Attorney Jessica Paluch-Hoerman, founder of TruLaw, has over 28 years of experience as a personal injury and mass tort attorney, and previously worked as an international tax attorney at Deloitte. Jessie collaborates with attorneys nationwide — enabling her to share reliable, up-to-date legal information with our readers.
This article has been written and reviewed for legal accuracy and clarity by the team of writers and legal experts at TruLaw and is as accurate as possible. This content should not be taken as legal advice from an attorney. If you would like to learn more about our owner and experienced injury lawyer, Jessie Paluch, you can do so here.
TruLaw does everything possible to make sure the information in this article is up to date and accurate. If you need specific legal advice about your case, contact us by using the chat on the bottom of this page. This article should not be taken as advice from an attorney.
Question: Can I still file an Instagram lawsuit?
Answer: Yes, you can still file an Instagram lawsuit in 2025 as MDL 3047 continues accepting new cases from families whose children suffered mental health injuries from the platform.
The statute of limitations varies by state but typically allows two to six years from injury discovery, meaning many teens who developed eating disorders, depression, or anxiety in recent years remain eligible.
Courts recognize that mental health injuries from social media may not manifest immediately, with some conditions developing gradually through prolonged exposure to Instagram’s harmful algorithms.
Parents discovering their child’s self-harm, suicide attempt, or eating disorder often have additional time to file once they connect these conditions to Instagram use.
On this page, we’ll discuss this question in further depth, major defendants in social media mental health litigation, types of mental health injuries in the Instagram Lawsuit, and much more.
MDL 3047 continues growing with over 1,700 pending cases and new complaints filed weekly as more families recognize Instagram’s role in their children’s mental health crises.
The October 2025 bellwether trial date provides urgency for families to file claims and participate in potential settlement negotiations that often occur before trials.
Recent court rulings rejecting Meta’s dismissal motions strengthen plaintiffs’ positions, encouraging attorneys to accept new cases with strong medical documentation.
If you or someone you love has experienced depression or self-harm from teen Instagram use, you may be eligible to seek compensation.
Contact TruLaw using the chat on this page to receive an instant case evaluation that can help you determine if you qualify to file a Social Media Mental Health Lawsuit today.
The multidistrict litigation (MDL 3047) has grown to 1,867 cases as of July 2025, consolidating claims against Instagram and other social media apps under Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers in the Northern District of California.
These social media addiction lawsuits allege Instagram’s algorithms intentionally foster addiction and psychological harm, particularly among users who were minors, with claims ranging from depression to wrongful death.
As the litigation advances toward bellwether trials in October 2025, families nationwide are joining forces to hold Meta accountable for prioritizing profits over user safety.
The current status of MDL 3047 reveals 1,867 pending cases as of July 2025, representing both personal injury claims from families and institutional cases from school districts seeking compensation for increased mental health service costs.
This consolidation combines individual tragedy with systemic harm, creating one of the largest social media litigation efforts in U.S. history.
The MDL structure allows plaintiffs to share discovery resources and coordinate legal strategies while maintaining their individual claims for damages.
Judge Rogers’ oversight is important in advancing these cases, particularly her October 2024 ruling that allowed negligence claims to proceed and rejected tech companies’ traditional Section 230 immunity arguments.
Instagram’s allegedly addictive features form the core of plaintiffs’ claims, with internal Meta documents revealing the company knowingly deployed infinite scroll, autoplay videos, and strategically-timed push notifications designed to increase user engagement time.
These features work together to create what experts describe as a “dopamine slot machine,” exploiting teenagers’ developing brains and natural vulnerability to social validation.
The algorithms specifically target users showing signs of mental health struggles, pushing increasingly harmful content to keep them engaged and draw vulnerable teens deeper into the platform.
Internal Meta documents revealed through discovery demonstrate the company’s awareness of Instagram’s harmful effects:
Meta’s internal research documented in the Facebook Papers shows Instagram worsens mental health for 1 in 3 teen girls, yet the company continued refining engagement features while publicly denying causation.
Whistleblower Frances Haugen’s testimony before Congress revealed executives repeatedly chose profits over safety, with one internal document showing an Instagram employee’s test account as a 13-year-old was quickly directed to pro-anorexia content.
These revelations demonstrate Meta not only knew about Instagram’s harm but actively designed features to exploit teen psychology for profit.
The primary legal theories center on product liability for defective design and negligence in implementing safeguards, with plaintiffs arguing Instagram’s algorithm constitutes an unreasonably dangerous product when used by minors.
