Attorney Jessie Paluch, founder of TruLaw, has over 25 years of experience as a personal injury and mass tort attorney, and previously worked as an international tax attorney at Deloitte. Jessie collaborates with attorneys nationwide — enabling her to share reliable, up-to-date legal information with our readers.
This article has been written and reviewed for legal accuracy and clarity by the team of writers and legal experts at TruLaw and is as accurate as possible. This content should not be taken as legal advice from an attorney. If you would like to learn more about our owner and experienced injury lawyer, Jessie Paluch, you can do so here.
TruLaw does everything possible to make sure the information in this article is up to date and accurate. If you need specific legal advice about your case, contact us by using the chat on the bottom of this page. This article should not be taken as advice from an attorney.
On this page, we’ll discuss an overview of the Snapchat lawsuit, analyze the danger of social media in the Snapchat lawsuit, allegations, and legal repercussions.
Here are some of the key legal issues Snapchat has faced:
If you or someone you love has struggled with mental health challenges related to Snapchat, you may qualify to file a claim.
Contact TruLaw using the chat on this page to find out if you qualify to seek compensation in the Snapchat lawsuit today.
On this page, we’ll discuss an overview of the Snapchat Lawsuit, addressing key events, allegations, and legal repercussions.
Snapchat, a widely used social media platform, has faced legal challenges over various issues.
Key points include consumer deception allegations and concerns about user safety.
Here are some of the key legal issues Snapchat has faced:
FTC’s complaint against Snapchat for deceptive practices concerning message disappearance and data security was a significant legal development for the company.
Furthermore, the lawsuit related to Snap’s Speed Filter speaks to ongoing concerns regarding how app features may encourage risky behavior among users.
In recent years, Snapchat has faced a number of legal challenges associated with its popular social media app.
These lawsuits have revolved around data privacy, user safety, and intellectual property rights.
Data privacy has been a significant aspect of lawsuits against Snapchat.
Users’ concerns over how their personal information is managed and protected have led to notable legal actions.
Some key examples of how data privacy laws have factored into lawsuits against Snapchat:
Lawsuits have also highlighted concerns regarding user safety on the platform, especially when it relates to features that could potentially promote unsafe behavior.
Several lawsuits have targeted Snapchat’s handling of user safety, including:
Intellectual property disputes form another critical part of the legal challenges facing Snapchat, with accusations of unauthorized use or imitation of patented technologies.
Specifically, lawsuits have raised concerns about Snapchat’s handling of intellectual property in the following ways:
In the Snapchat lawsuit, specific concerns have been raised regarding the alleged social media harm inflicted on social media users, particularly the impact on user behavior and social media site responses.
Social media companies have been compelled to reassess their policies and user engagement strategies in light of legal pressures.
Here’s how these pressures are impacting the industry:
Social media companies have typically been shielded from many social media lawsuits under Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act.
This law gives many online tech companies like Snap protection from legal claims stemming from activities that occur on their platforms.
The Snapchat lawsuit shines a light on how the use of social media sites may evolve due to increased awareness of potential risks.
Some potential consequences of the Snapchat lawsuit:
Recent litigation against Snapchat has put a spotlight on the platform’s potential impact on young people’s mental health.
The lawsuits argue that certain features of the app contribute to negative mental health outcomes among its users, especially teens.
Snapchat’s features have come under scrutiny for their potential to cause mental health problems.
The lawsuit against Snapchat highlights several areas of concern regarding mental health:
The lawsuit has highlighted a range of mental health risks associated with teen social media use.
Several teen social media risks that can negatively impact mental health:
In response to the lawsuit, some parents have taken action to protect their children’s mental health.
Here are some of the actions parents have taken:
Snapchat, a prominent platform among social media apps, has come under significant scrutiny for its impact on teen mental health.
The design of the user interface and content monitoring mechanisms are key areas of concern in recent lawsuits.
Snapchat’s user interface design has been a focal point in litigation.
Critics argue that certain design choices may contribute negatively to the mental health of its users, particularly adolescents.
Key concerns include:
Lawsuits also draw attention to Snapchat’s management and restriction of content, which is purported to have a direct influence on users’ mental well-being.
Highlighted issues include:
Filing a lawsuit alleges Snapchat involves several specific stages, from the initial claim to potential court hearings and settlements.
This process is particularly sensitive when it focuses on the impact of Snapchat on teen mental health.
Before diving into legalities, it’s crucial to gather evidence demonstrating a clear link between Snapchat use and the specific mental health concern experienced by the teenager.
This might involve documenting behavioral changes that coincide with increased Snapchat activity.
Identifying the Issue:
Drafting the Complaint:
Notification and Response:
The pre-trial phase involves extensive investigation and legal wrangling to build a strong case and narrow down the issues in dispute.
This phase typically involves discovery, motions, and hearings.
Discovery Phase:
Motions and Hearings:
Trial:
When lawsuits against Snapchat reach a stalemate, both sides may find a settlement more favorable than a lengthy court battle.
