Wurtsmith Air Force Base PFAS Lawsuit

Published By:
Jessica Paluch-Hoerman
Jessica Paluch-Hoerman

Attorney Jessica Paluch-Hoerman, founder of TruLaw, has over 28 years of experience as a personal injury and mass tort attorney, and previously worked as an international tax attorney at Deloitte. Jessie collaborates with attorneys nationwide — enabling her to share reliable, up-to-date legal information with our readers.

This article has been written and reviewed for legal accuracy and clarity by the team of writers and legal experts at TruLaw and is as accurate as possible. This content should not be taken as legal advice from an attorney. If you would like to learn more about our owner and experienced injury lawyer, Jessie Paluch, you can do so here.

TruLaw does everything possible to make sure the information in this article is up to date and accurate. If you need specific legal advice about your case, contact us by using the chat on the bottom of this page. This article should not be taken as advice from an attorney.

Key takeaways:

  • The EPA and Michigan have set strict PFAS water standards at Wurtsmith Air Force Base, with contamination levels reaching up to 213,000 ppt, far exceeding these limits.
  • PFAS exposure at Wurtsmith AFB is linked to serious health issues, including various cancers and immune, liver, and reproductive problems, with risks increasing with exposure levels and duration.
  • Individuals affected by PFAS at Wurtsmith AFB may pursue legal action against companies like 3M and DuPont, needing to provide evidence of exposure, medical conditions, and relevant documentation.

PFAS Contamination Lawsuit: Wurtsmith Air Force Base

The Wurtsmith Air Force Base PFAS contamination lawsuit investigation focuses on extensive forever chemical contamination from aqueous film-forming foam in drinking water, groundwater, and surface water at and around the former Michigan military installation.

The use of firefighting foam at the base has been a significant contributor to this contamination.

Department of Defense records reveal PFAS levels up to 213,000 parts per trillion in groundwater around the base, far exceeding safety standards.

The base, which operated for 70 years primarily as a combat crew and bomber training facility, has been the subject of ongoing environmental investigations since the 1980s.

Testing has revealed extensive PFAS contamination that continues to impact local communities, with contaminated drinking water and chemicals bleeding into Lake Huron via the Au Sable River.

On this page, we’ll provide an overview of the Wurtsmith Air Force Base PFAS Lawsuit, PFAS health implications for military and civilian life, military response to remediation, and much more.

Wurtsmith Air Force Base PFAS Lawsuit

Overview of PFAS Contamination at Wurtsmith AFB

The use of firefighting foams, particularly in areas where jet fuel was present, has been a major source of PFAS contamination.

Since then, extensive testing has revealed a pattern of contamination throughout the base and surrounding areas.

Current PFAS contamination data shows:

  • Groundwater levels: Up to 213,000 parts per trillion
  • Widespread contamination: Multiple exposure pathways including soil, groundwater, and surface water
  • Off-base migration: Documented spread to surrounding communities and water bodies
  • Lake Huron impact: Ongoing chemical discharge via the Au Sable River
  • Cleanup zones: Multiple areas requiring immediate remediation

The state has called for significantly stricter standards, including maximum levels of 0.02 ppt for PFOS and 0.004 ppt for PFOA, far below previous advisory levels.

If you or someone you love has been exposed to PFAS at Wurtsmith Air Force Base, you may qualify to seek compensation.

Contact TruLaw using the chat on this page to receive an instant case evaluation that can determine your eligibility to join others in filing a PFAS claim today.

Table of Contents

EPA Standards for PFAS Levels in Water

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) established the first national drinking water standards for PFAS chemicals.

These new regulations aim to reduce PFAS exposure for approximately 100 million people and prevent thousands of deaths and serious illnesses by focusing on drinking water supplies.

Michigan has been at the forefront of PFAS regulation, often implementing stricter standards than federal guidelines.

The Air Force’s efforts to address PFAS contamination have been a critical part of these regulatory changes.

For Wurtsmith AFB specifically, state regulators have called for maximum levels of 0.02 ppt for PFOS and 0.004 ppt for PFOA, significantly lower than previous standards.