Unlike traditional Section 230 cases involving third-party content, these lawsuits target Instagram’s own design choices and algorithmic recommendations.
Courts have recognized this distinction, allowing claims to proceed on the theory that Meta’s conduct goes beyond merely hosting content to actively creating user addiction.
Plaintiffs pursue multiple legal theories against Instagram’s parent company, each targeting different aspects of Instagram’s harmful design:
The court’s rejection of Meta’s Section 230 immunity defense has fundamentally strengthened plaintiffs’ positions, establishing that social media companies can be held liable for their own algorithmic designs rather than hiding behind protections meant for neutral platforms.
Judge Rogers specifically noted that negligence law provides a “flexible mechanism to redress evolving means for causing harm,” recognizing that traditional legal theories can adapt to address modern technological dangers.
This precedent-setting approach opens the door for accountability that has long eluded social media victims.
If you or a loved one experienced depression, anxiety, eating disorders, self-harm, or other mental health injuries related to Instagram use, you may be eligible to seek compensation.
Contact TruLaw using the chat on this page to receive an instant case evaluation and determine whether you qualify to join others in filing an Instagram Lawsuit today.
The range of psychological and physical injuries forming the basis of Instagram lawsuits reveals the devastating impact of algorithmic manipulation on teenage mental health, with particular emphasis on vulnerable populations already struggling with low self esteem and identity formation.
Instagram’s features allegedly exacerbate existing conditions and create new mental health problems, supported by Meta’s own internal research showing awareness of these harms.
From eating disorders triggered by thinspiration content to suicides linked to social comparison, the platform’s design choices have left a trail of documented injuries affecting thousands of young users’ mental health.
Meta’s internal research confirms Instagram’s negative impact on teen mental health, revealing that the platform’s visual nature and engagement algorithms create what researchers call a “dangerous spiral of negative social comparison.”
According to the Facebook Papers, Instagram makes 1 in 3 teen girls feel worse about their bodies, while Yale Medicine research shows teens using social media over three hours daily face twice the risk of depression and anxiety symptoms.
The platform’s algorithmic feed deliberately amplifies content that triggers emotional responses, keeping vulnerable users engaged despite psychological harm from excessive social media use.
Scientific research and Meta’s own studies document Instagram’s negative mental health impacts:
Harvard researchers identified the “dangerous spiral of negative social comparison” as particularly harmful for adolescent girls, who measure their worth against carefully curated and filtered images of peers and influencers.
Instagram’s Explore page and suggested content features deliberately serve users increasingly extreme versions of beauty and lifestyle content, creating impossible standards that fuel anxiety and depression.
The platform’s like counts and comment features transform normal teenage insecurities into quantified metrics of social worth, with devastating psychological consequences for developing minds amid the youth mental health crisis.
Instagram’s algorithm actively promotes “thinspiration” and idealized body content, with documented cases of children as young as 11 developing severe eating disorders after exposure to pro-anorexia communities on the platform.
A Tech Transparency Project investigation found Instagram continues pushing eating disorder content to teen accounts despite claims of content moderation, with test accounts quickly directed to hashtags like #thinspo and #proana within days of creation.
The visual nature of Instagram makes it particularly dangerous for body image issues, as users face constant streams of edited, filtered images promoting unrealistic body standards causing severe mental health issues.
Instagram’s algorithm promotes various forms of harmful body-image content to vulnerable users:
Despite age restrictions and supposed safety measures, Instagram’s recommendation algorithm continues to fail at preventing pro-eating disorder content from reaching vulnerable users, with internal testing by Meta employees revealing how quickly a 13-year-old’s Instagram account searching for diet tips was directed to accounts titled “skinny binge” and “apple core anorexic.”
Research published in the Journal of Eating Disorders confirms Instagram exposure correlates with increased body dissatisfaction and disordered eating behaviors, particularly among teenage girls.
The platform’s failure to effectively moderate this content, combined with algorithms that amplify it, has created what experts describe as a “digital pro-ana epidemic” affecting millions of young users.
The correlation between Instagram use and self-harm behaviors represents the most severe manifestation of the platform’s harmful design, with Brigham Young University’s landmark 10-year study finding young girls using social media 2-3 hours daily showed clinically elevated suicide risk, aligning with CDC data on youth mental health.
Wrongful death cases within the MDL involve teenagers as young as 15 who took their own lives after prolonged exposure to Instagram’s toxic environment of cyberbullying, social comparison, and algorithm-driven depression content.
