Attorney Jessie Paluch, founder of TruLaw, has over 25 years of experience as a personal injury and mass tort attorney, and previously worked as an international tax attorney at Deloitte. Jessie collaborates with attorneys nationwide — enabling her to share reliable, up-to-date legal information with our readers.
This article has been written and reviewed for legal accuracy and clarity by the team of writers and legal experts at TruLaw and is as accurate as possible. This content should not be taken as legal advice from an attorney. If you would like to learn more about our owner and experienced injury lawyer, Jessie Paluch, you can do so here.
TruLaw does everything possible to make sure the information in this article is up to date and accurate. If you need specific legal advice about your case, contact us by using the chat on the bottom of this page. This article should not be taken as advice from an attorney.
On this page, we’ll provide an overview of the Nurture Inc. lawsuit for heavy metals in baby food, legal basis for the Nurture Inc. baby food lawsuit, allegations against Nurture Inc. in the toxic baby food lawsuit, and much more.
Key aspects of the Nurture Inc. lawsuit include, but are not limited to:
If your child regularly consumed Happy BABY or other Nurture baby foods and was diagnosed with autism, ADHD, or other neurodevelopmental disorders, you may qualify for compensation.
Contact TruLaw using the chat on this page for a free consultation to see if you are eligible to file a claim in the Nurture lawsuit today.
Nurture, Inc., the parent company of Happy Family Organics baby foods, faces lawsuits alleging their products contain unsafe levels of toxic heavy metals.
The Nurture Inc. lawsuit claims the company failed to disclose and properly address this contamination despite internal testing showing high amounts of heavy metals in their foods.
This case is part of a broader legal action against several major baby food brands, which has prompted many parents to seek advice from a baby food lawyer.
According to a Congressional report released in February 2021, testing data from Nurture showed concerning levels of arsenic, lead, cadmium and mercury in their finished baby foods and ingredients.
The report revealed that Nurture’s products frequently exceeded the company’s own internal limits for these toxic metals.
Some specific findings include:
These levels present serious health risks to babies and toddlers, who are very vulnerable to the effects of toxic metals.
Even low levels of arsenic, lead, cadmium and mercury can impair development and cause lifelong deficits in intelligence.
The Nurture Inc. lawsuits allege that the company marketed their products as healthy and safe despite knowing about these high levels of heavy metals.
Plaintiffs argue that Nurture had a duty to disclose this contamination or take steps to reduce the heavy metals in its products but failed to do so.
Nurture’s CEO did not fully cooperate with the Congressional subcommittee’s investigation and provided no specific documents showing their products were safe.
Parents across the country have filed lawsuits against Nurture and other baby food companies after learning their children may have been exposed to unsafe levels of toxic metals.
Some cases involve child-developed autism, attention disorders, and other neurodevelopmental issues who regularly ate Nurture’s baby foods.
Many parents are understandably outraged to learn that products they trusted to be safe and nutritious for their babies were actually contaminated with dangerous toxins.
The Nurture Inc. lawsuits seek justice and compensation for families harmed by this deception and for Nurture’s negligence in allowing these contaminated foods to be sold.
Some of the plaintiffs’ stories demonstrate just how devastating the impact of Nurture’s actions can be on babies and their loved ones.
Studies have shown that exposure to heavy metals during a child’s first years of development can put them at elevated risk for:
Even amounts of heavy metals previously thought to be “safe” can still cause irreversible harm to a baby’s developing brain.
There is no established safe level of these metals for infants.
The Nurture Inc. baby food lawsuits allege several legal violations by the company, including failure to warn consumers and negligent misrepresentation of the safety of their products.
Organizations like Healthy Babies Bright Futures continue to push for reforms to ensure the safety of baby food maker Nurture products and protect the health of infants and young children.
Plaintiffs argue that Nurture’s failure to disclose the heavy metal contamination in their baby foods violates state consumer protection laws that prohibit companies from engaging in false or misleading advertising.
By marketing their products as healthy, high-quality and beneficial for babies without revealing the presence of toxins, Nurture misled parents into purchasing foods they thought were safe but actually exposed their children to harm.
The lawsuits also accuse Nurture of negligence for allowing baby foods with elevated heavy metals to be sold and for not properly testing ingredients and finished products for these contaminants.
Plaintiffs claim Nurture breached their implied warranty that their baby foods were fit for consumption by containing dangerous levels of heavy metals.
The Nurture Inc. lawsuits have been consolidated into multidistrict litigation (MDL) in the Eastern District of New York, along with similar cases against other baby food manufacturers like Beech-Nut and Gerber.
MDLs allow cases with common factual and legal issues to be coordinated under one court for more efficient proceedings during the pretrial and discovery process.
As of July 2022, the Nurture Inc. MDL is still in the early stages.
The court has appointed leadership for the plaintiffs’ counsel and is overseeing the gathering and review of evidence.
Nurture has previously tried to get some of the consumer protection claims dismissed but this motion was denied by the court.
The cases continue to move forward as more affected families come forward.
If the plaintiffs prevail in the Nurture Inc. lawsuits, the courts could award significant damages to compensate families for medical expenses, ongoing care needs, pain and suffering, and more.
The courts may also consider granting punitive damages to punish Nurture for their actions and deter other companies from similar misconduct.
As more evidence comes to light, Nurture may be motivated to try to reach settlements with the plaintiffs rather than continue litigation and risk a costly verdict against them at trial.
Previous lawsuits against food companies for mislabeling, deceptive marketing, and contamination have resulted in multi-million dollar settlements paid out to affected consumers.
Parents who believe their child may have been harmed by heavy metals in Nurture’s Happy BABY or other baby food products should contact an experienced law firm right away to discuss their legal rights and options.
