Fortnite Addiction Lawsuit

Published By:
Jessie Paluch
Jessie Paluch

Attorney Jessie Paluch, founder of TruLaw, has over 25 years of experience as a personal injury and mass tort attorney, and previously worked as an international tax attorney at Deloitte. Jessie collaborates with attorneys nationwide — enabling her to share reliable, up-to-date legal information with our readers.

This article has been written and reviewed for legal accuracy and clarity by the team of writers and legal experts at TruLaw and is as accurate as possible. This content should not be taken as legal advice from an attorney. If you would like to learn more about our owner and experienced injury lawyer, Jessie Paluch, you can do so here.

TruLaw does everything possible to make sure the information in this article is up to date and accurate. If you need specific legal advice about your case, contact us by using the chat on the bottom of this page. This article should not be taken as advice from an attorney.

Key takeaways:

  • Epic Games faces lawsuits alleging that Fortnite's game design deliberately uses psychological tactics to create addiction in players, especially minors, leading to mental health issues, behavioral changes, and financial exploitation.
  • Excessive Fortnite gameplay can negatively impact children's mental and physical health, causing anxiety, depression, social isolation, repetitive strain injuries, sleep disruptions, and poor academic performance.
  • Individuals who have experienced mental health issues, financial losses, or other damages due to Fortnite addiction may be eligible to file a lawsuit against Epic Games. TruLaw is currently accepting clients for the Fortnite addiction lawsuit and offers an instant case evaluation to see if you qualify.

Overview of Fortnite Addiction Lawsuits

Fortnite creator Epic Games faces mounting Fortnite Addiction Lawsuit claims as parents and advocacy groups pursue litigation over the game’s allegedly addictive design features and impact on young players’ mental health.

These Fortnite Addiction Lawsuits claim that Epic Games deliberately implemented psychological tactics to create dependency among players, particularly minors, leading to various behavioral and emotional issues.

On this page, we’ll provide an overview of the Fortnite addiction lawsuit., health risks associated with video game addiction, who qualifies for a Video Game Addiction Lawsuit, and much more.

Fortnite Addiction Lawsuit

Parents’ Claims Against Epic Games

Recent studies indicate that excessive gaming can lead to significant behavioral changes in young players, with Fortnite being a particularly popular video game due to its engaging design elements.

The game’s structure has raised serious concerns about its impact on children’s well-being.

Parents nationwide are filing the following claims against Epic Games:

  • Predatory Design Features: Implementation of psychological tactics that encourage compulsive gaming behavior
  • Lack of Warning: Failure to adequately warn about addiction risks and potential mental health impacts
  • Financial Exploitation: Aggressive monetization targeting minors through in-game purchases and loot boxes
  • Mental Health Impact: Documentation of anxiety, depression, and social isolation linked to excessive gameplay

These claims highlight the growing concern over video game addiction and its effects on young players’ development, academic performance, and family relationships.

If your child has experienced mental health issues or addiction-related problems due to Fortnite gameplay, you may be eligible to seek compensation.

Contact TruLaw using the chat on this page to receive an instant case evaluation and learn if you qualify to join others in filing a Fortnite addiction lawsuit.

Table of Contents

Video Game Addiction Lawsuit: Legal Arguments Against Epic Games

The legal action against Epic Games, specifically targeting Fortnite, hinges on allegations that the company’s game design and monetization practices contribute to addictive behaviors, particularly among younger players.

Parents claim that Epic Games has implemented gameplay elements and monetization features deliberately crafted to increase player retention and encourage compulsive gaming, often without clear warnings of the potential psychological and financial risks.

This section explores the core legal arguments in the lawsuit against Epic Games, including concerns about Fortnite’s gameplay model and the lack of sufficient safeguards for players.

Fortnite’s Gameplay and Monetization Model

One of the lawsuit’s central arguments is that Fortnite’s gameplay and monetization models are structured to foster dependency and incentivize in-game spending.