These cases demonstrate how Instagram’s engagement-maximizing features can push vulnerable users past their breaking point with severe mental health problems and adverse mental health effects.
Research documenting the connection between Instagram use and severe mental health outcomes:
Brigham Young University’s 10-year study provides scientific backing for these claims, demonstrating that specific patterns of social media use during early adolescence create lasting mental health challenges that can culminate in suicide attempts years later.
The study’s lead researcher, Dr. Sarah Coyne, identified that “something about that specific social media use pattern is particularly harmful for young girls,” validating what grieving families have long suspected about Instagram’s role in their children’s deaths.
With wrongful death cases representing the highest potential settlements in the MDL—ranging from $900,000 to over $3 million—these tragic outcomes underscore the ultimate price of Meta’s profit-driven design choices.
If you or a loved one experienced severe mental health injuries including eating disorders, self-harm, or lost a child to suicide related to Instagram use, you may be eligible to seek compensation.
Contact TruLaw using the chat on this page to receive an instant case evaluation and determine whether you qualify to join others in filing an Instagram Lawsuit today.
The separate $68.5 million BIPA settlement represents a distinct legal victory for Illinois users whose biometric data was collected by Instagram between August 10, 2015 and August 16, 2023, when the platform used facial recognition technology without proper consent.
This privacy litigation differs fundamentally from the mental health MDL, focusing on illegal biometric data collection through facial recognition features that violated Illinois’ nation-leading privacy protections.
While smaller than Facebook’s earlier $650 million BIPA settlement, the Instagram case demonstrates Meta platforms’ pattern of violating user privacy across its services.
The settlement covered approximately 4 million eligible Illinois residents who received payments averaging $32.56 per claimant, with distributions completed in June 2024 through direct deposit or mailed checks.
Unlike Facebook’s BIPA settlement where some users received over $400, Instagram’s lower per-person payout reflects differences in usage patterns and the shorter time period of violations after Instagram disabled facial recognition features in November 2021.
The Instagram class action lawsuit alleged Instagram’s facial tagging suggestions and filters illegally collected and stored users’ unique facial geometry without obtaining written consent required under Illinois law.
The $68.5 million Illinois biometric privacy settlement proceeded through these milestones:
Meta agreed to the settlement without admitting wrongdoing, following the pattern established by Facebook’s earlier BIPA settlement and similar agreements by Google ($100 million) and Snapchat ($35 million) for Illinois biometric privacy violations.
The relatively quick resolution and payment distribution demonstrates how BIPA’s strict liability provisions and statutory damages create powerful incentives for tech companies to settle rather than risk trial.
Illinois residents who submitted their Instagram settlement claim before the deadline have already received their settlement payments, marking another victory for the state’s pioneering biometric privacy protections.
Instagram’s facial recognition technology collected biometric identifiers through features like automatic face tagging suggestions and augmented reality filters, creating unique facial templates without users’ explicit written consent or required disclosures.
BIPA specifically prohibits private entities from collecting, storing, or using biometric data—including facial geometry, fingerprints, and iris scans—without first obtaining informed written consent and providing retention and destruction policies.
Instagram’s violations included using this technology on photos uploaded by Illinois users and their friends, building a database of facial recognition data for millions without permission.
Instagram violated specific provisions of Illinois’ Biometric Information Privacy Act:
Illinois stands alone in providing the strictest biometric privacy protections in the nation, with BIPA establishing statutory damages of $1,000 per negligent violation or $5,000 per intentional violation, creating financial exposure for tech companies that mishandle biometric data.
Unlike other states’ privacy laws, BIPA provides a private right of action, allowing individuals to sue directly without proving actual harm, which has made Illinois the epicenter of biometric privacy litigation.
This unique legal framework has forced major tech companies to either disable biometric features for Illinois users or implement comprehensive consent mechanisms, demonstrating how state-level privacy protections can drive nationwide changes in corporate behavior affecting mental and physical health.
Eligibility criteria for Instagram lawsuits encompass multiple tracks, distinguishing between individual mental health claims, wrongful death actions, and institutional cases brought by school districts seeking compensation for increased mental health service costs.
The requirements vary based on when the harm occurred, the severity of injuries, and whether claims involve direct users or secondary impacts on families and institutions.
Knowledge of these distinctions helps potential plaintiffs determine their standing and the strength of their claims within the MDL framework.
Parents and legal guardians can file claims on behalf of minors who received mental health treatment linked to Instagram use, with documentation requirements focusing on establishing both platform usage and resulting psychological harm requiring professional intervention.
