Attorney Jessie Paluch, founder of TruLaw, has over 25 years of experience as a personal injury and mass tort attorney, and previously worked as an international tax attorney at Deloitte. Jessie collaborates with attorneys nationwide — enabling her to share reliable, up-to-date legal information with our readers.
This article has been written and reviewed for legal accuracy and clarity by the team of writers and legal experts at TruLaw and is as accurate as possible. This content should not be taken as legal advice from an attorney. If you would like to learn more about our owner and experienced injury lawyer, Jessie Paluch, you can do so here.
TruLaw does everything possible to make sure the information in this article is up to date and accurate. If you need specific legal advice about your case, contact us by using the chat on the bottom of this page. This article should not be taken as advice from an attorney.
On April 21, 2017, Hylands Teething Tablet Lawsuit 2017 was filed by TorHoerman Law against Hyland’s Inc and Standard Homeopathic Laboratories on behalf of two victims of belladonna side effects – Bryan Morales II and Delyla Sanchez.
Sadly, Delyla passed away and like many others, Delyla’s family is looking for answers.
Belladonna is a toxic and poisonous plant that has been used as a poison since Roman times.
Belladonna causes toxic responses in the body including dry mouth, enlarged pupils, blurred vision, red dry skin, fever, fast heartbeat, inability to urinate or sweat, hallucinations, spasms, mental problems, convulsions and coma.
Belladonna can also aggravate congestive heart failure, constipation, down syndrome, esophageal reflux, fever, stomach ulcers, gastrointestinal tract infections, gastrointestinal tract blockages, hiatal hernia, high blood pressure, narrow-angle glaucoma, psychiatric disorders, rapid heartbeat, ulcerative colitis and urinary retention.
The lawsuit alleges that Hyland’s teething products caused the belladonna side effects that caused injury and death to the infants.
Adverse Event data collected by the FDA establishes that the teething products were inherently unsafe, and that Hylands was aware of the dangerous nature of these products as early as 2010.
The lawsuit alleges that Hylands disregarded known belladonna side effects rand continued to sell these products without informing or warning the public, including the families of Bryan and Delyla.
Hylands Teething Tablet Lawsuit 2017 contains eleven causes of action including design defect, inadequate warning, manufacturing defect, negligence, negligence misrepresentation, fraud misrepresentation, fraudulent concealment, express warranty, breach of implied warranty of merchantability, wrongful death and survival.
According to the lawsuit, the teething products used by Sanchez and Morales were in a condition unreasonably dangerous at the time they left Hyland’s manufacturing.
Plaintiffs allege that the families of Sanchez and Morales used the teething products in a manner that was reasonably forseeable to Hylands and the unreasonably dangerous condition of the teething products was the cause of the injuries.
At the time Sanchez and Morales used the teething products, the lawsuit alleges that Hylands knew of the potential risks and toxic effects of the teething products, but, failed to adequately warn of these risks.
Furthermore, Hyland’s teething tablets and gel label failed to provide adequate directions on how to use the products.
Prior to recall, the Hyland’s Teething Tablet label read:
to further clarify the homeopathic dosages of Belladonna in Baby Teething Tablets, a 10-pound child would have to accidentally ingest, all at the same time, more than a dozen bottles of 135 Baby Teething Tablets before experiencing even dry mouth from the product.
And the Hyland’s Teething Tablet Gel Read:
to further clarify the homeopathic dosages of Belladonna in Baby Teething Tablets, a 10-pound child would have to accidentally ingest, all at the same time, more than a dozen bottles of 135 Baby Teething Tablets before experiencing even dry mouth from the product.
Hylands designed, distributed, manufactured, marketed and sold their natural remedy teething tablets such that they were dangerous, unsafe and defective in manufacture.
Furthermore, Hylands had a duty to exercise reasonable and prudent care in the development, testing, design, manufacture, inspection, marketing, labeling, promotion, distribution and sale of the teething products and they knew or should have known that the teething tablets were dangerous.
Prior to the time the Sanchez and Morales families used the teething tablets, Hyland’s represented to the general public that these natural remedy teething products were safe and effective for use.
Hylands made these representations both negligently and intentionally (fraudulently).