The EPA’s regulation requires public water systems to monitor for these chemicals and take immediate action when levels exceed these limits, with additional requirements for industrial discharge limits and wastewater treatment.

Health Effects of PFAS Exposure: Symptoms & Conditions

Scientific research has linked PFAS exposure to numerous serious health conditions, particularly concerning for communities around Wurtsmith AFB where contamination levels far exceed safety standards.

According to medical studies and health agency documentation, PFAS exposure can lead to:

  • Bladder cancer
  • Testicular cancer
  • Kidney cancer
  • Thyroid cancer
  • Thyroid disease
  • Immune system dysfunction
  • Liver damage
  • Reproductive issues
  • Developmental effects
  • Increased cholesterol levels
  • Other serious health conditions

The severity and likelihood of these health effects correlate with both exposure levels and duration.

For communities around Wurtsmith AFB, where PFAS levels have been documented at up to 213,000 parts per trillion, these health risks are particularly significant.

Potential Defendants in PFAS Lawsuits

Several major manufacturers and chemical companies face legal action for their role in PFAS contamination at military installations including Wurtsmith AFB.

Primary PFAS manufacturers include, but are not limited to:

  • 3M Company
  • DuPont (and its spinoff, Chemours)
  • Tyco Fire Products
  • Chemguard
  • Kidde-Fenwal
  • National Foam
  • Buckeye Fire Equipment

These companies manufactured PFAS chemicals despite allegedly knowing about their potential health risks.

The lawsuits argue that these manufacturers continued producing and selling PFAS-containing products without adequate warnings about their dangers or proper guidance for safe disposal.

Military bases like Wurtsmith AFB used AFFF containing PFAS chemicals from these manufacturers for decades in firefighting operations and training exercises, leading to widespread contamination of soil and groundwater.

Official EPA and Military Reports on Wurtsmith AFB PFAS

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and Department of Defense have conducted extensive investigations into PFAS contamination at Wurtsmith Air Force Base.

The installation of groundwater treatment systems has been a key part of the mitigation efforts.

According to DoD records released in 2021, investigations revealed significant PFAS contamination, with groundwater testing showing PFAS levels up to 213,000 parts per trillion, far exceeding current safety standards.

Investigation efforts have included sampling of both public and private wells, with studies examining two public wells and 54 private wells in the surrounding area.

The Michigan Department of Environment, Great Lakes, and Energy (EGLE) continues to oversee testing and remediation efforts, though disputes with the Air Force over cleanup standards persist.

Recent reports have prompted expanded investigation and remediation efforts, with the Air Force announcing new initiatives to prevent additional PFAS spread around the former base.

Timeline of PFAS Investigation at Wurtsmith AFB

Former Wurtsmith Air Force has been the subject of ongoing environmental investigations and remediation efforts concerning PFAS contamination.

Environmental agencies and military investigators have documented the progression of testing, analysis, and remediation efforts throughout this period.

The PFAS contamination created by military activities has been a major focus of these efforts.

Key events in the investigation include:

  • 1980s: Initial identification of environmental contamination at the base
  • 2010: EGLE discovers PFAS contamination during fire training area sampling
  • 2021: DoD reveals groundwater contamination levels up to 213,000 ppt
  • 2023: Air Force announces expanded cleanup efforts
  • 2024: Implementation of new treatment systems and extraction well maintenance

Expert Testimonies and Scientific Evidence

Environmental scientists and health experts have provided extensive documentation of PFAS contamination at Wurtsmith AFB through comprehensive studies and analysis.

Their findings have been important in understanding the scope of contamination and its potential health impacts on local communities.

Scientific studies and expert findings confirm:

  • Groundwater contamination: Levels thousands of times above EPA standards
  • Drinking water impact: Multiple wells showing unsafe PFAS concentrations
  • Spread patterns: Documented migration through soil and groundwater systems
  • Treatment effectiveness: Ongoing evaluation of remediation methods
  • Health implications: Evidence of exposure risks to base personnel and residents

Recent environmental assessments conducted in early 2024 have led to updated remediation plans, though cleanup efforts continue to face challenges due to disagreements between state and federal agencies over appropriate standards and methods.

