Attorney Jessie Paluch, founder of TruLaw, has over 25 years of experience as a personal injury and mass tort attorney, and previously worked as an international tax attorney at Deloitte. Jessie collaborates with attorneys nationwide — enabling her to share reliable, up-to-date legal information with our readers.
This article has been written and reviewed for legal accuracy and clarity by the team of writers and legal experts at TruLaw and is as accurate as possible. This content should not be taken as legal advice from an attorney. If you would like to learn more about our owner and experienced injury lawyer, Jessie Paluch, you can do so here.
TruLaw does everything possible to make sure the information in this article is up to date and accurate. If you need specific legal advice about your case, contact us by using the chat on the bottom of this page. This article should not be taken as advice from an attorney.
Question: What are the grounds for the lawsuit against Instagram?
Answer: The lawsuit against Instagram is primarily based on allegations that Meta (the parent company of Instagram) has deliberately engineered its platforms to be addictive to children and teens.
On this page, we’ll discuss this question in further depth, including an overview of the Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act (COPPA) that Meta is accused of violating, allegations made in the lawsuit against Instagram and much more.
These allegations form the basis of the lawsuit against Instagram, suggesting negligence on the part of Meta in addressing the harmful effects of their social media platforms on young users.
The lawsuit against Instagram and its parent company, Meta, revolves around the following key allegations:
If you’ve suffered from mental health issues as a result of using these platforms, contact TruLaw today using the chat on this page to receive an instant case evaluation.
Instagram, a popular social media platform with over 2 billion active users worldwide, has faced numerous legal challenges in recent years.
These lawsuits allege a wide range of harms caused by the platform, including addiction, mental health issues, and data privacy violations.
A significant number of reports in the lawsuit against Instagram focus on the platform’s potential to cause addiction and exacerbate mental health issues, particularly among adolescents and young adults.
These lawsuits allege that Instagram’s addictive design, algorithms, and content moderation practices contribute to excessive use, social comparison, and exposure to harmful content, leading to negative consequences such as anxiety, depression, and self-harm.
Another area of concern is Instagram’s handling of user data. Several lawsuits have accused the platform of violating data privacy laws by collecting and using user data without adequate consent or transparency.
These lawsuits allege that Instagram’s data practices have led to identity theft, targeted advertising, and other harm.
These lawsuits have brought significant attention to the potential harms associated with Instagram and have pressured the company to change its practices.
Instagram has taken steps to address these concerns, such as implementing new features to limit screen time and providing more resources for mental health awareness.
Despite these changes, legal challenges against Instagram continue.
As the platform continues to evolve and its influence on users grows, these lawsuits will likely continue to shape its policies and practices.
The lawsuit against Instagram highlights the growing concerns surrounding the potential harm of social media platforms, particularly on young users.
These legal challenges have forced Instagram to confront these issues and take steps to mitigate the potential risks.
As social media continues to evolve, it is crucial to remain vigilant about the potential harm these platforms can cause and to hold them accountable for their actions.
The pervasive influence of Instagram on youth mental health has come under intense scrutiny, with numerous states taking legal action against the platform for its alleged role in exacerbating the youth mental health crisis.
These lawsuits shed light on pressing concerns that the addictive nature of social media use is driving mental health harms among teens, including increased risks for depression and anxiety.
The most common mental health issues reported in the lawsuit against Instagram include:
Social comparison, often fueled by the carefully curated and often unrealistic portrayals of lives on Instagram, can exacerbate eating disorders and self-esteem issues, particularly among impressionable young users who spend a significant portion of their time engaged with potentially age-inappropriate content.
This societal dilemma necessitates thoroughly examining how certain platform features, such as its algorithm that prioritizes engagement and rewards constant usage, may knowingly induce compulsive behavior in young children, ultimately trapping them in patterns detrimental to their emotional well-being and brain development.
The alarming rise in mental health issues among young people has garnered national attention, with studies linking heavy Instagram usage to worrisome trends in depression, anxiety, and poor body image.
Teen users are particularly vulnerable; they spend hours scrolling through feeds that can distort reality and exacerbate feelings of inadequacy.
