Toxic Baby Food Lawsuit

The U.S. Supreme Court heard oral arguments on Tuesday in a jurisdictional dispute involving Hain Celestial Group and Whole Foods Market over whether a federal judgment in a baby food lawsuit should be vacated after an appellate court ruled the case was improperly removed from state court.

At issue is whether a final federal judgment must be nullified when a non-diverse defendant—such as Whole Foods—is later found to have been wrongly dismissed, eliminating federal diversity jurisdiction.

The plaintiffs, Texas parents Grant and Sarah Palmquist, allege that Hain’s Earth’s Best Organic baby food, purchased from Whole Foods, caused their child’s autism and heavy metal poisoning.

The Fifth Circuit held that the district court should not have retained jurisdiction once Whole Foods, a Texas-based company, was dismissed from the case.

During the hearing, Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Elena Kagan expressed concern about depriving plaintiffs of their chosen forum.

Hain’s counsel argued that the Palmquists suffered no actual prejudice, but Justice Sotomayor pushed back, stating that losing the ability to sue “the people you want to sue in the forum you want” constitutes a significant disadvantage.

The Toxic Baby Food multidistrict litigation recorded a steady increase in case filings, rising from 225 in October to 272 in November.

This growth reflects a continuing wave of families coming forward with claims.

Plaintiffs allege that exposure to heavy metals found in certain commercial baby food products led to developmental disorders, including autism and ADHD.

The litigation remains active as investigations progress and additional lawsuits are filed.

Parents whose children were diagnosed with autism or other developmental disorders after consuming baby food contaminated with heavy metals may be eligible to file a Toxic Baby Food Lawsuit. 

Contact TruLaw for a free consultation to learn about your legal options.

A federal court has approved a plan to organize and manage lawsuits involving AngioDynamics port catheters, which are medical devices used to deliver chemotherapy and other IV treatments.

Plaintiffs claim the company’s port systems, including the SmartPort, Vortex Port, and Xcela Port, were defectively designed, leading to fractures, infections, migration, and blood clots.

There are now about 128 lawsuits pending in federal court, all consolidated before Judge Jinsook Ohta in the Southern District of California.

To move the litigation forward, the court approved a bellwether selection process.

These early test trials will help determine how juries view evidence related to the most common injuries: infections, fractures, and thrombosis.

Key dates include:

• February 6, 2026: Parties meet to determine injury-type distribution.
• June 5, 2026: Each side selects nine cases, forming a pool of 18.
• July 15, 2026: Plaintiff Fact Sheets due.
• September 1, 2026: Defendant Fact Sheets due.
• December 11, 2026: Each side removes one case from the opposing list, finalizing eight bellwether cases.

These selected cases will move into discovery and expert review before trial. While their outcomes won’t be binding, the results will guide settlement discussions and future case strategy.

The AngioDynamics MDL mirrors the structure of the Bard PowerPort litigation, which involves similar design defect claims.

If no settlement is reached after the bellwether trials, the remaining cases may return to their original courts for trial.

The process is expected to take several years and will help define the path forward for hundreds of injured patients seeking accountability.

New lab testing by the Clean Label Project found dangerous levels of heavy metals—including arsenic, cadmium, and DEHP—in several U.S. infant formulas, prompting the FDA to promise stricter oversight and updated safety standards.

The results showed DEHP contamination in nearly 95% of older brands, despite its known links to cancer and neurological harm.

FDA Commissioner Marty Makary announced plans to make manufacturers prove their products’ safety as part of a new testing initiative.

The findings raise potential product liability and failure-to-warn claims, as some newer brands reportedly achieved zero detectable toxins, suggesting safer alternatives exist.

As regulators tighten scrutiny, these revelations could fuel lawsuits alleging that formula makers prioritized profit over infant safety, marking a new front in litigation over toxic exposure in children’s products.

A federal judge in California has ruled that key claims against Amazon will move forward in the toxic baby food multidistrict litigation (MDL), finding the company may be held liable for distributing products contaminated with heavy metals.

Parents allege Amazon knowingly sold baby food containing arsenic, lead, cadmium, and mercury, metals linked to autism and other developmental disorders.

While the court dismissed certain warranty and consumer protection claims, it allowed negligence and strict liability claims to proceed based on Amazon’s active role in monitoring and distributing the products.

The court cited internal communications showing Amazon conducted safety reviews with manufacturers Nurture and Hain, determining the company may have assumed a duty to ensure product safety but failed to act.

According to the complaint, Amazon continued selling products flagged for contamination even after receiving incomplete responses from suppliers.

Under Louisiana law, the court also permitted a redhibition claim, a defect-based claim, to move forward, finding that Amazon may have knowingly sold defective baby food.

However, similar allegations against Whole Foods were dismissed for lack of evidence showing direct knowledge of contamination.

Baby food manufacturers, including Gerber and Beech-Nut, are petitioning Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley to prevent two key expert witnesses from testifying in the federal toxic baby food MDL, which consolidates more than 200 lawsuits in the Northern District of California.

The motion, filed September 26, seeks to block testimony from dietician Priscilla Barr and exposure scientist Rachael Jones, Ph.D., who are expected to connect heavy metal contamination in baby food to autism and ADHD in children.

Defendants argue that the plaintiffs’ experts are attempting to link developmental disorders to “trace levels” of metals such as arsenic, lead, cadmium, and mercury, despite evidence showing that concentrations in some products are nearly 200 times the allowable lead levels for bottled water.

They further argue that similar exposures occur through regular consumption of fruits and vegetables, and that autism rates have risen even as national heavy metal exposure has declined.

If Judge Corley grants the motion, plaintiffs may lose the opportunity to prove causation to a jury, possibly leading to many case dismissals.

However, parallel lawsuits in California state court, where the first trial is expected to proceed later this year, would remain unaffected.

That state trial is closely watched because its outcome could influence future settlement values in the broader baby food litigation.

The Toxic Baby Food lawsuit grew between September and October, with filings increasing from 210 to 225 cases.

The litigation alleges that multiple baby food brands sold products containing dangerous levels of heavy metals such as arsenic, lead, cadmium, and mercury.

These substances are linked to developmental delays and neurological disorders in children, including autism and ADHD.

The steady rise in cases reflects ongoing action from parents and guardians pursuing accountability and compensation for alleged harm caused by toxic baby food products.

If your child has been diagnosed with autism or other autism spectrum disorders after consuming toxic baby food from major brands like Gerber, Beech-Nut, or Earth’s Best Organic, you may be eligible to pursue compensation.

Contact TruLaw using the chat on this page to receive an instant case evaluation and see if you qualify to join others in filing a toxic baby food lawsuit.

Sprout Organics has issued a voluntary recall of its Sweet Potato, Apple & Spinach 3.5-ounce baby puree pouches after testing revealed the potential for elevated lead levels.

The affected lot is identified as lot code 4212 with an expiration date of October 29, 2025.

The recalled products were primarily sold through Walgreens and independent retailers in the Southern United States, with most purchases occurring between September and December 2024.

Consumers are advised to check the lot code on the bottom strip of the pouch and return affected products to the point of purchase for a full refund.

Sprout Organics is already named as a defendant in the baby food heavy metals lawsuit, where plaintiffs allege that exposure to toxic metals in baby food products increases the risk of autism and other neurodevelopmental disorders.

New York lawmakers have introduced the Baby Food Safety and Transparency Act, designed to address the presence of toxic heavy metals in baby food.

The bill requires that all baby food sold in the state undergo monthly testing for arsenic, cadmium, lead, and mercury.

Testing must be conducted by ISO/IEC 17025:2017-accredited laboratories using FDA-aligned methods.

Key provisions of the bill include:

• Sales Restrictions: Baby food exceeding state heavy metal limits would be deemed adulterated and unsafe for sale.
• Routine Testing: Manufacturers must test each production batch at least once a month and keep thorough records.
• Public Access to Results: Testing data, including levels of each metal, must be posted online and made available through a QR code on product labels.
• Labeling Requirements: Packaging must direct consumers to the testing information via QR code.
• Consumer Reporting: A reporting system will be created to allow the public to flag non-compliant products.

The proposal comes in response to concerns that federal standards fall short in protecting children from heavy metal exposure.

If enacted, the law would represent one of the most stringent state-level food safety regulations in the U.S.

Case activity in the toxic heavy metals baby food multidistrict litigation (MDL) held steady between August and September 2025.

According to the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation (JPML), the number of pending lawsuits declined slightly from 211 to 210 during this period.

