Attorney Jessica Paluch-Hoerman, founder of TruLaw, has over 28 years of experience as a personal injury and mass tort attorney, and previously worked as an international tax attorney at Deloitte. Jessie collaborates with attorneys nationwide — enabling her to share reliable, up-to-date legal information with our readers.
This article has been written and reviewed for legal accuracy and clarity by the team of writers and legal experts at TruLaw and is as accurate as possible. This content should not be taken as legal advice from an attorney. If you would like to learn more about our owner and experienced injury lawyer, Jessie Paluch, you can do so here.
TruLaw does everything possible to make sure the information in this article is up to date and accurate. If you need specific legal advice about your case, contact us by using the chat on the bottom of this page. This article should not be taken as advice from an attorney.
Question: How can Depo Provera Lawsuit lawyers can help your claim?
Answer: Depo Provera lawsuit lawyers can help you pursue compensation if you or a loved one has developed meningioma brain tumors after using Depo Provera birth control injections over a prolonged period.
On this page, we’ll answer this question in further depth, qualifying to file a claim in the Depo Provera Litigation, what to expect working with Depo Provera attorneys, and much more.
Depo Provera lawsuit lawyers represent women who developed meningioma brain tumors after receiving Depo Provera injections as birth control.
Recent medical studies have established a connection between prolonged use of this injectable contraceptive and the formation of brain and spinal cord tumors.
Pharmaceutical companies, including Pfizer, now face mounting legal claims from patients who were never adequately warned about these serious health risks.
If you or someone you love developed severe health conditions after using Depo Provera birth control injections, you may qualify to seek compensation.
Contact TruLaw using the chat on this page to receive an instant case evaluation that can determine your eligibility to join others in filing a Depo Provera Lawsuit.
Our Depo Provera attorney at TruLaw is dedicated to supporting clients through the process of filing a Depo Provera lawsuit.
With extensive experience in dangerous drugs cases, Jessica Paluch-Hoerman and our partner law firms work with litigation leaders and medical experts to prove how Depo Provera injections caused you harm.
TruLaw focuses on securing compensation for medical expenses, bone density treatment costs, pain and suffering, and other damages resulting from your Depo Provera injuries.
We understand the physical and emotional toll that Depo Provera complications have on your life and provide the personalized guidance you need when seeking justice.
Meet our lead Depo Provera attorney:
At TruLaw, we believe financial concerns should never stand in the way of justice.
That’s why we operate on a contingency fee basis—with this approach, you only pay legal fees after you’ve been awarded compensation for your injuries.
If you or someone you love developed severe health conditions after using Depo Provera birth control injections, you may qualify to seek compensation.
Contact TruLaw using the chat on this page to receive an instant case evaluation that can determine your eligibility to join others in filing a Depo Provera lawsuit.
Filing a lawsuit against pharmaceutical giants like Pfizer requires meeting specific eligibility criteria and understanding the legal landscape surrounding depo provera mdl cases.
The surge in litigation follows groundbreaking research published in March 2024 in the British Medical Journal that revealed women using medroxyprogesterone acetate for more than one year faced a startling 5.6-fold increased risk of developing meningioma brain tumors compared to non-users according to data from a comprehensive French healthcare study involving over 18,000 women who underwent surgery for these tumors.
As Depo Provera multi-district litigation consolidates in federal courts, attorneys are guiding potential plaintiffs through the qualification process that requires demonstrating causation between taking Depo Provera and a subsequent brain tumor diagnosis.
The foundation of any successful Depo Provera lawsuit begins with comprehensive medical documentation connecting the contraceptive to brain tumors.
Plaintiffs must provide substantial evidence, including medical and prescription records, confirming they received at least two injections of either Depo-Provera or Depo Subq Provera, followed by a meningioma diagnosis.
This temporal relationship is central as the legal argument hinges on establishing that the contraceptive directly contributed to tumor development, particularly when disrupting the menstrual cycle was the primary reason for use.
Documentation strengthening your Depo Provera lawsuit claim may include, but is not limited to:
The statute of limitations is an important factor when pursuing compensation for injuries related to weight gain and other side effects associated with this contraceptive method.