Do You Qualify for a Wurtsmith Air Force Base PFAS Lawsuit?

Individuals who were exposed to PFAS-contaminated water at Wurtsmith Air Force Base may be eligible to file a claim for compensation.

The qualification process requires documenting both exposure to contaminated drinking water and diagnosis of qualifying health conditions.

Environmental testing has confirmed widespread PFAS contamination in both public and private wells around the base, with levels far exceeding EPA safety standards.

This contamination affects military personnel, civilian employees, and residents who lived or worked at or near Wurtsmith AFB.

Legal experts are currently reviewing cases for individuals who may have been exposed to contaminated water through drinking, bathing, or other daily activities while at or near the base.

Steps to Take If You’ve Been Exposed to PFAS

The first step for anyone potentially exposed to PFAS at Wurtsmith AFB is to document their exposure history and seek appropriate medical evaluation.

Early detection and documentation of health issues can be crucial for both medical care and legal claims.

Important actions for those exposed to PFAS include:

  • Medical screening: Schedule comprehensive health evaluations
  • Water testing: Request testing of current water sources if you live near the base
  • Exposure documentation: Record dates and duration of time spent at Wurtsmith AFB
  • Symptom tracking: Keep detailed records of any health changes or concerns
  • Healthcare provider communication: Inform your doctors about potential PFAS exposure

Taking these steps promptly can significantly strengthen your claim and ensure you receive appropriate medical care.

Many PFAS-related health conditions develop gradually, making early documentation and ongoing monitoring essential for establishing the connection between exposure and health impacts.

Collecting Medical Records for a PFAS Claim

Proper documentation is essential for building a strong PFAS lawsuit case.

Medical records serve as evidence linking exposure to health conditions and documenting the progression of related medical issues.

The documentation process should be thorough and ongoing.

Required documentation typically includes:

  • Service records: Proof of military service or employment at Wurtsmith AFB
  • Residency verification: Evidence of living on or near the base
  • Medical diagnoses: Records of qualifying health conditions
  • Treatment history: Documentation of ongoing medical care
  • Expert opinions: Statements from healthcare providers about PFAS-related conditions

Working with experienced attorneys can help ensure all necessary documentation is properly collected and organized.

Legal teams often have established relationships with medical experts who understand PFAS exposure and can help strengthen the connection between contamination and health issues in your claim.

TruLaw: Accepting Clients with PFAS Water Contamination Lawsuit Claims

PFAS water contamination lawsuit claims are being filed by individuals and communities across the country who have been exposed to toxic PFAS chemicals in their drinking water.

TruLaw is currently accepting clients with PFAS water contamination lawsuit claims.

A few reasons to choose TruLaw for your PFAS water contamination lawsuit include:

  • If We Don’t Win, You Don’t Pay: The PFAS lawyers at TruLaw and our partner firms operate on a contingency fee basis, meaning we only get paid if you win.
  • Expertise: We have years of experience handling environmental contamination cases similar to the PFAS water contamination lawsuits, which helps us anticipate what we can expect to see in your case and the regulations we will be required to meet.
  • Successful Track Record: TruLaw and our partner law firms have helped our clients recover billions of dollars in compensation through verdicts and negotiated settlements.

If you or your community has been exposed to PFAS chemicals in your drinking water, you may be eligible to seek compensation.

Contact TruLaw using the chat on this page to receive an instant case evaluation that can determine if you qualify to join others in filing a PFAS water contamination lawsuit claim today.

Frequently Asked Questions

  • What are the current PFAS contamination levels at Wurtsmith Air Force Base?

    Department of Defense records show PFAS levels up to 213,000 parts per trillion in groundwater around the base, far exceeding safety standards.

    The contamination affects drinking water, groundwater, and surface water, with chemicals reaching Lake Huron via the Au Sable River.

  • What health risks are associated with PFAS exposure at Wurtsmith AFB?

    PFAS exposure has been linked to multiple types of cancer, including bladder, testicular, kidney, and thyroid cancers, as well as immune system dysfunction and liver damage.

