Why Are Depo-Provera Lawsuits Being Filed?

Published By:
Jessie Paluch
Jessie Paluch

Attorney Jessie Paluch, founder of TruLaw, has over 25 years of experience as a personal injury and mass tort attorney, and previously worked as an international tax attorney at Deloitte. Jessie collaborates with attorneys nationwide — enabling her to share reliable, up-to-date legal information with our readers.

This article has been written and reviewed for legal accuracy and clarity by the team of writers and legal experts at TruLaw and is as accurate as possible. This content should not be taken as legal advice from an attorney. If you would like to learn more about our owner and experienced injury lawyer, Jessie Paluch, you can do so here.

TruLaw does everything possible to make sure the information in this article is up to date and accurate. If you need specific legal advice about your case, contact us by using the chat on the bottom of this page. This article should not be taken as advice from an attorney.

Why Are Depo-Provera Lawsuits Being Filed?

Question: Why are Depo-Provera Lawsuits being filed?

Answer: Depo-Provera lawsuits are being filed because recent research has linked long-term use of the contraceptive to an increased risk of meningioma brain tumors.

The Depo-Provera lawsuits allege Pfizer, the drug’s primary manufacturer, failed to warn of serious risks associated with Depo-Provera, including neurological issues leading to an increased risk of meningiomas (brain tumors) and other severe health complications.

As more cases come forward, plaintiffs seek compensation for medical expenses, pain and suffering, and other damages related to taking Depo-Provera.

On this page, we’ll discuss this question in further depth, an overview of the Depo-Provera lawsuit, potential Depo-Provera Lawsuit settlement amounts, and much more.

Why Are Depo-Provera Lawsuits Being Filed

Lawyers Investigating the Depo-Provera Lawsuits

Individuals who suffered significant health issues after using Depo-Provera may qualify to participate in these lawsuits.

A study featured in the March 2024 British Medical Journal revealed that women receiving injections of medroxyprogesterone acetate, the active component in the Depo-Provera shot, faced a 5.6 times greater risk of developing meningiomas, which are brain tumors.

Legal experts handling these cases are focusing on the following investigative steps:

  1. Evidence Collection: Lawyers are collecting medical records, prescriptions, and evidence of harm linked to Depo-Provera use.
  2. Risk Analysis: Assessing if users were adequately informed about side effects, specifically neurological effects and the development of meningiomas.
  3. Manufacturer Accountability: Investigating whether the manufacturer knowingly failed to provide adequate warnings on potential health impacts.

Legal experts in these cases can assess individual circumstances, including medical history and specific adverse effects, to build a solid foundation for substantiating your claim in the Depo-Provera meningioma lawsuits today.

If you or a loved one developed severe health conditions after receiving Depo-Provera injections, you may be eligible to seek compensation.

Contact TruLaw using the chat on this page to receive an instant case evaluation and learn if you qualify to joining others in filing a claim for the Depo-Provera lawsuit.

Table of Contents

What are Meningiomas? (Brain Tumors)

A meningioma is a type of brain tumor that develops from the meninges, the protective layers surrounding the brain and spinal cord.

Meningiomas are the most common primary brain tumor in adults, with a higher incidence in women due to hormonal influences like progesterone and estrogen, to which some meningiomas respond.

Diagnosing the Symptoms of Meningiomas

Identifying meningiomas involves recognizing various symptoms, often depending on the tumor’s size and location.

Headaches, seizures, vision disturbances, movement or balance difficulties, and memory challenges can all signal the presence of a meningioma.

Notably, some smaller meningiomas may remain symptom-free, requiring only periodic monitoring rather than immediate treatment.

Here are some common symptoms associated with meningiomas:

  • Headaches: Often persistent, these can result from pressure exerted on the brain.
  • Seizures: These may occur if the tumor affects certain brain areas.
  • Vision Changes: Blurred or double vision is common if the tumor presses on the optic nerves.
  • Balance or Coordination Issues: Tumors in the cerebellum or other motor-related areas may cause these symptoms.
  • Memory Impairment: This can occur if a meningioma impacts memory-processing regions.