These lawsuits target leading baby food manufacturers, alleging that their products contained hazardous levels of arsenic, lead, cadmium, and mercury.

Plaintiffs claim that exposure to these toxic metals has caused developmental delays, neurological damage, and other long-term health complications in children.

If your child has been diagnosed with autism or other autism spectrum disorders after consuming toxic baby food from major brands like Gerber, Beech-Nut, or Earth’s Best Organic, you may be eligible to pursue compensation.

Contact TruLaw using the chat on this page to receive an instant case evaluation and see if you qualify to join others in filing a toxic baby food lawsuit.

Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton has opened an investigation into major baby food brands, including Gerber and Plum Organics, over allegations of false advertising related to products containing unsafe levels of toxic heavy metals.

The attorney general’s office has issued civil investigative demands and stated that additional companies may face scrutiny as the probe widens.

Paxton alleges that manufacturers set internal toxin limits for arsenic, lead, cadmium, and mercury at levels that pose known neurological risks to children.

Both Gerber and Plum Organics have responded, claiming their products meet or exceed FDA standards and undergo rigorous testing before reaching consumers.

This investigation coincides with ongoing multidistrict litigation in California federal court, where parents allege that exposure to heavy metals in baby foods caused developmental disorders in children.

While Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley recently dismissed several foreign parent companies, claims against domestic manufacturers, including Gerber, Beech-Nut, Nurture, Plum, Walmart, Sprout Foods, and Neptune Wellness Solutions, remain active.

Illinois Governor J.B. Pritzker has signed Senate Bill 73, introducing strict new testing and transparency requirements for baby food manufacturers.

Starting January 1, 2026, companies must conduct monthly testing for toxic heavy metals, including arsenic, cadmium, lead, mercury, and others.

Beginning January 1, 2027, manufacturers will be required to make these test results publicly available, increasing transparency for consumers.

The law also bans the sale or distribution of baby food products that exceed FDA limits for these contaminants.

Parents will have the ability to report suspected violations to the Illinois Department of Public Health if contamination levels surpass federal safety thresholds.

This legislation comes as lawsuits over toxic heavy metals in baby food continue nationwide, placing additional regulatory pressure on manufacturers to ensure product safety and accurate disclosures.

A new report from Consumer Reports and Unleaded Kids reveals that many baby food manufacturers are failing to provide easily accessible test results for toxic heavy metals, despite new regulatory requirements in California.

Under California Assembly Bill 899, which took effect in January 2024, baby food makers must conduct monthly testing for arsenic, lead, cadmium, and mercury and publicly post results.

Researchers reviewed 39 brands, awarding top ratings to those publishing complete testing data directly on their websites.

Key findings include:

• 16 brands — including Gerber, Plum Organics, and Earth’s Best — met the full transparency standard.
• 21 brands — such as Beech-Nut, Walmart’s Parent’s Choice, and Target’s Good & Gather Baby — required consumers to enter product codes or take additional steps to access results.

These findings come as more than 200 lawsuits are pending in federal court, consolidated in multidistrict litigation in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California.

Plaintiffs allege that manufacturers failed to warn consumers about the risks of toxic heavy metal exposure, claiming internal testing and public reports have long revealed contamination levels exceeding safety guidelines.

Consumer Reports recommends parents reduce potential exposure by diversifying children’s diets, avoiding rice-based foods, peeling root vegetables, and limiting fruit juice consumption.

This report could influence ongoing litigation as transparency and safety concerns remain central to the claims.

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has issued a letter to manufacturers, distributors, and retailers of infant formula, baby food, and children’s food products, emphasizing the need for better collaboration and improved recall communications.

The agency is calling on companies to immediately notify the FDA when initiating a recall and to enhance consumer outreach with broader public announcements and clearer messaging.

To support these efforts, the FDA plans to:

• Launch a centralized, user-friendly webpage dedicated to infant and child food recalls
• Improve search and filtering functions for recall data
• Accelerate the recall classification process

Long-term plans include integrating AI-assisted tools to analyze recall communications and developing a digital platform for standardized recall data submissions by industry.

These actions are part of the FDA’s “Operation Stork Speed” initiative, which aims to improve transparency and response times following recent contamination incidents and past supply chain disruptions involving infant formula and other children’s foods.

The Toxic Baby Food multidistrict litigation (MDL) added 31 new cases between July and August, bringing the total number of pending actions to 211—the largest monthly increase since early 2024.

The lawsuits allege that baby food products contained dangerous levels of toxic heavy metals such as arsenic, lead, cadmium, and mercury.

Plaintiffs claim these contaminants contributed to serious neurodevelopmental disorders in children, including autism and ADHD.

If your child has been diagnosed with autism or other autism spectrum disorders after consuming toxic baby food from major brands like Gerber, Beech-Nut, or Earth’s Best Organic, you may be eligible to pursue compensation.

Contact TruLaw using the chat on this page to receive an instant case evaluation and see if you qualify to join others in filing a toxic baby food lawsuit.

On July 23, 2025, a group of U.S. Senators, including Katie Britt, Tom Cotton, Rick Scott, and Josh Hawley, introduced the Safe Baby Formula Act, a proposed federal law aimed at removing toxic heavy metals from infant formula.

The legislation would prohibit the inclusion of harmful substances like arsenic, lead, cadmium, and mercury in baby formula and require the FDA to investigate their long-term health impacts on infants.

These metals have been linked in scientific research to serious risks including neurodevelopmental delays, autism spectrum disorders, and ADHD.

This bill comes amid mounting concern from parents, pediatricians, and consumer safety advocates over the continued sale of infant nutrition products that may expose children to hazardous substances during critical developmental stages.

Senator Britt stressed that ensuring children’s health is a cornerstone of supporting strong American families, while Senator Cotton noted the bill’s role in improving transparency and rebuilding public trust in infant nutrition.

The introduction of the Safe Baby Formula Act may also add legal weight to ongoing toxic baby food lawsuits, which allege that manufacturers knowingly distributed products with dangerous heavy metal levels without adequate warnings.

On July 10, 2025, the FDA called for “radical transparency” from all sectors of the infant and toddler formula supply chain in response to rising concerns over contamination and recent recalls.

The agency directed manufacturers, distributors, packers, importers, and retailers to improve public communication and promptly disclose risks linked to infant formula products.

FDA Commissioner Dr. Marty Makary emphasized that protecting infants requires full transparency and immediate action when contamination is identified.

Deputy Commissioner Kyle Diamantas announced a new recall hub on FDA.gov to centralize alerts and make it easier for families to identify affected infant and toddler products.

Diamantas, a former defense attorney for Abbott Laboratories in infant formula lawsuits, now oversees food safety for the FDA—raising concerns from lawmakers and advocates over potential conflicts of interest.

The FDA’s statement comes alongside its first comprehensive nutrient review of infant formula in nearly 30 years.

The agency continues to monitor reports of toxic substances in baby food, including heavy metals and PFAS, found in third-party testing of products still on the market.

Regulatory updates and enforcement actions are expected as the FDA works to address both nutritional adequacy and contamination risks.

New legal and regulatory pressure is intensifying concerns over the presence of toxic heavy metals in baby food.

A coalition of 20 state attorneys general, including D.C. Attorney General Brian Schwalb, has urged the FDA to revisit its denial of a petition calling for enforceable limits on heavy metals in commercial baby foods.

The letter points to repeated findings of arsenic, lead, cadmium, and mercury in top-selling brands like Gerber, Beech-Nut, HappyBABY, and Earth’s Best.

The AGs argue that the FDA’s “Closer to Zero” initiative lacks sufficient speed, transparency, and binding protections.

Currently, the FDA has only issued non-binding action levels for two metals—lead in juice and arsenic in infant rice cereal—leaving the majority of baby food products largely unregulated despite years of documented risk.

The 2021 House Oversight Report revealed disturbing internal test data:

• Nurture sold products with up to 180 ppb of inorganic arsenic and 641 ppb of lead, while Beech-Nut used ingredients testing over 900 ppb arsenic.

A recent WJLA I-Team investigation found that 1 in 4 toddler snack bars contained lead levels exceeding proposed FDA limits.

Lawsuits filed nationwide allege manufacturers knowingly distributed contaminated products without warning consumers, seeking damages for long-term neurological harm to children.

July 3rd, 2025: Oregon Infants Poisoned by Recalled Target Baby Food 

Two infants in Oregon have been diagnosed with lead poisoning after consuming a recalled Good & Gather baby food product sold at Target, according to the Oregon Health Authority (OHA).

