Corry Station PFAS Lawsuit

Health Effects Linked to PFAS Exposure

Service members and families exposed to PFAS at Corry Station face serious health risks from these harmful substances.

Scientific research documents numerous conditions associated with PFAS exposure – ranging from various cancers to reproductive complications.

These health effects helps affected individuals recognize symptoms and seek appropriate medical care while building their legal cases.

Cancer and PFAS Exposure

Research establishes strong links between PFAS exposure and multiple cancer types.

Studies show individuals with higher PFAS blood levels face substantially increased cancer risks compared to unexposed populations.

PFAS exposure has been linked to several types of cancer:

• Kidney cancer – with documentation showing an increased risk in populations exposed at military installations using firefighting foams
• Testicular cancer – showing strong correlations with PFAS blood levels in multiple studies
• Prostate cancer – with emerging research linking PFAS to elevated cancer rates in military populations
• Pancreatic cancer – showing connections to PFAS exposure in recent epidemiological studies
• Thyroid cancer – particularly papillary thyroid cancer, which accounts for 80-85% of thyroid cancer cases

The National Cancer Institute recognizes elevated risks of these cancers from PFAS exposure at military installations using firefighting foams.

Recent epidemiological evidence indicates PFAS might be a risk factor for thyroid cancer through mechanisms involving hormonal disruption and cellular damage that promote tumor growth.

Non-Cancer Health Conditions

PFAS exposure affects multiple body systems, causing a range of health problems beyond cancer.

Women face particularly high risks, with studies showing elevated likelihood of thyroid hormone disruption.

PFAS exposure has been associated with several non-cancer health conditions:

• Thyroid disorders – including hypothyroidism and other thyroid function disruptions requiring lifelong treatment
• High cholesterol – with strong correlations between PFAS blood levels and elevated cholesterol, increasing heart disease and stroke risks
• Liver damage – causing enzyme changes and potential liver disease
• Immune system dysfunction – affecting vaccine responses and overall disease resistance

These hazardous substances interfere with normal hormone production, causing metabolic problems and systemic health issues that often require ongoing medical management.

Reproductive and Developmental Effects

Pregnant women exposed to PFAS face risks of serious complications that threaten both maternal and infant health during pregnancy and delivery.

Children exposed to PFAS in utero or through contaminated water experience developmental delays and potential long-term health effects.

Pregnancy complications occur more frequently in PFAS-exposed women, with documented increases in preeclampsia, gestational diabetes, and pregnancy-induced hypertension.

Low birth weight and preterm birth also occur more frequently in PFAS-exposed pregnancies.

Fertility problems affect both men and women exposed to these chemicals, with studies documenting decreased fertility rates across affected populations.

The intergenerational nature of PFAS harm means exposure effects can pass to future generations through genetic and developmental mechanisms.

Who Qualifies for the Corry Station PFAS Lawsuit

Multiple groups affected by PFAS contamination at Corry Station may qualify for legal action against chemical manufacturers and other responsible parties.

Eligibility depends on exposure duration, health conditions developed, and ability to document time spent at the installation.

Veterans, family members, and civilian workers all potentially have valid claims for financial compensation.

Military Personnel and Veterans

Active duty service members stationed at Corry Station for at least six consecutive months after 1970 may qualify for PFAS lawsuits.

Veterans who served at the installation during contamination periods maintain eligibility regardless of current location or discharge status.

Military personnel who may qualify for PFAS lawsuits include, but are not limited to:

• Active duty service members stationed at Corry Station for at least six consecutive months after 1970
• Veterans who served at the installation during contamination periods
• Air Force, National Guard, and Reserve members who completed training exercises at Corry Station (if they meet exposure duration requirements)

Service records showing duty station assignments, dates of service, and specific work locations strengthen claims.

Medical records documenting PFAS-related health conditions connect exposure to current illnesses – supporting compensation claims.

Family Members and Dependents

Spouses and children who lived in base housing at Corry Station qualify for PFAS lawsuits if they resided there for one cumulative year or more.

Family members consumed contaminated drinking water, bathed in it, and cooked with it daily – resulting in substantial exposure levels.

Pregnant women who lived on base during their pregnancies face particular eligibility due to documented risks to maternal and fetal health.

Children born with health conditions after parental PFAS exposure may file claims for developmental delays, birth defects, or other complications.