These deadlines vary significantly by state, typically ranging from one to six years from the date of injury or discovery.
What makes the Depo Shot Lawsuit unique is how the “discovery rule” may apply.
This could extend filing deadlines since many women couldn’t reasonably connect their diagnosis to the medication until the 2024 BMJ study was published.
Legal experts argue that two key principles protect potential plaintiffs from statute of limitations concerns.
First, the discovery rule delays the countdown until a plaintiff reasonably understands both their injury and its connection to Depo Provera.
Second, attorneys can invoke the doctrine of fraudulent concealment, arguing that manufacturers intentionally concealed risks associated with long-term use of this injectable.
Previous Depo Provera lawsuit settlements related to bone density loss cases provide precedent for compensation, with a Canadian class action resolved for $2.1 million in 2021.
It is important to note that the current multi-district litigation is unrelated to the prior litigation and is still in its early stages, with outcomes yet to be determined as the case develops.
Taking legal action against manufacturers of the injectable contraceptive Depo Provera requires qualified representation familiar with pharmaceutical cases.
Law firms across the country have mobilized to help affected women seek justice through a streamlined multidistrict litigation (MDL) process established in the Northern District of Florida.
Attorneys are actively accepting new clients who meet specific medical documentation requirements and guiding them through each stage of the legal process, from initial consultation through potential settlement negotiations or trial proceedings.
The recent decision to consolidate Depo Provera lawsuits into a centralized MDL has transformed how these cases progress through the federal court system.
The Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation (JPML) issued an order on February 7, 2025, transferring all related federal cases to Florida.
This allows a coordinated pretrial proceeding while preserving each plaintiff’s right to individual compensation based on their specific circumstances.
This consolidation benefits plaintiffs by reducing duplicative discovery, creating consistent rulings on pretrial matters, and establishing a clear timeline for case progression.
Early phases of federal court proceedings in Depo Provera MDL may include:
Women diagnosed with meningioma brain tumors after using Depo Provera may be entitled to various forms of compensation based on their specific circumstances and the severity of their injuries.
Legal experts estimate potential settlement amounts ranging from $150,000 to $500,000 per case depending upon the severity of damage experienced.
These figures are preliminary estimates, as the litigation is still in its early stages with no cases yet reaching verdict or settlement.
Working with a specialized Depo Provera attorney provides the best opportunity to recover compensation for medical expenses, lost wages, pain and suffering, and other damages associated with a meningioma diagnosis.
Many law firms handle these cases on a contingency fee basis, meaning clients pay nothing upfront and attorneys receive payment only if the case results in compensation.
While the legal process may take considerable time to resolve, having knowledgeable representation ensures your interests are protected throughout proceedings and increases the likelihood of receiving appropriate compensation for the life-altering consequences of these serious brain tumors.
Depo Provera lawsuits are being filed by individuals across the country who suffered serious bone density loss and other health complications after receiving the contraceptive injection.
TruLaw is currently accepting clients for the Depo Provera lawsuit.
A few reasons to choose TruLaw for your Depo Provera lawsuit include:
If you or a loved one suffered bone density loss, fractures, or other health problems after receiving Depo Provera injections, you may be eligible to seek compensation.
Contact TruLaw using the chat on this page to receive an instant case evaluation that can determine if you qualify for the Depo Provera lawsuit today.
Depo Provera lawsuit lawyers report estimated settlements ranging from $150,000 to $500,000, though amounts may be significantly higher depending on individual case circumstances.
Experienced attorneys can help evaluate your potential compensation based on specific damages, medical documentation, and related financial losses.
You may qualify if you used Depo-Provera and subsequently developed health issues like meningiomas or other conditions linked to the medication.
Depo Provera lawsuit lawyers evaluate eligibility based on medical history, documentation of Depo-Provera usage, timing of symptoms, and evidence establishing the connection between the drug and your injuries.
Recent medical research has established a concerning link between Depo-Provera use and meningiomas, a specific type of brain tumor.
Depo Provera lawsuit lawyers are representing women who developed these tumors after using the birth control injection, with studies indicating a significantly higher risk among long-term users of the medication.
Yes, the Depo-Provera lawsuit remains active in 2025, with Depo Provera lawsuit lawyers continuing to file new cases nationwide.