Evidence suggests that Instagram’s design, which prioritizes engagement and rewards constant usage, could be contributing to a generation of youth struggling with low self-esteem and even suicidal ideation.
The lawsuits against Instagram initiated by multiple states underscore the severity of this crisis by accusing Meta Platforms’ Instagram service of failing to safeguard teen users against these risks and exploiting their susceptibility for profit.
Specific mental health impacts highlighted in these lawsuits include:
Across the United States, a wave of legal action has emerged, with 40 states and D.C. vigorously contesting Meta’s responsibility for increasing what they claim are addictive social media habits among teens.
Internal company documents referenced by attorneys general suggest that Meta employees may have been aware of the potential harms but still pursued strategies to ensnare youth, prioritizing profits over the well-being of its young users.
Legal complaints against Instagram highlight troubling patterns: depression, anxiety, low self-esteem, and even insomnia in kids who use the app regularly.
These bold moves by state officials underscore the urgency of addressing mental health crises linked to social media usage, particularly where minors are concerned.
Instagram faces increasing legal scrutiny for its design choices and operational practices, especially concerning high usage rates among teens.
The lawsuit against Instagram is pivotal in understanding the platform’s impact on youth mental health, raising serious questions about tech platforms’ responsibility towards their younger users.
Key areas of concern outlined in the lawsuits include:
Central to the lawsuits is the claim that Instagram’s addictive features and sophisticated algorithms lead to extended usage among teens, fostering potentially harmful patterns of behavior.
Plaintiffs argue that these elements are deliberately designed to keep users, particularly young children and teens, engaged for unhealthy durations, exacerbating issues like low self-esteem and increasing risks for mental health problems and self-harm.
Instagram is criticized for its inadequate efforts in enforcing age-appropriate standards and protecting young users from sexual exploitation and harmful content.
The lack of rigorous protective measures is seen as a significant contributor to mental health issues such as low self-esteem and self-harm among teens.
The legal challenges demand more decisive actions from Instagram, urging the platform to prioritize the safety and well-being of its youngest users.
The lawsuits highlight a disturbing trend where Instagram, driven by profit motives, overlooks the well-being of its users.
Endless scrolling and personalized algorithms are pinpointed as tactics to maximize user engagement and ad revenue, often at the expense of the mental health of teens.
Critics argue that Instagram’s profit-driven strategies disregard the safety of vulnerable populations, including children and adolescents, and demand a reevaluation of the company’s priorities toward consumer protection.
The lawsuit against Instagram reflects a broader societal concern about the impact of tech platforms on youth mental health.
The current litigation is not just about Instagram.
It also represents a critical discourse on how social media companies should redefine duty-of-care standards to prioritize their users’ mental health and safety, especially the younger generation.
Through these lawsuits, there is a growing demand for a shift in how social media platforms operate, with a greater emphasis on ethical practices and the protection of the mental well-being of their users.
This movement signals a crucial turning point in the approach towards responsible social media usage and the accountability of tech companies in shaping a safer online environment.
Instagram’s pervasive influence has sparked significant legal scrutiny, focusing on the platform’s potential to inflict detrimental effects on users’ mental health.
The lawsuits highlight how extensive Instagram use can lead to detrimental mental health outcomes, especially among adolescents.
Key areas of concern identified in the lawsuits include:
Instagram, a platform originally intended for connection and creativity, has increasingly been linked to negative mental health outcomes.
The lawsuits allege that the app’s excessive use, particularly by young people, is causing a rise in depression, anxiety, and other serious issues.
The addictive features of Instagram are accused of contributing significantly to a youth mental health crisis, with research showing escalated feelings of loneliness, inadequacy, and increased suicide risk factors due to problematic social media usage.
Specific mental health concerns raised in the lawsuits include:
The constant exposure to idealized images on Instagram severely affects users’ self-perception, particularly among young users.
These comparisons can lead to diminished self-esteem and, in some cases, an obsession with social media validation.
The lawsuit against Instagram claims that the platform has failed to address the pressures to conform to specific beauty standards, contributing directly to eating disorders and negative body image among teens.
