Attorney Jessie Paluch, founder of TruLaw, has over 25 years of experience as a personal injury and mass tort attorney, and previously worked as an international tax attorney at Deloitte. Jessie collaborates with attorneys nationwide — enabling her to share reliable, up-to-date legal information with our readers.
This article has been written and reviewed for legal accuracy and clarity by the team of writers and legal experts at TruLaw and is as accurate as possible. This content should not be taken as legal advice from an attorney. If you would like to learn more about our owner and experienced injury lawyer, Jessie Paluch, you can do so here.
TruLaw does everything possible to make sure the information in this article is up to date and accurate. If you need specific legal advice about your case, contact us by using the chat on the bottom of this page. This article should not be taken as advice from an attorney.
Occupational asbestos exposure has been a significant concern for decades due to its link to severe health risks, including mesothelioma and lung cancer.
While regulatory measures have reduced exposure in recent years, many workers continue to face risks, especially in industries where asbestos materials were historically widespread.
From manufacturing to construction, asbestos was once lauded for its durability and resistance to heat, leading to its integration into various products and job sites.
On this page, we’ll provide an overview of occupational asbestos exposure, comprehensive occupational risk assessment, high-risk occupations for asbestos exposure, and much more.
Asbestos was extensively used in the 20th century across multiple industries, largely due to its fireproofing and insulating properties.
This mineral was a staple in construction materials, automotive parts, and industrial equipment, often considered indispensable for high-heat applications.
Key industries with historical asbestos use include:
Despite growing awareness, the latency of asbestos-related diseases means that many workers exposed decades ago are only now experiencing health issues.
Today, regulations aim to minimize exposure, but risks remain, particularly in older buildings or during improper asbestos handling.
If you or a loved has been been diagnosed with an asbestos-related disease, you may be eligible to seek compensation.
Contact TruLaw using the chat on this page to receive an instant case evaluation and determine whether you qualify to join others in filing a Mesothelioma lawsuit today.
Workers who suffered occupational asbestos exposure face significant health risks, particularly in industries where asbestos-containing materials remain present.
Despite regulations and the recent ban on chrysotile asbestos by the Biden administration, many job sites still contain these hazardous materials in buildings, equipment, and various industrial products.
Construction workers and demolition professionals face some of the highest risks of occupational exposure to asbestos, especially when working in older buildings where asbestos materials were commonly used in insulation, roofing, and flooring.
Common exposure sources in construction include:
The Environmental Protection Agency reports that construction workers account for a significant percentage of asbestos related disease cases, with approximately 25% of asbestosis deaths occurring in this sector.
Firefighters and emergency personnel face unique challenges regarding occupational safety when responding to fires or disasters in buildings containing asbestos materials.
Their risk of exposure is more than twice that of the general public.
Primary exposure risks include:
These emergency responders often work in high-stress situations where immediate action is required, potentially limiting their ability to take full protective measures against asbestos exposure.
This reality has led to enhanced safety protocols and specialized training for handling asbestos-contaminated environments.
Industrial and manufacturing workers face some of the highest risks of developing an asbestos related disease due to their direct contact with asbestos-containing materials in confined spaces.
The focus on occupational safety has increased since studies revealed the dangers of workplace exposure.
Common industrial settings with high exposure risks include:
These industrial environments often contained multiple asbestos-containing products, from insulation to machinery components, creating sustained exposure risks for workers throughout their careers.
Power plant workers encountered occupational exposure to asbestos through various materials used throughout facility operations, including cement products, insulation, and electrical components.
Their work often required maintaining and repairing equipment in areas with concentrated asbestos materials.
Common exposure sources in power plants include:
The combination of high-temperature operations and the need for fire-resistant materials made power plants particularly hazardous for workers, as maintenance and repair activities often disturbed asbestos-containing materials, releasing dangerous fibers into the air.