Plaintiffs claim that Epic Games intentionally employs various features that promote excessive gameplay and spending, leading to potential addiction:

  • Reward and Progression Systems: Fortnite uses complex reward mechanisms that encourage players to continue gaming to earn achievements, level up, or gain access to exclusive content, creating a cycle of engagement that may lead to compulsive play.
  • Virtual Currency (V-Bucks): Players must purchase V-Bucks, the game’s in-game currency, to unlock skins, dances, and other items. This currency, detached from real money value, can lead to impulsive spending, particularly among younger users.
  • Battle Passes and Season Events: Fortnite’s seasonal content model, where limited-time rewards are available only through active play, pressures players to stay engaged or risk losing out on exclusive items.
  • Randomized Rewards and Scarcity Tactics: By using features similar to loot boxes, Epic Games encourages players to make repeated purchases, hoping to receive valuable in-game items, which can mimic gambling-like behavior.
  • Peer Pressure in Multiplayer Mode: Fortnite’s multiplayer component includes social features, such as leaderboards and customizable avatars, which can lead to pressure to purchase cosmetic items to “keep up” with friends, reinforcing a cycle of spending and play.

These tactics are argued to exploit psychological triggers known to contribute to compulsive gaming behavior, especially among young players who may be more vulnerable to such strategies.

Plaintiffs assert that this gameplay model is designed to maximize profits, often at the expense of players’ well-being.

Lack of Adequate Warnings and Safeguards

Another key point in the lawsuit is Epic Games’ alleged failure to provide adequate warnings about the potential for addiction and the risks associated with Fortnite’s monetization model.

Plaintiffs claim that Epic Games did not disclose sufficient information about the potentially addictive nature of their game or the risks tied to in-game purchases, particularly for younger users:

  • Absence of Addiction Warnings: Unlike other potentially habit-forming products, Fortnite does not provide clear warnings about the potential for addiction, leaving parents and players uninformed about the risks of prolonged gameplay.
  • Lack of Spending Limit Controls: Fortnite lacks strict spending limits or mechanisms for young players, making it easier for children and adolescents to spend significant amounts of money without fully understanding the financial consequences.
  • Minimal Parental Control Options: Plaintiffs argue that Epic Games does not provide sufficient parental control features to allow guardians to monitor or restrict gameplay and in-game spending effectively.
  • Inadequate Education on Risks: The lawsuit claims that Epic Games has not made meaningful efforts to educate players or parents about the risks of excessive gameplay and spending despite evidence suggesting that some players may experience negative consequences.
  • Failure to Implement Safeguards Against Excessive Play: Unlike online platforms that implement “cool-off” periods or notifications to encourage breaks, Fortnite lacks mechanisms to alert players when gameplay has reached potentially harmful levels.

These arguments highlight the game maker’s perceived lack of responsibility to safeguard its user base, especially younger, more impressionable players.

Plaintiffs argue that Epic Games has prioritized profit over player safety by omitting warnings and not providing proper tools for managing gameplay.

A favorable outcome for the plaintiffs could lead to enhanced protections and transparency within the gaming industry, potentially requiring video game developers to implement clearer warnings and control features in future titles.

Health Consequences of Excessive Gaming

Excessive gaming can lead to a variety of health consequences, impacting players’ mental and physical well-being.

As gaming becomes increasingly immersive, individuals who engage in prolonged sessions or develop compulsive gaming habits may experience challenges that affect their everyday lives, including their mental health, physical comfort, and overall quality of life.

These health effects can range from moderate symptoms, such as eye strain or fatigue, to more severe issues requiring medical attention or therapeutic intervention.

Psychological Effects of Video Game Addiction

Excessively playing video games can take a toll on mental health, particularly for individuals who begin to substitute virtual achievements and relationships for real-world experiences.

Common psychological effects associated with video game addiction often include:

  • Heightened Anxiety and Depression: Individuals who engage in excessive gaming often experience increased levels of anxiety and depression, especially if gaming interferes with social obligations, family life, or academic or professional responsibilities.
  • Social Withdrawal and Isolation: As gaming becomes more central to an individual’s life, they may withdraw from friends and family, leading to isolation and a reliance on virtual interactions over meaningful in-person connections.
  • Decreased Self-Worth: Many players report guilt or low self-esteem when unable to control gaming habits, which can contribute to a reduced sense of self-worth and life satisfaction.
  • Obsessive Thoughts: Compulsive gaming behaviors often involve persistent thoughts about the game, including preoccupations with strategies, progress, or future goals, which can lead to distractions from daily tasks.
  • Mood Instability and Irritability: Excessive gamers may experience emotional dysregulation, such as irritability, frustration, or sadness when not gaming or experiencing in-game setbacks, which can strain personal relationships.

These psychological effects can create a cycle where individuals turn to gaming to cope with negative feelings, further deepening dependency on the game and worsening mental health over time.

