Attorney Jessie Paluch, founder of TruLaw, has over 25 years of experience as a personal injury and mass tort attorney, and previously worked as an international tax attorney at Deloitte. Jessie collaborates with attorneys nationwide — enabling her to share reliable, up-to-date legal information with our readers.
This article has been written and reviewed for legal accuracy and clarity by the team of writers and legal experts at TruLaw and is as accurate as possible. This content should not be taken as legal advice from an attorney. If you would like to learn more about our owner and experienced injury lawyer, Jessie Paluch, you can do so here.
TruLaw does everything possible to make sure the information in this article is up to date and accurate. If you need specific legal advice about your case, contact us by using the chat on the bottom of this page. This article should not be taken as advice from an attorney.
Question: Why are Depo-Provera Lawsuits being filed?
Answer: Depo-Provera lawsuits are being filed because recent research has linked long-term use of the contraceptive to an increased risk of meningioma brain tumors.
The Depo-Provera lawsuits allege Pfizer, the drug’s primary manufacturer, failed to warn of serious risks associated with Depo-Provera, including neurological issues leading to an increased risk of meningiomas (brain tumors) and other severe health complications.
As more cases come forward, plaintiffs seek compensation for medical expenses, pain and suffering, and other damages related to taking Depo-Provera.
On this page, we’ll discuss this question in further depth, an overview of the Depo-Provera lawsuit, potential Depo-Provera Lawsuit settlement amounts, and much more.
Individuals who suffered significant health issues after using Depo-Provera may qualify to participate in these lawsuits.
A study featured in the March 2024 British Medical Journal revealed that women receiving injections of medroxyprogesterone acetate, the active component in the Depo-Provera shot, faced a 5.6 times greater risk of developing meningiomas, which are brain tumors.
Legal experts handling these cases are focusing on the following investigative steps:
Legal experts in these cases can assess individual circumstances, including medical history and specific adverse effects, to build a solid foundation for substantiating your claim in the Depo-Provera meningioma lawsuits today.
If you or a loved one developed severe health conditions after receiving Depo-Provera injections, you may be eligible to seek compensation.
Contact TruLaw using the chat on this page to receive an instant case evaluation and learn if you qualify to joining others in filing a claim for the Depo-Provera lawsuit.
A meningioma is a type of brain tumor that develops from the meninges, the protective layers surrounding the brain and spinal cord.
Meningiomas are the most common primary brain tumor in adults, with a higher incidence in women due to hormonal influences like progesterone and estrogen, to which some meningiomas respond.
Identifying meningiomas involves recognizing various symptoms, often depending on the tumor’s size and location.
Headaches, seizures, vision disturbances, movement or balance difficulties, and memory challenges can all signal the presence of a meningioma.
Notably, some smaller meningiomas may remain symptom-free, requiring only periodic monitoring rather than immediate treatment.
Here are some common symptoms associated with meningiomas:
Meningiomas are usually detected through MRI or CT scans, clearly showing their size, position, and potential impact on nearby brain structures.
In some cases, a biopsy may be necessary to ascertain if the tumor is benign or malignant.
These diagnostic tools help medical professionals create an individualized treatment plan based on the tumor’s characteristics.
Treatment for meningiomas varies depending on factors like tumor size, location, and symptom severity.
The treatment approach aims to reduce or eliminate the tumor while preserving brain function as much as possible.
Below are common treatment options for managing meningiomas:
The choice of treatment balances effectiveness to minimize side effects and preserve quality of life.
While most meningiomas are benign, they can still cause significant symptoms if they grow large enough to press on critical brain areas.
A meningioma is a type of brain tumor originating in the meninges, the protective membranes surrounding the brain and spinal cord.
Representing around 40% of all brain tumors, meningiomas are the most commonly diagnosed brain tumors.
Often slow-growing, meningiomas may exist in the brain for years without symptoms before detection, allowing doctors to monitor these tumors if they remain asymptomatic.
Meningiomas are classified into three grades, each with distinct characteristics and treatment considerations.
Grade I meningiomas are completely non-cancerous, growing at a very slow rate and accounting for the vast majority of cases—about 80%.
These tumors are typically low-risk and may not require immediate intervention if they are not causing symptoms.
However, periodic imaging is often recommended to monitor any potential changes.
Key details of Grade I meningiomas include:
Grade I meningiomas are often managed with monitoring or surgical removal if they begin to cause symptoms.
For these benign tumors, surgery generally has a high success rate and low risk of recurrence, especially with recent advancements in surgical technology.
Grade II meningiomas, while still technically non-cancerous, grow more quickly than Grade I tumors and pose a higher recurrence risk.