Shipyard workers faced some of the highest exposure levels due to the extensive use of asbestos in vessel construction and repair.
Both civilian and military personnel working in these environments encountered asbestos materials in confined spaces, intensifying their exposure risks.
Maritime industry exposure sources include:
The enclosed spaces and poor ventilation in maritime settings created particularly dangerous conditions for workers.
This combination of factors has led to higher rates of asbestos-related diseases among shipyard and maritime workers compared to many other occupations.
Workplace asbestos exposure varies significantly across different occupations, with some jobs presenting substantially higher risk factors than others.
The World Health Organization and occupational safety agencies have documented extensive data showing certain professions face greater dangers of asbestos-related diseases due to prolonged or intense exposure levels.
The construction industry remains one of the most affected sectors for asbestos exposure, with workers regularly encountering materials in older buildings and renovation projects.
The Health Administration reports that construction workers account for 25% of asbestosis deaths, highlighting the ongoing dangers in this field.
High-risk occupations include:
These occupations often involve direct contact with asbestos-containing materials, creating situations where workers may inhale or disturb dangerous fibers during routine tasks.
Many of these jobs historically required handling raw asbestos or working in confined spaces with deteriorating asbestos products.
Secondary exposure risks affect workers who may not directly handle asbestos but work in environments where these materials are present.
The construction industry continues to address these challenges through improved safety protocols and protective equipment requirements.
Moderate-risk positions include:
These occupations typically involve periodic rather than constant exposure to asbestos materials.
However, even limited contact can pose health risks, especially when proper safety measures aren’t followed or workers are unaware of asbestos presence in their work environment.
Federal and state regulations governing asbestos in workplaces aim to prevent malignant mesothelioma and other serious health conditions.
These regulations have evolved since the 1970s, with ongoing updates to address emerging concerns about workplace exposure.
The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) maintain strict guidelines to protect workers from both direct and secondary asbestos exposure.
The EPA’s regulatory framework includes comprehensive measures for handling asbestos in various work environments.
In December 2020, the agency completed Part 1 of its chrysotile asbestos review, identifying significant risks for asbestos exposed workers, particularly those handling aftermarket brakes, brake linings, and gaskets.
Key federal regulations include:
These regulations work together to establish clear guidelines for employers, requiring proper training, safety equipment, and monitoring procedures to minimize exposure risks.
OSHA established specific standards limiting workplace asbestos exposure to 0.1 fibers per cubic centimeter.
These guidelines help prevent the release of asbestos dust during maintenance, renovation, and demolition activities.
OSHA workplace requirements include:
These standards require employers to implement safety programs, maintain proper documentation, and provide necessary protective equipment.
Workers who suspect violations can file anonymous complaints with OSHA, leading to workplace inspections and potential enforcement actions.
Mesothelioma lawsuits are being filed by individuals across the country who need help with their mesothelioma treatment costs after they were exposed to asbestos and later diagnosed with this aggressive cancer.
TruLaw is currently accepting clients who have mesothelioma lawsuit claims they are eligible to file.
A few reasons to choose TruLaw for your mesothelioma lawsuit include:
If you or a loved one have been diagnosed with mesothelioma after being exposed to asbestos, you may be eligible to seek compensation.
Contact TruLaw using the chat on this page to receive an instant case evaluation that can determine if you qualify for a mesothelioma lawsuit today.
The highest-risk occupations include construction workers, shipyard workers, miners, and industrial workers who directly handle asbestos-containing materials.
These workers face up to 10 times higher risk of developing mesothelioma compared to the general population due to prolonged exposure in confined spaces.
Firefighters face exposure through building collapse, smoke inhalation, and debris handling during emergency responses.
Their risk of exposure is more than twice that of the general public, particularly when responding to fires in older buildings containing asbestos materials.
The EPA and OSHA maintain strict guidelines limiting workplace asbestos exposure to 0.1 fibers per cubic centimeter.
