Attorney Jessie Paluch, founder of TruLaw, has over 25 years of experience as a personal injury and mass tort attorney, and previously worked as an international tax attorney at Deloitte. Jessie collaborates with attorneys nationwide — enabling her to share reliable, up-to-date legal information with our readers.
This article has been written and reviewed for legal accuracy and clarity by the team of writers and legal experts at TruLaw and is as accurate as possible. This content should not be taken as legal advice from an attorney. If you would like to learn more about our owner and experienced injury lawyer, Jessie Paluch, you can do so here.
TruLaw does everything possible to make sure the information in this article is up to date and accurate. If you need specific legal advice about your case, contact us by using the chat on the bottom of this page. This article should not be taken as advice from an attorney.
Question: What asbestos manufacturers and companies produced asbestos products?
Answer: Asbestos manufacturers and companies played a significant role in the widespread use of asbestos throughout the 20th century, particularly from the late 1800s through the 1970s.
Major companies like Johns-Manville grew wealthy by mining, manufacturing, and selling asbestos products, despite knowing the serious health risks to workers and consumers.
On this page, we’ll provide an overview of asbestos manufacturers, historical perspective on asbestos manufacturing, corporate negligence in asbestos manufacturing, and much more.
The industry’s legacy continues to impact public health, with many manufacturers now held accountable through legal action.
The asbestos manufacturing industry was characterized by:
If you or someone you love has been diagnosed with mesothelioma, you may be eligible to seek compensation.
Contact TruLaw using the chat on this page to receive an instant case evaluation and determine if you qualify to file a mesothelioma lawsuit today.
The asbestos manufacturing industry emerged as a powerful economic force in the late 19th and early 20th centuries, transforming industrial production across multiple sectors.
Manufacturers recognized asbestos as a versatile material with remarkable heat-resistant and insulating properties, leading to its widespread adoption in numerous industrial and commercial applications.
Asbestos exposure became increasingly common as manufacturers integrated the mineral into various products, creating a dangerous legacy that would impact millions of workers and consumers.
The industrial revolution provided the perfect environment for asbestos to proliferate across multiple manufacturing sectors.
Here are the key industries that rapidly adopted asbestos-containing products:
The widespread use of asbestos reflected a time when industrial efficiency was prioritized over worker and consumer safety, leading to significant long-term health consequences for millions of Americans.
Manufacturers like Goodyear tire-rubber and other industrial giants developed an extensive range of asbestos-containing products that permeated nearly every aspect of American industrial and domestic life.
These products were prized for their durability and fire-resistant properties.
Major categories of asbestos-related products included:
The proliferation of asbestos products created a silent health crisis, with asbestos mining and manufacturing contributing to numerous cases of lung cancer and other asbestos-related illnesses.
By the mid-20th century, the devastating health impacts of these products began to emerge, ultimately leading to widespread legal action and industry transformation.
Asbestos exposure became a pervasive issue across multiple industrial sectors, putting millions of workers at substantial risk of developing asbestos-related disease.
The manufacturing landscape transformed as companies integrated asbestos into increasingly diverse applications.
Key industries that extensively used asbestos included:
Lung cancer and other asbestos-related illness became significant long-term consequences of asbestos mining and manufacturing practices.
Workers in these industries faced unprecedented exposure risks, often without proper protective equipment or awareness of the potential health hazards associated with the mineral.
The historical narrative of asbestos manufacturing reveals a stark pattern of corporate negligence and prioritizing economic interests over worker safety, creating a legacy of devastating health consequences that continues to impact communities today.
The asbestos manufacturing industry represents a dark chapter in industrial history, where corporate profits systematically overshadowed human health and safety.
Manufacturers knowingly exposed workers and consumers to deadly asbestos fibers, creating a public health crisis that would span decades and impact millions of lives across the United States.
Early occupational cancer research revealed the devastating health consequences of prolonged asbestos exposure, yet manufacturers continued to produce and distribute asbestos-containing products without adequate warnings or protections.
The industrial landscape became a minefield of potential health hazards, with workers in multiple sectors facing unprecedented risks.
Here are the primary ways manufacturers prioritized profits over human safety:
The pervasive use of asbestos created a systemic problem that extended far beyond individual manufacturing facilities, embedding toxic materials into the fundamental infrastructure of American industry.
Mesothelioma patients would later reveal the extensive cover-up strategies employed by asbestos manufacturers to conceal known health dangers.