Documentation that can establish residency includes, but is not limited to:

• Base housing records
• Dependent ID cards
• School enrollment documents
• Other proof of on-base residence

Family members should document all health conditions potentially linked to PFAS exposure, including those developing years after leaving Corry Station.

Civilian Employees and Contractors

Department of Defense civilian workers employed at Corry Station qualify for PFAS lawsuits based on workplace exposure.

Contractors who worked on base regularly (including maintenance crews, construction workers, and service providers) maintain eligibility if they meet exposure duration requirements.

Firefighters and emergency responders face particularly high qualification likelihood due to direct AFFF exposure during training and emergency responses.

Employment verification establishes exposure for civilian workers.

Pay stubs, employment contracts, work badges, and human resources records prove time spent at Corry Station.

Civilians should document specific work locations – particularly if duties involved areas with known contamination like firefighting training grounds or maintenance facilities near AFFF storage areas.

Building Your PFAS Exposure Case

Successful PFAS lawsuits require thorough documentation connecting Corry Station exposure to health conditions.

Building a strong case involves gathering military or employment records, obtaining medical evidence, and understanding potential damages.

Working with experienced attorneys helps ensure all necessary documentation supports your claim for compensation from chemical manufacturers and responsible parties.

Documenting Your Time at Corry Station

Military personnel should request complete service records through the National Archives, including DD-214 forms showing discharge information and duty station assignments.

Personnel files, orders, and training records establish specific dates at Corry Station. Veterans can submit Standard Form 180 online or by mail to obtain these important documents.

Documentation that can help establish residence and employment at Corry Station includes, but is not limited to:

• Military personnel records – DD-214 forms, personnel files, orders, and training records establishing specific dates and locations
• Base housing records – proving family member residence at Corry Station
• Family documentation – school enrollment documents, dependent ID cards, medical records from base facilities, and utility bills
• Civilian employment verification – from human resources departments or the Defense Finance and Accounting Service
• Work-related documents – pay stubs, W-2 forms, work badges, and contractor agreements establishing workplace exposure

Creating a detailed timeline helps attorneys understand exposure duration and intensity.

Workers should document specific job locations – particularly near firefighting training areas or AFFF storage facilities.

Medical Evidence Requirements

Complete medical records from military treatment facilities, VA hospitals, and civilian providers prove PFAS-related health conditions.

Documentation should include diagnoses, treatment histories, and ongoing care requirements.

PFAS blood testing provides direct evidence of exposure levels, though VA medical centers currently don’t offer routine testing. Private laboratories can perform these tests, with results becoming important lawsuit evidence.

Testing shows current PFAS levels – helping establish connections between exposure and health conditions.

Veterans should enroll in the VA Environmental Health Registry for comprehensive evaluations documenting toxic exposures.

Registry participation creates official records linking military service to environmental hazards, strengthening disability and lawsuit claims.

Medical monitoring documentation demonstrates ongoing health concerns requiring future care.

Calculating Potential Damages

PFAS lawsuit damages encompass multiple categories of compensation based on the impact of exposure-related health conditions.

Types of damages in PFAS lawsuits include, but are not limited to:

• Medical expenses – past and future costs for treating exposure-related conditions, including cancer treatment, thyroid medication, cardiovascular care, and monitoring costs
• Lost wages and earning capacity – compensation for inability to work due to health conditions, calculated using employment records, tax returns, and expert testimony
• Pain and suffering – recognition of physical discomfort and emotional distress from PFAS-related illnesses
• Wrongful death claims – damages for families losing loved ones to PFAS-caused cancers or other conditions

Attorneys calculate lifetime medical needs based on diagnoses and treatment requirements.

Future lost earnings calculations consider age, occupation, and disability severity.

Settlement amounts vary based on exposure severity, health impacts, and available evidence – with individual cases potentially reaching several hundred thousand dollars.

Current Status of Corry Station PFAS Litigation

PFAS litigation continues evolving as courts consolidate cases and major settlements emerge.

The multidistrict litigation (MDL 2873) in South Carolina centralizes thousands of AFFF-related claims, while individual lawsuits proceed in various jurisdictions.

Recent settlements with chemical manufacturers signal potential compensation pathways for Corry Station victims – though individual claims remain separate from water system settlements.

Individual Lawsuits vs. Class Actions

Individual PFAS lawsuits allow personalized representation focusing on specific health injuries and exposure circumstances.