Both children were exposed through the Pea, Zucchini, and Kale Thyme Vegetable Puree, one of the items included in the FDA’s March 2025 recall of more than 25,000 units.

The FDA categorized the recall as Class II, indicating a risk of medically reversible but potentially harmful health effects.

Though the recall is now closed, officials caution that contaminated products may still be present in homes. The affected packages carry a best-by date of December 2025.

Lead exposure is especially dangerous for infants, as it can cause long-term developmental damage.

The OHA urges parents to be aware of symptoms and seek blood testing if exposure is suspected.

In 2024, Oregon documented 361 cases of pediatric lead poisoning—most involving children under age six.

Two infants in Oregon have been diagnosed with lead poisoning after eating baby food from Target’s Good & Gather brand, according to a recent announcement from the Oregon Health Authority (OHA).

Health officials confirmed that both children had consumed the Pea, Zucchini, and Kale Thyme Vegetable Puree—one of the flavors included in a March 2025 recall issued by the FDA.

Over 25,000 units were recalled at that time due to concerns about potential lead contamination.

The FDA classified the recall as Class II, meaning the products could cause medically reversible but potentially serious health effects.

Although the recall is now officially closed, authorities caution that some households may still have the contaminated baby food on hand.

The affected pouches are labeled with a best-by date of December 2025.

The OHA stressed the dangers of lead exposure in young children, noting that it can cause significant developmental harm and that symptoms often go unnoticed without a blood test.

In 2024, Oregon reported 361 cases of pediatric lead poisoning, with most affecting children under the age of six.

Health officials urge parents to check their pantries and discard any remaining recalled baby food to avoid further risk.

The Toxic Baby Food multidistrict litigation (MDL) saw a steady rise in filings this past month, increasing from 167 cases in June to 180 in July.

Parents continue to allege that well-known baby food brands sold products containing harmful levels of heavy metals, including lead, arsenic, cadmium, and mercury—substances linked to autism, ADHD, and other neurodevelopmental disorders.

The court is moving forward with pretrial proceedings, including active discovery and expert disclosure deadlines that will shape the admissibility of scientific evidence.

If your child has been diagnosed with autism or other autism spectrum disorders after consuming toxic baby food from major brands like Gerber, Beech-Nut, or Earth’s Best Organic, you may be eligible to pursue compensation.

Contact TruLaw using the chat on this page to receive an instant case evaluation and see if you qualify to join others in filing a toxic baby food lawsuit.

A recent study funded by the Clean Label Project and conducted by Ellipse Analytics has uncovered alarming levels of toxic heavy metals in U.S. snack and nutrition bars, raising serious concerns about consumer safety and legal accountability.

According to the findings:

• 98% of bars tested positive for lead.
• Nearly 22% exceeded California Prop 65’s lead limits.
• 98% also contained cadmium, with some lower-quality bars holding more than three times the heavy metal content found in higher-quality options.
• Vegan, soy-based, dairy-free, and gluten-free bars were equally affected.

Lead, cadmium, arsenic, and mercury are all linked to severe health risks, including neurological damage, cancer, and organ failure—particularly in children.

Yet, there are no federal standards that regulate heavy metals in snack bars.

Advocates are comparing this issue to the toxic baby food litigation, where companies faced lawsuits for failing to prevent harmful exposure.

With this new data, snack bar manufacturers could also face legal action for failing to ensure product safety.

The NHS has issued updated infant feeding guidance urging parents not to use store-bought baby food pouches as everyday meals for babies under 12 months.

The advisory warns that many of these commercial products fail to meet basic nutritional needs and may pose hidden health risks.

This is the first time national UK health guidance has directly challenged the widespread use of baby food pouches, many of which are labeled as suitable from birth.

The warning follows a BBC Panorama investigation that found baby food from six leading UK brands lacked essential nutrition.

The NHS “Start for Life” website now advises delaying the introduction of solid foods until around six months and recommends against giving babies snacks.

It also cautions parents against allowing infants to suck directly from pouches, citing a heightened risk of tooth decay.

Health experts and advocates say the warning is long overdue. Nutritionist Charlotte Stirling-Reed and Dr. Vicky Sibson criticized current marketing practices and called for tighter regulations.

Although the Department of Health maintains that existing laws are sufficient, campaigners continue to push for clearer labeling and stronger oversight of the baby food industry.

Publix has issued a recall for its GreenWise Pear, Kiwi, Spinach & Pea baby food pouches due to possible lead contamination, as announced on May 9.

The affected 4-ounce pouches were sold in eight states, including North Carolina, and carry a best-if-used-by date of November 1, 2025.

Routine testing revealed elevated lead levels, prompting the recall as a precaution.

Though no illnesses have been reported, the FDA stresses that even low levels of lead can harm children’s development, including learning, behavior, and neurological function.

Publix confirmed that the recalled products have been removed from store shelves and that customers may return them for a full refund.

This recall adds to a growing list of baby food products flagged for heavy metal contamination.

Defendants in the federal multidistrict litigation (MDL) over toxic baby food must file their motions to dismiss the Amended Master Complaint by June 27, 2025, according to a pretrial order issued by Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley after a status conference held on May 22.

The schedule also sets July 25 as the deadline for plaintiffs to file opposition briefs, with August 14 reserved for defendants’ replies.

The Amended Master Complaint, submitted on April 16, follows a prior ruling that dismissed claims concerning aluminum and infant formula.

However, the court allowed the core allegations—focused on toxic heavy metal exposure—to proceed.

The revised complaint sharpens the plaintiffs’ focus on claims that baby food products from major brands such as Gerber and Beech-Nut contained hazardous levels of arsenic, lead, cadmium, and mercury.

Plaintiffs allege that exposure to these metals has led to developmental disorders in children, including autism and ADHD.

The MDL, centralized in the Northern District of California, consolidates more than 130 lawsuits.

These cases largely stem from a 2021 Congressional report that uncovered alarmingly high concentrations of toxic metals in widely consumed baby food products.

The litigation continues to draw national attention as parents, health advocates, and lawmakers scrutinize safety standards in the baby food industry.

Publix has issued a voluntary recall of its GreenWise Pear, Kiwi, Spinach & Pea baby food pouch due to elevated lead levels detected during routine testing.

The recalled four-ounce pouches are marked with GTIN 41415-00901 and a ‘best by’ date of November 1, 2025.

Although no illnesses have been reported, Publix has pulled the product from shelves across all eight states where it operates and is offering full refunds.

This is the second baby food recall linked to lead in recent weeks, following Target’s April recall of a similar Good & Gather item.

Despite growing public concern, the FDA has not released a formal warning regarding the issue.

Critics warn that the FDA’s silence may reduce the urgency with which both consumers and retailers respond to the potential hazard.

Consumer safety advocates, including Sarah Sorscher from the Center for Science in the Public Interest, emphasize that FDA alerts typically lead to faster action and greater public awareness.

Industry experts suggest that recent FDA guidance on acceptable lead levels in baby food has led to increased testing and more frequent recalls.

However, they caution that regulatory efforts may be losing momentum.

In response to backlash, the FDA recently reversed its decision to close a heavy metals testing lab, while the CDC’s lead poisoning prevention program has faced staffing reductions amid a broader agency restructuring.

The Toxic Baby Food lawsuit continues to grow as more families come forward with claims that baby food products contained dangerous levels of heavy metals.

These lawsuits allege that manufacturers knowingly sold products contaminated with arsenic, lead, mercury, and cadmium—substances linked to developmental delays, cognitive issues, and long-term health risks in children.

In the past month, 21 new cases were added to the multidistrict litigation (MDL), bringing the total number of new filings in 2025 to 68.

Plaintiffs argue that companies failed to warn consumers about these toxic ingredients, despite growing research on the potential harm.

Exposure to heavy metals in early childhood can lead to irreversible damage, impacting a child’s lifelong health and cognitive development.

As the litigation progresses, families continue to seek accountability and justice from the manufacturers of these products.

If your child has been diagnosed with autism or other autism spectrum disorders after consuming toxic baby food from major brands like Gerber, Beech-Nut, or Earth’s Best Organic, you may be eligible to pursue compensation.

Contact TruLaw using the chat on this page to receive an instant case evaluation and see if you qualify to join others in filing a toxic baby food lawsuit.

Two recent federal rulings out of New York have deepened a legal divide on whether parents can sue baby food manufacturers over toxic heavy metals in their products—an issue central to the ongoing Toxic Baby Food Lawsuit.

