS Military Lawsuit
PFAS Testicular Cancer Lawsuit
PFAS Thyroid Cancer Lawsuit
PFAS Thyroid Disease Lawsuit
PFAS Ulcerative Colitis Lawsuit
PFAS Water Contamination Lawsuit
Plattsburgh Air Force Base PFAS Lawsuit
Randolph Air Force Base PFAS Lawsuit
Robins Air Force Base PFAS Lawsuit
Scott Air Force Base PFAS Lawsuit
Seymour Johnson Air Force Base PFAS Lawsuit
Tinker Air Force Base PFAS Lawsuit
Travis Air Force Base PFAS Lawsuit
Wurtsmith Air Force Base PFAS Lawsuit
AFFF Lawsuit

AFFF Lawsuit claims are being filed against manufacturers of aqueous film-forming foam (AFFF), commonly used in firefighting.

Claims allege that companies such as 3M, DuPont, and Tyco Fire Products failed to adequately warn users about the potential dangers of AFFF exposure — including increased risks of various cancers and diseases.

Depo Provera Lawsuit

Depo Provera Lawsuit claims are being filed by individuals who allege they developed meningioma (a type of brain tumor) after receiving Depo-Provera birth control injections.

A 2024 study found that women using Depo-Provera for at least 1 year are five times more likely to develop meningioma brain tumors compared to those not using the drug.

Suboxone Lawsuit

Suboxone Tooth Decay Lawsuit claims are being filed against Indivior, the manufacturer of Suboxone, a medication used to treat opioid addiction.

Claims allege that Indivior failed to adequately warn users about the potential dangers of severe tooth decay and dental injuries associated with Suboxone’s sublingual film version.

Social Media Lawsuits

Social Media Harm Lawsuits are being filed against social media companies for allegedly causing mental health issues in children and teens.

Claims allege that companies like Meta, Google, ByteDance, and Snap designed addictive platforms that led to anxiety, depression, and other mental health issues without adequately warning users or parents.

Vaginal Mesh Lawsuits

Transvaginal Mesh Lawsuits are being filed against manufacturers of transvaginal mesh products used to treat pelvic organ prolapse (POP) and stress urinary incontinence (SUI).

Claims allege that companies like Ethicon, C.R. Bard, and Boston Scientific failed to adequately warn about potential dangers — including erosion, pain, and infection.

Bair Hugger Lawsuit

Bair Hugger Warming Blanket Lawsuits involve claims against 3M — alleging their surgical warming blankets caused severe infections and complications (particularly in hip and knee replacement surgeries).

Plaintiffs claim 3M failed to warn about potential risks — despite knowing about increased risk of deep joint infections since 2011.

Baby Formula NEC Lawsuit

Baby Formula NEC Lawsuit claims are being filed against manufacturers of cow’s milk-based baby formula products.

Claims allege that companies like Abbott Laboratories (Similac) and Mead Johnson & Company (Enfamil) failed to warn about the increased risk of necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) in premature infants.

Do You
Have A Case?

Here, at TruLaw, we’re committed to helping victims get the justice they deserve.

Alongside our partner law firms, we have successfully collected over $3 Billion in verdicts and settlements on behalf of injured individuals.

Would you like our help?

Other PFAS Contamination Lawsuit Resources

All
FAQs
Injuries & Conditions
Legal Help
Military
Other Resources
Settlements & Compensation

Helpful Sites & Resources