Attorney Jessie Paluch, founder of TruLaw, has over 25 years of experience as a personal injury and mass tort attorney, and previously worked as an international tax attorney at Deloitte. Jessie collaborates with attorneys nationwide — enabling her to share reliable, up-to-date legal information with our readers.
This article has been written and reviewed for legal accuracy and clarity by the team of writers and legal experts at TruLaw and is as accurate as possible. This content should not be taken as legal advice from an attorney. If you would like to learn more about our owner and experienced injury lawyer, Jessie Paluch, you can do so here.
TruLaw does everything possible to make sure the information in this article is up to date and accurate. If you need specific legal advice about your case, contact us by using the chat on the bottom of this page. This article should not be taken as advice from an attorney.
On this page, we’ll discuss an overview of the Instagram Mental Health Lawsuit, legal actions by a coalition of U.S. attorneys general, Instagram’s internal mental health research presentations, and much more.
The lawsuit alleges that Instagram, owned by Meta, has knowingly implemented features that could worsen mental health issues in young users.
Here’s how the lawsuit details the impact of Instagram on youth mental health:
If you or someone you love has struggled with mental health challenges related to Instagram, you may qualify to file a claim.
Contact TruLaw using the chat on this page to find out if you qualify to seek compensation in the Instagram Mental Health Lawsuit today.
A significant legal proceeding has unfolded as a bipartisan coalition of attorneys general filed a federal suit against Meta.
Legal experts claim that these proceedings could be instrumental in addressing the broader youth mental health crisis supposedly catalyzed by social media platforms.
Instagram’s internal research presentations have become pivotal in the mental health lawsuit.
Reports suggest that these documents shed light on the platform’s understanding of its impact on users’ well-being.
Here’s what these presentations reveal:
The court awaits Meta’s response as they navigate these allegations while the parent company assesses the implications of the findings from its internal research presentations.
The intersection of Instagram usage and the mental health of young users has become a pressing concern as recent actions highlight the platform’s negative impact and the serious nature of these issues.
Instagram has been linked to a range of negative mental health effects among young people.
These include:
In response to the rising concern, a coalition of attorneys general has taken legal action against Instagram’s parent company, Meta, for exacerbating mental health issues, particularly among teen girls.
The lawsuit contends:
Research suggests that excessive social media use can negatively impact adolescent mental health, particularly for platforms like Instagram, which heavily emphasize idealized portrayals of appearance and lifestyle.
Empirical data and case studies shed light on the substantial dangers that Instagram can pose to adolescent health:
Instagram’s impact on the mental health of teens, especially teenage girls, has sparked concern.
The platform’s addictive features and the negative social comparison it fosters have been central to this issue.
Instagram and other social media platforms are engineered to captivate users’ attention, particularly teens.
Here are the key points:
Teens navigate a diverse app landscape, with each platform offering unique features and purposes.
Compared to those focused on education, creativity, or specific interests, Instagram stands out for its emphasis on visual content and social connection.
When Instagram is compared with other apps that teens use, several distinctions become apparent:
In this examination of legal action, the focus is on the Instagram mental health lawsuit, which has urged a deliberation on consumer protection, appropriate content standards for youth, and the involvement of school districts.
School districts have become pivotal players in the legal proceedings against Instagram.
They argue that the social media giant has failed to protect children from the platform’s potentially harmful effects.
The lawsuit centers on several key claims:
The lawsuits initiated by various states invoke consumer protection laws aiming at safeguarding the public, particularly minors, from deceptive practices.
These consumer protection laws raise key questions regarding Instagram’s practices:
Litigation against Instagram has sparked a conversation on the necessity for age-appropriate standards for content on social media platforms.
The lawsuits highlight several key areas for establishing age-appropriate standards:
In response to accusations that its platform negatively impacts young people’s mental health, particularly among teenage girls, Instagram has implemented various measures and programs aimed at protecting and supporting its young users.
The company states that these initiatives are focused on creating positive experiences online and minimizing harm.
Instagram highlights the introduction of protection mechanisms to safeguard the mental well-being of its users, especially teens.
Below are notable steps taken:
Instagram’s efforts to support teens struggling with mental health are multi-faceted, aiming to provide resources and foster positive personal relationships.
The platform has rolled out initiatives that include:
Media outlets have thrown a harsh light on Instagram, notably after a Wall Street Journal report highlighted internal documents suggesting Instagram knew its platform could be suffering mental health problems among teens.