The widespread use of Instagram has been linked with surges in depression and anxiety among teens.
Lawsuits draw on internal documents from Facebook, Instagram’s parent company, to demonstrate a connection between social media activities and emotional distress in young users.
The design of addictive algorithms and interactive features on the platform are cited as factors leading to excessive engagement, negative self-comparisons, and exposure to triggering content.
These legal actions assert that despite being aware of these risks, Instagram continued to prioritize profit over the well-being of its users.
These legal battles against Instagram are not merely about individual grievances; they represent a crucial discourse on the responsibility of social media platforms in shaping the mental health landscape for young users.
The lawsuits urge a reevaluation of Instagram’s role in the growing mental health crisis among teenagers and call for a shift towards prioritizing user safety and mental well-being over profit and engagement metrics.
This movement underscores the need for a more responsible approach to social media usage and the accountability of tech companies in protecting their users’ mental health, especially the younger generation.
The lawsuit against Instagram highlights a range of potential damages, from compensation for emotional distress to punitive damages aimed at reforming company practices.
Understanding these legal remedies is crucial in comprehending the full scope of the lawsuit’s impact.
Key types of damages being pursued in the lawsuits include:
Victims in the Instagram lawsuit may be entitled to economic damages, reflecting the real-world financial impacts of the platform’s influence.
Examples of economic damages include:
Non-economic damages in these lawsuits acknowledge the emotional distress and other intangible impacts of social media harm.
Examples of non-economic damages include:
Punitive damages in the lawsuit against Instagram go beyond compensating the victims; they serve as a penalty to Meta for harmful practices and act as a deterrent against future unethical behavior.
Examples where punitive damages may be sought include:
The damages claimed in the lawsuit against Instagram reflect social media’s various impacts on user lives.
These legal actions are not just seeking compensation for individuals; they challenge corporate behavior and demand a shift towards more responsible and ethical business practices.
By pursuing a combination of economic, non-economic, and punitive damages, the lawsuits aim to hold Instagram accountable for its role in the mental health crisis among its users, particularly young people, and to catalyze change in how social media platforms operate.
The lawsuit against Instagram has set a precedent, leading to increased scrutiny and potential legal actions against other social media platforms.
Key areas of concern extending to other social media platforms as a result of the lawsuit against Instagram include:
This evolution reflects a growing awareness of the psychological impacts of social media on users, compelling platforms to reevaluate their policies and practices in light of the lawsuit against Instagram.
The demand for more ethical social media practices is gaining momentum, pushing companies to innovate to prioritize user health and safety while maintaining engagement.
Examples of the impact on other social media platforms due to the lawsuit against Instagram include:
The Instagram lawsuits have sparked a broader dialogue on the role of social media in society.
As these cases unfold, they shed light on the complex relationship between technology, mental health, and corporate ethics, amplified by the lawsuit against Instagram.
This scrutiny is driving a paradigm shift in the social media industry, compelling companies to reexamine their impact on society and the individual well-being of users in the wake of the lawsuit against Instagram.
The future of these platforms is now increasingly tied to their ability to adapt to a changing societal landscape that demands more responsibility and transparency in their operations.
The lawsuit against Instagram signifies a pivotal shift in societal and governmental attitudes toward social media’s impact on youth.
They highlight a pressing need for increased corporate accountability and the protection of young users, who are often unaware of the long-term implications of their online activities.
These legal battles are not just about Instagram; they represent a broader call for a more responsible and ethical digital world where the welfare of users, especially minors, is a priority.
As these lawsuits progress, they have the potential to set new precedents in digital interaction, advocating for safer and more transparent online environments.
The implications extend beyond Instagram, potentially influencing the social media industry to prioritize mental wellness over profitability.
The outcomes of these cases could be instrumental in shaping future guidelines for digital consumption, impacting how social media is integrated into daily life.
This shift reflects a societal effort to balance technological progress with users’ mental and emotional well-being, setting a new standard for how social media platforms should operate.
The lawsuit against Instagram was initiated due to allegations that Instagram knowingly exploited addictive features in its app, negatively impacting the mental health of young users and violating consumer protection laws.