Plaintiffs maintain control over their cases, choosing attorneys and settlement decisions independently.

Individual PFAS lawsuits typically seek higher compensation reflecting unique damages that include, but are not limited to:

• Medical costs
• Lost wages
• Pain and suffering

The AFFF multidistrict litigation consolidates pretrial proceedings before Judge Richard M. Gergel in the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina.

MDL 2873 includes over 10,000 cases involving military personnel, firefighters, and civilians exposed to PFAS-containing firefighting foam.

Consolidation streamlines discovery and expert testimony while preserving individual case characteristics.

Class action settlements primarily address public water system contamination rather than personal injury claims.

The approved settlements compensate water utilities for PFAS remediation costs but don’t preclude individual health-related lawsuits.

Service members and families retain rights to pursue separate claims for personal injuries regardless of water system settlements.

Recent Settlements and Verdicts

3M agreed to pay up to $12.5 billion settling public water supplier claims, with payments beginning in 2024 and continuing through 2036. DuPont and related companies reached a separate $1.185 billion settlement for water system contamination.

These agreements resolve municipal claims but leave individual personal injury cases unaffected.

Settlement precedents from other military installations provide benchmarks for Corry Station cases.

Individual PFAS settlements range from several hundred thousand dollars to millions depending on cancer diagnoses, exposure duration, and documented damages.

Key factors influencing compensation include, but are not limited to:

• Medical expenses
• Disability severity
• Age at diagnosis
• Quality of life impacts

Timeline expectations vary between consolidated MDL proceedings and individual state court cases.

Bellwether trials testing legal theories and damage models typically occur before widespread settlement negotiations.

Most PFAS cases resolve through negotiated settlements rather than trials – with resolution timelines extending 2-4 years from filing.

Government Response and Compensation Programs

The Department of Defense allocated billions for environmental remediation at contaminated military installations including Corry Station.

Cleanup efforts focus on key areas that include, but are not limited to:

• Containing PFAS plumes
• Treating contaminated groundwater
• Providing alternative water sources

However, remediation timelines span decades given PFAS persistence in the environment.

VA disability benefits offer potential compensation for veterans with PFAS-related conditions, though no presumptive service connections currently exist.

Veterans must prove individual connections between military service and health conditions through medical evidence and exposure documentation.

Successful VA claims provide monthly compensation and healthcare coverage separate from lawsuit settlements.

Congressional efforts to establish presumptive benefits for PFAS-exposed veterans continue through proposed legislation like the VET PFAS Act.

These bills would automatically connect certain conditions to military PFAS exposure – simplifying VA claims processes.

Until passage, veterans pursue case-by-case disability determinations while maintaining rights to civil litigation against chemical manufacturers.

Legal Process and Timeline for Filing a PFAS Lawsuit

From the initial case evaluation through potential resolution, each step requires careful attention to deadlines and procedural requirements.

Working with experienced environmental litigation attorneys ensures proper filing and enhances compensation opportunities while meeting all legal obligations.

Statute of Limitations Considerations

Florida law provides a four-year statute of limitations for personal injury claims, including toxic exposure cases.

The clock typically starts when victims discover their injury and its connection to PFAS exposure – not necessarily when exposure occurred.

This discovery rule proves particularly important for latent conditions like cancer developing years after military service.

Courts may extend filing deadlines under specific circumstances, particularly for conditions with long latency periods.

Veterans diagnosed with PFAS-related cancers decades after service often qualify for these extensions.

However, prompt action remains important once health conditions manifest and potential connections to Corry Station exposure become apparent.

Military personnel face unique considerations regarding filing deadlines that include, but are not limited to:

• Active duty status affecting limitation periods
• Deployment schedules impacting case management
• VA disability claim processes that may influence timing
• Special protections in some jurisdictions that toll statutes during active duty periods

Consulting attorneys immediately upon diagnosis ensures deadlines don’t jeopardize valid claims.

What to Expect During Litigation

Initial case evaluation involves reviewing military records, medical documentation, and exposure evidence.

Attorneys assess claim strength, identify responsible parties, and determine optimal filing jurisdiction.

This evaluation phase typically requires several weeks to gather necessary documentation and expert opinions.

Discovery proceedings allow both sides to exchange information through document requests, interrogatories, and depositions.

Plaintiffs provide testimony about their military service, exposure circumstances, and health impacts. Defense attorneys may request medical examinations and access to treatment records.