Meningiomas are usually detected through MRI or CT scans, clearly showing their size, position, and potential impact on nearby brain structures.

In some cases, a biopsy may be necessary to ascertain if the tumor is benign or malignant.

These diagnostic tools help medical professionals create an individualized treatment plan based on the tumor’s characteristics.

Meningiomas Treatment Options

Treatment for meningiomas varies depending on factors like tumor size, location, and symptom severity.

The treatment approach aims to reduce or eliminate the tumor while preserving brain function as much as possible.

Below are common treatment options for managing meningiomas:

  • Observation: Regular imaging can help track growth or changes for slow-growing, symptom-free meningiomas.
  • Surgical Removal: If accessible, surgery is the most common approach for removing symptomatic meningiomas.
  • Radiation Therapy: Often used for inoperable tumors or as a follow-up to surgery to eliminate remaining cells.
  • Medication: Under investigation for certain hormone-sensitive tumors, though further research is needed.

The choice of treatment balances effectiveness to minimize side effects and preserve quality of life.

While most meningiomas are benign, they can still cause significant symptoms if they grow large enough to press on critical brain areas.

Meningioma Brain Tumors

A meningioma is a type of brain tumor originating in the meninges, the protective membranes surrounding the brain and spinal cord.

Representing around 40% of all brain tumors, meningiomas are the most commonly diagnosed brain tumors.

Often slow-growing, meningiomas may exist in the brain for years without symptoms before detection, allowing doctors to monitor these tumors if they remain asymptomatic.

Meningiomas are classified into three grades, each with distinct characteristics and treatment considerations.

Grade I Meningiomas (Non-Cancerous)

Grade I meningiomas are completely non-cancerous, growing at a very slow rate and accounting for the vast majority of cases—about 80%.

These tumors are typically low-risk and may not require immediate intervention if they are not causing symptoms.

However, periodic imaging is often recommended to monitor any potential changes.

Key details of Grade I meningiomas include:

  • Growth Rate: Very slow-growing, often remaining stable for years.
  • Symptom Management: Many cases are symptom-free, allowing for observation rather than active treatment.
  • Treatment Options: Surgery is generally effective, and if complete removal is possible, the risk of recurrence is minimal.
  • Recurrence Rate: Low recurrence rate if the tumor is entirely removed.

Grade I meningiomas are often managed with monitoring or surgical removal if they begin to cause symptoms.

For these benign tumors, surgery generally has a high success rate and low risk of recurrence, especially with recent advancements in surgical technology.

Grade II Meningiomas (Non-Cancerous)

Grade II meningiomas, while still technically non-cancerous, grow more quickly than Grade I tumors and pose a higher recurrence risk.

These are atypical tumors that represent approximately 15% of all meningiomas.

Grade II tumors often require a more aggressive treatment approach, including both surgery and possibly radiation to reduce the risk of regrowth.

The primary characteristics of Grade II meningiomas include:

  • Growth Characteristics: Faster-growing and more challenging to treat than Grade I.
  • Subtypes: These include atypical, clear cell, and choroid meningiomas with cellular changes linked to higher recurrence.
  • Recurrence Risk: Higher than Grade I, often requiring radiation alongside surgery.
  • Treatment Plans: Additional treatments are frequently necessitated to minimize recurrence risk.

These atypical meningiomas may lead to more severe cases due to their growth rate and recurrence risk, often necessitating both surgery and radiation.

Despite comprising only 15% of cases, Grade II meningiomas account for over 25% of patient inquiries due to their challenging management.

Grade III Meningiomas (Cancerous)

Grade III meningiomas are malignant, fast-growing, and aggressive tumors.

Although they account for less than 2% of all meningiomas, they require prompt and comprehensive treatment due to their rapid progression and high likelihood of recurrence.