Young adults who suffered injuries as minors retain independent standing to file claims, typically until age 20 or 21 depending on state tolling provisions, allowing those harmed during adolescence to seek justice even after reaching adulthood.
The MDL accepts claims from users who developed diagnosed mental health conditions including depression, anxiety, eating disorders, self-harm behaviors, or suicidal ideation that required medical or psychiatric treatment.
Young adults who were harmed as minors maintain independent standing to file claims even without parental involvement, recognizing that many suffered in silence or faced family situations preventing earlier action.
Most states toll (pause) the statute of limitations for minors until they reach age 18, then provide an additional 2-3 years to file claims, meaning those harmed as teenagers may still have viable cases through age 20 or 21.
Specific age and diagnosis requirements include documented Instagram use before age 21 and professional treatment for mental health conditions directly linked to platform engagement, with stronger cases involving hospitalization, self-harm requiring medical attention, or ongoing psychiatric care.
Six school districts from Maryland, Georgia, Kentucky, New Jersey, North Carolina, and Arizona were selected for bellwether trials based on their comprehensive documentation of increased mental health service costs directly attributable to social media-related issues among students.
These districts demonstrated measurable financial impacts through expanded counseling programs, behavioral intervention specialists, anti-bullying initiatives, and crisis response teams implemented specifically to address Instagram and social media-driven mental health deterioration.
The selection criteria emphasized geographic and socioeconomic diversity to ensure bellwether outcomes reflect nationwide impacts on educational institutions.
Educational institutions seek compensation for Instagram-related expenditures:
Requirements for demonstrating financial impact include detailed budget analyses showing year-over-year increases in mental health expenditures correlating with rising social media usage among students, documentation of specific incidents requiring intervention, and expert testimony linking behavioral issues to platform design.
School districts must establish that traditional disciplinary and counseling approaches proved inadequate for addressing the unique challenges posed by Instagram addiction and cyberbullying, necessitating extraordinary resource allocation.
The direct connection to social media-related issues distinguishes these costs from general mental health spending, requiring districts to show specific causation through incident reports, counseling records, and administrative documentation.
Varying state laws create a multifaceted patchwork of filing deadlines for Instagram lawsuits, with the discovery rule potentially extending limitations periods for mental health injuries that manifest gradually over time.
Most states provide 2-3 year limitations periods for personal injury claims, but courts increasingly recognize that social media addiction’s insidious nature may delay recognition of harm, potentially triggering discovery rule protections.
The ongoing MDL proceedings and upcoming bellwether trials in October 2025 create urgency for potential plaintiffs to preserve their claims before state-specific deadlines expire.
Statute of limitations will vary across the following jurisdictions:
Tolling provisions for minors protect Instagram victims who may not recognize or report harm during adolescence, with most jurisdictions pausing the limitations clock until the victim reaches age 18, then providing additional time to file claims.
The discovery rule may further extend deadlines when psychological injuries develop slowly or when the connection between Instagram use and mental health harm becomes apparent only through later diagnosis or treatment.
Given the intricacy of state-specific rules and potential federal preemption issues within the MDL, prompt legal consultation remains necessary to preserve claims and ensure compliance with applicable deadlines.
If you or a loved one suffered mental health injuries from Instagram use as a minor, or if your school district faces increased costs from social media-related student issues, you may be eligible to seek compensation.
Contact TruLaw using the chat on this page to receive an instant case evaluation and determine whether you qualify to join others in filing an Instagram Lawsuit today.
Our Social Media Mental Health attorney at TruLaw is dedicated to supporting clients through the legal process of filing a Social Media Mental Health lawsuit.
With extensive experience in Consumer Protection cases, Jessica Paluch-Hoerman and our partner law firms work with litigation leaders and mental health professionals to prove how social media apps with addictive features caused you harm.
TruLaw focuses on securing compensation for mental health treatment costs and medical expenses, pain and suffering, academic/career setbacks, and other damages resulting from your social media-related mental health injuries.
We understand the psychological and emotional toll that Social media mental health issues have on your life and provide the personalized guidance you need when seeking justice.
Meet our lead Social Media Mental Health attorney:
At TruLaw, we believe financial concerns should never stand in the way of justice.
That’s why we operate on a contingency fee basis—with this approach, you only pay legal fees after you’ve been awarded compensation for your injuries.
If you or a loved one experienced mental health issues from social media use that include depression, anxiety, eating disorders, self-harm behaviors, or suicidal thoughts, you may be eligible to seek compensation.