Construction workers were particularly vulnerable, unknowingly exposed to materials that would ultimately compromise their long-term health.
Manufacturers employed multiple strategies to suppress critical health information:
The systematic suppression of asbestos risks created a legacy of corporate misconduct that would ultimately result in significant asbestos liabilities for manufacturers, leading to numerous legal challenges and compensation funds for affected workers and their families.
Asbestos was a pervasive material used across numerous industries, with manufacturers integrating the mineral into a wide range of products that posed significant health risks to workers and consumers.
The toxic mineral’s versatility made it attractive for industrial applications, leading to widespread use in construction, manufacturing, and consumer goods throughout much of the 20th century.
The manufacturing of asbestos products spanned multiple sectors, creating a dangerous legacy of exposure that would impact millions of Americans.
Asbestos companies developed an extensive array of materials that seemed innovative at the time but would later be recognized as deadly.
Here are some of the most common materials that manufactured asbestos products:
The prevalence of these products meant that exposure was not limited to industrial workers but extended to homeowners, mechanics, and countless other individuals who interacted with these seemingly ordinary materials.
The industrial landscape of the mid-20th century was saturated with asbestos-containing materials, creating numerous pathways for potentially deadly exposure.
Workers in specific industries faced extraordinary risks from prolonged contact with manufactured asbestos.
Industries with the highest risk of asbestos exposure included:
The widespread use of asbestos led to the creation of asbestos bankruptcy trusts, which were established to compensate workers and families impacted by the devastating health consequences of prolonged exposure.
These trusts stand as a testament to the extensive damage caused by products contained asbestos across multiple industries.
Beyond direct workplace exposure, the manufactured asbestos products created significant risks for family members and surrounding communities.
The potential for secondary exposure became a critical health concern as asbestos fibers could be carried home on clothing, skin, and equipment.
Secondary exposure pathways included:
The long-term consequences of these exposure pathways became evident through the establishment of asbestos bankruptcy trusts, which were created to compensate victims of asbestos-related diseases.
These trusts acknowledged the widespread harm caused by companies that manufactured asbestos products without adequately protecting workers and consumers from known health risks.
The asbestos industry in the United States experienced a dramatic transformation during the late 20th century, driven by mounting scientific evidence of the mineral’s devastating health consequences.
As awareness grew about the deadly risks associated with asbestos exposure, manufacturers faced increasing legal challenges and public scrutiny, ultimately leading to a significant decline in production and widespread use across multiple industries.
Regulatory agencies began implementing stricter controls on asbestos use, responding to the overwhelming medical documentation of its harmful effects.
The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) played pivotal roles in establishing guidelines that dramatically reduced asbestos applications in commercial and industrial settings.
Key regulatory milestones that impacted the asbestos industry include:
These regulatory changes fundamentally transformed the industrial landscape, forcing manufacturers to reassess their production methods and seek alternative materials that could provide similar performance without health risks.
The shift away from asbestos prompted significant innovation across multiple sectors, with manufacturers developing safer substitutes that could match the thermal and mechanical properties of the original mineral.
Asbestos litigation and bankruptcy protection became common strategies for companies facing mounting personal injury claims related to their historical product lines.
Emerging alternative materials included:
The transition represented more than a technical challenge; it was a comprehensive reimagining of industrial materials that prioritized worker and consumer safety.
Companies that successfully adapted to these changes not only survived but often emerged as leaders in developing innovative, health-conscious product solutions.
Asbestos lawsuits are being filed by individuals across the country who were diagnosed with mesothelioma, lung cancer, or other asbestos-related diseases after being exposed to asbestos-containing products manufactured by various companies.
TruLaw is currently accepting clients for asbestos exposure cases.
A few reasons to choose TruLaw for your asbestos lawsuit include:
If you or a loved one have been diagnosed with mesothelioma, lung cancer, or other asbestos-related diseases after being exposed to asbestos-containing products, you may be eligible to seek compensation.
Contact TruLaw using the chat on this page to receive an instant case evaluation that can determine if you qualify for an asbestos lawsuit today.
Major companies like Johns-Manville and Goodyear were prominent manufacturers of asbestos-containing products throughout the 20th century.
These manufacturers produced thousands of different products including insulation, cement, textiles, and automotive parts despite knowing the serious health risks.
