First Cook IVC Filter Litigation Bellwether Trials to Begin Soon

Written By:
Jessie Paluch
Jessie Paluch

Attorney Jessie Paluch, founder of TruLaw, has over 25 years of experience as a personal injury and mass tort attorney, and previously worked as an international tax attorney at Deloitte. Jessie collaborates with attorneys nationwide — enabling her to share reliable, up-to-date legal information with our readers.

This article has been written and reviewed for legal accuracy and clarity by the team of writers and legal experts at TruLaw and is as accurate as possible. This content should not be taken as legal advice from an attorney. If you would like to learn more about our owner and experienced injury lawyer, Jessie Paluch, you can do so here.

TruLaw does everything possible to make sure the information in this article is up to date and accurate. If you need specific legal advice about your case, contact us by using the chat on the bottom of this page. This article should not be taken as advice from an attorney.

First Cook IVC Filter Litigation Bellwether Trials to Begin Soon

Scales IVC Filter Lawsuit
Table of Contents

Cook IVC Filter Litigation

The first inferior vena cava (IVC) filter lawsuits against Cook Medical will be tried as bellwether cases next month, and may set the tone for similar cases filed against C.R. Bard that will begin in mid-2017.

The Cook IVC multidistrict litigation (MDL) was established in October 2014 in the Southern District of Indiana.

The lawsuits consolidated into the MDL make similar allegations:

  • Cook Medical failed to inform patients that IVC filters are prone to breakage, tilting, and migration from the initial insertion position.
  • Filters that migrate may puncture the lungs, heart, or inferior vena cava, and cause serious and even fatal injuries.

What are IVC Filters?

IVC filters are medical devices placed between the proximal vessels of the lower extremities and the right side of the heart.

They help prevent pulmonary embolism by catching blood clots and preventing them from traveling to the lungs.

Over the past 30 years, the use of the IVC filter has steadily increased.

While approximately 2,000 filters were implanted in patients in the U.S. in 1979, by 1990, over 120,000 IVC filters had been placed.

At the end of the decade, nearly 50,000 IVC filters were being implanted each year.

Adverse Event Reports Lead to IVC Filter Lawsuits

Since 2005, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has received more than 900 reports of adverse events connected to IVC filters.

According to the FDA, the majority of IVC filters are not retrieved despite the risk of increased fracture, embolism, and IVC wall penetration.

Common complications associated with IVC filters left in the body for long periods of time include:

  • The progression of DVT
  • Recurrent PE
  • Filter migration
  • Tilt, break, or embolism
  • IVC perforation or occlusion

2013 JAMA Internal Medicine report noted that an attempt is made to remove only about 10.5 percent of all IVC filters implanted, and concluded that this low retrieval rate, combined with other factors, resulted in less-than-optimal outcomes due to high rates of venous thromboembolism (VTE).

Written By:
Jessie Paluch
Jessie Paluch

Experienced Attorney & Legal SaaS CEO

With over 25 years of legal experience, Jessie is an Illinois lawyer, a CPA, and a mother of three.  She spent the first decade of her career working as an international tax attorney at Deloitte.

In 2009, Jessie co-founded her own law firm with her husband – which has scaled to over 30 employees since its conception.

In 2016, Jessie founded TruLaw, which allows her to collaborate with attorneys and legal experts across the United States on a daily basis. This hypervaluable network of experts is what enables her to share reliable legal information with her readers!

Camp Lejeune Lawsuit

Camp Lejeune’s water contamination issue spanned several decades starting in the 1950s. Exposure to these chemicals has been linked to various serious health issues, including cancer, organ diseases, and death.

Tylenol Lawsuit

Research is increasingly suggesting a link between the use of Tylenol during pregnancy and the development of neurodevelopmental disorders, such as autism and ADHD, in infants.

AFFF Lawsuit

Legal action is being taken against manufacturers of Aqueous Film-Forming Foam (AFFF), a chemical used in fighting fires. The plaintiffs allege that exposure to the foam caused health issues such as cancer, organ damage, and birth and fertility issues.

Do You
Have A Case?

Here, at TruLaw, we’re committed to helping victims get the justice they deserve.

Alongside our partner law firms, we have successfully collected over $3 Billion in verdicts and settlements on behalf of injured individuals.

Would you like our help?

Helpful Sites & Resources