In severe cases, professional treatment may be needed to help individuals establish healthier habits and coping mechanisms.

Physical Health Impacts from Prolonged Gaming

In addition to mental health challenges, prolonged gaming can result in several physical health issues due to the sedentary nature of gameplay and the repetitive movements involved.

Physical health impacts from excessive gaming may include:

  • Repetitive Strain Injuries: Conditions like carpal tunnel syndrome, tendonitis, and other repetitive strain injuries are common among frequent gamers due to continuous controller, keyboard, or mouse use.
  • Digital Eye Strain: Staring at screens for extended periods can cause digital eye strain, leading to symptoms like dry eyes, blurred vision, and headaches, especially if breaks are infrequent.
  • Postural Problems and Musculoskeletal Pain: Long gaming sessions can result in poor posture, which may cause neck, shoulder, and back pain. Over time, this can lead to chronic musculoskeletal issues, including spinal alignment problems.
  • Sleep Disruptions: Gaming addiction is often linked to irregular sleep patterns, as individuals may stay up late to play, disrupting their natural sleep cycle and resulting in sleep disorders or chronic fatigue.
  • Weight Gain and Related Health Risks: A sedentary lifestyle, often coupled with poor dietary habits during gaming sessions, can lead to weight gain and increase the risk of conditions like obesity, hypertension, and type 2 diabetes.

These physical health effects can add to the mental burden of gaming addiction, creating a cycle where physical discomfort contributes to social isolation and further gaming dependency.

Preventive steps, such as regular breaks, ergonomic support, and physical activity, can help mitigate these effects. Still, individuals struggling with gaming addiction may benefit from structured support to address both mental and physical health concerns comprehensively.

The health consequences of gaming addiction highlight the importance of moderation, balance, and responsible gaming practices.

For those experiencing severe symptoms, medical and psychological support can help address the underlying causes of gaming dependency and promote a healthier lifestyle.

Do You Qualify for the Epic Games Lawsuit?

Evidence collection focuses on establishing clear connections between Epic Games’ practices and adverse outcomes.

The strength of your case often depends on maintaining detailed records that demonstrate the extent of gameplay and its negative impacts on various aspects of life, including academic performance, social relationships, and mental well-being.

Gathering Evidence for a Video Game Addiction Lawsuit

Establishing a video game addiction case requires compelling evidence demonstrating the addiction’s impact on the individual’s mental, physical, and financial well-being.

Documenting the addiction’s effects on daily life and gathering proof of psychological or physical injuries is important to substantiate your claims.

Key types of evidence include:

  • Medical records: Reports documenting diagnoses, such as anxiety, depression, or repetitive strain injuries linked to prolonged gaming.
  • Gaming activity logs: Records of excessive gaming sessions showing patterns of compulsive play and lack of control over gaming habits.
  • Financial records: Statements or receipts detailing in-game purchases, establishing the financial strain of addiction.
  • Behavioral testimonies: Observations from family members, teachers, or mental health professionals that outline changes in behavior, academic performance, or social interactions.
  • Expert testimony: Insights from psychologists or medical specialists who can establish a link between gaming addiction and resulting psychological or physical harm.

These records are invaluable in illustrating the severity and reach of the addiction, showing both the immediate and long-term effects on the individual.

Damages in Video Game Addiction Lawsuits

Damages in Video Game Addiction Lawsuits are intended to compensate victims for the harm caused by certain games’ addictive design features.

Plaintiffs may be eligible for damages covering various aspects of life impacted by excessive gaming.

Possible damages in these lawsuits include:

  • Medical expenses: Costs of therapy, counseling, or medical treatment for injuries or mental health issues associated with gaming addiction.
  • Emotional distress: Compensation for trauma, stress, and other emotional impacts experienced by both the gamer and their family.
  • Financial losses: Reimbursement for in-game purchases contributes to addiction, as well as financial strain on the family.
  • Loss of quality of life: Damages for diminished ability to engage in daily or social activities, affecting education, relationships, and general well-being.
  • Impact on education or work: Compensation for academic or career progress setbacks due to excessive gaming, such as failing grades or lost employment opportunities.

Achieving these damages depends on demonstrating a clear link between the harm suffered and the game’s design or monetization tactics.

For families dealing with the repercussions of excessive gaming, these damages represent an opportunity to recover the costs and emotional toll associated with video game addiction.