The primary characteristics of Grade III meningiomas include:

  • Aggressive Nature: Fast-growing and invasive, with potential spread to surrounding tissue.
  • Recurrence Rate: High recurrence rate, often requiring ongoing monitoring even after treatment.
  • Treatment Plan: Surgery, radiation, and sometimes chemotherapy are commonly used to manage these tumors.
  • Prognosis: More guarded prognosis due to aggressive growth and likelihood of recurrence.

Patients with Grade III meningiomas often face an intensive treatment regimen and require close follow-up care due to the tumor’s aggressive nature.

Treatment usually combines surgery, radiation, and possibly chemotherapy to manage this malignant form of meningioma effectively.

If you or a loved one developed severe health conditions after receiving Depo-Provera injections, you may be eligible to seek compensation.

Contact TruLaw using the chat on this page to receive an instant case evaluation and learn if you qualify to file a Depo-Provera meningioma lawsuit today.

Steps to File a Depo-Provera Lawsuit

Filing a Depo-Provera lawsuit involves a multi-step process aimed at securing compensation for damages related to brain tumors potentially linked to the use of this injectable contraceptive.

Individual Depo-Provera cases in federal courts is expected to lead to consolidation into a multi-district litigation (MDL) as the number of claims grows, allowing for a more efficient handling of common issues across cases.

Here are the steps typically involved in pursuing a Depo-Provera lawsuit:

  1. Consult with a Qualified Attorney: Begin by consulting a lawyer who specializes in pharmaceutical liability cases, such as TruLaw to asses the details of your case, explain your legal rights, and outline the potential path forward, including any relevant deadlines.
  2. Gather Medical Records and Documentation: An experienced attorney at TruLaw can help you collect medical records showing your use of Depo-Provera and diagnosis of any related health conditions, particularly brain tumors such as meningiomas.
  3. Evaluate Damages: The attorney will assess all potential damages, including medical expenses, lost wages, future earnings, pain and suffering, and more. This evaluation will help determine the amount of compensation to seek in your claim.
  4. File the Claim: Once documentation is complete, your attorney will facilitate getting your Depo-Provera lawsuit filed against Pfizer on your behalf. This legal document will outline your claim, the alleged connection between Depo-Provera and your health condition, and the compensation sought.
  5. Participate in Discovery and Pretrial Proceedings: During the discovery phase, your attorney and Pfizer’s legal team will exchange evidence and information. You may be required to provide statements or participate in depositions to strengthen your case.
  6. Negotiate a Settlement or Prepare for Trial: Many cases settle before going to trial. Your attorney will negotiate with Pfizer’s representatives to pursue a fair settlement. If a satisfactory settlement is not reached, your case may proceed to trial, where a judge or jury will decide the outcome.

Given the challenges surrounding causation evidence, hiring an experienced attorney with a history in pharmaceutical litigation is an important first step in pursuing compensation.

An experienced attorney at TruLaw can help you learn more about the various types of recoverable damages specific to your individual circumstances, ensuring that all aspects of your claim are thoroughly evaluated and pursued.

Contact TruLaw using the chat on this page to receive an instant case evaluation and learn if you qualify to file a Depo-Provera lawsuit today.

Types of Recoverable Damages

In Depo-Provera lawsuits, plaintiffs may seek compensation for various damages related to the Depo-Provera users’ health condition, treatment costs, and emotional suffering.

If successful, these damages can help cover the wide-ranging impacts of the tumor diagnosis.

The following are common types of recoverable damages in Depo-Provera lawsuits:

  • Medical Expenses: Covers costs related to tumor diagnosis, treatment, and ongoing care.
  • Lost Wages: Compensates for any income lost due to the inability to work while undergoing treatment.
  • Future Earning Capacity: Accounts for any potential loss of earning power caused by lasting effects of the tumor.
  • Pain and Suffering: Provides compensation for the physical and emotional distress caused by the illness.
  • Loss of Consortium: In some cases, spouses may claim damages for the impact on their marital relationship.

