Depo-Provera Brain Tumor Lawsuit

Published By:
Jessie Paluch
Jessie Paluch

Attorney Jessie Paluch, founder of TruLaw, has over 25 years of experience as a personal injury and mass tort attorney, and previously worked as an international tax attorney at Deloitte. Jessie collaborates with attorneys nationwide — enabling her to share reliable, up-to-date legal information with our readers.

This article has been written and reviewed for legal accuracy and clarity by the team of writers and legal experts at TruLaw and is as accurate as possible. This content should not be taken as legal advice from an attorney. If you would like to learn more about our owner and experienced injury lawyer, Jessie Paluch, you can do so here.

TruLaw does everything possible to make sure the information in this article is up to date and accurate. If you need specific legal advice about your case, contact us by using the chat on the bottom of this page. This article should not be taken as advice from an attorney.

Depo-Provera Brain Tumor Lawsuit Overview

The new Depo-Provera lawsuit centers around claims that the contraceptive injection, Depo-Provera, may increase the risk of certain brain tumors (meningiomas) in patients.

This legal action seeks to hold Pfizer (the drug’s manufacturer) accountable for failing to disclose adverse health effects linked to the prolonged use of Depo-Provera.

On this page, we’ll provide an overview of the Depo-Provera brain tumor lawsuit, scientific evidence in the Depo-Provera brain tumor lawsuit, eligibility criteria for Depo-Provera lawsuits, and much more.

Depo-Provera Brain Tumor Lawsuit

Plaintiff Allegations: Depo-Provera Brain Tumor Lawsuit

A study based on the French National Health Data System found a 5.6-fold increased risk of developing meningioma brain tumors in women who had used Depo-Provera injections (medroxyprogesterone acetate) for prolonged periods.

The elevated risk of meningiomas appeared predominantly in patients who used the high-dose injectable form of medroxyprogesterone acetate over an extended duration.

Allegations made by plaintiffs in the Depo-Provera brain tumor lawsuit include, but are not limited to:

  • Failure to Warn: Plaintiffs argue that the manufacturer did not sufficiently disclose the risk of brain tumor development.
  • Increased Health Risks: Prolonged use of Depo-Provera is alleged to elevate the risk of meningiomas, impacting plaintiffs’ long-term health.
  • Negligent Misrepresentation: The lawsuit includes negligence claims for failing to provide patients and healthcare providers with clear safety information.
  • Demand for Accountability: Plaintiffs are seeking accountability for physical, emotional, and financial damages resulting from brain tumor diagnoses.
  • Compensation for Damages: If successful, plaintiffs may recover compensation for medical costs, lost income, pain and suffering, and ongoing healthcare needs.

Plaintiffs in these lawsuits seek financial compensation to recover damages due to injuries and promote regulatory action to require future patients to have more information about the potential risks associated with Depo-Provera.

The outcomes of these cases will likely depend on the strength of the scientific evidence connecting Depo-Provera (depo-subq-provera) with increased tumor risks, the adequacy of warning labels, and the impact of the alleged omissions on patient safety.

If you or a loved one have been diagnosed with a meningioma or any other serious health condition after prolonged use of Depo-Provera, you may qualify to seek compensation.

Contact TruLaw using the chat on this page to receive an instant case evaluation and determine if you are eligible to join others in filing a Depo-Provera brain tumor lawsuit today.

Table of Contents

Scientific Evidence in the Depo-Provera Brain Tumor Lawsuit

Meningiomas are typically benign but can cause significant health issues due to their location, potentially leading to symptoms such as headaches, thickening cervical mucus, and seizures.

The study also notes that other hormonal treatments containing progestogens, like medrogestone and promegestone, were associated with increased risks.

Research Findings on Brain Tumor Correlation Risks

Scientific research has identified a significant link between prolonged Depo-Provera use and an increased likelihood of developing intracranial meningiomas.

A recent study of 18,061 women who had undergone surgery for meningiomas compared with over 90,000 control subjects found that prolonged use of Depo-Provera was associated with a 5.6-fold higher likelihood of developing meningiomas brain tumors.

The risk was markedly higher among women over the age of 65 who had used Depo-Provera continuously for three or more years.

In response to these findings, Pfizer has started updating the product labels and patient information to include warnings about the possible risk of meningiomas associated with long-term use.

Plaintiffs, however, argue that these updates came too late for many who were already exposed to the risk without sufficient warning at the onset of treatment.