Contact TruLaw using the chat on this page to receive an instant case evaluation and determine whether you qualify to join others in filing a Social Media Mental Health lawsuit today.
Social media mental health lawsuits are being filed by individuals and families across the country who have suffered mental health injuries from Instagram and other social media platforms.
TruLaw is currently accepting clients for the social media mental health lawsuit.
A few reasons to choose TruLaw for your social media mental health lawsuit include:
If you or a loved one suffered mental health injuries related to social media use, you may be eligible to seek compensation.
Contact TruLaw using the chat on this page to receive an instant case evaluation that can determine if you qualify for the Social Media Mental Health Lawsuit today.
Instagram mental health lawsuit settlements vary based on individual circumstances, with potential payouts ranging from $10,000 to over $100,000 for standard cases.
Unlike the completed Illinois BIPA settlement that paid an average of $32.56 per person, mental health claims involve individualized damages based on the severity of harm, duration of treatment, and specific injuries suffered.
Wrongful death cases within the MDL have the highest potential value, ranging from $900,000 to over $3 million.
Factors affecting settlement amounts include age when harm occurred, documented treatment costs, severity of mental health impacts (hospitalization versus outpatient therapy), and strength of causation evidence linking Instagram use to psychological injuries.
Since MDL 3047 remains in active litigation with bellwether trials scheduled for October 2025, no global settlement amounts have been established yet.
No, the Instagram mental health litigation is not a class action but rather a multidistrict litigation (MDL 3047) consolidating 1,867 individual cases as of July 2025.
This distinction matters for compensation—in an MDL, each plaintiff maintains their individual lawsuit and receives settlements based on their specific injuries, unlike class actions where all members share a common settlement fund.
The MDL includes three types of plaintiffs: parents filing on behalf of harmed minors, young adults who suffered injuries as teenagers, and school districts seeking compensation for increased mental health service costs.
Additionally, 14 state attorneys general filed separate enforcement actions against Meta, the parent company of Instagram, in October 2024, but these government lawsuits seek policy changes and penalties rather than individual victim compensation.
The Wall Street Journal has reported extensively on these Instagram addiction lawsuits, highlighting how social media adolescent addiction affects the user well being of millions of teens.
To qualify for the Instagram mental health lawsuit, users must meet specific criteria: (1) developed social media addiction or serious mental health issues before age 21, (2) used Instagram for 3+ hours daily during the harm period, and (3) received professional treatment for resulting psychological conditions.
Eligible conditions include depression, anxiety, eating disorders, body dysmorphia, self-harm behaviors, and suicidal ideation that required therapy, psychiatric care, or hospitalization.
Parents can file on behalf of minor children currently experiencing harm or who suffered past injuries, while young adults who were harmed as minors can file independently until age 20-21 depending on state tolling provisions.
Documentation requirements include Instagram usage records, medical diagnoses, treatment history, and evidence linking platform use to mental health decline.
School districts with documented increases in mental health service costs related to Instagram use among students also qualify for institutional claims seeking reimbursement for services related to social and behavioral sciences interventions.
Illinois Instagram users who submitted valid claims for the $68.5 million BIPA settlement should have received payments by June 2024, with average payouts of $32.56 distributed via direct deposit or mailed checks.
If you haven’t received your payment despite submitting a claim before the 27 September 2023 deadline, you can request a check reissue through the settlement website.
This biometric privacy settlement is completely separate from the ongoing mental health litigation—it compensated Illinois residents for Instagram’s illegal collection of facial recognition data between August 10, 2015 and August 16, 2023.
Late claims are no longer accepted as the settlement fund has been fully distributed.
For those who missed this settlement, the ongoing mental health MDL provides a different avenue for compensation if you suffered psychological injuries from Instagram use, though Instagram addiction lawsuits require proof of actual mental health harm.
Filing an Instagram mental health lawsuit begins with consulting an attorney experienced in social media litigation who can evaluate your case within MDL 3047’s framework.
The process requires gathering documentation, including proof of Instagram usage patterns (account data, screen time records), medical records showing mental health treatment, therapy notes linking platform use to psychological harm, and timeline evidence showing when symptoms developed.
Your attorney will file an individual complaint that gets transferred to the Northern District of California MDL, where it joins 1,867+ pending cases for coordinated pretrial proceedings.
Unlike class actions, you maintain control over your individual case and settlement decisions.
Most social media attorneys work on contingency fees, meaning no upfront costs, with fees paid only from eventual settlements or verdicts.