    The severity of health risks is particularly significant due to the extremely high contamination levels documented at Wurtsmith Air Force Base.

  • Who can qualify for a Wurtsmith Air Force Base PFAS lawsuit?

    Individuals who were exposed to PFAS-contaminated water while living or working at or near Wurtsmith AFB may be eligible to file a claim.

    Qualification requires documenting both exposure to contaminated water and diagnosis of qualifying health conditions.

  • What companies are potential defendants in PFAS contamination lawsuits?

    Major manufacturers facing legal action include 3M Company, DuPont, Tyco Fire Products, and Chemguard.

    These companies manufactured PFAS chemicals despite allegedly knowing about potential health risks and continued selling PFAS-containing products without adequate warnings.

  • What documentation is needed for a PFAS contamination claim?

    Essential documentation includes service records, residency verification, medical diagnoses, and treatment history related to PFAS exposure.

    Working with experienced attorneys can help ensure proper collection of necessary documentation and expert opinions to strengthen your claim.

  • What immediate steps should I take if I've been exposed to PFAS at Wurtsmith AFB?

    Individuals should schedule comprehensive medical screening and maintain detailed records of their exposure history and health symptoms.

    It’s important to inform healthcare providers about potential PFAS exposure and request water testing if currently living near the base.

Published By:
Jessica Paluch-Hoerman
Jessica Paluch-Hoerman

Managing Attorney & Owner

With over 25 years of legal experience, Jessica Paluch-Hoerman is an Illinois lawyer, a CPA, and a mother of three.  She spent the first decade of her career working as an international tax attorney at Deloitte.

In 2009, Jessie co-founded her own law firm with her husband – which has scaled to over 30 employees since its conception.

In 2016, Jessie founded TruLaw, which allows her to collaborate with attorneys and legal experts across the United States on a daily basis. This hypervaluable network of experts is what enables her to share the most reliable, accurate, and up-to-date legal information with our readers!

AFFF Lawsuit

AFFF Lawsuit claims are being filed against manufacturers of aqueous film-forming foam (AFFF), commonly used in firefighting.

Claims allege that companies such as 3M, DuPont, and Tyco Fire Products failed to adequately warn users about the potential dangers of AFFF exposure — including increased risks of various cancers and diseases.

Suboxone Lawsuit

Suboxone Tooth Decay Lawsuit claims are being filed against Indivior, the manufacturer of Suboxone, a medication used to treat opioid addiction.

Claims allege that Indivior failed to adequately warn users about the potential dangers of severe tooth decay and dental injuries associated with Suboxone’s sublingual film version.

Social Media Lawsuits

Social Media Harm Lawsuits are being filed against social media companies for allegedly causing mental health issues in children and teens.

Claims allege that companies like Meta, Google, ByteDance, and Snap designed addictive platforms that led to anxiety, depression, and other mental health issues without adequately warning users or parents.

Vaginal Mesh Lawsuits

Transvaginal Mesh Lawsuits are being filed against manufacturers of transvaginal mesh products used to treat pelvic organ prolapse (POP) and stress urinary incontinence (SUI).

Claims allege that companies like Ethicon, C.R. Bard, and Boston Scientific failed to adequately warn about potential dangers — including erosion, pain, and infection.

Bair Hugger Lawsuit

Bair Hugger Warming Blanket Lawsuits involve claims against 3M — alleging their surgical warming blankets caused severe infections and complications (particularly in hip and knee replacement surgeries).

Plaintiffs claim 3M failed to warn about potential risks — despite knowing about increased risk of deep joint infections since 2011.

Baby Formula NEC Lawsuit

Baby Formula NEC Lawsuit claims are being filed against manufacturers of cow’s milk-based baby formula products.

Claims allege that companies like Abbott Laboratories (Similac) and Mead Johnson & Company (Enfamil) failed to warn about the increased risk of necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) in premature infants.

Do You
Have A Case?

Here, at TruLaw, we’re committed to helping victims get the justice they deserve.

Alongside our partner law firms, we have successfully collected over $3 Billion in verdicts and settlements on behalf of injured individuals.

Would you like our help?

Helpful Sites & Resources