On March 19, 2025, a federal judge in the Northern District of New York dismissed a class action against Beech-Nut.

The court ruled that the plaintiffs failed to show economic injury under Article III standing, rejecting their argument that they overpaid based on a “price premium theory.”

Just one week later, the Southern District of New York reached the opposite conclusion in a similar case against Nurture, Inc., the maker of Happy Baby Organics.

That court found that the plaintiffs had standing and allowed most claims to proceed, including consumer fraud and violations of state laws in California, Illinois, and Minnesota.

In the Nurture case, the judge accepted arguments that consumers would not have paid premium prices had they known the baby food contained harmful levels of arsenic, lead, cadmium, and mercury—claims backed by a 2021 congressional report.

The court also rejected preemption defenses, emphasizing the FDA has not finalized limits on heavy metals in baby food.

This conflicting precedent between the Northern and Southern Districts highlights how toxic baby food claims may be treated differently depending on jurisdiction.

While some courts are adopting stricter standing requirements, others are allowing more flexibility in consumer protection claims—an important development as litigation continues to expand nationwide.

The U.S. Supreme Court has agreed to review a pivotal case involving claims that Earth’s Best organic baby food contributed to a child’s autism, a decision that could significantly impact toxic baby food litigation nationwide.

The lawsuit was originally dismissed by a federal judge in Texas, who ruled that the plaintiffs failed to prove a direct causal link between heavy metals in the baby food and the child’s autism spectrum disorder.

However, the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals later reversed that dismissal, finding that Whole Foods had been wrongly excluded from the case due to jurisdictional issues.

The appellate court sent the case back to Texas state court for a new trial.

Hain Celestial Group and Whole Foods are now appealing to the Supreme Court, arguing that the Fifth Circuit’s ruling creates a problematic precedent by allowing new trials based solely on procedural errors rather than the merits of the case.

The companies warn this could lead to legal abuse and an increased burden on defendants and courts nationwide.

The plaintiffs allege that exposure to trace levels of arsenic, lead, and mercury in baby food contributed to their child’s neurological development issues—an allegation echoed in numerous similar lawsuits across the country.

While the Supreme Court reviews the case, a new trial in Texas is on hold.

Legal observers note that the Court’s decision could influence future litigation strategies and reshape the rules governing toxic baby food cases going forward.

A Reuters review of newly released test results reveals that several top baby food manufacturers—including Gerber, Beech-Nut, Plum Organics, and Happy Family—are failing to meet California’s strict lead standards under a law that took effect on January 1, 2025.

Out of 1,757 tested batches, 102 exceeded the state’s maximum allowable lead exposure limit of 0.5 micrograms per day for children.

Elevated lead levels were found in organic sweet potatoes, prunes, and carrots from various brands.

Although none of the batches violated federal limits set by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), experts argue that California’s standards aim to better protect infants, who are particularly vulnerable to lead’s neurological effects.

This news comes amid a federal lawsuit involving thousands of families, which alleges that heavy metal exposure in baby food may contribute to autism spectrum disorder (ASD) and attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD).

A federal judge recently allowed the case to proceed, signaling increasing legal and public scrutiny.

While companies claim their products comply with legal limits using batch averaging or long-term consumption assumptions, critics argue that these methods may not accurately reflect the real-world risks children face.

Maryland has enacted a law similar to California’s, and Illinois is considering similar legislation.

As concerns over toxic heavy metals in baby food continue to grow, more states are expected to follow suit.

If your child has been diagnosed with autism or other autism spectrum disorders after consuming toxic baby food from major brands like Gerber, Beech-Nut, or Earth’s Best Organic, you may be eligible to pursue compensation.

Contact TruLaw using the chat on this page to receive an instant case evaluation and see if you qualify to join others in filing a toxic baby food lawsuit.

Target has announced a nationwide recall of 25,600 units of its Good & Gather Baby Pea, Zucchini, Kale & Thyme Vegetable Puree due to elevated lead levels, according to the FDA.

The affected product, made by FRUSELVA USA, was distributed nationally and includes lot numbers 4169 (Best by Dec 09, 2025) and 4167 (Best by Dec 07, 2025).

This Class II recall indicates a potential for medically reversible health effects, but lead exposure in infants can still result in long-term neurological harm.

Even low doses of lead are known to contribute to developmental delays, behavioral issues, and cognitive impairment.

Parents are urged to stop using the product and verify packaging against the recalled lots.

This recall underscores growing concerns about heavy metals in baby food and increases pressure on manufacturers and regulators to implement stronger safety standards.

If your child has been diagnosed with autism or other autism spectrum disorders after consuming toxic baby food from major brands like Gerber, Beech-Nut, or Earth’s Best Organic, you may be eligible to pursue compensation.

Contact TruLaw using the chat on this page to receive an instant case evaluation and see if you qualify to join others in filing a toxic baby food lawsuit.

In a key advancement for families seeking justice, U.S. District Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley ruled on April 3, 2025, that claims in the Toxic Baby Food Lawsuit can proceed in federal court.

The ruling allows allegations of defective manufacturing, negligence, and failure to warn to move forward in the multidistrict litigation (MDL).

More than 600 baby food products from companies including Gerber, Beech-Nut, Walmart, Hain Celestial, and Danone are named in the lawsuit.

Plaintiffs allege these products contained harmful levels of arsenic, lead, mercury, and cadmium, contributing to neurological disorders such as autism and ADHD.

While defendants argued these metals occur naturally, Judge Corley determined that plaintiffs presented valid claims that some companies failed to meet internal safety standards or ignored contamination risks.

This decision marks a critical phase in the litigation and increases accountability pressure on manufacturers accused of endangering children’s health through unsafe baby food.

If your child has been diagnosed with autism or other autism spectrum disorders after consuming toxic baby food from major brands like Gerber, Beech-Nut, or Earth’s Best Organic, you may be eligible to pursue compensation.

Contact TruLaw using the chat on this page to receive an instant case evaluation and see if you qualify to join others in filing a toxic baby food lawsuit.

The Toxic Baby Food Lawsuit continues to grow, with a notable rise in case filings between March and April 2025.

In March, 101 new cases were added to the litigation.

By April, the total increased to 135 pending cases, reflecting an additional 34 new filings.

This increase underscores the continued concern from families impacted by toxic heavy metals found in baby food.

As awareness spreads, more parents are pursuing legal action to hold manufacturers accountable and seek compensation for the potential long-term harm caused by these contaminated products.

The upward trend in filings highlights the sustained momentum behind this litigation.

If your child has been diagnosed with autism or other autism spectrum disorders after consuming toxic baby food from major brands like Gerber, Beech-Nut, or Earth’s Best Organic, you may be eligible to pursue compensation.

Contact TruLaw using the chat on this page to receive an instant case evaluation and see if you qualify to join others in filing a toxic baby food lawsuit.

U.S. Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has launched “Operation Stork Speed,” a new initiative aimed at increasing heavy metal testing in infant formula.

The plan directs the FDA to prioritize children’s nutritional safety and conduct a full toxic exposure review—the first of its kind since 1998.

However, this initiative faces major staffing challenges.

The FDA is still recovering from significant workforce reductions under the Trump administration, including layoffs and the end of telework arrangements.

Experts warn that without additional personnel, the FDA may struggle to meet new oversight demands.

This effort follows recent findings by Consumer Reports, which identified concerning levels of lead and arsenic in formulas produced by Abbott and Mead Johnson—two companies already facing lawsuits over NEC injuries and toxic baby food exposures.

Kennedy stated that the FDA will increase product sampling and enforce stricter ingredient monitoring.

Still, food safety advocates caution that the agency may need to double its staff to meet the initiative’s goals.

Despite the obstacles, “Operation Stork Speed” is seen as a critical step toward reforming an oversight system that has failed to prevent heavy metal contamination in infant nutrition.

If your child has been diagnosed with autism or other autism spectrum disorders after consuming toxic baby food from major brands like Gerber, Beech-Nut, or Earth’s Best Organic, you may be eligible to pursue compensation.

Contact TruLaw using the chat on this page to receive an instant case evaluation and see if you qualify to join others in filing a toxic baby food lawsuit.

Illinois lawmakers are advancing new legislation aimed at protecting children from toxic heavy metals in baby food.

Senate Bill 73, introduced by Sen. Laura Fine, would ban the sale of baby food in Illinois that contains arsenic, cadmium, lead, or mercury—metals linked to developmental delays and long-term health issues.

If passed, the law would require manufacturers to test products monthly for toxic metals, disclose detected levels by name, and include a QR code on packaging with access to full test results and FDA health resources.