An experienced attorney at TruLaw will assess the full extent of your damages and build a case to pursue maximum compensation, drawing from medical records, employment history, and other relevant documentation.

Potential Depo-Provera Settlement Amounts

Estimating settlement amounts in Depo-Provera lawsuits is challenging due to the early stage of litigation.

Projections are speculative at this point, as we await the outcome of preliminary rulings on the admissibility of scientific evidence regarding causation.

However, based on similar mass tort cases, legal experts have identified potential ranges for Depo-Provera settlements if evidence substantiates the claims.

These estimates should not be taken as a guarantee, as the actual settlement amounts in successful Depo-Provera claims may vary substantially based on a variety of factors.

The following are general settlement projections for Depo-Provera cases, based on the severity and type of tumor:

  • Minor, Non-Cancerous Cases (Grade I): Settlements may range from $10,000 to $200,000 for cases with minimal complications.
  • Moderate Cases (Grade II): Settlements could range from $200,000 to $500,000 due to a higher recurrence risk and more sophisticated treatment needs.
  • Severe, Malignant Cases (Grade III): Settlements for these life-threatening cases could exceed $1 million dollars.

While Grade III meningiomas cases present the highest potential for substantial compensation, non-cancerous cases with significant symptoms may yield considerable settlements.

Payouts are likely to vary widely in individual cases, particularly if a global settlement is reached, but severe cases are expected to yield higher compensation.

It’s important to note that the projections discussed below are strictly intended to give affected individuals a general idea of what these settlement values could look like if claims are successful — as the litigation progresses, more accurate estimates may become possible.

TruLaw: Accepting Clients for the Depo-Provera Lawsuits

Depo-Provera lawsuits are being filed by individuals across the country who were diagnosed with meningiomas (brain tumors) or suffered from other severe health conditions after using the contraceptive injection.

TruLaw is currently accepting clients for the Depo-Provera lawsuits.

A few reasons to choose TruLaw for your Depo-Provera lawsuits include:

  • If We Don’t Win, You Don’t Pay: The pharmaceutical liability lawyers at TruLaw and our partner firms operate on a contingency fee basis, meaning we only get paid if you win.
  • Expertise: We have years of experience handling pharmaceutical liability cases similar to the Depo-Provera lawsuits, which helps us anticipate what we can expect to see in your case and the regulations we will be required to meet.
  • Successful Track Record: TruLaw and our partner law firms have helped our clients recover billions of dollars in compensation through verdicts and negotiated settlements.

If you or a loved one suffered severe side effects after receiving the Depo-Provera birth control shot, you may be eligible to seek compensation.

Contact TruLaw using the chat on this page to receive an instant case evaluation that can determine if you qualify for the Depo-Provera brain tumor lawsuit today.

Frequently Asked Questions

  • What is the Depo-Provera lawsuit?

    The Depo-Provera lawsuits allege that Pfizer failed to warn users about serious risks associated with the drug, particularly the increased risk of developing meningiomas (brain tumors).

    According to a March 2024 study in the British Medical Journal, women receiving Depo-Provera injections faced a 5.6 times greater risk of developing meningiomas.

  • Who can qualify to file a Depo-Provera lawsuit?

    Individuals who developed severe health conditions, particularly brain tumors, after receiving Depo-Provera injections may be eligible to file a lawsuit.

    An experienced pharmaceutical liability attorney can evaluate your case by reviewing medical records and specific adverse effects to determine if you qualify.

  • What are the potential settlement amounts for Depo-Provera lawsuits?

    Settlement amounts vary based on tumor grade severity, with Grade I cases potentially ranging from $10,000 to $200,000, while Grade III malignant cases could exceed $1 million.

    The actual compensation depends on factors including medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

  • Is there a Depo-Provera Class Action Lawsuit?

    No. Currently, individuals are filing separate lawsuits in federal courts nationwide.