If you’ve suffered from mental health issues as a result of using these platforms, contact TruLaw today using the chat on this page to receive an instant case evaluation.
The grounds for the lawsuit against Instagram include a violation of consumer protection laws by using addictive features to retain young users, compromising their mental health and well-being.
If you’ve suffered from mental health issues as a result of using these platforms, contact TruLaw today using the chat on this page to receive an instant case evaluation.
Several states, such as New York and California, are leading the proceedings against Instagram’s parent company, Meta, with allegations of harmful practices in social media usage affecting young users.
If you’ve suffered from mental health issues as a result of using these platforms, contact TruLaw today using the chat on this page to receive an instant case evaluation.
The potential consequences of the lawsuit against Instagram include, but are not limited to:
If you’ve suffered from mental health issues as a result of using these platforms, contact TruLaw today using the chat on this page to receive an instant case evaluation.
Experienced Attorney & Legal SaaS CEO
With over 25 years of legal experience, Jessie is an Illinois lawyer, a CPA, and a mother of three. She spent the first decade of her career working as an international tax attorney at Deloitte.
In 2009, Jessie co-founded her own law firm with her husband – which has scaled to over 30 employees since its conception.
In 2016, Jessie founded TruLaw, which allows her to collaborate with attorneys and legal experts across the United States on a daily basis. This hypervaluable network of experts is what enables her to share reliable legal information with her readers!
You can learn more about the Social Media Harm Lawsuits by visiting any of our pages listed below:
Here, at TruLaw, we’re committed to helping victims get the justice they deserve.
Alongside our partner law firms, we have successfully collected over $3 Billion in verdicts and settlements on behalf of injured individuals.
Would you like our help?
At TruLaw, we fiercely combat corporations that endanger individuals’ well-being. If you’ve suffered injuries and believe these well-funded entities should be held accountable, we’re here for you.
With TruLaw, you gain access to successful and seasoned lawyers who maximize your chances of success. Our lawyers invest in you—they do not receive a dime until your lawsuit reaches a successful resolution!
Do you believe you’re entitled to compensation?
Use our Instant Case Evaluator to find out in as little as 60 seconds!
AFFF Lawsuit claims are being filed against manufacturers of aqueous film-forming foam (AFFF), commonly used in firefighting.
Claims allege that companies such as 3M, DuPont, and Tyco Fire Products failed to adequately warn users about the potential dangers of AFFF exposure — including increased risks of various cancers and diseases.
Suboxone Tooth Decay Lawsuit claims are being filed against Indivior, the manufacturer of Suboxone, a medication used to treat opioid addiction.
Claims allege that Indivior failed to adequately warn users about the potential dangers of severe tooth decay and dental injuries associated with Suboxone’s sublingual film version.
Social Media Harm Lawsuits are being filed against social media companies for allegedly causing mental health issues in children and teens.
Claims allege that companies like Meta, Google, ByteDance, and Snap designed addictive platforms that led to anxiety, depression, and other mental health issues without adequately warning users or parents.
Transvaginal Mesh Lawsuits are being filed against manufacturers of transvaginal mesh products used to treat pelvic organ prolapse (POP) and stress urinary incontinence (SUI).
Claims allege that companies like Ethicon, C.R. Bard, and Boston Scientific failed to adequately warn about potential dangers — including erosion, pain, and infection.
Bair Hugger Warming Blanket Lawsuits involve claims against 3M — alleging their surgical warming blankets caused severe infections and complications (particularly in hip and knee replacement surgeries).
Plaintiffs claim 3M failed to warn about potential risks — despite knowing about increased risk of deep joint infections since 2011.
Baby Formula NEC Lawsuit claims are being filed against manufacturers of cow’s milk-based baby formula products.
Claims allege that companies like Abbott Laboratories (Similac) and Mead Johnson & Company (Enfamil) failed to warn about the increased risk of necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) in premature infants.
Here, at TruLaw, we’re committed to helping victims get the justice they deserve.
Alongside our partner law firms, we have successfully collected over $3 Billion in verdicts and settlements on behalf of injured individuals.
Would you like our help?