Research on Depo-Provera and Breast Cancer Risk

Research on Depo-Provera’s association with breast cancer has yielded mixed results, with some studies indicating a potential increase in breast cancer risk for specific user groups.

Five extensive case-control studies have also assessed the link between depo-medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA) and breast cancer:

  • Slight Risk Increase: Three of the studies indicated a slight increase in breast cancer risk among DMPA users, although only one of these studies reached statistical significance.
  • Impact of Duration and Recency: A recent U.S. study found that women who used DMPA for a year or more and within the past five years faced a statistically significant increase in breast cancer risk.
  • Consistency Across Studies: This recent finding aligns with previous research suggesting an increased risk for recent users with prolonged exposure to DMPA.

These findings highlight the importance of evaluating individual breast cancer risk factors, including family history when considering Depo-Provera as a contraceptive method.

The studies underscore the necessity for informed discussions between patients and healthcare providers to weigh the benefits of Depo-Provera use against potential long-term health risks.

Intracranial Meningiomas: Discovering the Link

Intracranial meningiomas are typically benign brain tumors that arise from the meninges, the protective layers covering the brain and spinal cord.

While these tumors are generally non-cancerous, their location can result in significant health issues, including persistent headaches, vision problems, memory loss, and seizures.

Research has increasingly associated the prolonged use of certain progestogen-containing medications, like Depo-Provera, with a higher incidence of meningiomas, especially in individuals who use these drugs at high doses or for extended durations.

Patients and healthcare professionals now face important considerations as more information about this connection comes to light.

Diagnosing Intracranial Meningiomas

Diagnosing intracranial meningiomas requires a combination of clinical evaluations and advanced imaging techniques.

Typically, the diagnosis process begins with a neurological examination to assess symptoms such as headaches, sensory changes, or visual disturbances.

If meningioma is suspected, imaging methods like magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or computed tomography (CT) scans are commonly employed to detect and confirm the presence of a tumor.

Key steps in the diagnosis of intracranial meningiomas include:

  1. Neurological Examination: Initial assessment for symptoms like headaches, vision changes, or cognitive issues.
  2. MRI and CT Scans: Advanced imaging techniques to identify and locate the tumor within the brain.
  3. Biopsy (if necessary): May be conducted for tumors with atypical features or uncertain growth patterns.
  4. Symptom Monitoring: Continued monitoring to assess symptom progression, especially in cases where immediate surgery is not indicated.

Treatment Options for Depo-Provera-Related Brain Tumors

The treatment for meningiomas related to Depo-Provera use varies depending on the tumor’s size, growth rate, and impact on the patient’s health.

Common approaches include observation, surgery, and in some cases, radiation therapy to manage or reduce the tumor.

For small or slow-growing meningiomas, observation with regular monitoring may be recommended.

Treatment options for meningiomas brain tumors may include:

  • Observation and Monitoring: This procedure is suitable for small, asymptomatic tumors where regular scans monitor changes in tumor size or symptoms.
  • Surgical Removal: Primary option for accessible tumors that cause symptoms or threaten nearby brain structures.
  • Radiation Therapy: Targeted radiation may be used in cases where surgery is not feasible or to control tumor regrowth.
  • Medication Adjustments: Discontinuing Depo-Provera may help reduce further risk, and healthcare providers often consider alternative contraceptive options.

In cases where the tumor poses a significant risk or affects brain function, surgical removal is often considered the best course of action.

For individuals with Depo-Provera-related meningiomas, early detection and tailored treatment plans can help mitigate symptoms and prevent further complications.

As more research emerges, patients and healthcare providers are urged to weigh the benefits of Depo-Provera against these potential risks and explore safer contraceptive methods when appropriate.

Eligibility Criteria for Depo-Provera Lawsuits

To qualify for a Depo-Provera brain tumor lawsuit, individuals generally need to demonstrate that they used Depo-Provera, a hormonal contraceptive injection, and subsequently developed a brain tumor, such as a meningioma.

Given the specific nature of these cases, eligibility may further depend on the length of Depo-Provera use, with prolonged exposure (typically three years or more) linked more firmly to elevated brain tumor risks.

Lawsuit eligibility may also consider whether the patient was adequately warned about potential side effects.

Evidence Collection and Damage Assessment

Successful Depo-Provera brain tumor claims will most likely depend heavily on thorough evidence collection and an accurate assessment of damages.

Comprehensive documentation is essential, as is an in-depth evaluation of the financial, emotional, and physical impacts suffered due to the brain tumor diagnosis.

