FAQ: Is the Social Media Harm Lawsuit Legit?
- Last Updated: April 14th, 2025
Attorney Jessica Paluch-Hoerman, founder of TruLaw, has over 28 years of experience as a personal injury and mass tort attorney, and previously worked as an international tax attorney at Deloitte. Jessie collaborates with attorneys nationwide — enabling her to share reliable, up-to-date legal information with our readers.
Legally Reviewed
This article has been written and reviewed for legal accuracy and clarity by the team of writers and legal experts at TruLaw and is as accurate as possible. This content should not be taken as legal advice from an attorney. If you would like to learn more about our owner and experienced injury lawyer, Jessie Paluch, you can do so here.
Fact-Checked
TruLaw does everything possible to make sure the information in this article is up to date and accurate. If you need specific legal advice about your case, contact us by using the chat on the bottom of this page. This article should not be taken as advice from an attorney.
Key takeaways:
- Thousands of social media addiction lawsuits target social media giants like Facebook, Instagram, TikTok, and Snapchat for causing addiction and mental health issues in users under 21 years old.
- Recent Social Media Harm Lawsuit filings allege social media companies knew their products had addictive algorithms that knowingly increase screen time, causing psychological or physical harm to adolescents.
- Many Social Media Harm Lawsuit claimants must prove that addiction to platforms resulted in severe mental health issues while under the age of 21 to qualify for compensation.
Is the Social Media Harm Lawsuit Legit?
Question: Is the social media harm lawsuit legit?
Answer: Yes, the social media harm lawsuit is legit.
Several lawsuits have been filed alleging that social media platforms intentionally designed addictive features, contributing to mental health issues – especially in minors.
These lawsuits argue that companies knew their platforms could cause harm but chose to prioritize profit.
Individuals may qualify to file a Social media harm lawsuit against companies like Meta, TikTok, and Snapchat if they used these social media platforms (prior to turning 21 years old) and subsequently developed addiction or other mental health disorders due to their use of the platforms.
On this page, we’ll answer this question in further depth, social media addiction in adolescents, mental health disorders related to social media use, and much more.
Eligibility Requirements for Social Media Addiction Claims
Social media addiction litigation targets major platforms including Facebook, Instagram, TikTok, and Snapchat for deliberately designing addictive features that encourage addictive behavior in users.
These lawsuits focus primarily on youth and adolescents who started using these platforms before age 21 and subsequently developed serious mental health issues, contributing to the youth mental health crisis.
Documentation of diagnoses like depression, anxiety, self-harm behaviors, eating disorders, low self-esteem, or suicidal ideation strengthens these claims.
The litigation has gained momentum as thousands of families have come forward with evidence that social media companies knowingly created harmful products targeting young users, holding social media giants accountable.
If you or your child has suffered mental health problems from excessive social media use, you may qualify to seek compensation.
Contact TruLaw using the chat on this page to receive an instant case evaluation that can determine your eligibility to join others in filing a Social Media Harm Lawsuit today.
Table of Contents
How Can A Social Media Mental Health Attorney From TruLaw Help You?
Our Social Media Mental Health attorney at TruLaw is dedicated to supporting clients through the process of filing a Social Media Mental Health lawsuit.
With extensive experience in consumer protection laws, Jessica Paluch-Hoerman and our partner law firms work with litigation leaders and mental health professionals to prove how addictive features trigger extensive social media use (causing you harm as a result).
TruLaw focuses on securing compensation for mental health treatment expenses, emotional suffering, academic/career setbacks, and other mental health issues stemming from these addictive social media accounts.
We understand the psychological and emotional toll that addictive social media feeds and platforms have on your life and provide the personalized guidance you need when seeking justice through the social media addiction litigation process.
Meet the Lead Social Media Mental Health Attorney at TruLaw
Meet our lead Social Media Mental Health attorney:
- Jessica Paluch-Hoerman: As founder and managing attorney of TruLaw, Jessica brings her experience in product liability and personal injury to her client-centered approach by prioritizing open communication and personalized attention with her clients. Through TruLaw and partner law firms, Jessica has helped collect over $3 billion dollars on behalf of injured individuals across all 50 states through verdicts and negotiated settlements.
How much does hiring a Social Media Mental Health lawyer from TruLaw cost?
At TruLaw, we believe financial concerns should never stand in the way of justice.
That’s why we operate on a contingency fee basis—with this approach, you only pay legal fees after you’ve been awarded compensation for your injuries.
If you or a loved one experienced mental health problems from social media use that include depression, anxiety, eating disorders, self-harm behaviors, or suicidal thoughts, you may be eligible to seek compensation.
Contact TruLaw using the chat on this page to receive an instant case evaluation and determine whether you qualify to join others in filing a Social Media Mental Health Lawsuit today.
Mental Health Disorders Related to Social Media Use
Social media platforms have transformed how we connect and communicate, but research increasingly points to their harmful effects on mental health. These platforms can trigger various psychological issues, particularly among younger users who spend substantial time engaging with digital content.
How Social Media Harm Affects Psychological Wellbeing
Prolonged use of social media platforms has been linked to various mental health conditions.