Potential Damages and Compensation

In video game addiction cases, plaintiffs seek compensation for the psychological, social, and financial harm that they or their loved ones have experienced due to compulsive gaming behaviors.

These lawsuits often focus on proving that game developers used addictive design tactics without sufficient warnings, resulting in considerable impacts on players’ lives.

Understanding the types of damages available and the methods for calculating losses is essential for potential plaintiffs who may qualify for compensation.

Types of Damages Sought in Video Game Addiction Cases

In video game addiction lawsuits, damages are typically sought to compensate for a range of personal, financial, and emotional impacts.

Common types of damages include, but are not limited to:

  • Psychological and Emotional Damages: Plaintiffs may pursue compensation for the costs of mental health treatment, such as therapy, counseling, or addiction treatment programs, required to address conditions linked to gaming addiction, including anxiety, depression, or social withdrawal.
  • Financial Damages for In-Game Spending: Plaintiffs can seek reimbursement for excessive spending on in-game purchases, loot boxes, or microtransactions.
  • Educational or Employment Losses: In cases where excessive gaming has interfered with education or job performance, plaintiffs may seek compensation for lost wages, reduced productivity, academic setbacks, or job loss due to gaming addiction.
  • Social and Relational Harm: Damages may cover costs related to family counseling, loss of companionship, or the relational strain caused by gaming addiction.
  • Punitive Damages: In cases where game companies are found to have intentionally designed features to foster addiction without regard for player well-being, plaintiffs may seek punitive damages.

Each type of damage addresses a specific form of harm caused by gaming addiction, providing a path for plaintiffs to recover losses and receive support for overcoming the impact of addictive game design.

Calculating Losses and Harm from Gaming Addiction

Calculating damages in video game addiction cases involves evaluating both tangible and intangible losses associated with compulsive gaming behaviors.

Standard methods for calculating losses typically include:

  • Direct Financial Losses: Financial harm is often calculated based on documented in-game spending. Bank statements, receipts, and transaction histories are used to total expenses on in-game purchases, providing a clear measure of financial losses driven by addictive gaming elements.
  • Medical and Psychological Treatment Costs: Damages for mental health treatment are typically calculated based on past and anticipated future expenses for therapy, counseling, and addiction treatment services.
  • Lost Wages or Academic Opportunity Costs: If gaming addiction interferes with work or school, damages might cover lost wages, career setbacks, or missed educational opportunities.
  • Emotional and Social Impact: While challenging to quantify, the emotional toll of gaming addiction can be considered in damage calculations.
  • Future Losses and Relapse Prevention: For plaintiffs requiring long-term support or preventative measures to avoid relapse, damages may include projected costs for continued therapy, social support, or technology aids that help monitor and control gaming behaviors.

By gathering documentation and providing expert assessments, plaintiffs can establish sufficient and specific allegations of the full range of harm they experienced due to video game addiction.

This approach seeks to restore financial losses and provides essential support for plaintiffs’ mental health and social well-being.

TruLaw: Accepting Clients for the Epic Games Fortnite Addiction Lawsuit

Fortnite addiction lawsuits are being filed against major game development companies, such as Epic Games, by individuals across the country who were negatively impacted by the addictive nature of certain video games.

TruLaw is currently accepting clients for the Epic Games Fortnite addiction lawsuit.

A few reasons to choose TruLaw for your video game addiction lawsuit include:

  • If We Don’t Win, You Don’t Pay: The video game addiction lawyers at TruLaw and our partner firms operate on a contingency fee basis, meaning we only get paid if you win.
  • Expertise: We have years of experience handling product liability cases similar to the EA Games lawsuit, which helps us anticipate what we can expect to see in your case and the regulations we will be required to meet.
  • Successful Track Record: TruLaw and our partner law firms have helped our clients recover billions of dollars in compensation through verdicts and negotiated settlements.

If you or a loved one suffered from video game addiction after playing Fortnite, you may be eligible to file a video game addiction lawsuit and seek compensation.

Contact TruLaw using the chat on this page to receive an instant case evaluation that can determine if you qualify for the EA Games video game addiction lawsuit today.

Frequently Asked Questions

  • What is Internet Gaming Disorder?

    Internet Gaming Disorder is a recognized mental health condition characterized by persistent and excessive video game playing that leads to significant impairment in daily life.

    The World Health Organization (WHO) has included this disorder in the 11th revision of the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-11).

  • Is Fortnite addictive for children?

    Yes, Fortnite can be highly addictive for children due to its engaging gameplay, social features, and in-game rewards.