The Illinois Department of Public Health would also gain the authority to implement consumer reporting rules.

Sen. Fine emphasized the need for transparency, noting that many parents are unaware of the risks.

The bill passed unanimously out of the Senate Public Health Committee and awaits a full Senate vote.

If your child has been diagnosed with autism or other autism spectrum disorders after consuming toxic baby food from major brands like Gerber, Beech-Nut, or Earth’s Best Organic, you may be eligible to pursue compensation.

Contact TruLaw using the chat on this page to receive an instant case evaluation and see if you qualify to join others in filing a toxic baby food lawsuit.

The Toxic Baby Food Lawsuit is ongoing.

A recent Consumer Reports investigation has raised new concerns about infant formula safety after detecting potentially harmful levels of lead and arsenic in select products.

The study tested 41 powdered infant formulas and found that while most posed no immediate health threat, several showed elevated levels of toxic substances.

Formulas tested positive for contaminants including lead, arsenic, per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS), bisphenol A (BPA), and acrylamide—all of which are linked to serious health risks in infants.

Enfamil’s Nutramigen formula was reported to have the highest lead levels.

Meanwhile, Abbott Nutrition’s EleCare Hypoallergenic and Similac Alimentum were noted for their high arsenic concentrations.

Manufacturers have argued that some contaminants occur naturally in ingredients, but Consumer Reports is calling for stronger federal oversight.

In response, the FDA and Department of Health and Human Services have launched “Operation Stork Speed,” a new initiative focused on expanding testing and reducing toxic exposures in baby formula products.

This latest investigation may fuel ongoing litigation as parents seek accountability for potential harm linked to contaminated infant nutrition.

If your child has been diagnosed with autism or other autism spectrum disorders after consuming toxic baby food from major brands like Gerber, Beech-Nut, or Earth’s Best Organic, you may be eligible to pursue compensation.

Contact TruLaw using the chat on this page to receive an instant case evaluation and see if you qualify to join others in filing a toxic baby food lawsuit.

The Toxic Baby Food Lawsuit is ongoing.

On February 25, 2025, Congressman Raja Krishnamoorthi called on new HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. to take immediate steps toward eliminating toxic heavy metals from baby food.

In his letter, Krishnamoorthi urged the Department of Health and Human Services to prioritize long-overdue regulations on arsenic, cadmium, and mercury.

Krishnamoorthi pointed to his 2021 investigation, which revealed dangerously high lead levels in baby food—some measuring up to 177 times the legal limit for drinking water.

He criticized the FDA’s Closer to Zero initiative for repeated delays and a lack of urgency in finalizing safety standards.

He has requested a full briefing from both HHS and the FDA by March 15 to present a clear plan of action.

Emphasizing bipartisan support, Krishnamoorthi noted that parents deserve better transparency and stronger protections when it comes to infant nutrition.

If your child has been diagnosed with autism or other autism spectrum disorders after consuming toxic baby food from major brands like Gerber, Beech-Nut, or Earth’s Best Organic, you may be eligible to pursue compensation.

Contact TruLaw using the chat on this page to receive an instant case evaluation and see if you qualify to join others in filing a toxic baby food lawsuit.

The Toxic Baby Food Lawsuit involves allegations that certain baby food products contain harmful levels of heavy metals, such as arsenic, lead, mercury, and cadmium.

These toxic metals have been linked to developmental delays, cognitive impairments, and other significant health risks in children.

Plaintiffs assert that manufacturers failed to warn consumers about these dangers, exposing infants to potential harm.

In February, there were 92 cases pending in the Toxic Baby Food MDL. By March, that number had risen to 101, with 9 new claims added.

Heavy metal contamination in baby food can cause irreversible damage, particularly during critical stages of childhood development, resulting in lifelong health issues.

If your child has been diagnosed with autism or other autism spectrum disorders after consuming toxic baby food from major brands like Gerber, Beech-Nut, or Earth’s Best Organic, you may be eligible to pursue compensation.

Contact TruLaw using the chat on this page to receive an instant case evaluation and see if you qualify to join others in filing a toxic baby food lawsuit.

The Toxic Baby Food Lawsuit is ongoing. 

As Congress delays action on toxic heavy metals in baby food, several states are moving forward with their own regulations to protect infants from lead, arsenic, cadmium, and mercury contamination.

Maryland recently passed “Rudy’s Law,” following California’s lead in requiring baby food manufacturers to test products for heavy metals and display QR codes for transparency.

The law is named after Rudy Callahan, a toddler who suffered acute lead poisoning from contaminated applesauce pouches.

His mother, Sarah Callahan, has become a strong advocate for stricter regulations, testifying in multiple states to prevent similar cases.

Since Maryland’s action, at least five other states, including Virginia, have introduced similar legislation.

Virginia lawmaker Michelle Lopes Maldonado, whose child also faced health issues linked to food contamination, is advocating for greater corporate accountability and consumer awareness.

While federal legislation remains stalled, state initiatives are already making an impact.

QR codes are appearing on baby food labels, giving parents instant access to safety test results.

Meanwhile, lawmakers in Washington, D.C., plan to reintroduce the Baby Food Safety Act in an effort to set national standards.

If your child has been diagnosed with autism or other autism spectrum disorders after consuming toxic baby food from major brands like Gerber, Beech-Nut, or Earth’s Best Organic, you may be eligible to pursue compensation.

Contact TruLaw using the chat on this page to receive an instant case evaluation and see if you qualify to join others in filing a toxic baby food lawsuit.

Concerns over toxic heavy metals in baby food continue to grow, prompting calls for stricter regulations.

While the FDA recently issued voluntary limits on lead in baby food, experts and lawmakers argue that more enforceable measures are needed to protect infants from harmful substances like cadmium and arsenic.

A 2021 Congressional report exposed dangerously high levels of heavy metals, including lead, in baby food from major brands.

Some products contained lead levels as high as 880 parts per billion (ppb), far exceeding the FDA’s proposed limit of 10 ppb. 

The report criticized both the food industry and regulatory agencies for failing to address these risks, raising serious concerns about the safety of infant nutrition.

The Baby Food Safety Act seeks to implement mandatory limits on heavy metals in all baby food products, aiming to close regulatory gaps that have allowed contamination to persist.

Meanwhile, states like California and Maryland have begun implementing their own regulations, increasing pressure on federal agencies to take stronger action.

If your child has been diagnosed with autism or other autism spectrum disorders after consuming toxic baby food from major brands like Gerber, Beech-Nut, or Earth’s Best Organic, you may be eligible to pursue compensation.

Contact TruLaw using the chat on this page to receive an instant case evaluation and see if you qualify to join others in filing a toxic baby food lawsuit.

At the beginning of the year, 88 cases were pending in the Toxic Baby Food MDL, and by February, the number had increased to 92, with 4 new claims filed.

The Toxic Baby Food Lawsuit is ongoing, involving claims that certain baby food products contain harmful levels of heavy metals, including arsenic, lead, mercury, and cadmium.

These toxic substances have been linked to developmental delays, cognitive impairments, and other serious health risks in children.

Plaintiffs argue that manufacturers failed to warn consumers about these dangers, putting infants at risk.

This gradual rise reflects growing awareness among parents about the potential dangers of heavy metal exposure in baby food, which can cause irreversible harm, especially during early childhood development, leading to lifelong health challenges.

If your child has been diagnosed with autism or other autism spectrum disorders after consuming toxic baby food from major brands like Gerber, Beech-Nut, or Earth’s Best Organic, you may be eligible to pursue compensation.

Contact TruLaw using the chat on this page to receive an instant case evaluation and see if you qualify to join others in filing a toxic baby food lawsuit.

The Toxic Baby Food Lawsuit is ongoing. 

A 2021 congressional report found that over 90% of tested baby food products contained toxic heavy metals, with rice-based products and sweet potato snacks showing the highest contamination levels.

Consumer Reports also confirmed these findings in independent testing.

New California Law on Baby Food Safety

In response to these concerns, California enacted a 2024 law requiring baby food manufacturers to:

• Test for heavy metals at least once per month.
• Publicly disclose test results on their websites.
• Provide QR codes on product packaging for easy consumer access.

Advocacy groups such as Consumer Reports and Unleaded Kids continue to pressure manufacturers to adopt stricter safety measures.

However, only a few companies, including Plum Organics and Once Upon a Farm, have voluntarily shared 2024 test results.

