Attorney Jessica Paluch-Hoerman, founder of TruLaw, has over 28 years of experience as a personal injury and mass tort attorney, and previously worked as an international tax attorney at Deloitte. Jessie collaborates with attorneys nationwide — enabling her to share reliable, up-to-date legal information with our readers.
This article has been written and reviewed for legal accuracy and clarity by the team of writers and legal experts at TruLaw and is as accurate as possible. This content should not be taken as legal advice from an attorney. If you would like to learn more about our owner and experienced injury lawyer, Jessie Paluch, you can do so here.
TruLaw does everything possible to make sure the information in this article is up to date and accurate. If you need specific legal advice about your case, contact us by using the chat on the bottom of this page. This article should not be taken as advice from an attorney.
Question: Who qualifies for the Dyess Air Force Base PFAS Lawsuit?
Answer: Those affected by PFAS contamination at Dyess Air Force Base may be eligible to file a lawsuit seeking compensation for medical expenses, health issues, and other damages related to PFAS exposure.
On this page, we’ll answer this question in further depth, examining PFAS contamination at Dyess Air Force Base, health effects linked to PFAS exposure, and much more.
Dyess Air Force Base in Texas has been identified as a site with documented PFAS contamination in drinking water and groundwater systems.
The military base utilized Aqueous Film Forming Foam (AFFF) for decades during firefighting training exercises and emergency response situations, which released PFAS chemicals into the surrounding environment.
Testing results have detected PFAS levels reaching 702,000 parts per trillion at the base, which exceeds the safety thresholds established by the Environmental Protection Agency.
If you lived or worked at Dyess Air Force Base and experienced health issues potentially related to PFAS exposure, you may qualify to pursue legal action for compensation.
Contact TruLaw using the chat on this page to receive an instant case evaluation that can determine your eligibility to join others in filing a Dyess Air Force Base PFAS Lawsuit today.
Our PFAS Contamination attorney at TruLaw is dedicated to supporting clients through the process of filing a PFAS Contamination lawsuit.
With extensive experience in chemical exposure cases, Jessica Paluch-Hoerman and our partner law firms work with litigation leaders to prove how toxic PFAS chemicals in water supplies caused you harm.
TruLaw focuses on securing compensation for medical expenses, pain and suffering, property damage, lost income, and ongoing health monitoring resulting from your PFAS exposure.
We understand the health and environmental impacts of PFAS exposure on your life and provide the personalized guidance you need when seeking justice.
Meet our lead PFAS Contamination attorney:
At TruLaw, we believe financial concerns should never stand in the way of justice.
That’s why we operate on a contingency fee basis—with this approach, you only pay legal fees after you’ve been awarded compensation for your injuries.
If you or a loved one experienced health complications from exposure to PFAS-contaminated water that include forms of cancer, immune disorders, liver damage, or thyroid disease, you may be eligible to seek compensation.
Contact TruLaw using the chat on this page to receive an instant case evaluation and determine whether you qualify to join others in filing a PFAS Contamination Lawsuit today.
Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) at Dyess Air Force Base present a serious health concern for military personnel, their families, and surrounding communities.
The base has reported alarmingly high PFAS contamination levels, with measurements reaching up to 2,052,000 parts per trillion (ppt), far exceeding the Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) 2024 drinking water standard of 4 ppt.
The contamination at Dyess is approximately 30,000 times higher than what is considered safe for human exposure.
This extensive pollution stems primarily from decades of using aqueous film-forming foam (AFFF) for firefighting training and emergency responses.
The accumulation of PFAS chemicals in the human body can trigger numerous adverse health outcomes, especially with prolonged exposure through contaminated drinking water.
According to research by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), exposure to certain levels of PFAS may lead to reproductive issues such as decreased fertility and pregnancy-induced hypertension.
Several important studies have linked PFAS exposure to a range of medical conditions:
Research conducted by the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS) has also found connections between PFAS exposure and altered metabolism, body weight regulation, and increased risk of childhood obesity.
For military personnel and families stationed at Dyess Air Force Base, these health risks are particularly concerning due to the extremely high contamination levels present on the installation.
The body of scientific evidence connecting PFAS exposure to adverse health outcomes has grown substantially in recent years.
According to the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR), studies with animals have demonstrated that PFAS exposure can cause damage to the liver and immune system, along with low birth weight, birth defects, and delayed development.
Multiple authoritative health organizations have reviewed the scientific data regarding PFAS:
Research from the National Cancer Institute found a link between serum PFOS levels and testicular cancer among military servicemen, especially among firefighters and those serving at bases with high PFAS contamination in water supplies.