Discovery typically spans 12-18 months in challenging PFAS cases.

Expert witnesses play vital roles in PFAS litigation and include, but are not limited to:

• Toxicologists – explaining how toxic agents affect human health
• Medical experts – connecting specific diagnoses to contamination
• Environmental engineers – testifying about exposure pathways and contamination levels

Settlement negotiations often intensify after expert reports strengthen plaintiff positions.

Choosing Legal Representation

Environmental litigation experience proves vital when selecting PFAS attorneys.

Firms handling military contamination cases understand unique aspects of military operations, chain of command documentation, and VA interactions.

Ask potential attorneys about their track record with toxic exposure cases and specific PFAS litigation experience.

Important questions to ask potential attorneys include, but are not limited to:

• Their approach to case investigation
• Expert witness networks they utilize
• Settlement negotiation strategies
• Fee structures and case expense handling
• Communication protocols and expectations

Understanding these factors helps establish clear expectations from the beginning.

Most PFAS attorneys work on contingency fees – typically 33-40% of settlements or verdicts.

Contingency fee arrangements mean no upfront costs for plaintiffs. Attorneys advance case expenses, with these costs getting reimbursed from settlements or verdicts.

Case expenses that attorneys typically advance include, but are not limited to:

• Expert witness fees
• Medical record retrieval costs
• Court filing fees

This arrangement ensures financial barriers don’t prevent valid claims.

The process requires minimal involvement from clients during initial phases.

Reputable firms offer free consultations to evaluate cases before engagement.

Taking Action to Protect Your Rights

Time remains important for Corry Station personnel and families affected by PFAS exposure.

Taking immediate steps to document exposure, seek medical care, and connect with legal resources protects both health and legal rights.

Immediate Steps to Take

Schedule PFAS blood testing through commercial laboratories like Quest Diagnostics or Eurofins to establish current exposure levels.

These tests analyze multiple PFAS compounds – typically costing $200-400 without insurance coverage.

Results provide important evidence linking military service to chemical exposure, strengthening both VA disability claims and civil lawsuits.

Important immediate actions to take include, but are not limited to:

• Schedule PFAS blood testing through commercial laboratories to establish current exposure levels
• Gather all military service records including duty station assignments and base housing documentation
• Collect medical documentation showing any health conditions potentially linked to PFAS exposure
• Create detailed timelines documenting specific work locations and time periods at Corry Station
• Document family member information including pregnancy dates, children’s birth records, and health conditions
• Contact experienced PFAS litigation attorneys for free case evaluations to understand legal options

Begin gathering all military service records, medical documentation, and exposure evidence immediately.

Many firms offer consultations without obligation – reviewing your exposure history and medical conditions to assess claim viability.

Early attorney involvement ensures proper documentation and prevents missing important filing deadlines.

Ongoing Medical Monitoring

Veterans should enroll in VA healthcare to access free toxic exposure screenings mandated by the PACT Act.

Every VA-enrolled veteran qualifies for screening at least every five years, with Environmental Health Coordinators available at VA facilities to guide the process.

These screenings document exposure concerns and connect veterans with appropriate healthcare services.

Regular health screenings prove vital for early detection of PFAS-related conditions.

Key areas to monitor through regular health screenings include, but are not limited to:

• Thyroid function – through regular hormone level testing
• Cholesterol levels – monitoring cardiovascular health impacts
• Kidney health – assessing potential organ damage
• Cancer markers – screening for early detection of PFAS-related cancers
• Fertility evaluations – particularly important for men exposed to PFAS
• Pregnancy risk discussions – important consultations for women of childbearing age

Maintaining detailed medical records strengthens future compensation claims.

Document all new symptoms or diagnoses potentially related to PFAS exposure. Keep copies of test results, treatment plans, and physician notes connecting health conditions to military service.

VA Environmental Health Registry participation creates official records linking toxic exposures to ongoing health problems – supporting both disability benefits and lawsuit claims.

Connecting with Other Affected Individuals

Military environmental advocacy groups provide valuable resources and community support for PFAS-exposed veterans.

Organizations that offer resources and support include, but are not limited to:

• Military Environmental Advocacy Group (MEAG) – providing resources and community support for PFAS-exposed veterans
• Environmental Working Group – maintaining databases of contaminated military installations and offering educational materials about health risks
• Local support groups – connecting families facing similar PFAS-related health challenges

These organizations amplify veteran voices pushing for stronger protections and compensation programs while maintaining focus on public health.