These are atypical tumors that represent approximately 15% of all meningiomas.
Grade II tumors often require a more aggressive treatment approach, including both surgery and possibly radiation to reduce the risk of regrowth.
The primary characteristics of Grade II meningiomas include:
These atypical meningiomas may lead to more severe cases due to their growth rate and recurrence risk, often necessitating both surgery and radiation.
Despite comprising only 15% of cases, Grade II meningiomas account for over 25% of patient inquiries due to their challenging management.
Grade III meningiomas are malignant, fast-growing, and aggressive tumors.
Although they account for less than 2% of all meningiomas, they require prompt and comprehensive treatment due to their rapid progression and high likelihood of recurrence.
The primary characteristics of Grade III meningiomas include:
Patients with Grade III meningiomas often face an intensive treatment regimen and require close follow-up care due to the tumor’s aggressive nature.
Treatment usually combines surgery, radiation, and possibly chemotherapy to manage this malignant form of meningioma effectively.
If you or a loved one developed severe health conditions after receiving Depo-Provera injections, you may be eligible to seek compensation.
Contact TruLaw using the chat on this page to receive an instant case evaluation and learn if you qualify to file a Depo-Provera meningioma lawsuit today.
Filing a Depo-Provera lawsuit involves a multi-step process aimed at securing compensation for damages related to brain tumors potentially linked to the use of this injectable contraceptive.
Individual Depo-Provera cases in federal courts is expected to lead to consolidation into a multi-district litigation (MDL) as the number of claims grows, allowing for a more efficient handling of common issues across cases.
Here are the steps typically involved in pursuing a Depo-Provera lawsuit:
Given the challenges surrounding causation evidence, hiring an experienced attorney with a history in pharmaceutical litigation is an important first step in pursuing compensation.
An experienced attorney at TruLaw can help you learn more about the various types of recoverable damages specific to your individual circumstances, ensuring that all aspects of your claim are thoroughly evaluated and pursued.
Contact TruLaw using the chat on this page to receive an instant case evaluation and learn if you qualify to file a Depo-Provera lawsuit today.
In Depo-Provera lawsuits, plaintiffs may seek compensation for various damages related to the Depo-Provera users’ health condition, treatment costs, and emotional suffering.
If successful, these damages can help cover the wide-ranging impacts of the tumor diagnosis.
The following are common types of recoverable damages in Depo-Provera lawsuits:
An experienced attorney at TruLaw will assess the full extent of your damages and build a case to pursue maximum compensation, drawing from medical records, employment history, and other relevant documentation.
Estimating settlement amounts in Depo-Provera lawsuits is challenging due to the early stage of litigation.
Projections are speculative at this point, as we await the outcome of preliminary rulings on the admissibility of scientific evidence regarding causation.
However, based on similar mass tort cases, legal experts have identified potential ranges for Depo-Provera settlements if evidence substantiates the claims.
These estimates should not be taken as a guarantee, as the actual settlement amounts in successful Depo-Provera claims may vary substantially based on a variety of factors.
The following are general settlement projections for Depo-Provera cases, based on the severity and type of tumor:
While Grade III meningiomas cases present the highest potential for substantial compensation, non-cancerous cases with significant symptoms may yield considerable settlements.
Payouts are likely to vary widely in individual cases, particularly if a global settlement is reached, but severe cases are expected to yield higher compensation.
It’s important to note that the projections discussed below are strictly intended to give affected individuals a general idea of what these settlement values could look like if claims are successful — as the litigation progresses, more accurate estimates may become possible.
Depo-Provera lawsuits are being filed by individuals across the country who were diagnosed with meningiomas (brain tumors) or suffered from other severe health conditions after using the contraceptive injection.
TruLaw is currently accepting clients for the Depo-Provera lawsuits.
A few reasons to choose TruLaw for your Depo-Provera lawsuits include:
If you or a loved one suffered severe side effects after receiving the Depo-Provera birth control shot, you may be eligible to seek compensation.
Contact TruLaw using the chat on this page to receive an instant case evaluation that can determine if you qualify for the Depo-Provera brain tumor lawsuit today.
The Depo-Provera lawsuits allege that Pfizer failed to warn users about serious risks associated with the drug, particularly the increased risk of developing meningiomas (brain tumors).
According to a March 2024 study in the British Medical Journal, women receiving Depo-Provera injections faced a 5.6 times greater risk of developing meningiomas.
Individuals who developed severe health conditions, particularly brain tumors, after receiving Depo-Provera injections may be eligible to file a lawsuit.