The main industries that heavily utilized asbestos products were construction, shipbuilding, automotive, and manufacturing.
These sectors used asbestos extensively in materials like insulation, brake components, protective equipment, and building materials from the late 1800s through the 1970s.
Asbestos companies deliberately concealed health risks through strategies like funding manipulated research, maintaining secret internal reports, and challenging medical evidence linking asbestos to cancer.
The systematic suppression of health risk information created a legacy of corporate misconduct that led to numerous legal challenges.
Primary exposure occurred through occupational contact in industries like construction, shipbuilding, and manufacturing where asbestos products were widely used.
Secondary exposure happened when workers unknowingly brought asbestos fibers home on their clothes and through consumer products containing asbestos.
The EPA implemented major regulations in 1989 that banned spray-applied asbestos insulation and most asbestos-containing products.
OSHA also established strict workplace exposure limits and safety requirements that transformed how industries handled asbestos materials.
Individuals diagnosed with mesothelioma, lung cancer, or other asbestos-related diseases can pursue compensation through asbestos lawsuits and bankruptcy trust funds.
TruLaw and partner firms work on a contingency fee basis to help victims recover damages from negligent manufacturers.
Experienced Attorney & Legal SaaS CEO
With over 25 years of legal experience, Jessie is an Illinois lawyer, a CPA, and a mother of three. She spent the first decade of her career working as an international tax attorney at Deloitte.
In 2009, Jessie co-founded her own law firm with her husband – which has scaled to over 30 employees since its conception.
In 2016, Jessie founded TruLaw, which allows her to collaborate with attorneys and legal experts across the United States on a daily basis. This hypervaluable network of experts is what enables her to share reliable legal information with her readers!
You can learn more about the Asbestos by visiting any of our pages listed below:
Here, at TruLaw, we’re committed to helping victims get the justice they deserve.
Alongside our partner law firms, we have successfully collected over $3 Billion in verdicts and settlements on behalf of injured individuals.
Would you like our help?
At TruLaw, we fiercely combat corporations that endanger individuals’ well-being. If you’ve suffered injuries and believe these well-funded entities should be held accountable, we’re here for you.
With TruLaw, you gain access to successful and seasoned lawyers who maximize your chances of success. Our lawyers invest in you—they do not receive a dime until your lawsuit reaches a successful resolution!
Do you believe you’re entitled to compensation?
Use our Instant Case Evaluator to find out in as little as 60 seconds!
AFFF Lawsuit claims are being filed against manufacturers of aqueous film-forming foam (AFFF), commonly used in firefighting.
Claims allege that companies such as 3M, DuPont, and Tyco Fire Products failed to adequately warn users about the potential dangers of AFFF exposure — including increased risks of various cancers and diseases.
Suboxone Tooth Decay Lawsuit claims are being filed against Indivior, the manufacturer of Suboxone, a medication used to treat opioid addiction.
Claims allege that Indivior failed to adequately warn users about the potential dangers of severe tooth decay and dental injuries associated with Suboxone’s sublingual film version.
Social Media Harm Lawsuits are being filed against social media companies for allegedly causing mental health issues in children and teens.
Claims allege that companies like Meta, Google, ByteDance, and Snap designed addictive platforms that led to anxiety, depression, and other mental health issues without adequately warning users or parents.
Transvaginal Mesh Lawsuits are being filed against manufacturers of transvaginal mesh products used to treat pelvic organ prolapse (POP) and stress urinary incontinence (SUI).
Claims allege that companies like Ethicon, C.R. Bard, and Boston Scientific failed to adequately warn about potential dangers — including erosion, pain, and infection.
Bair Hugger Warming Blanket Lawsuits involve claims against 3M — alleging their surgical warming blankets caused severe infections and complications (particularly in hip and knee replacement surgeries).
Plaintiffs claim 3M failed to warn about potential risks — despite knowing about increased risk of deep joint infections since 2011.
Baby Formula NEC Lawsuit claims are being filed against manufacturers of cow’s milk-based baby formula products.
Claims allege that companies like Abbott Laboratories (Similac) and Mead Johnson & Company (Enfamil) failed to warn about the increased risk of necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) in premature infants.
Here, at TruLaw, we’re committed to helping victims get the justice they deserve.
Alongside our partner law firms, we have successfully collected over $3 Billion in verdicts and settlements on behalf of injured individuals.
Would you like our help?