Zimmer M/L Taper With Kinectiv Technology Hip Lawsuit
- Last Updated: April 14th, 2025
Attorney Jessica Paluch-Hoerman, founder of TruLaw, has over 28 years of experience as a personal injury and mass tort attorney, and previously worked as an international tax attorney at Deloitte. Jessie collaborates with attorneys nationwide — enabling her to share reliable, up-to-date legal information with our readers.
Legally Reviewed
This article has been written and reviewed for legal accuracy and clarity by the team of writers and legal experts at TruLaw and is as accurate as possible. This content should not be taken as legal advice from an attorney. If you would like to learn more about our owner and experienced injury lawyer, Jessie Paluch, you can do so here.
Fact-Checked
TruLaw does everything possible to make sure the information in this article is up to date and accurate. If you need specific legal advice about your case, contact us by using the chat on the bottom of this page. This article should not be taken as advice from an attorney.
Zimmer M/L Taper With Kinectiv Technology Hip Lawsuit
The Zimmer Kinectiv hip implant lawsuit alleges that the manufacturer, Zimmer Biomet, knew the product defects but withheld the information from the public — choosing corporate profits over patient safety.
This medical device is said to present an unreasonable risk of pain, swelling, metallosis, and adverse local tissue reaction.
The Zimmer M/L Taper Hip Prosthesis and Zimmer VerSys Hip femoral head are defective in design and dangerous when used together.
The corrosion problem is at the femoral stem and femoral head junction.
Table of Contents
FDA Recall For Zimmer’s M/L Taper Prosthesis
May 18, 2015 – The FDA issued a Class 1 Device Recall Zimmer M/L Taper Hip Prosthesis with Kinectiv Technology.
Due to high levels of manufacturing residue left on the implant components patients are at risk for:
- Allergic Reactions – metal poisoning due to debris and microscopic metal particles in the bloodstream
- Pain and Inflammation – redness, tenderness, swelling in the hip joint,
- Infections – the bone and tissues surrounding the implant
- Loosening and Dislocation – when the implant wears against the bone surfaces, some people have experienced loosening of the replacement and joint dislocation that led to revision surgeries
- Bone Fractures – this can occur in the hip bones due to defects in the neck and stem components
- Bone and Tissue Loss – if a patient has a revision surgery they may suffer bone and tissue loss in the joint.
The FDA has stated that revision surgery to replace defective implants may be necessary.
Zimmer’s Kinectiv Technology
Zimmer’s Kinectiv Technology allows surgeons the flexibility to adjust the length of the affected leg, relieve nerve impingement, allow a better range of motion and makes sure the hip remains stable.
The Zimmer M/L Taper with Kinectiv Technology uses a modular neck system that is inserted into the femoral stem at a fixed angle.
A taper is used to connect the two components of the device.
Kinectiv Hip Lawsuit
As the Zimmer hip replacement lawsuits continue to grow, plaintiffs are requesting an MDL in order to consolidate the cases in front of one judge.
The JPML plans to hear oral arguments for the motion on September 27, 2018, in San Francisco, California.
If you or a loved one has had a Zimmer hip implant and are experiencing any of the side effects listed above you may be entitled to compensation.
Fill out the form on this page so we can go over your legal options as soon as possible.
Managing Attorney & Owner
With over 25 years of legal experience, Jessica Paluch-Hoerman is an Illinois lawyer, a CPA, and a mother of three. She spent the first decade of her career working as an international tax attorney at Deloitte.
In 2009, Jessie co-founded her own law firm with her husband – which has scaled to over 30 employees since its conception.
In 2016, Jessie founded TruLaw, which allows her to collaborate with attorneys and legal experts across the United States on a daily basis. This hypervaluable network of experts is what enables her to share the most reliable, accurate, and up-to-date legal information with our readers!
Here, at TruLaw, we’re committed to helping victims get the justice they deserve.
Alongside our partner law firms, we have successfully collected over $3 Billion in verdicts and settlements on behalf of injured individuals.
Would you like our help?
At TruLaw, we fiercely combat corporations that endanger individuals’ well-being. If you’ve suffered injuries and believe these well-funded entities should be held accountable, we’re here for you.
With TruLaw, you gain access to successful and seasoned lawyers who maximize your chances of success. Our lawyers invest in you—they do not receive a dime until your lawsuit reaches a successful resolution!
AFFF Lawsuit claims are being filed against manufacturers of aqueous film-forming foam (AFFF), commonly used in firefighting.
Claims allege that companies such as 3M, DuPont, and Tyco Fire Products failed to adequately warn users about the potential dangers of AFFF exposure — including increased risks of various cancers and diseases.
Depo Provera Lawsuit claims are being filed by individuals who allege they developed meningioma (a type of brain tumor) after receiving Depo-Provera birth control injections.
A 2024 study found that women using Depo-Provera for at least 1 year are five times more likely to develop meningioma brain tumors compared to those not using the drug.
Suboxone Tooth Decay Lawsuit claims are being filed against Indivior, the manufacturer of Suboxone, a medication used to treat opioid addiction.
Claims allege that Indivior failed to adequately warn users about the potential dangers of severe tooth decay and dental injuries associated with Suboxone’s sublingual film version.
Social Media Harm Lawsuits are being filed against social media companies for allegedly causing mental health issues in children and teens.
Claims allege that companies like Meta, Google, ByteDance, and Snap designed addictive platforms that led to anxiety, depression, and other mental health issues without adequately warning users or parents.
Transvaginal Mesh Lawsuits are being filed against manufacturers of transvaginal mesh products used to treat pelvic organ prolapse (POP) and stress urinary incontinence (SUI).
Claims allege that companies like Ethicon, C.R. Bard, and Boston Scientific failed to adequately warn about potential dangers — including erosion, pain, and infection.
Bair Hugger Warming Blanket Lawsuits involve claims against 3M — alleging their surgical warming blankets caused severe infections and complications (particularly in hip and knee replacement surgeries).
Plaintiffs claim 3M failed to warn about potential risks — despite knowing about increased risk of deep joint infections since 2011.
Baby Formula NEC Lawsuit claims are being filed against manufacturers of cow’s milk-based baby formula products.
Claims allege that companies like Abbott Laboratories (Similac) and Mead Johnson & Company (Enfamil) failed to warn about the increased risk of necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) in premature infants.
Here, at TruLaw, we’re committed to helping victims get the justice they deserve.
Alongside our partner law firms, we have successfully collected over $3 Billion in verdicts and settlements on behalf of injured individuals.
Would you like our help?