    Parents should monitor their children while they play video games and be aware of potential signs of video game addiction.

  • How can Fortnite impact a child's behavior?

    Excessive Fortnite gameplay can change a child’s behavior, such as increased aggression, irritability, and neglect of other responsibilities.

    Setting clear boundaries, utilizing industry-leading parental controls, and encouraging a balanced lifestyle can help mitigate these negative behavioral effects.

  • Do loot boxes and in-game purchases in Fortnite contribute to addiction?

    Loot boxes and in-game purchases in Fortnite can contribute to addiction by providing a reward and encouraging players to spend more time and money on the game.

    These monetization strategies can be particularly problematic for children who may not fully understand the financial implications.

  • Are there any class action lawsuits against Fortnite for addiction?

    No, currently, there has not been a class action lawsuit that has been filed against Fortnite or any other major video game companies alleging that their games are designed to be addictive.

    The video game addiction lawsuits seek to hold the game maker accountable for damages through individual claims.

  • What other companies are facing video game addiction lawsuits?

    In addition to Epic Games, other major video game companies, such as Electronic Arts (EA) and Activision Blizzard, have faced lawsuits related to video game addiction and exploitative monetization practices.

    These lawsuits highlight the growing concern over the potential harms of certain video game design elements.

  • How can parents help prevent Fortnite addiction in their children?

    Parents can help prevent Fortnite addiction by setting clear limits on playtime, monitoring their child’s behavior, utilizing industry-leading parental controls, and encouraging alternative activities.

    Open communication and education about the potential risks of excessive video game use are also important in promoting healthy gaming habits.

Published By:
Jessie Paluch
Jessie Paluch

Experienced Attorney & Legal SaaS CEO

With over 25 years of legal experience, Jessie is an Illinois lawyer, a CPA, and a mother of three.  She spent the first decade of her career working as an international tax attorney at Deloitte.

In 2009, Jessie co-founded her own law firm with her husband – which has scaled to over 30 employees since its conception.

In 2016, Jessie founded TruLaw, which allows her to collaborate with attorneys and legal experts across the United States on a daily basis. This hypervaluable network of experts is what enables her to share reliable legal information with her readers!

AFFF Lawsuit

AFFF Lawsuit claims are being filed against manufacturers of aqueous film-forming foam (AFFF), commonly used in firefighting.

Claims allege that companies such as 3M, DuPont, and Tyco Fire Products failed to adequately warn users about the potential dangers of AFFF exposure — including increased risks of various cancers and diseases.

Suboxone Lawsuit

Suboxone Tooth Decay Lawsuit claims are being filed against Indivior, the manufacturer of Suboxone, a medication used to treat opioid addiction.

Claims allege that Indivior failed to adequately warn users about the potential dangers of severe tooth decay and dental injuries associated with Suboxone’s sublingual film version.

Social Media Lawsuits

Social Media Harm Lawsuits are being filed against social media companies for allegedly causing mental health issues in children and teens.

Claims allege that companies like Meta, Google, ByteDance, and Snap designed addictive platforms that led to anxiety, depression, and other mental health issues without adequately warning users or parents.

Vaginal Mesh Lawsuits

Transvaginal Mesh Lawsuits are being filed against manufacturers of transvaginal mesh products used to treat pelvic organ prolapse (POP) and stress urinary incontinence (SUI).

Claims allege that companies like Ethicon, C.R. Bard, and Boston Scientific failed to adequately warn about potential dangers — including erosion, pain, and infection.

Bair Hugger Lawsuit

Bair Hugger Warming Blanket Lawsuits involve claims against 3M — alleging their surgical warming blankets caused severe infections and complications (particularly in hip and knee replacement surgeries).

Plaintiffs claim 3M failed to warn about potential risks — despite knowing about increased risk of deep joint infections since 2011.

Baby Formula NEC Lawsuit

Baby Formula NEC Lawsuit claims are being filed against manufacturers of cow’s milk-based baby formula products.

Claims allege that companies like Abbott Laboratories (Similac) and Mead Johnson & Company (Enfamil) failed to warn about the increased risk of necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) in premature infants.

Do You
Have A Case?

Here, at TruLaw, we’re committed to helping victims get the justice they deserve.

Alongside our partner law firms, we have successfully collected over $3 Billion in verdicts and settlements on behalf of injured individuals.

Would you like our help?

Helpful Sites & Resources