    While these cases may be consolidated into multidistrict litigation (MDL) for more efficient processing, each claim remains independent – allowing damages to be evaluated based on individual circumstances rather than as a single class action.

  • What symptoms are associated with meningiomas from Depo-Provera?

    Common meningioma symptoms include persistent headaches, seizures, vision changes, balance issues, and memory impairment.

    These symptoms can vary depending on the tumor’s size and location in the brain.

  • Is generic Depo-Provera included in the lawsuits?

    While the lawsuits primarily focus on the brand-name Depo-SubQ Provera, it’s possible that generic versions such as could also be included if they are manufactured by Pfizer or if there is evidence that the generic manufacturers failed to provide adequate warnings.

    Therefore, if you used a generic version of Depo-Provera and developed a brain tumor or other serious health complications, you should consult with an experienced attorney at TruLaw to discuss your specific situation and determine if you may be eligible to file a lawsuit.

  • What is the statute of limitations in the Depo Provera lawsuit?

    The Depo-Provera lawsuit statute varies by state, typically ranging from one to six years.

    This period generally begins either from the date of injury or from when the plaintiff reasonably became aware of the connection between Depo-Provera use and the development of a brain tumor or other serious health condition.

Published By:
Jessie Paluch
Jessie Paluch

Experienced Attorney & Legal SaaS CEO

With over 25 years of legal experience, Jessie is an Illinois lawyer, a CPA, and a mother of three.  She spent the first decade of her career working as an international tax attorney at Deloitte.

In 2009, Jessie co-founded her own law firm with her husband – which has scaled to over 30 employees since its conception.

In 2016, Jessie founded TruLaw, which allows her to collaborate with attorneys and legal experts across the United States on a daily basis. This hypervaluable network of experts is what enables her to share reliable legal information with her readers!

AFFF Lawsuit

AFFF Lawsuit claims are being filed against manufacturers of aqueous film-forming foam (AFFF), commonly used in firefighting.

Claims allege that companies such as 3M, DuPont, and Tyco Fire Products failed to adequately warn users about the potential dangers of AFFF exposure — including increased risks of various cancers and diseases.

Suboxone Lawsuit

Suboxone Tooth Decay Lawsuit claims are being filed against Indivior, the manufacturer of Suboxone, a medication used to treat opioid addiction.

Claims allege that Indivior failed to adequately warn users about the potential dangers of severe tooth decay and dental injuries associated with Suboxone’s sublingual film version.

Social Media Lawsuits

Social Media Harm Lawsuits are being filed against social media companies for allegedly causing mental health issues in children and teens.

Claims allege that companies like Meta, Google, ByteDance, and Snap designed addictive platforms that led to anxiety, depression, and other mental health issues without adequately warning users or parents.

Vaginal Mesh Lawsuits

Transvaginal Mesh Lawsuits are being filed against manufacturers of transvaginal mesh products used to treat pelvic organ prolapse (POP) and stress urinary incontinence (SUI).

Claims allege that companies like Ethicon, C.R. Bard, and Boston Scientific failed to adequately warn about potential dangers — including erosion, pain, and infection.

Bair Hugger Lawsuit

Bair Hugger Warming Blanket Lawsuits involve claims against 3M — alleging their surgical warming blankets caused severe infections and complications (particularly in hip and knee replacement surgeries).

Plaintiffs claim 3M failed to warn about potential risks — despite knowing about increased risk of deep joint infections since 2011.

Baby Formula NEC Lawsuit

Baby Formula NEC Lawsuit claims are being filed against manufacturers of cow’s milk-based baby formula products.

Claims allege that companies like Abbott Laboratories (Similac) and Mead Johnson & Company (Enfamil) failed to warn about the increased risk of necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) in premature infants.

Do You
Have A Case?

Here, at TruLaw, we’re committed to helping victims get the justice they deserve.

Alongside our partner law firms, we have successfully collected over $3 Billion in verdicts and settlements on behalf of injured individuals.

Would you like our help?

Helpful Sites & Resources