Time is important due to varying state statutes of limitations, making prompt legal action necessary to preserve your claims.
Instagram lawsuits cover a comprehensive range of mental health conditions documented in Meta’s own internal research and scientific studies, including clinical depression, generalized anxiety disorder, social anxiety, panic disorders, and body dysmorphic disorder particularly severe in teenage girls exposed to filtered beauty content.
Eating disorders represent a major category, encompassing anorexia nervosa, bulimia, binge eating disorder, and “orthorexia” often triggered by Instagram’s algorithm promoting thinspiration and extreme diet content.
Self-harm behaviors qualifying for compensation include cutting, burning, or other self-injury requiring medical intervention, while the most severe cases involve suicide attempts or completed suicides linked to platform use.
Physical manifestations like social media-induced tics (resembling Tourette syndrome), chronic insomnia from compulsive nighttime scrolling, and stress-related conditions are also covered.
The key requirement is professional diagnosis and treatment—self-reported symptoms without medical documentation typically don’t meet evidentiary standards for litigation, though other mental health issues may qualify if properly documented and companies failed to warn users of known risks.
Managing Attorney & Owner
With over 25 years of legal experience, Jessica Paluch-Hoerman is an Illinois lawyer, a CPA, and a mother of three. She spent the first decade of her career working as an international tax attorney at Deloitte.
In 2009, Jessie co-founded her own law firm with her husband – which has scaled to over 30 employees since its conception.
In 2016, Jessie founded TruLaw, which allows her to collaborate with attorneys and legal experts across the United States on a daily basis. This hypervaluable network of experts is what enables her to share the most reliable, accurate, and up-to-date legal information with our readers!
Here, at TruLaw, we’re committed to helping victims get the justice they deserve.
Alongside our partner law firms, we have successfully collected over $3 Billion in verdicts and settlements on behalf of injured individuals.
Would you like our help?
At TruLaw, we fiercely combat corporations that endanger individuals’ well-being. If you’ve suffered injuries and believe these well-funded entities should be held accountable, we’re here for you.
With TruLaw, you gain access to successful and seasoned lawyers who maximize your chances of success. Our lawyers invest in you—they do not receive a dime until your lawsuit reaches a successful resolution!
AFFF Lawsuit claims are being filed against manufacturers of aqueous film-forming foam (AFFF), commonly used in firefighting.
Claims allege that companies such as 3M, DuPont, and Tyco Fire Products failed to adequately warn users about the potential dangers of AFFF exposure — including increased risks of various cancers and diseases.
Depo Provera Lawsuit claims are being filed by individuals who allege they developed meningioma (a type of brain tumor) after receiving Depo-Provera birth control injections.
A 2024 study found that women using Depo-Provera for at least 1 year are five times more likely to develop meningioma brain tumors compared to those not using the drug.
Suboxone Tooth Decay Lawsuit claims are being filed against Indivior, the manufacturer of Suboxone, a medication used to treat opioid addiction.
Claims allege that Indivior failed to adequately warn users about the potential dangers of severe tooth decay and dental injuries associated with Suboxone’s sublingual film version.
Social Media Harm Lawsuits are being filed against social media companies for allegedly causing mental health issues in children and teens.
Claims allege that companies like Meta, Google, ByteDance, and Snap designed addictive platforms that led to anxiety, depression, and other mental health issues without adequately warning users or parents.
Transvaginal Mesh Lawsuits are being filed against manufacturers of transvaginal mesh products used to treat pelvic organ prolapse (POP) and stress urinary incontinence (SUI).
Claims allege that companies like Ethicon, C.R. Bard, and Boston Scientific failed to adequately warn about potential dangers — including erosion, pain, and infection.
Bair Hugger Warming Blanket Lawsuits involve claims against 3M — alleging their surgical warming blankets caused severe infections and complications (particularly in hip and knee replacement surgeries).
Plaintiffs claim 3M failed to warn about potential risks — despite knowing about increased risk of deep joint infections since 2011.
Baby Formula NEC Lawsuit claims are being filed against manufacturers of cow’s milk-based baby formula products.
Claims allege that companies like Abbott Laboratories (Similac) and Mead Johnson & Company (Enfamil) failed to warn about the increased risk of necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) in premature infants.
Here, at TruLaw, we’re committed to helping victims get the justice they deserve.
Alongside our partner law firms, we have successfully collected over $3 Billion in verdicts and settlements on behalf of injured individuals.
Would you like our help?