Furthermore, after learning of toxic responses to the teething tablets, Hylands concealed this information and continued to assure the public that the product was safe.
Check If You Qualify for a Hyland’s Teething Tablet Case
Link here to see the Morales and Sanchez v. Hylands Homeopathic Lawsuit filed on 4/21/17
Experienced Attorney & Legal SaaS CEO
With over 25 years of legal experience, Jessie is an Illinois lawyer, a CPA, and a mother of three. She spent the first decade of her career working as an international tax attorney at Deloitte.
In 2009, Jessie co-founded her own law firm with her husband – which has scaled to over 30 employees since its conception.
In 2016, Jessie founded TruLaw, which allows her to collaborate with attorneys and legal experts across the United States on a daily basis. This hypervaluable network of experts is what enables her to share reliable legal information with her readers!
Here, at TruLaw, we’re committed to helping victims get the justice they deserve.
Alongside our partner law firms, we have successfully collected over $3 Billion in verdicts and settlements on behalf of injured individuals.
Would you like our help?
At TruLaw, we fiercely combat corporations that endanger individuals’ well-being. If you’ve suffered injuries and believe these well-funded entities should be held accountable, we’re here for you.
With TruLaw, you gain access to successful and seasoned lawyers who maximize your chances of success. Our lawyers invest in you—they do not receive a dime until your lawsuit reaches a successful resolution!
Do you believe you’re entitled to compensation?
Use our Instant Case Evaluator to find out in as little as 60 seconds!
AFFF Lawsuit claims are being filed against manufacturers of aqueous film-forming foam (AFFF), commonly used in firefighting.
Claims allege that companies such as 3M, DuPont, and Tyco Fire Products failed to adequately warn users about the potential dangers of AFFF exposure — including increased risks of various cancers and diseases.
Suboxone Tooth Decay Lawsuit claims are being filed against Indivior, the manufacturer of Suboxone, a medication used to treat opioid addiction.
Claims allege that Indivior failed to adequately warn users about the potential dangers of severe tooth decay and dental injuries associated with Suboxone’s sublingual film version.
Social Media Harm Lawsuits are being filed against social media companies for allegedly causing mental health issues in children and teens.
Claims allege that companies like Meta, Google, ByteDance, and Snap designed addictive platforms that led to anxiety, depression, and other mental health issues without adequately warning users or parents.
Transvaginal Mesh Lawsuits are being filed against manufacturers of transvaginal mesh products used to treat pelvic organ prolapse (POP) and stress urinary incontinence (SUI).
Claims allege that companies like Ethicon, C.R. Bard, and Boston Scientific failed to adequately warn about potential dangers — including erosion, pain, and infection.
Bair Hugger Warming Blanket Lawsuits involve claims against 3M — alleging their surgical warming blankets caused severe infections and complications (particularly in hip and knee replacement surgeries).
Plaintiffs claim 3M failed to warn about potential risks — despite knowing about increased risk of deep joint infections since 2011.
Baby Formula NEC Lawsuit claims are being filed against manufacturers of cow’s milk-based baby formula products.
Claims allege that companies like Abbott Laboratories (Similac) and Mead Johnson & Company (Enfamil) failed to warn about the increased risk of necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) in premature infants.
Here, at TruLaw, we’re committed to helping victims get the justice they deserve.
Alongside our partner law firms, we have successfully collected over $3 Billion in verdicts and settlements on behalf of injured individuals.
Would you like our help?
Late last week, Youngstown Grape Distributors Inc. issued a voluntary recall of two lots of their Happy Moose Juice, citing a production error and an increased risk of bacterial contamination. The recall was initiated on October 4th, and the FDA shared the company’s announcement on
Philips Respironics, Inc. has issued an Urgent Medical Device Correction for their series of Trilogy Evo ventilators due to concerns of aerosol deposits on the flow sensor when using in-line nebulizers. According to the FDA, the correction involves a field safety notice with updated guidelines
The Wisconsin-based company Jack and the Green Sprouts, Inc., is recalling two lots of its Alfalfa and Alfalfa Onion sprouts due to possible contamination with Listeria monocytogenes. According to the FDA, the company announced the recall on October 4th. The recalled products are sold in