Negotiation becomes an option to resolve the dispute without a trial.
Snapchat’s legal battles have become notable markers in the evolving conversation on privacy, data security, and social media’s influence on public health.
These cases are scrutinized for their potential to set significant legal precedents that could redefine how social media companies operate and are regulated.
The litigation involving Snapchat has brought forth several critical considerations that courts must address.
These considerations could set legal precedents that impact how social media platforms operate in the future, including:
These evolving legal cases are painting a clearer picture of the legal landscape for social media companies.
Here’s how these cases might influence the future:
The amount of compensation an individual may receive from a class action settlement, such as Snapchat’s, can vary.
Several factors can affect this, including the terms of the settlement agreed upon by both parties, the number of class members who have filed a claim, and the legal fees and other expenses deducted from the settlement fund.
Monitoring the developments in the Snapchat lawsuit is crucial for staying informed.
Official court documents and filings, which offer the most recent legal progress, are essential sources for acquiring the latest information.
In order to receive a payment from the settlement, you’ll typically need to submit a claim form and any required documents by a certain deadline.
The deadline and instructions for filing a claim can be found with the settlement administrator.
The current lawsuits against Snapchat don’t directly address wrongful death from fentanyl overdoses.
However, there are emerging legal arguments that social media platforms have a responsibility for user safety.
Consulting with an attorney specializing in wrongful death lawsuits is crucial.
They can advise you on the possibility of filing a separate lawsuit against Snapchat and the dealer involved, depending on the specific circumstances.
The Neville et al v. Snap Inc. case is a lawsuit brought by families who allege that their children died after purchasing drugs sold on Snapchat.
The families claim that Snapchat failed to take sufficient action to prevent drug dealing on its platform, despite knowing it was a problem, and that this inaction is what led to their children’s deaths.
Experienced Attorney & Legal SaaS CEO
With over 25 years of legal experience, Jessie is an Illinois lawyer, a CPA, and a mother of three. She spent the first decade of her career working as an international tax attorney at Deloitte.
In 2009, Jessie co-founded her own law firm with her husband – which has scaled to over 30 employees since its conception.
In 2016, Jessie founded TruLaw, which allows her to collaborate with attorneys and legal experts across the United States on a daily basis. This hypervaluable network of experts is what enables her to share reliable legal information with her readers!
You can learn more about the Social Media Harm Lawsuits by visiting any of our pages listed below:
Here, at TruLaw, we’re committed to helping victims get the justice they deserve.
Alongside our partner law firms, we have successfully collected over $3 Billion in verdicts and settlements on behalf of injured individuals.
Would you like our help?
At TruLaw, we fiercely combat corporations that endanger individuals’ well-being. If you’ve suffered injuries and believe these well-funded entities should be held accountable, we’re here for you.
With TruLaw, you gain access to successful and seasoned lawyers who maximize your chances of success. Our lawyers invest in you—they do not receive a dime until your lawsuit reaches a successful resolution!
Do you believe you’re entitled to compensation?
Use our Instant Case Evaluator to find out in as little as 60 seconds!
AFFF Lawsuit claims are being filed against manufacturers of aqueous film-forming foam (AFFF), commonly used in firefighting.
Claims allege that companies such as 3M, DuPont, and Tyco Fire Products failed to adequately warn users about the potential dangers of AFFF exposure — including increased risks of various cancers and diseases.
Suboxone Tooth Decay Lawsuit claims are being filed against Indivior, the manufacturer of Suboxone, a medication used to treat opioid addiction.
Claims allege that Indivior failed to adequately warn users about the potential dangers of severe tooth decay and dental injuries associated with Suboxone’s sublingual film version.
Social Media Harm Lawsuits are being filed against social media companies for allegedly causing mental health issues in children and teens.
Claims allege that companies like Meta, Google, ByteDance, and Snap designed addictive platforms that led to anxiety, depression, and other mental health issues without adequately warning users or parents.
Transvaginal Mesh Lawsuits are being filed against manufacturers of transvaginal mesh products used to treat pelvic organ prolapse (POP) and stress urinary incontinence (SUI).
Claims allege that companies like Ethicon, C.R. Bard, and Boston Scientific failed to adequately warn about potential dangers — including erosion, pain, and infection.
Bair Hugger Warming Blanket Lawsuits involve claims against 3M — alleging their surgical warming blankets caused severe infections and complications (particularly in hip and knee replacement surgeries).
Plaintiffs claim 3M failed to warn about potential risks — despite knowing about increased risk of deep joint infections since 2011.
Baby Formula NEC Lawsuit claims are being filed against manufacturers of cow’s milk-based baby formula products.
Claims allege that companies like Abbott Laboratories (Similac) and Mead Johnson & Company (Enfamil) failed to warn about the increased risk of necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) in premature infants.
Here, at TruLaw, we’re committed to helping victims get the justice they deserve.
Alongside our partner law firms, we have successfully collected over $3 Billion in verdicts and settlements on behalf of injured individuals.
Would you like our help?