Health Risks of Heavy Metals in Baby Food

Long-term exposure to arsenic, lead, cadmium, and mercury can cause serious health issues in children, including:

• Developmental delays and cognitive impairments
• Reduced IQ and learning disabilities
• Neurological disorders and behavioral issues

The FDA’s Closer to Zero initiative aims to establish maximum allowable heavy metal levels in baby food, but full implementation remains years away.

How Families Can Minimize Heavy Metal Exposure

• Avoid Rice-Based Baby Foods – Rice absorbs more arsenic than other grains. Replace rice cereals and snacks with oat, barley, quinoa, or millet-based options.
• Limit Processed Baby Snacks – Puffs, teething biscuits, and other processed snacks often contain high levels of heavy metals. Whole foods are safer alternatives.
• Reduce Fruit Juice Consumption – Many fruit juices contain lead and arsenic. Offer fresh fruit or water instead.
• Diversify Your Baby’s Diet – A varied diet with different fruits, vegetables, proteins, and grains reduces reliance on high-risk foods.
• Check Baby Food Test Results – Use QR codes on packaging or visit company websites to review heavy metal testing data.
• Buy from Trusted Brands – Plum Organics and Once Upon a Farm have voluntarily disclosed their 2024 test results, demonstrating transparency.
• Stay Informed About FDA Regulations – The Closer to Zero initiative is working toward tighter safety standards, though full implementation is still pending.

If your child has been diagnosed with autism or other autism spectrum disorders after consuming toxic baby food from major brands like Gerber, Beech-Nut, or Earth’s Best Organic, you may be eligible to pursue compensation.

Contact TruLaw using the chat on this page to receive an instant case evaluation and see if you qualify to join others in filing a toxic baby food lawsuit.

The Toxic Baby Food Lawsuit is ongoing. 

A new lawsuit has been filed against Gerber, Beech-Nut, Walmart, and other major baby food manufacturers, alleging that their products contained toxic heavy metals that led to a child’s autism and developmental disorders.

The lawsuit, filed in San Francisco federal court, seeks to join the ongoing multidistrict litigation (MDL) against baby food makers.

The plaintiff claims that for years, these companies knowingly sold baby foods containing lead, arsenic, mercury, cadmium, and aluminum without informing parents of the risks.

The lawsuit argues that, in the absence of federal regulations, the companies chose profit over infant safety, leading to harmful neurodevelopmental effects.

This litigation stems from a 2021 congressional report that found high levels of toxic metals in baby food from major manufacturers.

The plaintiff’s complaint links her child’s autism spectrum disorder and other developmental issues to exposure from these contaminated products.

The MDL, consolidated in April 2024, includes lawsuits from Arizona, California, Missouri, Nevada, Louisiana, and Washington.

The case against Beech-Nut, Nestlé, and Walmart is being overseen by the U.S. District Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley in the Northern District of California.

This latest lawsuit adds to the growing legal pressure on baby food manufacturers, as parents seek accountability for the long-term health effects linked to heavy metal exposure in infant nutrition.

If your child has been diagnosed with autism or other autism spectrum disorders after consuming toxic baby food from major brands like Gerber, Beech-Nut, or Earth’s Best Organic, you may be eligible to pursue compensation.

Contact TruLaw using the chat on this page to receive an instant case evaluation and see if you qualify to join others in filing a toxic baby food lawsuit.

Illinois lawmakers are considering Senate Bill 73, a pioneering proposal to ban the sale and distribution of baby food containing toxic heavy metals, including arsenic, cadmium, lead, and mercury.

Introduced by Sen. Laura Fine (D-Glenview), the bill would require manufacturers to test their products for these substances and provide detailed disclosures to both consumers and the Illinois Department of Public Health (IDPH).

Key Provisions of Senate Bill 73:

• Mandatory Testing: Baby food manufacturers must test their products for toxic heavy metals and report findings to the IDPH.
• Transparency Requirements: Starting January 1, 2027, manufacturers would need to disclose the type and levels of heavy metals in their products, along with batch and lot numbers, on packaging labels and via QR codes.
• Consumer Reporting: Illinois residents would be empowered to report toxic baby food directly to the IDPH.

The bill aims to address the long-term health risks associated with heavy metals in baby food, which are linked to developmental delays, neurological damage, and other serious health issues in children.

“When you think you’re doing something healthy for your child, it’s a wake-up call to learn it could be harmful,” Sen. Fine stated.

If enacted, this legislation would position Illinois as one of the first states to independently regulate toxic heavy metals in baby food, bypassing delays at the federal level.

The bill is expected to be reviewed by a Senate committee when lawmakers reconvene in Springfield.

Advocates hope the measure will inspire similar efforts nationwide and encourage safer manufacturing practices.

If your child has been diagnosed with autism or other autism spectrum disorders after consuming toxic baby food from major brands like Gerber, Beech-Nut, or Earth’s Best Organic, you may be eligible to pursue compensation.

Contact TruLaw using the chat on this page to receive an instant case evaluation and see if you qualify to join others in filing a toxic baby food lawsuit.

As part of its Closer to Zero initiative, the FDA has released final guidance establishing strict lead action levels in processed foods for babies and young children.

Starting January 6, 2025, these action levels are:

• 10 parts per billion (ppb) for fruits, vegetables (excluding single-ingredient root vegetables), mixtures, yogurts, custards, and single-ingredient meats.
• 20 ppb for single-ingredient root vegetables and dry infant cereals.

These thresholds aim to reduce lead exposure while ensuring access to nutritious baby food. The FDA will use these levels to determine whether food may be deemed adulterated under federal law.

Building on the Closer to Zero initiative, which targets contaminants like lead, arsenic, cadmium, and mercury, this action supports ongoing research, enforcement, and collaboration to improve food safety.

The FDA encourages parents to provide children with a varied, nutrient-dense diet, while manufacturers are expected to adopt control measures to meet these levels and reduce toxic contaminants in baby food products over time.

This step is essential for enhancing food safety and safeguarding the health of vulnerable populations.

If your child has been diagnosed with autism or other autism spectrum disorders after consuming toxic baby food from major brands like Gerber, Beech-Nut, or Earth’s Best Organic, you may be eligible to pursue compensation.

Contact TruLaw using the chat on this page to receive an instant case evaluation and see if you qualify to join others in filing a toxic baby food lawsuit.

The Toxic Baby Food lawsuit involves allegations that certain baby food products contain hazardous levels of heavy metals such as arsenic, lead, mercury, and cadmium.

These substances have been associated with developmental delays, cognitive impairments, and other severe health problems in children.

Plaintiffs claim that manufacturers failed to disclose these dangers, placing infants at substantial risk.

The number of cases in the Toxic Baby Food MDL rose from 75 in December 2024 to 88 in January 2025, with 13 new claims filed.

Exposure to heavy metals during critical developmental stages can lead to irreversible harm, resulting in lifelong challenges for children impacted by these toxic substances.

If your child has been diagnosed with autism or other autism spectrum disorders after consuming toxic baby food from major brands like Gerber, Beech-Nut, or Earth’s Best Organic, you may be eligible to pursue compensation.

Contact TruLaw using the chat on this page to receive an instant case evaluation and see if you qualify to join others in filing a toxic baby food lawsuit.

Hain Celestial Group is facing a proposed class action lawsuit alleging that its Earth’s Best Baby Food products contained arsenic levels exceeding recognized safety thresholds.

U.S. District Judge Nina Morrison ruled that claims concerning arsenic are significant to consumer decisions regarding baby food marketed as healthy and safe.

The court dismissed related claims involving lead, cadmium, and mercury, citing the absence of established safety standards for these metals in baby food.

This lawsuit follows a 2021 U.S. House subcommittee report highlighting “dangerous” levels of heavy metals in baby food.

Other companies, including Beech-Nut, Gerber, and Walmart, are also facing similar legal challenges.

If your child has been diagnosed with autism or other autism spectrum disorders after consuming toxic baby food from major brands like Gerber, Beech-Nut, or Earth’s Best Organic, you may be eligible to pursue compensation.

Contact TruLaw using the chat on this page to receive an instant case evaluation and see if you qualify to join others in filing a toxic baby food lawsuit.

Starting January 1, 2025, California’s Assembly Bill 899 (AB 899) will enforce stricter regulations on baby food manufacturers, requiring them to conduct thorough testing for harmful heavy metals such as lead, arsenic, cadmium, and mercury.

The new law also calls for clear product labeling and public reporting to raise consumer awareness and minimize exposure risks.