This finding is particularly relevant to Dyess Air Force Base where PFAS levels are exceptionally high.
The scientific community continues to study these chemicals, but the weight of evidence now clearly points to meaningful health hazards from exposure.
The legal implications of these findings are substantial, with many affected individuals now pursuing claims.
Law firms are actively investigating the potential for PFAS litigation against manufacturers who may be responsible for contamination at and around military sites like Dyess Air Force Base.
For those who have suffered health effects after exposure to PFAS-contaminated water at Dyess, legal options may be available to seek compensation.
Dyess Air Force Base near Abilene, Texas, faces major challenges with water quality due to high concentrations of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS).
These human-made chemicals, used in firefighting foams at military installations for decades, have infiltrated groundwater on and around the base.
Recent analysis shows deeply troubling levels of PFAS in water sources at Dyess Air Force Base.
According to 2024 Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) standards, PFAS levels in the base’s water exceed regulatory limits.
The presence of these chemicals raises serious health concerns for those consuming this water.
Dr. Graham Peaslee, a physicist at Notre Dame University, warns that “everybody drinking that water is drinking water with PFAS concentrations significantly above levels that the EPA have decreed are the maximum allowable in drinking water.”
The contamination profile includes multiple PFAS compounds:
The extreme levels found at Dyess make it one of the most contaminated military installations in the country.
The primary source appears to be decades of using aqueous film-forming foam (AFFF) for firefighting training and emergency responses, with chemicals gradually seeping into groundwater supplies.
The Department of Defense (DoD) has acknowledged the widespread PFAS problem at military installations across the country, including Dyess Air Force Base.
Through September 2024, the DoD identified 722 active military installations, Base Realignment and Closure locations, National Guard facilities, and Formerly Used Defense Sites that require assessment for PFAS use or potential release.
The military’s approach to handling the contamination involves:
For affected areas like Dyess, the DoD has stated they will “initiate interim actions to address private drinking water wells impacted by PFAS from DoD activities where concentrations are known to be at or above three times the Maximum Contaminant Levels.”
These remediation efforts face criticism for moving too slowly.
In July 2024, the EPA and U.S. Army announced a joint project to conduct sampling and testing of private drinking water wells near military installations, which would inform remedial actions if results show PFAS contamination.
The legal action primarily targets the manufacturers of PFAS chemicals and AFFF, including companies like 3M, DuPont, and Chemours, rather than the military itself.
These manufacturers are accused of knowing about the health hazards associated with their products but failing to warn users or the public about these risks.
Individuals who successfully file PFAS contamination claims related to Dyess Air Force Base may be entitled to various forms of compensation:
For those concerned about potential PFAS exposure at Dyess Air Force Base, contacting a specialized attorney is the first step toward pursuing compensation.
Most law firms handling these cases offer free consultations and case evaluations to determine eligibility.
PFAS contamination extends well beyond Eaker Air Force Base, affecting hundreds of military installations across the United States.
The widespread use of AFFF firefighting foam has created a national contamination crisis at bases operated by all branches of the armed forces.
Additional military installations that contain PFAS contamination include, but are not limited to:
Testing at these facilities has revealed PFAS levels that frequently exceed safety standards by significant margins.
The Department of Defense faces growing pressure to expedite cleanup efforts, provide alternative water sources for affected communities, and take responsibility for decades of contamination.
Coordinated remediation plans now represent one of the largest environmental cleanup challenges in U.S. military history.
PFAS contamination lawsuits are being filed by individuals nationwide who experienced health problems from exposure to PFAS chemicals in drinking water.
TruLaw is currently accepting clients for the PFAS contamination lawsuit.
A few reasons to choose TruLaw for your PFAS contamination lawsuit include:
If you or a loved one suffered health problems related to PFAS-contaminated water, you may be eligible to seek compensation.
Contact TruLaw using the chat on this page to receive an instant case evaluation that can determine if you qualify for the PFAS Contamination Lawsuit today.
Based on similar PFAS lawsuits nationwide, affected individuals may expect settlement amounts ranging from $175,000 to $350,000, though actual compensation may vary depending on exposure duration, health impacts, and proximity to the contamination at Dyess Air Force Base.
Yes, Dyess Air Force Base is one of the 455 military sites confirmed to have PFAS contamination.
While specific concentration levels vary across installations, many bases like Dyess have reported concerning levels of these “forever chemicals” in groundwater and surrounding communities.