Following scientific evidence connecting the medication to meningiomas, affected women are actively pursuing compensation for medical expenses, pain and suffering, lost wages, and other damages related to their diagnoses.
To find qualified Depo Provera lawsuit lawyers in your area, search for attorneys specializing in pharmaceutical litigation with specific experience handling Depo-Provera cases.
Many law firms offer free consultations, serve clients nationwide, and can assist regardless of your location, including Indiana and surrounding areas.
Depo Provera lawsuit lawyers typically require your complete medical records, history of Depo-Provera usage (including dates and duration), documentation of your diagnosis, evidence of related medical treatments, and financial records showing expenses and losses.
Gathering this information before your initial consultation can help attorneys evaluate your case more efficiently.
Managing Attorney & Owner
With over 25 years of legal experience, Jessica Paluch-Hoerman is an Illinois lawyer, a CPA, and a mother of three. She spent the first decade of her career working as an international tax attorney at Deloitte.
In 2009, Jessie co-founded her own law firm with her husband – which has scaled to over 30 employees since its conception.
In 2016, Jessie founded TruLaw, which allows her to collaborate with attorneys and legal experts across the United States on a daily basis. This hypervaluable network of experts is what enables her to share the most reliable, accurate, and up-to-date legal information with our readers!
You can learn more about the Depo-Provera Lawsuit by visiting any of our pages listed below:
Here, at TruLaw, we’re committed to helping victims get the justice they deserve.
Alongside our partner law firms, we have successfully collected over $3 Billion in verdicts and settlements on behalf of injured individuals.
Would you like our help?
At TruLaw, we fiercely combat corporations that endanger individuals’ well-being. If you’ve suffered injuries and believe these well-funded entities should be held accountable, we’re here for you.
With TruLaw, you gain access to successful and seasoned lawyers who maximize your chances of success. Our lawyers invest in you—they do not receive a dime until your lawsuit reaches a successful resolution!
AFFF Lawsuit claims are being filed against manufacturers of aqueous film-forming foam (AFFF), commonly used in firefighting.
Claims allege that companies such as 3M, DuPont, and Tyco Fire Products failed to adequately warn users about the potential dangers of AFFF exposure — including increased risks of various cancers and diseases.
Depo Provera Lawsuit claims are being filed by individuals who allege they developed meningioma (a type of brain tumor) after receiving Depo-Provera birth control injections.
A 2024 study found that women using Depo-Provera for at least 1 year are five times more likely to develop meningioma brain tumors compared to those not using the drug.
Suboxone Tooth Decay Lawsuit claims are being filed against Indivior, the manufacturer of Suboxone, a medication used to treat opioid addiction.
Claims allege that Indivior failed to adequately warn users about the potential dangers of severe tooth decay and dental injuries associated with Suboxone’s sublingual film version.
Social Media Harm Lawsuits are being filed against social media companies for allegedly causing mental health issues in children and teens.
Claims allege that companies like Meta, Google, ByteDance, and Snap designed addictive platforms that led to anxiety, depression, and other mental health issues without adequately warning users or parents.
Transvaginal Mesh Lawsuits are being filed against manufacturers of transvaginal mesh products used to treat pelvic organ prolapse (POP) and stress urinary incontinence (SUI).
Claims allege that companies like Ethicon, C.R. Bard, and Boston Scientific failed to adequately warn about potential dangers — including erosion, pain, and infection.
Bair Hugger Warming Blanket Lawsuits involve claims against 3M — alleging their surgical warming blankets caused severe infections and complications (particularly in hip and knee replacement surgeries).
Plaintiffs claim 3M failed to warn about potential risks — despite knowing about increased risk of deep joint infections since 2011.
Baby Formula NEC Lawsuit claims are being filed against manufacturers of cow’s milk-based baby formula products.
Claims allege that companies like Abbott Laboratories (Similac) and Mead Johnson & Company (Enfamil) failed to warn about the increased risk of necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) in premature infants.
Here, at TruLaw, we’re committed to helping victims get the justice they deserve.
Alongside our partner law firms, we have successfully collected over $3 Billion in verdicts and settlements on behalf of injured individuals.
Would you like our help?