These regulations require employers to implement safety programs, provide protective equipment, and conduct regular exposure monitoring.
Construction workers should follow proper safety protocols and wear appropriate protective equipment when working with potential asbestos-containing materials.
Regular training programs and medical surveillance are essential for workers in high-risk construction environments.
Contact an experienced law firm like TruLaw immediately to evaluate your eligibility for a mesothelioma lawsuit.
Their lawyers work on a contingency fee basis and have helped clients recover billions in compensation through verdicts and settlements.
The construction, shipbuilding, and manufacturing industries were the primary users of asbestos throughout the 20th century.
These industries utilized asbestos extensively in insulation, roofing materials, and industrial equipment due to its heat-resistant properties.
Experienced Attorney & Legal SaaS CEO
With over 25 years of legal experience, Jessie is an Illinois lawyer, a CPA, and a mother of three. She spent the first decade of her career working as an international tax attorney at Deloitte.
In 2009, Jessie co-founded her own law firm with her husband – which has scaled to over 30 employees since its conception.
In 2016, Jessie founded TruLaw, which allows her to collaborate with attorneys and legal experts across the United States on a daily basis. This hypervaluable network of experts is what enables her to share reliable legal information with her readers!
You can learn more about the Asbestos by visiting any of our pages listed below:
Here, at TruLaw, we’re committed to helping victims get the justice they deserve.
Alongside our partner law firms, we have successfully collected over $3 Billion in verdicts and settlements on behalf of injured individuals.
Would you like our help?
At TruLaw, we fiercely combat corporations that endanger individuals’ well-being. If you’ve suffered injuries and believe these well-funded entities should be held accountable, we’re here for you.
With TruLaw, you gain access to successful and seasoned lawyers who maximize your chances of success. Our lawyers invest in you—they do not receive a dime until your lawsuit reaches a successful resolution!
Do you believe you’re entitled to compensation?
Use our Instant Case Evaluator to find out in as little as 60 seconds!
AFFF Lawsuit claims are being filed against manufacturers of aqueous film-forming foam (AFFF), commonly used in firefighting.
Claims allege that companies such as 3M, DuPont, and Tyco Fire Products failed to adequately warn users about the potential dangers of AFFF exposure — including increased risks of various cancers and diseases.
Suboxone Tooth Decay Lawsuit claims are being filed against Indivior, the manufacturer of Suboxone, a medication used to treat opioid addiction.
Claims allege that Indivior failed to adequately warn users about the potential dangers of severe tooth decay and dental injuries associated with Suboxone’s sublingual film version.
Social Media Harm Lawsuits are being filed against social media companies for allegedly causing mental health issues in children and teens.
Claims allege that companies like Meta, Google, ByteDance, and Snap designed addictive platforms that led to anxiety, depression, and other mental health issues without adequately warning users or parents.
Transvaginal Mesh Lawsuits are being filed against manufacturers of transvaginal mesh products used to treat pelvic organ prolapse (POP) and stress urinary incontinence (SUI).
Claims allege that companies like Ethicon, C.R. Bard, and Boston Scientific failed to adequately warn about potential dangers — including erosion, pain, and infection.
Bair Hugger Warming Blanket Lawsuits involve claims against 3M — alleging their surgical warming blankets caused severe infections and complications (particularly in hip and knee replacement surgeries).
Plaintiffs claim 3M failed to warn about potential risks — despite knowing about increased risk of deep joint infections since 2011.
Baby Formula NEC Lawsuit claims are being filed against manufacturers of cow’s milk-based baby formula products.
Claims allege that companies like Abbott Laboratories (Similac) and Mead Johnson & Company (Enfamil) failed to warn about the increased risk of necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) in premature infants.
Here, at TruLaw, we’re committed to helping victims get the justice they deserve.
Alongside our partner law firms, we have successfully collected over $3 Billion in verdicts and settlements on behalf of injured individuals.
Would you like our help?