The constant comparison to curated lives of others, exposure to harmful content, and addictive design features contribute to psychological distress.
Medical research has identified several key mental health conditions associated with social media use:
- Depression
- Anxiety disorders
- Body image issues
- Sleep disruption
- Self-esteem problems
- Social isolation
- Attention deficits
The relationship between these platforms and mental health issues becomes especially important when examining high-risk groups.
Adolescents and young adults show heightened vulnerability, as their developing brains are more susceptible to external influences and peer validation.
Documenting Mental Health Impacts for Lawsuit Claims
Proper documentation is vital in building strong legal cases related to social media harm.
Medical records serve as the foundation for establishing the connection between platform use and psychological damage.
Effective documentation requires several important elements:
- Detailed medical history with timeline of symptoms
- Professional diagnoses from qualified mental health practitioners
- Treatment records showing interventions and medications
- Usage patterns of specific social media platforms
- Expert testimony connecting platform features to harm
- Evidence of known risks that companies failed to address
The strength of a claim often depends on demonstrating the direct relationship between specific platform features and the resulting psychological harm.
For example, algorithmically-driven content that promotes harmful behaviors or design elements that exploit vulnerability can strengthen a case.
Medical professionals can help establish this connection through thorough assessment and documentation.
Mental health specialists who understand the mechanisms of social media addiction and harm provide particularly valuable testimony in these cases.
Social Media Adolescent Addiction and Legal Standing
Social media addiction among adolescents has emerged as a serious public health concern, prompting legal action against major platforms.
Parents and guardians increasingly seek legal remedies for the harmful effects these platforms have on young users, whose developing brains are particularly vulnerable to addictive digital experiences.
Age Requirements for Social Media Harm Lawsuits
The legal age considerations in social media harm lawsuits vary by jurisdiction and the specific claims involved.
The following age-related elements affect social media lawsuits:
- Minors under 18 generally cannot file lawsuits independently
- Many platforms require users to be at least 13 years old, violating COPPA for younger users
- The age at which symptoms began may strengthen causation arguments
- Statutes of limitations may be tolled (paused) until a minor reaches the age of majority
- Documented age verification failures by platforms can bolster negligence claims
For adolescents who developed addiction issues while using social media under the minimum required age, parents may have stronger legal claims.
This is particularly true when platforms failed to implement proper age verification measures or when algorithms targeted vulnerable young users despite awareness of their age.
Parental Rights in Social Media Addiction Lawyers’ Cases
Parents have specific legal rights when representing their children in social media addiction cases. These rights enable them to pursue justice for harm caused to their children while using these platforms.
Parents maintain these key legal rights when working with attorneys:
- Standing to file as “next friend” or legal guardian of the minor
- Authority to share medical records and psychological evaluations with legal counsel
- Decision-making power regarding settlement offers
- Ability to testify about observed behavioral changes
- Right to seek compensation for family therapy and parental damages
- Control over any compensation awarded to the minor through structured settlements
The legal relationship between parent and child creates unique considerations in these cases.
Many courts require approval of settlements involving minors and may appoint guardians to ensure the child’s interests are protected throughout the legal process.
When working with social media addiction attorneys, parents should prepare documentation of their child’s usage patterns, behavioral changes, and any medical treatment sought.
This evidence helps establish the connection between platform use and the resulting harm, strengthening the legal claim.
TruLaw: Accepting Clients for the Social Media Mental Health Lawsuit
Social media mental health lawsuits are being filed by individuals and families across the country who suffered mental health injuries from addictive social media platforms.
TruLaw is currently accepting clients for the social media mental health lawsuit.
A few reasons to choose TruLaw for your social media mental health lawsuit include:
- If We Don’t Win, You Don’t Pay: The social media mental health lawyers at TruLaw and our partner firms operate on a contingency fee basis, meaning we only get paid if you win.
- Expertise: We have decades of experience handling consumer protection cases similar to the social media mental health lawsuit.
- Successful Track Record: TruLaw and our partner law firms have helped our clients recover billions of dollars in compensation through verdicts and negotiated settlements.
If you or a loved one suffered mental health injuries related to social media use, you may be eligible to seek compensation.
Contact TruLaw using the chat on this page to receive an instant case evaluation that can determine if you qualify for the Social Media Mental Health Lawsuit today.
Social Media Harm Lawsuits Frequently Asked Questions
-
Is the social media harm lawsuit legit?
Yes, the social media harm lawsuit is legit.
Several lawsuits have been filed alleging that social media platforms intentionally designed addictive features, contributing to mental health issues – especially in minors.
These lawsuits argue that companies knew their platforms could cause harm but chose to prioritize profit.
Individuals may qualify to file a social media harm lawsuit against companies like Meta, TikTok, and Snapchat if they used these social media platforms (prior to turning 21 years old) and subsequently developed addiction or other mental health disorders due to their use of the platforms.
-
What types of social media lawsuits are currently being filed?
Thousands of social media harm lawsuits are being filed against major platforms including Facebook, Instagram, Snapchat, TikTok, YouTube, Discord, and other social media platforms.