To further substantiate their claims, plaintiffs should consider collecting the following types of evidence and supporting documentation:

  • Medical Documentation: Medical records proving Depo-Provera use, imaging reports, and physician notes on tumor diagnosis are foundational evidence.
  • Proof of Product Use: Pharmacy records or documentation of Depo-Provera prescriptions support the connection between the drug and the health complications experienced.
  • Expert Testimony: Medical experts may testify on the likelihood of Depo-Provera contributing to tumor development and the standard of care for patient warning.
  • Damage Calculation: Calculating financial losses, including medical bills, lost wages, and long-term care needs, is critical to determining compensation.
  • Non-Economic Damages: Pain and suffering, loss of enjoyment of life, and emotional distress due to the tumor’s impact are also factors in damage assessment.

A well-documented case and substantial evidence can improve plaintiffs’ chances of recovering compensation for the physical, financial, and emotional damages incurred due to Depo-Provera use.

This approach ensures a more thorough presentation of the harms suffered and holds the manufacturer accountable for alleged failures in providing adequate risk information.

Steps to File a Depo-Provera Brain Tumor Claim

Filing a Depo-Provera brain tumor claim involves several essential steps to ensure that affected individuals present a comprehensive case.

Since every case is unique and outcomes can vary significantly, it is important to consult an experienced attorney for more personalized guidance on the types of compensation you may be eligible to pursue.

The steps to file a Depo-Provera brain tumor lawsuit typically include the following:

  • Consult with an Attorney: Initial consultation with an attorney experienced in pharmaceutical litigation helps assess case eligibility and potential outcomes.
  • Gather Medical Records: It is important to collect complete medical records, including proof of Depo-Provera prescriptions and diagnoses of brain tumors.
  • Establish Causation: Medical evidence and expert testimony are crucial to demonstrate a potential link between Depo-Provera use and the development of a brain tumor.
  • File a Claim: An attorney will help draft and file the claim, ensuring all legal documentation and evidence are properly submitted.
  • Participate in Discovery: During the discovery phase, plaintiffs may be required to provide medical history and other relevant details as the case progresses.

Contact TruLaw using the chat on this page to receive an instant case evaluation and see if you qualify to join others in filing a Depo-Provera lawsuit today.

TruLaw: Accepting Clients for the Depo-Provera Brain Tumor Lawsuit

Depo-Provera lawsuits are being filed by individuals across the country who were diagnosed with brain tumors after using the contraceptive injection.

TruLaw is currently accepting clients for the Depo-Provera brain tumor lawsuit.

A few reasons to choose TruLaw for your Depo-Provera lawsuit include:

  • If We Don’t Win, You Don’t Pay: The Depo-Provera lawyers at TruLaw and our partner firms operate on a contingency fee basis, meaning we only get paid if you win.
  • Expertise: We have years of experience handling pharmaceutical liability cases similar to the Depo-Provera brain tumor lawsuit, which helps us anticipate what we can expect to see in your case and the regulations we will be required to meet.
  • Successful Track Record: TruLaw and our partner law firms have helped our clients recover billions of dollars in compensation through verdicts and negotiated settlements.

If you or a loved one were diagnosed with a brain tumor after using Depo-Provera, you may be eligible to file a Depo-Provera lawsuit and seek compensation.

Contact TruLaw using the chat on this page to receive an instant case evaluation that can determine if you qualify to join others in filing for the Depo-Provera brain tumor lawsuit today.

Frequently Asked Questions

  • What is the Depo-Provera brain tumor lawsuit about?

    The Depo-Provera lawsuit claims that the contraceptive injection increases the risk of developing meningioma brain tumors in patients.

    The lawsuit alleges that Pfizer failed to properly warn users about these serious health risks associated with prolonged use of the medication.

  • What evidence links Depo-Provera to brain tumors?

    A study from the French National Health Data System found a 5.6-fold increased risk of developing meningiomas in women who used Depo-Provera for extended periods.

    The risk was particularly elevated in women over 65 who used the medication continuously for three or more years.

  • Who is eligible to file a Depo-Provera lawsuit?

    Individuals who used Depo-Provera or generic Depo-Provera and subsequently developed a brain tumor or meningioma may qualify to file a lawsuit.

    Eligibility typically requires prolonged use of the medication (usually three years or more) and proper documentation of both usage and diagnosis.

