Attorney Jessie Paluch, founder of TruLaw, has over 25 years of experience as a personal injury and mass tort attorney, and previously worked as an international tax attorney at Deloitte. Jessie collaborates with attorneys nationwide — enabling her to share reliable, up-to-date legal information with our readers.
This article has been written and reviewed for legal accuracy and clarity by the team of writers and legal experts at TruLaw and is as accurate as possible. This content should not be taken as legal advice from an attorney. If you would like to learn more about our owner and experienced injury lawyer, Jessie Paluch, you can do so here.
TruLaw does everything possible to make sure the information in this article is up to date and accurate. If you need specific legal advice about your case, contact us by using the chat on the bottom of this page. This article should not be taken as advice from an attorney.
On this page, we’ll discuss how SSDI and SSI differ, what are their eligibility criteria, who qualifies to file an SSDI Lawsuit, and much more.
Understanding the labyrinth of disability benefits can often feel overwhelming, with acronyms like SSDI and SSI creating confusion for many seeking assistance.
As an expert in Social Security programs with years of experience navigating these waters,
We are here to clarify the distinctions between Social Security Disability Insurance (SSDI) and Supplemental Security Income (SSI).
Both are critical programs the Social Security Administration runs to support individuals who cannot work due to disability.
.
While they may seem similar at first glance, SSDI and SSI serve different populations based on distinct eligibility requirements—one rooted in work history and another in financial need.
This article is grasping this distinction is crucial—not only could it determine which program you qualify for and how much assistance you receive.
Stay informed; read on to unravel this complexity.
Social Security Disability Insurance (SSDI) and Supplemental Security Income (SSI) are critical components of the social safety net administered by the Social Security Administration (SSA) to provide disability benefits to eligible individuals.
While both programs aid those with disabilities, they have distinct eligibility requirements and funding sources.
The main difference between Supplemental Security Income (SSI) and Social Security Disability Insurance (SSDI) is that SSI is an entitlement program with no work-related requirements, whereas SSDI is an earned benefit that has work requirements to qualify.
Both programs pay monthly benefits to people with disabilities.
Social Security Disability Insurance: provides benefits to disabled or blind persons who are “insured” by workers’ contributions to the Social Security trust fund.
These contributions are based on your earnings (or those of your spouse or parents) as required by the Federal Insurance Contributions Act (FICA).
Your dependents may also be eligible for benefits from your earnings record.
Supplemental Security Income: distributes cash assistance payments to aged, blind, and disabled persons (including children) who have limited income and resources.
The Federal Government funds SSI from general tax revenues.
Many states pay a supplemental benefit to persons in addition to their Federal benefits.
It’s important to note that although both SSDI and SSI are disability programs, they have very important differences in the rules affecting eligibility and benefit payments.
Eligibility for Social Security Disability Insurance (SSDI) and Supplemental Security Income (SSI) is determined through distinct criteria focusing on an individual’s work history, income levels, and the severity of their disability.
SSDI is designed for individuals who have engaged in work activities and contributed to Social Security through payroll taxes.
A few specific benchmarks that characterize SSDI benefits include, but are not limited to:
SSI targets individuals with limited income and resources, providing financial assistance regardless of work history.
The eligibility for SSI is based on a variety of factors, such as:
SSI and SSDI serve as pivotal elements of the United States’ social security system, offering vital support to individuals facing significant disabilities or financial needs.
When applying for SSDI or SSI benefits, it’s important to understand the distinction between the application processes for these two programs.
Accurate and complete submission of required documents is crucial for a smooth application process.
The SSDI application process necessitates that the applicant provides comprehensive medical evidence to support their claim of disability.
They require proof of a significant work history from which the work credits are derived.
For those applying for family benefits such as spousal or children’s benefits, the application process requires the following steps:
The Social Security Administration (SSA) assesses whether an individual has accumulated enough credits to be eligible for SSDI.
It’s advisable to start the process by checking eligibility information through government information services online.
SSI, on the other hand, is designed for individuals who have limited income and resources.
The application process for SSI does not require work credits but does necessitate proof of age, disability, or blindness, along with financial criteria that fall within stipulated limits.
To apply for SSI, prospective beneficiaries should also gather pertinent medical evidence and financial information.
While individuals can begin their Social Security disability application online, completing the process often requires additional steps, such as:
For both SSDI and SSI, the review process may take several months, during which additional information may be requested.
Once approved, receiving benefits will typically commence after a specific waiting period, and beneficiaries will be notified of the monthly benefits amount they are to receive.
Both SSDI and SSI programs are important for individuals with disabilities, but they operate differently.
Each program offers distinct support pathways, differentiated by its eligibility criteria, including work history, income levels, and resource limitations.
For those qualifying for Social Security Disability Insurance (SSDI), the program acts as a crucial safety net, anchored by previous contributions to the Social Security system through work credits.
Here’s what beneficiaries need to know:
Turning our attention to Supplemental Security Income (SSI), this program extends a helping hand to those facing significant financial constraints.