An attorney can review your family’s specific circumstances and advise whether you may have a baby food contamination claim against Nurture.
Generally, you may qualify to file a claim against Nurture as part of the baby food heavy metals lawsuit if:
To get started, contact an attorney handling these cases for a free consultation.
If they determine you likely qualify, they can begin gathering documentation like pediatric medical records and product purchase receipts.
Your lawyer can file an individual baby food class action lawsuit on your behalf or add your claim to an existing consolidated action against Nurture.
They will guide you through each step of the process and fight to secure the justice and recovery your family deserves.
TruLaw is currently representing parents across the country in lawsuits against Nurture and other baby food manufacturers over the issue of heavy metals.
Our firm has extensive experience litigating complex defective products and consumer protection cases.
We have the resources and knowledge to hold companies accountable for the harm caused by their negligence.
Our attorneys understand the immense toll a child’s neurodevelopmental issues can take on a family and are committed to pursuing the maximum compensation possible.
We offer free consultations and work on a contingency basis, so there are no upfront or out-of-pocket costs for our clients.
We only get paid if we win a jury award or settlement for you.
If you believe your child may have a case against Nurture or other baby food companies, contact TruLaw today to learn more about your family’s legal options.
Our team is available 24/7 to provide the answers and guidance you need during this difficult time.
We can determine if you qualify for a Nurture Inc. lawsuit claim and advise you of important deadlines and next steps.
Nurture Inc., Beech-Nut, Gerber, and Hain Celestial (Earth’s Best Organic) face lawsuits after a Congressional report revealed high levels of arsenic, lead, cadmium, and mercury in their products.
The suits claim they misled parents about these contaminants.
Nurture is a company that owns Happy Family Brands and sells baby food under the brand name Happy BABY.
Over 25% of Nurture’s products exceeded the maximum allowable cadmium level for drinking water, with many also containing high arsenic and lead.
Nurture frequently violated its own internal limits but still marketed products as safe.
Your child may qualify if they regularly ate the baby foods in question and were diagnosed with autism, ADHD or another neurodevelopmental condition.
Factors like timing and medical history determine eligibility.
Consult an attorney for a free case review.
Even low levels of arsenic, lead and other heavy metals can permanently harm a baby’s developing brain, leading to IQ deficits, learning and behavioral challenges, and speech and motor issues.
There is no established safe level of exposure.
Contact a law firm handling the toxic baby food litigation to see if you qualify.
They can pursue compensation for medical expenses, ongoing care needs, and your family’s suffering.
Look for attorneys with relevant experience and a track record of fighting for children’s health.
Experienced Attorney & Legal SaaS CEO
With over 25 years of legal experience, Jessie is an Illinois lawyer, a CPA, and a mother of three. She spent the first decade of her career working as an international tax attorney at Deloitte.
In 2009, Jessie co-founded her own law firm with her husband – which has scaled to over 30 employees since its conception.
In 2016, Jessie founded TruLaw, which allows her to collaborate with attorneys and legal experts across the United States on a daily basis. This hypervaluable network of experts is what enables her to share reliable legal information with her readers!
You can learn more about the Toxic Baby Food Lawsuit by visiting any of our pages listed below:
Here, at TruLaw, we’re committed to helping victims get the justice they deserve.
Alongside our partner law firms, we have successfully collected over $3 Billion in verdicts and settlements on behalf of injured individuals.
Would you like our help?
At TruLaw, we fiercely combat corporations that endanger individuals’ well-being. If you’ve suffered injuries and believe these well-funded entities should be held accountable, we’re here for you.
With TruLaw, you gain access to successful and seasoned lawyers who maximize your chances of success. Our lawyers invest in you—they do not receive a dime until your lawsuit reaches a successful resolution!
Do you believe you’re entitled to compensation?
Use our Instant Case Evaluator to find out in as little as 60 seconds!
AFFF Lawsuit claims are being filed against manufacturers of aqueous film-forming foam (AFFF), commonly used in firefighting.
Claims allege that companies such as 3M, DuPont, and Tyco Fire Products failed to adequately warn users about the potential dangers of AFFF exposure — including increased risks of various cancers and diseases.
Suboxone Tooth Decay Lawsuit claims are being filed against Indivior, the manufacturer of Suboxone, a medication used to treat opioid addiction.
Claims allege that Indivior failed to adequately warn users about the potential dangers of severe tooth decay and dental injuries associated with Suboxone’s sublingual film version.
Social Media Harm Lawsuits are being filed against social media companies for allegedly causing mental health issues in children and teens.
Claims allege that companies like Meta, Google, ByteDance, and Snap designed addictive platforms that led to anxiety, depression, and other mental health issues without adequately warning users or parents.
Transvaginal Mesh Lawsuits are being filed against manufacturers of transvaginal mesh products used to treat pelvic organ prolapse (POP) and stress urinary incontinence (SUI).
Claims allege that companies like Ethicon, C.R. Bard, and Boston Scientific failed to adequately warn about potential dangers — including erosion, pain, and infection.
Bair Hugger Warming Blanket Lawsuits involve claims against 3M — alleging their surgical warming blankets caused severe infections and complications (particularly in hip and knee replacement surgeries).
Plaintiffs claim 3M failed to warn about potential risks — despite knowing about increased risk of deep joint infections since 2011.
Baby Formula NEC Lawsuit claims are being filed against manufacturers of cow’s milk-based baby formula products.
Claims allege that companies like Abbott Laboratories (Similac) and Mead Johnson & Company (Enfamil) failed to warn about the increased risk of necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) in premature infants.
Here, at TruLaw, we’re committed to helping victims get the justice they deserve.
Alongside our partner law firms, we have successfully collected over $3 Billion in verdicts and settlements on behalf of injured individuals.
Would you like our help?