  • What compensation can plaintiffs receive in a Depo-Provera lawsuit?

    Depo-Provera lawsuit plaintiffs may receive compensation for medical costs, lost wages, pain and suffering, and ongoing healthcare needs.

    The amount of compensation in a Depo-Provera settlement will likely depend on factors like the severity of injuries, duration of drug use, and extent of damages incurred.

  • What are the symptoms of Depo-Provera-related brain tumors?

    Meningiomas caused by Depo-Provera can cause symptoms including persistent headaches, vision problems, memory loss, and seizures.

    While these tumors are typically benign, their location in the brain can result in significant health complications requiring medical intervention.

  • How can someone file a Depo-Provera brain tumor claim?

    To file a Depo-Provera claim, individuals should consult an experienced pharmaceutical litigation attorney and gather complete medical records.

    The process involves establishing causation between Depo-Provera use and tumor development, followed by having your Depo Provera lawsuit filed.

  • What are the Depo-Provera Lawsuit Statute of Limitations?

    The statute of limitations for filing a Depo-Provera lawsuit varies by state, typically ranging from 1 to 6 years.

    This period usually begins from the date of injury or when the injury was discovered.

    However, certain factors, such as the “discovery rule” or fraudulent concealment by the defendant, may extend this timeframe.

    Since every case is unique and outcomes can vary significantly, it is important to consult an experienced attorney for more personalized guidance on the types of compensation you may be eligible to pursue.

    Contact TruLaw using the chat on this page to receive an instant case evaluation that can determine if you qualify to join others in filing for the Depo-Provera brain tumor lawsuit today.

Published By:
Jessie Paluch
Jessie Paluch

Experienced Attorney & Legal SaaS CEO

With over 25 years of legal experience, Jessie is an Illinois lawyer, a CPA, and a mother of three.  She spent the first decade of her career working as an international tax attorney at Deloitte.

In 2009, Jessie co-founded her own law firm with her husband – which has scaled to over 30 employees since its conception.

In 2016, Jessie founded TruLaw, which allows her to collaborate with attorneys and legal experts across the United States on a daily basis. This hypervaluable network of experts is what enables her to share reliable legal information with her readers!

You can learn more about the Depo-Provera Lawsuit by visiting any of our pages listed below:

AFFF Lawsuit

AFFF Lawsuit claims are being filed against manufacturers of aqueous film-forming foam (AFFF), commonly used in firefighting.

Claims allege that companies such as 3M, DuPont, and Tyco Fire Products failed to adequately warn users about the potential dangers of AFFF exposure — including increased risks of various cancers and diseases.

Suboxone Lawsuit

Suboxone Tooth Decay Lawsuit claims are being filed against Indivior, the manufacturer of Suboxone, a medication used to treat opioid addiction.

Claims allege that Indivior failed to adequately warn users about the potential dangers of severe tooth decay and dental injuries associated with Suboxone’s sublingual film version.

Social Media Lawsuits

Social Media Harm Lawsuits are being filed against social media companies for allegedly causing mental health issues in children and teens.

Claims allege that companies like Meta, Google, ByteDance, and Snap designed addictive platforms that led to anxiety, depression, and other mental health issues without adequately warning users or parents.

Vaginal Mesh Lawsuits

Transvaginal Mesh Lawsuits are being filed against manufacturers of transvaginal mesh products used to treat pelvic organ prolapse (POP) and stress urinary incontinence (SUI).

Claims allege that companies like Ethicon, C.R. Bard, and Boston Scientific failed to adequately warn about potential dangers — including erosion, pain, and infection.

Bair Hugger Lawsuit

Bair Hugger Warming Blanket Lawsuits involve claims against 3M — alleging their surgical warming blankets caused severe infections and complications (particularly in hip and knee replacement surgeries).

Plaintiffs claim 3M failed to warn about potential risks — despite knowing about increased risk of deep joint infections since 2011.

Baby Formula NEC Lawsuit

Baby Formula NEC Lawsuit claims are being filed against manufacturers of cow’s milk-based baby formula products.

Claims allege that companies like Abbott Laboratories (Similac) and Mead Johnson & Company (Enfamil) failed to warn about the increased risk of necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) in premature infants.

Do You
Have A Case?

Here, at TruLaw, we’re committed to helping victims get the justice they deserve.

Alongside our partner law firms, we have successfully collected over $3 Billion in verdicts and settlements on behalf of injured individuals.

Would you like our help?

Helpful Sites & Resources