Consider these pivotal aspects:
Through the tailored support of SSDI and SSI, individuals with disabilities find varying degrees of financial and healthcare assistance, reflecting the programs’ shared commitment to safeguarding the well-being of vulnerable populations.
When navigating the landscapes of Supplemental Security Income (SSI) and Social Security Disability Insurance (SSDI), it’s crucial for beneficiaries to understand how these disability programs interact with other benefits and what responsibilities come with receiving such assistance.
The impact of Social Security Disability Insurance (SSDI) and Supplemental Security Income (SSI) on other benefits is significant and can be summarized as follows:
It’s important to understand the following responsibilities of beneficiaries receiving SSDI or SSI:
Eligibility for SSDI is primarily based on an individual’s work history and the amount of Social Security taxes they have paid.
Conversely, SSI eligibility hinges on age, disability, or blindness and is means-tested, considering the applicant’s income and assets.
The benefit amount for SSDI is calculated using the beneficiary’s earnings record, reflecting how much they have contributed to Social Security.
On the other hand, SSI payments are determined by federal and varying state supplemental amounts, considering the individual’s income and resources.
The approval process for both SSDI and SSI involves assessing the medical eligibility of an applicant; however, SSDI also requires a review of the applicant’s work credits, while SSI reviews financial eligibility.
Receiving both SSDI and SSI benefits simultaneously is possible for individuals who meet the medical disability criteria and have limited income and resources, in addition to having a qualifying work history for SSDI.
SSDI eligibility requires a certain number of work credits, which are accumulated based on the total number of years worked and contributions to the Social Security system through payroll taxes.
SSI does not consider work history in its eligibility criteria.
Typically, SSDI offers higher monthly payments than SSI, as SSDI is based on the beneficiary’s earning history.
SSI payments are often lower and meant to provide for the basic needs of individuals with little to no income.
Experienced Attorney & Legal SaaS CEO
With over 25 years of legal experience, Jessie is an Illinois lawyer, a CPA, and a mother of three. She spent the first decade of her career working as an international tax attorney at Deloitte.
In 2009, Jessie co-founded her own law firm with her husband – which has scaled to over 30 employees since its conception.
In 2016, Jessie founded TruLaw, which allows her to collaborate with attorneys and legal experts across the United States on a daily basis. This hypervaluable network of experts is what enables her to share reliable legal information with her readers!
You can learn more about the Social Security Disability Insurance by visiting any of our pages listed below:
Here, at TruLaw, we’re committed to helping victims get the justice they deserve.
Alongside our partner law firms, we have successfully collected over $3 Billion in verdicts and settlements on behalf of injured individuals.
Would you like our help?
At TruLaw, we fiercely combat corporations that endanger individuals’ well-being. If you’ve suffered injuries and believe these well-funded entities should be held accountable, we’re here for you.
With TruLaw, you gain access to successful and seasoned lawyers who maximize your chances of success. Our lawyers invest in you—they do not receive a dime until your lawsuit reaches a successful resolution!
Do you believe you’re entitled to compensation?
Use our Instant Case Evaluator to find out in as little as 60 seconds!
AFFF Lawsuit claims are being filed against manufacturers of aqueous film-forming foam (AFFF), commonly used in firefighting.
Claims allege that companies such as 3M, DuPont, and Tyco Fire Products failed to adequately warn users about the potential dangers of AFFF exposure — including increased risks of various cancers and diseases.
Suboxone Tooth Decay Lawsuit claims are being filed against Indivior, the manufacturer of Suboxone, a medication used to treat opioid addiction.
Claims allege that Indivior failed to adequately warn users about the potential dangers of severe tooth decay and dental injuries associated with Suboxone’s sublingual film version.
Social Media Harm Lawsuits are being filed against social media companies for allegedly causing mental health issues in children and teens.
Claims allege that companies like Meta, Google, ByteDance, and Snap designed addictive platforms that led to anxiety, depression, and other mental health issues without adequately warning users or parents.
Transvaginal Mesh Lawsuits are being filed against manufacturers of transvaginal mesh products used to treat pelvic organ prolapse (POP) and stress urinary incontinence (SUI).
Claims allege that companies like Ethicon, C.R. Bard, and Boston Scientific failed to adequately warn about potential dangers — including erosion, pain, and infection.
Bair Hugger Warming Blanket Lawsuits involve claims against 3M — alleging their surgical warming blankets caused severe infections and complications (particularly in hip and knee replacement surgeries).
Plaintiffs claim 3M failed to warn about potential risks — despite knowing about increased risk of deep joint infections since 2011.
Baby Formula NEC Lawsuit claims are being filed against manufacturers of cow’s milk-based baby formula products.
Claims allege that companies like Abbott Laboratories (Similac) and Mead Johnson & Company (Enfamil) failed to warn about the increased risk of necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) in premature infants.
Here, at TruLaw, we’re committed to helping victims get the justice they deserve.
Alongside our partner law firms, we have successfully collected over $3 Billion in verdicts and settlements on behalf of injured individuals.
Would you like our help?