The Clean Label Project (CLP), a nonprofit organization focused on promoting product safety and transparency, has launched initiatives to help ensure compliance with AB 899 and to educate families about the dangers of heavy metal exposure in baby foods.

CLP’s activities include educational campaigns for consumers, resources for healthcare providers, and testing programs for manufacturers.

Key Requirements of AB 899:

• Comprehensive Testing: Thorough evaluations for harmful heavy metals.
• Clear Labeling: Transparent product labels with safety information.
• Public Reporting: Accessible reports from manufacturers to ensure compliance.

A recent survey showed that while most parents are concerned about heavy metals in baby food, only 44% are aware of AB 899.

Advocates, including CLP and the Count on Mothers organization, stress the importance of educating families and holding manufacturers accountable.

This new law could have significant implications for ongoing lawsuits against baby food companies accused of failing to disclose harmful heavy metal exposure to children.

AB 899 sets a significant precedent for future regulations and may influence the outcomes of litigation related to contaminated products.

If your child has been diagnosed with autism or other autism spectrum disorders after consuming toxic baby food from major brands like Gerber, Beech-Nut, or Earth’s Best Organic, you may be eligible to pursue compensation.

Contact TruLaw using the chat on this page to receive an instant case evaluation and see if you qualify to join others in filing a toxic baby food lawsuit.

The Toxic Baby Food Lawsuit continues to move forward, with a status conference held today to address several important agenda items:

• Discovery Requirements: Plaintiffs outlined the discovery needed from parent defendants and Walmart’s co-manufacturers for general causation proceedings.
• Expert Discovery Schedule: A timeline for expert discovery was discussed and planned.
• Plaintiff Fact Sheets: The parties were given a deadline to submit competing proposals for initial Plaintiff fact sheets.
• Loyalty Program Information: Plaintiffs agreed to provide loyalty program data to the defendants.
• Discovery Disputes: A deadline was set for submitting a joint letter addressing disputes regarding defendants’ interrogatory responses.
• Page Limits: Page limits were established for future case management conference statements.
• Rescheduling Future Conferences: The case management conference originally scheduled for May 29, 2025, was rescheduled to May 22, 2025, at 9:00 a.m.

This conference helped streamline discovery and procedural steps as the litigation advances.

Additional updates will be provided as new deadlines and rulings are established.

The AngioDynamics Port Catheter lawsuit alleges that the device, designed for long-term venous access, has caused serious complications such as infections, device fractures, and blood clots.

Plaintiffs assert that AngioDynamics failed to adequately warn users of these risks.

In November, 52 cases were filed, increasing to 75 in December with 23 new claims added.

This rise underscores growing awareness of the health risks associated with the device.

These complications may result in severe medical challenges, necessitating interventions and impacting the quality of life for patients relying on the device for essential treatments.

If your child has been diagnosed with autism or other autism spectrum disorders after consuming toxic baby food from major brands like Gerber, Beech-Nut, or Earth’s Best Organic, you may be eligible to pursue compensation.

Contact TruLaw using the chat on this page to receive an instant case evaluation and see if you qualify to join others in filing a toxic baby food lawsuit.

The Toxic Baby Food Lawsuit is ongoing. 

The Toxic Baby Food MDL, established in April 2024, is progressing with a defined schedule for key pretrial milestones.

Important Upcoming Dates in the MDL Include:

• February 6, 2025: Deadline for submitting motion to dismiss (MTD) briefing.
• February 27, 2025: Oral arguments on the motion to dismiss.
• April 2025: Expert discovery is scheduled to begin.
• December 2025: Oral arguments on Daubert motions to exclude expert testimony.
• Early 2026: Rulings on Daubert motions, determining the admissibility of expert evidence.

These Daubert rulings are pivotal, as they evaluate the reliability of expert testimony crucial to the Toxic Baby Food cases.

If the evidence survives this scrutiny, the litigation could proceed to trial or settlement discussions within 15 to 18 months.

If your child has been diagnosed with autism or other autism spectrum disorders after consuming toxic baby food from major brands like Gerber, Beech-Nut, or Earth’s Best Organic, you may be eligible to pursue compensation.

Contact TruLaw using the chat on this page to receive an instant case evaluation and see if you qualify to join others in filing a toxic baby food lawsuit.

The Toxic Baby Food Lawsuit is ongoing.

This lawsuit focuses on allegations that certain baby food products contain harmful levels of heavy metals, including arsenic, lead, mercury, and cadmium.

Exposure to these toxic metals has been linked to serious health risks in children, such as developmental delays and cognitive impairments.

Plaintiffs argue that manufacturers failed to disclose these dangers, putting infants at significant risk.

In October, 32 cases were filed, and by November, the number rose to 52, reflecting 20 new filings.

This increase highlights the growing awareness among parents and caregivers about the potential dangers of heavy metal contamination in baby food.

Heavy metals pose serious risks, particularly to children in crucial stages of growth and development.

Exposure can result in long-term health consequences, including learning disabilities and cognitive challenges.

If your child or a loved one’s child has been diagnosed with autism or other health disorders after consuming baby food contaminated with heavy metals, you may be eligible to file a Toxic Baby Food Lawsuit.

Contact the Toxic Baby Food Lawyers at TruLaw for a free consultation today. 

You can also use the chatbot on this page to find out if you qualify to file a Contaminated Baby Food Lawsuit instantly.

The Toxic Baby Food lawsuit involves allegations that several major baby food brands contain dangerous levels of heavy metals, including arsenic, lead, mercury, and cadmium.

These toxic substances have been linked to developmental delays, cognitive impairments, and other serious health issues in children.

The lawsuit claims that manufacturers failed to disclose these risks, exposing countless infants to harmful chemicals.

On September, 30 cases were filed in the Toxic Baby Food MDL, rising to 32 by October. Heavy metals found in the baby food products can cause serious harm, particularly during critical stages of development.

Exposure to these substances has been associated with long-term health issues, such as learning disabilities and behavioral problems.

Arsenic, for instance, is known to impact brain development, while lead can damage a child’s nervous system, leading to permanent cognitive deficits.

Recent reports from school lunch tests have shown that the issue of toxic metals in food extends beyond baby products.

Alarmingly high levels of pesticides and heavy metals were also found in meals served to children in public schools. T

his points to a broader, ongoing problem affecting vulnerable populations, with dangerous chemicals and toxins persisting in the food supply despite known health risks.

Our lawyers are currently accepting new clients for the Toxic Baby Food Lawsuit. If you believe your child’s health has been affected by consuming contaminated baby food, you may be eligible to file a Toxic Baby Food Autism Lawsuit to seek compensation.

Contact TruLaw today for a free consultation. 

You can also use the chatbot on this page for a free and instant case evaluation.

The Toxic Baby Food Lawsuit is ongoing. 

In a recent development, the Fifth Circuit Court denied Whole Foods and Hain Celestial Group request for rehearing in a lawsuit filed by parents of a toddler who allegedly suffered physical and mental health issues due to toxic metals in baby food.

Originally filed in state court, the companies moved the case to federal court.

However, the court ruled that the case should return to state court, as the parents provided sufficient clarification regarding their claims that the baby food may have been harmful.

This means the case will proceed in state court, where it was first filed, giving the plaintiffs another opportunity to present their evidence and claims.

The case will be reconsidered from the start, as though it had never been moved to federal court, with a new decision to be made on the merits of their claims.

Meanwhile, U.S. District Judge Corley is overseeing the consolidation of lawsuits against major baby food manufacturers like Gerber and Beech-Nut.

Families in these cases allege that toxic metals in baby food caused autism and ADHD in their children.

The court has ordered the manufacturers to provide testing data for 600 products from 2012 to 2021, including ingredient and final product details. 

This extensive data will help evaluate the claims that toxic metals in baby food contributed to these developmental issues.

This testing data could reveal what the manufacturers knew about the presence of heavy metals in their products and when they became aware of these risks.

Such information is crucial for plaintiffs as they seek to prove the companies’ knowledge of the contamination.

Our lawyers are currently accepting new clients for the Toxic Baby Food Lawsuit. If you believe your child’s health has been affected by consuming contaminated baby food, you may be eligible to file a Toxic Baby Food Autism Lawsuit to seek compensation.

Contact TruLaw today for a free consultation. 

You can also use the chatbot on this page for a free and instant case evaluation.

The number of case filings in the Toxic Baby Food Lawsuit increased slightly from 28 in August to 30 in September.

Studies show that nearly 95% of store-bought baby food contains trace amounts of heavy metals such as lead, arsenic, cadmium, and mercury.