These cases primarily focus on addiction issues, mental health impacts, and algorithmic harms that major social media companies allegedly knew about but failed to address.
-
Can I sue if I've become addicted to social media platforms?
You may qualify to file a social media harm lawsuit if you or your child became addicted to platforms like Facebook, Instagram, or TikTok, suffered physical or psychological harm as a result of extensive social media use, and were under age 21 when the addiction developed.
These lawsuits target the major social media companies’ allegedly intentional addictive designs.
-
What is Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act and how does it affect social media harm lawsuits?
Section 230 is legislation that typically shields social media companies from liability for third-party content (e.g., user-posted content).
However, current social media harm lawsuits argue that defendant social media platforms should be held accountable for their addictive algorithms and recommendation systems, which fall outside Section 230’s protections.
-
How do I pursue a defamation lawsuit for harmful social media posts?
To succeed in a social media defamation lawsuit, you must prove the defendant made false factual statements about you, published them to at least one other person, and was at minimum negligent in making those statements.
These cases differ from broader social media harm lawsuits targeting platform design.
-
What compensation might be available in social media harm lawsuits?
Compensation in social media harm lawsuits may include damages for medical expenses, therapy costs, lost wages, emotional distress, and in some cases, punitive damages.
While specific payout amounts vary widely, cases involving mental health consequences or suicide attempts potentially involve larger settlements.
-
Are adults eligible to file social media harm lawsuits?
Yes, adults can file social media harm lawsuits, though many current cases focus on harm to minors.
Adult plaintiffs typically need to demonstrate addiction, mental health impacts, or other specific harms directly caused by social media giants’ design features and algorithms rather than just general usage.
Managing Attorney & Owner
With over 25 years of legal experience, Jessica Paluch-Hoerman is an Illinois lawyer, a CPA, and a mother of three. She spent the first decade of her career working as an international tax attorney at Deloitte.
In 2009, Jessie co-founded her own law firm with her husband – which has scaled to over 30 employees since its conception.
In 2016, Jessie founded TruLaw, which allows her to collaborate with attorneys and legal experts across the United States on a daily basis. This hypervaluable network of experts is what enables her to share the most reliable, accurate, and up-to-date legal information with our readers!
You can learn more about the Social Media Harm Lawsuits by visiting any of our pages listed below:
Here, at TruLaw, we’re committed to helping victims get the justice they deserve.
Alongside our partner law firms, we have successfully collected over $3 Billion in verdicts and settlements on behalf of injured individuals.
Would you like our help?
At TruLaw, we fiercely combat corporations that endanger individuals’ well-being. If you’ve suffered injuries and believe these well-funded entities should be held accountable, we’re here for you.
With TruLaw, you gain access to successful and seasoned lawyers who maximize your chances of success. Our lawyers invest in you—they do not receive a dime until your lawsuit reaches a successful resolution!
AFFF Lawsuit claims are being filed against manufacturers of aqueous film-forming foam (AFFF), commonly used in firefighting.
Claims allege that companies such as 3M, DuPont, and Tyco Fire Products failed to adequately warn users about the potential dangers of AFFF exposure — including increased risks of various cancers and diseases.
Depo Provera Lawsuit claims are being filed by individuals who allege they developed meningioma (a type of brain tumor) after receiving Depo-Provera birth control injections.
A 2024 study found that women using Depo-Provera for at least 1 year are five times more likely to develop meningioma brain tumors compared to those not using the drug.
Suboxone Tooth Decay Lawsuit claims are being filed against Indivior, the manufacturer of Suboxone, a medication used to treat opioid addiction.
Claims allege that Indivior failed to adequately warn users about the potential dangers of severe tooth decay and dental injuries associated with Suboxone’s sublingual film version.
Social Media Harm Lawsuits are being filed against social media companies for allegedly causing mental health issues in children and teens.
Claims allege that companies like Meta, Google, ByteDance, and Snap designed addictive platforms that led to anxiety, depression, and other mental health issues without adequately warning users or parents.
Transvaginal Mesh Lawsuits are being filed against manufacturers of transvaginal mesh products used to treat pelvic organ prolapse (POP) and stress urinary incontinence (SUI).
Claims allege that companies like Ethicon, C.R. Bard, and Boston Scientific failed to adequately warn about potential dangers — including erosion, pain, and infection.
Bair Hugger Warming Blanket Lawsuits involve claims against 3M — alleging their surgical warming blankets caused severe infections and complications (particularly in hip and knee replacement surgeries).
Plaintiffs claim 3M failed to warn about potential risks — despite knowing about increased risk of deep joint infections since 2011.
Baby Formula NEC Lawsuit claims are being filed against manufacturers of cow’s milk-based baby formula products.
Claims allege that companies like Abbott Laboratories (Similac) and Mead Johnson & Company (Enfamil) failed to warn about the increased risk of necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) in premature infants.
Here, at TruLaw, we’re committed to helping victims get the justice they deserve.
Alongside our partner law firms, we have successfully collected over $3 Billion in verdicts and settlements on behalf of injured individuals.
Would you like our help?