Here is how the public and media have reacted:
Researchers and experts have taken a data-driven approach to assess the psychological impacts of Instagram.
Their findings present a compelling case:
In light of the recent developments, several state attorneys general have initiated legal actions against Meta.
They assert that the company has contributed to mental health issues among young people through the deployment of their social media platforms.
Key points to consider:
Lawsuits can be filed against companies if there is evidence that their products or services have caused harm.
There are reports of various state attorneys general filing legal actions based on allegations that Instagram’s features have caused mental health issues among young users.
Meta, the parent company of Instagram, is facing lawsuits for allegedly designing features that negatively impact adolescent health.
These lawsuits involve a bipartisan coalition of attorneys general from several states.
Yes, there are currently lawsuits targeting social media companies, including Meta, for their platforms’ potential role in exacerbating mental health issues among young users.
The Instagram mental health lawsuits involve a bipartisan coalition of attorneys general from several states.
The settlement payout from Instagram will depend on the outcomes of the legal proceedings and subsequent negotiations.
Experienced Attorney & Legal SaaS CEO
With over 25 years of legal experience, Jessie is an Illinois lawyer, a CPA, and a mother of three. She spent the first decade of her career working as an international tax attorney at Deloitte.
In 2009, Jessie co-founded her own law firm with her husband – which has scaled to over 30 employees since its conception.
In 2016, Jessie founded TruLaw, which allows her to collaborate with attorneys and legal experts across the United States on a daily basis. This hypervaluable network of experts is what enables her to share reliable legal information with her readers!
You can learn more about the Social Media Harm Lawsuits by visiting any of our pages listed below:
Here, at TruLaw, we’re committed to helping victims get the justice they deserve.
Alongside our partner law firms, we have successfully collected over $3 Billion in verdicts and settlements on behalf of injured individuals.
Would you like our help?
At TruLaw, we fiercely combat corporations that endanger individuals’ well-being. If you’ve suffered injuries and believe these well-funded entities should be held accountable, we’re here for you.
With TruLaw, you gain access to successful and seasoned lawyers who maximize your chances of success. Our lawyers invest in you—they do not receive a dime until your lawsuit reaches a successful resolution!
Do you believe you’re entitled to compensation?
Use our Instant Case Evaluator to find out in as little as 60 seconds!
AFFF Lawsuit claims are being filed against manufacturers of aqueous film-forming foam (AFFF), commonly used in firefighting.
Claims allege that companies such as 3M, DuPont, and Tyco Fire Products failed to adequately warn users about the potential dangers of AFFF exposure — including increased risks of various cancers and diseases.
Suboxone Tooth Decay Lawsuit claims are being filed against Indivior, the manufacturer of Suboxone, a medication used to treat opioid addiction.
Claims allege that Indivior failed to adequately warn users about the potential dangers of severe tooth decay and dental injuries associated with Suboxone’s sublingual film version.
Social Media Harm Lawsuits are being filed against social media companies for allegedly causing mental health issues in children and teens.
Claims allege that companies like Meta, Google, ByteDance, and Snap designed addictive platforms that led to anxiety, depression, and other mental health issues without adequately warning users or parents.
Transvaginal Mesh Lawsuits are being filed against manufacturers of transvaginal mesh products used to treat pelvic organ prolapse (POP) and stress urinary incontinence (SUI).
Claims allege that companies like Ethicon, C.R. Bard, and Boston Scientific failed to adequately warn about potential dangers — including erosion, pain, and infection.
Bair Hugger Warming Blanket Lawsuits involve claims against 3M — alleging their surgical warming blankets caused severe infections and complications (particularly in hip and knee replacement surgeries).
Plaintiffs claim 3M failed to warn about potential risks — despite knowing about increased risk of deep joint infections since 2011.
Baby Formula NEC Lawsuit claims are being filed against manufacturers of cow’s milk-based baby formula products.
Claims allege that companies like Abbott Laboratories (Similac) and Mead Johnson & Company (Enfamil) failed to warn about the increased risk of necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) in premature infants.
Here, at TruLaw, we’re committed to helping victims get the justice they deserve.
Alongside our partner law firms, we have successfully collected over $3 Billion in verdicts and settlements on behalf of injured individuals.
Would you like our help?