Attorney Jessie Paluch, founder of TruLaw, has over 25 years of experience as a personal injury and mass tort attorney, and previously worked as an international tax attorney at Deloitte. Jessie collaborates with attorneys nationwide — enabling her to share reliable, up-to-date legal information with our readers.
This article has been written and reviewed for legal accuracy and clarity by the team of writers and legal experts at TruLaw and is as accurate as possible. This content should not be taken as legal advice from an attorney. If you would like to learn more about our owner and experienced injury lawyer, Jessie Paluch, you can do so here.
TruLaw does everything possible to make sure the information in this article is up to date and accurate. If you need specific legal advice about your case, contact us by using the chat on the bottom of this page. This article should not be taken as advice from an attorney.
Question: What causes Mesothelioma?
Answer: Mesothelioma causes in the U.S. are primarily linked to asbestos exposure during the 1930s to 1970s.
Asbestos exposure accounts for the vast majority of mesothelioma cases, with occupational exposure being the most common risk factor.
On this page, we’ll provide an overview of mesothelioma causes, major risk factors for mesothelioma development, mesothelioma prevention and risk reduction strategies, and much more.
The development of mesothelioma is strongly associated with several key factors:
The latency period between asbestos exposure and mesothelioma diagnosis typically ranges from 20 to 60 years, making early identification of exposure crucial for monitoring and treatment.
If you or someone you love has been diagnosed with mesothelioma, you may be eligible to seek compensation.
Contact TruLaw using the chat on this page to receive an instant case evaluation and determine if you qualify to file a mesothelioma lawsuit today.
Mesothelioma represents a devastating cancer directly linked to toxic environmental and occupational exposures.
While asbestos remains the primary cause, multiple risk factors contribute to an individual’s potential for developing this aggressive disease.
Workplace environments historically represented the most significant source of asbestos exposure, particularly in industrial and construction settings.
Workers in specific industries faced substantially higher risks of encountering dangerous asbestos materials during their careers.
Industries with high asbestos exposure risk include:
Occupational exposure remains the most prevalent pathway for individuals to develop mesothelioma.
The duration and intensity of workplace contact directly correlate with potential cancer development, creating long-term health risks for workers in these industries.
Military service, particularly in naval branches, presented significant asbestos exposure risks for veterans.
Asbestos was extensively used across military infrastructure, vehicles, and protective equipment due to its heat-resistant properties.
Military positions with increased asbestos exposure risk:
Veterans, especially those who served between the 1930s and 1970s, face higher risks of developing pleural mesothelioma due to widespread asbestos usage during that period.
Many service members were unknowingly exposed to asbestos fibers throughout their military careers.
The connection between military service and malignant mesothelioma highlights the importance of comprehensive health screenings and support for veterans who may have encountered these hazardous materials during their service.
Secondary asbestos exposure occurs when individuals inadvertently come into contact with fibers brought home on clothing, skin, or equipment.
Family members of workers in high-risk industries faced significant potential for indirect contamination.
Women and children were particularly vulnerable to secondary exposure, as workers often unknowingly transported asbestos particles on work clothing or personal items.
This pathway contributed to numerous peritoneal mesothelioma cases among individuals with no direct occupational contact.
While asbestos exposure remains the primary cause, genetic mutations and environmental factors can increase an individual’s susceptibility to malignant pleural mesothelioma.
Specific genetic markers, such as BAP1 gene mutations, may heighten cancer cell development risks.
Environmental exposure near asbestos mining regions or manufacturing sites can also contribute to potential health risks.
Radiation therapy and other ionizing radiation sources might further complicate an individual’s potential for developing mesothelioma.
Asbestos-induced malignant mesothelioma represents a serious health concern that extends beyond direct workplace exposure.
While primary causes are well-documented, researchers continue to investigate additional factors that may contribute to cancer development.
The intricate relationship between asbestos exposure and cellular damage reveals multiple pathways through which this devastating disease can emerge.
Ionizing radiation presents another potential pathway for mesothelioma development.
Medical professionals have observed connections between radiation exposure and cellular mutations that can potentially trigger cancer formation.
Radiation sources that may increase mesothelioma risk include:
Medical research suggests that while radiation alone may not directly cause mesothelioma, it can potentially enhance the carcinogenic effects of asbestos fibers, creating an increased risk for cancer development.
Viral interactions represent another intriguing area of mesothelioma research.
Scientists have identified potential links between certain viral infections and cellular changes that might contribute to cancer progression.
Viral factors potentially associated with mesothelioma include:
The Mesothelioma Applied Research Foundation continues investigating these viral and genetic connections. Pericardial mesothelioma, a rare form of the disease, may have unique interactions with these emerging risk factors that differ from more common lung cancer presentations.
Researchers emphasize that while these factors provide fascinating insights, asbestos-related diseases remain the primary concern for medical professionals and patients alike.
Preventing mesothelioma requires a comprehensive approach to identifying and minimizing asbestos exposure across various environments.
While complete prevention remains challenging, individuals can take strategic steps to reduce their risk of developing this aggressive cancer by understanding potential exposure pathways and implementing protective measures.
Workplace exposure represents the most significant risk for asbestos-related health complications.
The National Comprehensive Cancer Network emphasizes the critical importance of implementing rigorous safety protocols in industries historically associated with asbestos use.
Here are key protective strategies for workers in high-risk industries:
Employers must prioritize worker safety by establishing strict protocols that limit potential asbestos interactions and provide ongoing monitoring for employees in high-risk occupational settings.