The issue remains complex since homemade baby food is not guaranteed to be safer, and parents do not have reliable methods to detect these contaminants.

The FDA has launched its “Closer to Zero” plan aimed at reducing heavy metals in baby food, but concerns have been raised about the plan’s speed and effectiveness.

The next status conference is expected by September 24, 2024.

If you or a loved one’s child developed health problems due to toxic heavy metals in baby foods, you may be eligible to take legal action. 

Contact TruLaw for a free consultation, or use the chatbot on this page to get in touch with our lawyers.

During the most recent status conference in the Multidistrict Litigation (MDL) regarding toxic heavy metals in baby food, the court issued several important directives:

Heavy Metal Test Results: The defendants are required to submit test results for heavy metals, including lead, arsenic, mercury, and cadmium, in baby food ingredients and final products from 2012 to 2021.

This order is consistent with the findings of a 2021 congressional subcommittee report, which highlighted dangerously high levels of these metals in various baby foods.

Additionally, the court has ordered the production of product formulas from the same period. The report, which examined over 600 infant and toddler food products, found that about two-thirds did not meet the health standards established by the World Health Organization (WHO).

Water Test Results: Defendants must also provide test results for heavy metals in the water used during the manufacturing of baby food from 2012 to 2021.

Identification of Third-Party Co-Manufacturers: The court has ordered the defendants to identify any third-party co-manufacturers involved in producing baby food during the specified period. Defendants lacking adequate test data are also required to disclose their suppliers.

Evidence Preservation: By September 12, 2024, each defendant must file documentation outlining the steps taken to preserve evidence, including the implementation of litigation holds.

ESI Protocol: The parties must submit a mutually agreed-upon protocol for electronically stored information (ESI) by September 19, 2024, including any unresolved issues and the arguments supporting their positions.

Future Case Management Conferences: The court has scheduled additional case management conferences for September 26, 2024, November 7, 2024, and December 12, 2024.

The next status conference is expected by September 24, 2024.

If you or a loved one’s child developed health problems due to toxic heavy metals in baby foods, you may be eligible to take legal action. 

Contact TruLaw for a free consultation, or use the chatbot on this page to get in touch with our lawyers.

A recent study published in the journal Nutrients reveals concerning findings about the nutritional quality of baby foods sold in the United States.

The study analyzed over 600 infant and toddler food products available in the top 10 U.S. grocery store chains and found that approximately two-thirds of these products do not meet the health standards set by the World Health Organization (WHO).

Specifically, 70% of the products failed to meet the protein requirements established by the WHO, and 25% did not satisfy calorie recommendations. 

Additionally, 44% of the baby foods examined exceeded the recommended sugar content, with 74% containing added sugars or sweeteners. 

The study also noted that all products analyzed made at least one claim on their packaging that did not align with WHO standards.

These findings add to the growing concerns about contaminants in baby food products sold nationwide.

The Toxic Baby Food Lawsuit, now centralized into Multidistrict Litigation (MDL) in the Northern District of California, addresses concerns about toxic heavy metal contamination in popular baby food products.

The litigation, overseen by The Honorable Jacqueline Corley, has been progressing steadily, with over 30 lawsuits filed.

The core issue in this litigation revolves around the potential harm caused by toxic substances in baby foods and the failure of manufacturers to meet established health standards.

At a recent Case Management Conference, the central dispute was the scope of Plaintiffs’ discovery requests.

Plaintiffs seek comprehensive information on testing and safety protocols, arguing that this information is critical to their case.

Defendants, however, argue that these requests are overly broad.

If you or a loved one’s child developed health problems due to toxic heavy metals in baby foods, you may be eligible to take legal action. 

Contact TruLaw for a free consultation, or use the chatbot on this page to get in touch with our lawyers.

The Master Long-Form Complaint has been filed in the Baby Food Products Liability Litigation (MDL 3101), centralized in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California.

This comprehensive document outlines a unified set of allegations and claims that individual plaintiffs can adopt in their cases, facilitating a more streamlined and organized litigation process in response to widespread concerns about contaminated baby food products.

The plaintiffs assert that major baby food manufacturers knowingly sold products contaminated with toxic heavy metals, including lead, arsenic, mercury, cadmium, and aluminum.

These contaminants are associated with neurodevelopmental disorders such as autism spectrum disorder (ASD) and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in children.

The complaint details the severe health impacts on affected children and the economic burden on their families, while also outlining the relationships between the companies involved and their roles in producing and distributing the contaminated products.

The complaint references studies and reports, including a Congressional investigation, that revealed significant levels of toxic heavy metals in baby foods sold by the defendants.

It accuses the defendants of persistently selling contaminated products and failing to reduce metal levels, despite being aware of the potential risks.

The lawsuit alleges that these companies either set dangerously high internal limits for toxic metals, failed to set any limits, allowed contaminated ingredients to be used, or did not adequately test the finished products.

Key claims include:

• Failure to Warn: Defendants did not sufficiently inform consumers about the presence of toxic heavy metals in their products.
• Manufacturing Defects: The presence of these toxic substances rendered the products unsafe for infant consumption.
• Design Defects: The design of the baby foods was inherently unsafe due to the use of contaminated ingredients.

Several major baby food manufacturers and their parent companies have been named in the lawsuit, including companies that participated in the Congressional investigation and others that refused to cooperate with the 2021 investigation.

Defendants named in the lawsuit include:

• Beech-Nut Nutrition Company
• Campbell Soup Company
• Danone S.A.
• Gerber Products Company
• Hain Celestial Group, Inc.
• Hero A.G.
• Neptune Wellness Solutions
• Nestlé Holdings, Inc.
• Nurture, LLC
• Plum, PBC
• Sprout Foods, Inc.
• Sun-Maid Growers of California
• Walmart, Inc.

If your child or a loved one’s child has developed health issues due to toxic heavy metals in baby foods, you may be eligible to take legal action. 

Contact us for a free consultation, or use the chatbot on this page to connect with our lawyers.

Recent Consumer Reports testing revealed alarmingly high lead levels in children’s snack puffs, especially those with cassava root.

This finding underscores ongoing concerns about lead contamination in baby foods and highlights the need for stringent FDA regulatory action.

Consumer Reports tested four snacks from Lesser Evil and Serenity Kids, all containing cassava root.

The contamination levels in these products were higher than in any of the 80 baby foods tested since 2017.

Tom Neltner, National Director of Unleaded Kids, emphasized the need for rigorous testing and careful sourcing, as root crops can absorb heavy metals like lead from the soil.

He criticized the FDA for not setting enforceable limits on heavy metals in baby foods, despite its Closer to Zero program, noting that the agency has missed multiple deadlines.

The FDA recently indicated that guidelines may be available by the end of the year.

The FDA stated it is gathering information on lead exposure from snack foods to determine the best regulatory approach.

However, Neltner and other experts argue that the existing scientific consensus on the dangers of lead exposure to children should prompt immediate action.

The discovery of high lead levels in popular snack puffs could strengthen claims against manufacturers and increase pressure on the FDA to implement stringent regulations.

Parents and advocates continue to push for comprehensive and enforceable standards to protect children from toxic contaminants in their food.

If your child developed health problems due to toxic heavy metals in baby food, you may be eligible for legal action. 

Contact us for a free consultation or use the chatbot on this page to reach our lawyers.

In April 2024, the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation (JPML) centralized the Toxic Baby Food MDL 3101 in the Northern District of California under Judge Corley.

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the World Health Organization (WHO) have identified heavy metals like arsenic, cadmium, lead, and mercury as hazardous to children’s health, with even low levels of exposure leading to neurological and other serious health issues.

A report from the U.S. House of Representatives Committee on Oversight and Reform revealed that several baby food manufacturers, including Beech-Nut, Hain (Earth’s Best Organic), Gerber, and Nurture Inc., knowingly sold products with unsafe levels of these metals.

The MDL, which currently has under 30 pending lawsuits, is making steady progress.

Key upcoming dates are:

• July 15, 2024: Deadline for the Master Complaint.
• September 16, 2024: Deadline for Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss (MTD).
• October 28, 2024: Deadline for Opposition to MTD.
• November 18, 2024: Deadline for Reply to Opposition.

A ruling on the Motion to Dismiss is expected before the end of 2024.

Additionally, a related Baby Food case in California state court is scheduled for trial in January 2025.

If your child developed health problems due to toxic heavy metals in baby food, you may be eligible for legal action. 

Contact us for a free consultation or use the chatbot on this page to reach our lawyers.