Sharing experiences helps identify common symptoms, treatment options, and legal strategies.

Exercise caution when discussing active litigation on public social media platforms. Defense attorneys monitor these discussions – potentially using statements against plaintiffs.

Private support groups offer safer spaces for sharing information while protecting legal interests.

Focus public advocacy on raising awareness rather than discussing specific case details.

Addressing Ongoing Contamination Concerns

Recent PFAS testing at Corry Station reveals contamination extends well beyond initial estimates, with only toxic contaminants representing a fraction of the overall environmental challenge.

Ongoing monitoring reveals that challenges remain for complete remediation, particularly given PFAS persistence in groundwater systems.

Veterans and their families who developed health issues after exposure continue documenting illnesses linked to their time at the installation.

Current monitoring efforts focus on:

• Tracking contamination spread in groundwater
• Assessing drinking water safety in surrounding communities
• Identifying residents who may have such elevated levels of PFAS in their blood

Diseases linked to PFAS exposure continue emerging as research progresses, with studies revealing additional health connections requiring medical attention.

Environmental remediation work proceeds slowly, as these chemicals resist traditional cleanup methods and continue affecting water supplies years after initial release.

Medical professionals strongly encourage anyone with potential exposure to seek regular health screenings, as further contamination pathways may exist that weren’t initially recognized.

The complexity of addressing PFAS contamination across multiple environmental media presents ongoing challenges that require minimal involvement from residents in cleanup decisions but sustained attention to health monitoring needs.

How Can A PFAS Contamination Attorney from TruLaw Help You?

Our PFAS Contamination attorney at TruLaw is dedicated to supporting clients through the process of filing a PFAS Contamination lawsuit.

With extensive experience in chemical exposure cases, Jessica Paluch-Hoerman and our partner law firms work with litigation leaders to prove how toxic chemicals in water supplies caused you harm.

TruLaw focuses on securing compensation for medical expenses, pain and suffering, property damage, lost income, and ongoing health monitoring resulting from your PFAS exposure.

We understand the health and environmental impacts of PFAS exposure on your life and provide the personalized guidance you need when seeking justice.

Meet the Lead PFAS Contamination Attorney at TruLaw

Meet our lead PFAS Contamination attorney:

• Jessica Paluch-Hoerman: As founder and managing attorney of TruLaw, Jessica brings her experience in product liability and personal injury litigation to her client-centered approach by prioritizing open communication and personalized attention with her clients. Through TruLaw and partner law firms, Jessica has helped collect over $3 billion dollars on behalf of injured individuals across all 50 states through verdicts and negotiated settlements.

How much does hiring a PFAS Contamination lawyer from TruLaw cost?

At TruLaw, we believe financial concerns should never stand in the way of justice.

That’s why we operate on a contingency fee basis—with this approach, you only pay legal fees after you’ve been awarded compensation for your injuries.

If you or a loved one experienced health complications from exposure to PFAS-contaminated water that include forms of cancer, immune disorders, liver damage, or thyroid disease, you may be eligible to seek compensation.

Contact TruLaw using the chat on this page to receive an instant case evaluation and determine whether you qualify to join others in filing a PFAS Contamination Lawsuit today.

TruLaw: Accepting Clients with Corry Station PFAS Lawsuit Claims

PFAS contamination lawsuits are being filed by individuals nationwide who experienced health problems from exposure to PFAS chemicals in drinking water.

TruLaw is currently accepting clients for the PFAS contamination lawsuit.

A few reasons to choose TruLaw for your PFAS contamination lawsuit include:

• If We Don’t Win, You Don’t Pay: The PFAS contamination lawyers at TruLaw and our partner firms operate on a contingency fee basis, meaning we only get paid if you win.
• Expertise: We have decades of experience handling toxic exposure cases similar to the PFAS contamination lawsuit.
• Successful Track Record: TruLaw and our partner law firms have helped our clients recover billions of dollars in compensation through verdicts and negotiated settlements.

If you or a loved one suffered health problems related to PFAS-contaminated water, you may be eligible to seek compensation.

Contact TruLaw using the chat on this page to receive an instant case evaluation that can determine if you qualify for the PFAS Contamination Lawsuit today.