Environmental exposure presents another critical pathway for potential mesothelioma development, particularly in regions with historical industrial activities or natural mineral deposits.
Strategies for managing environmental asbestos risks include:
The National Cancer Institute recommends comprehensive environmental assessments, particularly in regions with documented asbestos contamination, to minimize unintentional exposure risks.
Mesothelioma risks vary depending on multiple factors, including duration and intensity of exposure, individual genetic predisposition, and proximity to asbestos-containing environments.
While some individuals may develop other cancers from similar exposures, mesothelioma remains uniquely linked to asbestos interaction.
Family history can also play a significant role in determining an individual’s susceptibility to asbestos-related health complications, underscoring the importance of comprehensive medical evaluations and proactive health monitoring.
Lawsuits related to mesothelioma causes are being filed by individuals across the country who were diagnosed with this aggressive cancer after being exposed to asbestos.
TruLaw is currently accepting clients for mesothelioma cases.
A few reasons to choose TruLaw for your mesothelioma lawsuit include:
If you or a loved one have been diagnosed with mesothelioma after being exposed to asbestos, you may be eligible to seek compensation.
Contact TruLaw using the chat on this page to receive an instant case evaluation that can determine if you qualify for a mesothelioma lawsuit today.
Asbestos exposure is the primary cause of mesothelioma, with occupational exposure being the most common risk factor.
The latency period between exposure and diagnosis typically ranges from 20 to 60 years.
Construction workers, industrial workers, factory personnel, and shipyard workers face the highest risk of asbestos exposure in their workplaces.
Military veterans, particularly those who served in the Navy between the 1930s and 1970s, are also at significant risk.
Yes, secondary exposure can occur when family members come into contact with asbestos fibers brought home on workers’ clothing or personal items.
Women and children were particularly vulnerable to this type of indirect contamination.
Genetic mutations, particularly in the BAP1 gene, can increase an individual’s susceptibility to developing mesothelioma.
These genetic factors, combined with asbestos exposure, may enhance the risk of cancer development.
While not a direct cause, radiation exposure from sources like X-rays and radiation therapy may enhance the carcinogenic effects of asbestos fibers.
This interaction potentially increases the risk of developing mesothelioma in exposed individuals.
Workers should use proper Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) and follow strict safety protocols in industries with potential asbestos exposure.
Regular medical screenings and comprehensive training programs are essential for early detection and risk reduction.
Experienced Attorney & Legal SaaS CEO
With over 25 years of legal experience, Jessie is an Illinois lawyer, a CPA, and a mother of three. She spent the first decade of her career working as an international tax attorney at Deloitte.
In 2009, Jessie co-founded her own law firm with her husband – which has scaled to over 30 employees since its conception.
In 2016, Jessie founded TruLaw, which allows her to collaborate with attorneys and legal experts across the United States on a daily basis. This hypervaluable network of experts is what enables her to share reliable legal information with her readers!
You can learn more about the Asbestos by visiting any of our pages listed below:
Here, at TruLaw, we’re committed to helping victims get the justice they deserve.
Alongside our partner law firms, we have successfully collected over $3 Billion in verdicts and settlements on behalf of injured individuals.
Would you like our help?
At TruLaw, we fiercely combat corporations that endanger individuals’ well-being. If you’ve suffered injuries and believe these well-funded entities should be held accountable, we’re here for you.
With TruLaw, you gain access to successful and seasoned lawyers who maximize your chances of success. Our lawyers invest in you—they do not receive a dime until your lawsuit reaches a successful resolution!
Do you believe you’re entitled to compensation?
Use our Instant Case Evaluator to find out in as little as 60 seconds!
AFFF Lawsuit claims are being filed against manufacturers of aqueous film-forming foam (AFFF), commonly used in firefighting.
Claims allege that companies such as 3M, DuPont, and Tyco Fire Products failed to adequately warn users about the potential dangers of AFFF exposure — including increased risks of various cancers and diseases.
Suboxone Tooth Decay Lawsuit claims are being filed against Indivior, the manufacturer of Suboxone, a medication used to treat opioid addiction.
Claims allege that Indivior failed to adequately warn users about the potential dangers of severe tooth decay and dental injuries associated with Suboxone’s sublingual film version.
Social Media Harm Lawsuits are being filed against social media companies for allegedly causing mental health issues in children and teens.
Claims allege that companies like Meta, Google, ByteDance, and Snap designed addictive platforms that led to anxiety, depression, and other mental health issues without adequately warning users or parents.
Transvaginal Mesh Lawsuits are being filed against manufacturers of transvaginal mesh products used to treat pelvic organ prolapse (POP) and stress urinary incontinence (SUI).
Claims allege that companies like Ethicon, C.R. Bard, and Boston Scientific failed to adequately warn about potential dangers — including erosion, pain, and infection.
Bair Hugger Warming Blanket Lawsuits involve claims against 3M — alleging their surgical warming blankets caused severe infections and complications (particularly in hip and knee replacement surgeries).
Plaintiffs claim 3M failed to warn about potential risks — despite knowing about increased risk of deep joint infections since 2011.
Baby Formula NEC Lawsuit claims are being filed against manufacturers of cow’s milk-based baby formula products.
Claims allege that companies like Abbott Laboratories (Similac) and Mead Johnson & Company (Enfamil) failed to warn about the increased risk of necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) in premature infants.
Here, at TruLaw, we’re committed to helping victims get the justice they deserve.
Alongside our partner law firms, we have successfully collected over $3 Billion in verdicts and settlements on behalf of injured individuals.
Would you like our help?