The Dyess Air Force Base PFAS lawsuit shares similarities with the Camp Lejeune case, though they involve different contaminants.
Both involve military facilities exposing personnel and residents to toxic substances, but the Camp Lejeune case spans decades (1950s-1980s) and has established legal precedents for military contamination claims.
Dyess Air Force Base’s Superfund designation by the EPA indicates serious environmental contamination requiring long-term cleanup.
The PFAS contamination is one of several environmental concerns at the base, complicating remediation efforts and strengthening the legal basis for lawsuits against the government.
Individuals who lived or worked at Dyess Air Force Base and were exposed to PFAS-contaminated water may qualify to join the lawsuit.
This typically includes military personnel, civilian employees, and family members who resided on or near the base and experienced health issues potentially linked to PFAS exposure.
The lawsuit recognizes various health conditions linked to PFAS exposure, including certain cancers (kidney, testicular, thyroid), high cholesterol, thyroid disease, pregnancy-induced hypertension, and ulcerative colitis.
Claimants must demonstrate both exposure at Dyess Air Force Base and diagnosed qualifying conditions.
Managing Attorney & Owner
With over 25 years of legal experience, Jessica Paluch-Hoerman is an Illinois lawyer, a CPA, and a mother of three. She spent the first decade of her career working as an international tax attorney at Deloitte.
In 2009, Jessie co-founded her own law firm with her husband – which has scaled to over 30 employees since its conception.
In 2016, Jessie founded TruLaw, which allows her to collaborate with attorneys and legal experts across the United States on a daily basis. This hypervaluable network of experts is what enables her to share the most reliable, accurate, and up-to-date legal information with our readers!
You can learn more about the PFAS Contamination Lawsuit by visiting any of our pages listed below:
Here, at TruLaw, we’re committed to helping victims get the justice they deserve.
Alongside our partner law firms, we have successfully collected over $3 Billion in verdicts and settlements on behalf of injured individuals.
Would you like our help?
At TruLaw, we fiercely combat corporations that endanger individuals’ well-being. If you’ve suffered injuries and believe these well-funded entities should be held accountable, we’re here for you.
With TruLaw, you gain access to successful and seasoned lawyers who maximize your chances of success. Our lawyers invest in you—they do not receive a dime until your lawsuit reaches a successful resolution!
AFFF Lawsuit claims are being filed against manufacturers of aqueous film-forming foam (AFFF), commonly used in firefighting.
Claims allege that companies such as 3M, DuPont, and Tyco Fire Products failed to adequately warn users about the potential dangers of AFFF exposure — including increased risks of various cancers and diseases.
Depo Provera Lawsuit claims are being filed by individuals who allege they developed meningioma (a type of brain tumor) after receiving Depo-Provera birth control injections.
A 2024 study found that women using Depo-Provera for at least 1 year are five times more likely to develop meningioma brain tumors compared to those not using the drug.
Suboxone Tooth Decay Lawsuit claims are being filed against Indivior, the manufacturer of Suboxone, a medication used to treat opioid addiction.
Claims allege that Indivior failed to adequately warn users about the potential dangers of severe tooth decay and dental injuries associated with Suboxone’s sublingual film version.
Social Media Harm Lawsuits are being filed against social media companies for allegedly causing mental health issues in children and teens.
Claims allege that companies like Meta, Google, ByteDance, and Snap designed addictive platforms that led to anxiety, depression, and other mental health issues without adequately warning users or parents.
Transvaginal Mesh Lawsuits are being filed against manufacturers of transvaginal mesh products used to treat pelvic organ prolapse (POP) and stress urinary incontinence (SUI).
Claims allege that companies like Ethicon, C.R. Bard, and Boston Scientific failed to adequately warn about potential dangers — including erosion, pain, and infection.
Bair Hugger Warming Blanket Lawsuits involve claims against 3M — alleging their surgical warming blankets caused severe infections and complications (particularly in hip and knee replacement surgeries).
Plaintiffs claim 3M failed to warn about potential risks — despite knowing about increased risk of deep joint infections since 2011.
Baby Formula NEC Lawsuit claims are being filed against manufacturers of cow’s milk-based baby formula products.
Claims allege that companies like Abbott Laboratories (Similac) and Mead Johnson & Company (Enfamil) failed to warn about the increased risk of necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) in premature infants.
Here, at TruLaw, we’re committed to helping victims get the justice they deserve.
Alongside our partner law firms, we have successfully collected over $3 Billion in verdicts and settlements on behalf of injured individuals.
Would you like our help?