An experienced pharmaceutical liability attorney can evaluate your case by reviewing medical records and specific adverse effects to determine if you qualify.
Settlement amounts vary based on tumor grade severity, with Grade I cases potentially ranging from $10,000 to $200,000, while Grade III malignant cases could exceed $1 million.
The actual compensation depends on factors including medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.
No. Currently, individuals are filing separate lawsuits in federal courts nationwide.
While these cases may be consolidated into multidistrict litigation (MDL) for more efficient processing, each claim remains independent – allowing damages to be evaluated based on individual circumstances rather than as a single class action.
Common meningioma symptoms include persistent headaches, seizures, vision changes, balance issues, and memory impairment.
These symptoms can vary depending on the tumor’s size and location in the brain.
While the lawsuits primarily focus on the brand-name Depo-SubQ Provera, it’s possible that generic versions such as could also be included if they are manufactured by Pfizer or if there is evidence that the generic manufacturers failed to provide adequate warnings.
Therefore, if you used a generic version of Depo-Provera and developed a brain tumor or other serious health complications, you should consult with an experienced attorney at TruLaw to discuss your specific situation and determine if you may be eligible to file a lawsuit.
The Depo-Provera lawsuit statute varies by state, typically ranging from one to six years.
This period generally begins either from the date of injury or from when the plaintiff reasonably became aware of the connection between Depo-Provera use and the development of a brain tumor or other serious health condition.
Experienced Attorney & Legal SaaS CEO
With over 25 years of legal experience, Jessie is an Illinois lawyer, a CPA, and a mother of three. She spent the first decade of her career working as an international tax attorney at Deloitte.
In 2009, Jessie co-founded her own law firm with her husband – which has scaled to over 30 employees since its conception.
In 2016, Jessie founded TruLaw, which allows her to collaborate with attorneys and legal experts across the United States on a daily basis. This hypervaluable network of experts is what enables her to share reliable legal information with her readers!
You can learn more about the Depo-Provera Lawsuit by visiting any of our pages listed below:
Here, at TruLaw, we’re committed to helping victims get the justice they deserve.
Alongside our partner law firms, we have successfully collected over $3 Billion in verdicts and settlements on behalf of injured individuals.
Would you like our help?
At TruLaw, we fiercely combat corporations that endanger individuals’ well-being. If you’ve suffered injuries and believe these well-funded entities should be held accountable, we’re here for you.
With TruLaw, you gain access to successful and seasoned lawyers who maximize your chances of success. Our lawyers invest in you—they do not receive a dime until your lawsuit reaches a successful resolution!
Do you believe you’re entitled to compensation?
Use our Instant Case Evaluator to find out in as little as 60 seconds!
AFFF Lawsuit claims are being filed against manufacturers of aqueous film-forming foam (AFFF), commonly used in firefighting.
Claims allege that companies such as 3M, DuPont, and Tyco Fire Products failed to adequately warn users about the potential dangers of AFFF exposure — including increased risks of various cancers and diseases.
Suboxone Tooth Decay Lawsuit claims are being filed against Indivior, the manufacturer of Suboxone, a medication used to treat opioid addiction.
Claims allege that Indivior failed to adequately warn users about the potential dangers of severe tooth decay and dental injuries associated with Suboxone’s sublingual film version.
Social Media Harm Lawsuits are being filed against social media companies for allegedly causing mental health issues in children and teens.
Claims allege that companies like Meta, Google, ByteDance, and Snap designed addictive platforms that led to anxiety, depression, and other mental health issues without adequately warning users or parents.
Transvaginal Mesh Lawsuits are being filed against manufacturers of transvaginal mesh products used to treat pelvic organ prolapse (POP) and stress urinary incontinence (SUI).
Claims allege that companies like Ethicon, C.R. Bard, and Boston Scientific failed to adequately warn about potential dangers — including erosion, pain, and infection.
Bair Hugger Warming Blanket Lawsuits involve claims against 3M — alleging their surgical warming blankets caused severe infections and complications (particularly in hip and knee replacement surgeries).
Plaintiffs claim 3M failed to warn about potential risks — despite knowing about increased risk of deep joint infections since 2011.
Baby Formula NEC Lawsuit claims are being filed against manufacturers of cow’s milk-based baby formula products.
Claims allege that companies like Abbott Laboratories (Similac) and Mead Johnson & Company (Enfamil) failed to warn about the increased risk of necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) in premature infants.
Here, at TruLaw, we’re committed to helping victims get the justice they deserve.
Alongside our partner law firms, we have successfully collected over $3 Billion in verdicts and settlements on behalf of injured individuals.
Would you like our help?