Scott Air Force Base PFAS Lawsuit

Published By:
Jessica Paluch-Hoerman
Jessica Paluch-Hoerman

Attorney Jessica Paluch-Hoerman, founder of TruLaw, has over 28 years of experience as a personal injury and mass tort attorney, and previously worked as an international tax attorney at Deloitte. Jessie collaborates with attorneys nationwide — enabling her to share reliable, up-to-date legal information with our readers.

This article has been written and reviewed for legal accuracy and clarity by the team of writers and legal experts at TruLaw and is as accurate as possible. This content should not be taken as legal advice from an attorney. If you would like to learn more about our owner and experienced injury lawyer, Jessie Paluch, you can do so here.

TruLaw does everything possible to make sure the information in this article is up to date and accurate. If you need specific legal advice about your case, contact us by using the chat on the bottom of this page. This article should not be taken as advice from an attorney.

Key takeaways:

  • In April 2024, the EPA set national drinking water standards for PFAS, limiting PFOA and PFOS to 4 PPT, and PFNA, PFHxS, and GenX Chemicals to 10 PPT.
  • PFAS exposure is linked to serious health issues like kidney and testicular cancer, liver damage, and thyroid disruption, with Scott AFB communities at higher risk due to elevated PFAS levels.
  • Lawsuits target major manufacturers like 3M and DuPont for PFAS contamination; affected individuals from Scott AFB may qualify by documenting exposure and health conditions.

PFAS Contamination Lawsuit: Scott Air Force Base

The Scott Air Force Base PFAS contamination lawsuit investigation focuses on widespread forever chemical contamination in drinking water and groundwater at and around the Illinois military installation.

Following concerns regarding the safety of drinking water near Scott Air Force Base, the Air Force began initiatives to sample off-base wells for PFAS contamination.

Scott Air Force Base has been identified as one of over 700 military sites nationwide with PFAS contamination facing scrutiny due to decades of using PFAS-containing firefighting foam (AFFF) in training exercises and emergency responses.

On this page, we’ll provide an overview of the Scott Air Force Base PFAS lawsuit, scientific research on PFAS at Scott AFB, official EPA & military reports on Scott AFB PFAS contamination, and much more.

Scott Air Force Base PFAS Lawsuit

Overview of PFAS Contamination at Scott AFB

Legal action is being investigated for military service members, civilian employees, and residents who consumed PFAS-contaminated drinking water supplies at Scott AFB and subsequently developed health problems.

Environmental testing at Scott Air Force Base has revealed alarming levels of various PFAS chemicals in groundwater, according to data from the Environmental Working Group (EWG):

  • PFBS: 14,000 PPT
  • PFOA: 62,000 PPT
  • PFOS: 81,000 PPT
  • Combined PFOS+PFOA: 104,000 PPT

These contamination levels are particularly concerning compared to the EPA’s 2024 drinking water standards, which set the maximum safe level for PFOS and PFOA at just 4 parts per trillion (PPT).

To put this in perspective, the combined PFOS and PFOA levels discovered at Scott AFB are roughly 26,000 times above the EPA’s threshold.

If you or someone you love has been exposed to PFAS at Scott Air Force Base, you may qualify to seek compensation.

Contact TruLaw using the chat on this page to receive an instant case evaluation that can determine your eligibility to join others in filing a PFAS claim today.

Table of Contents

EPA Standards for PFAS Levels in Water

In April 2024, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) established the first-ever national, legally enforceable drinking water standards for PFAS chemicals.

This regulation sets strict limits on six specific PFAS compounds, marking a significant shift in environmental protection standards.

The new EPA regulations establish the following Maximum Contaminant Levels (MCLs):

  • PFOA: 4 parts per trillion (PPT)
  • PFOS: 4 PPT
  • PFNA: 10 PPT
  • PFHxS: 10 PPT
  • HFPO-DA (GenX Chemicals): 10 PPT
  • PFBS: Regulated through a Hazard Index approach

These stringent standards reflect growing scientific evidence about the serious health risks posed by even minimal PFAS exposure. The EPA’s regulation requires public water systems to monitor for these chemicals and take action when levels exceed these limits.

Health Effects of PFAS Exposure: Symptoms & Conditions

Scientific research has linked PFAS exposure to numerous serious health conditions.

According to the latest studies and CDC/ATSDR documentation, individuals exposed to PFAS may experience or develop:

  • Kidney cancer
  • Testicular cancer
  • Liver damage
  • Increased cholesterol levels
  • Decreased immune response
  • Thyroid hormone disruption
  • Pregnancy-induced hypertension
  • Reproductive issues
  • Developmental effects in infants
  • Additional severe health conditions

The severity of health effects often correlates with both the level and duration of exposure.

These health risks are particularly concerning for communities around Scott AFB, where PFAS levels significantly exceed EPA standards.

Potential Defendants in PFAS Lawsuits

Military bases like Scott AFB used AFFF containing PFAS chemicals from these manufacturers for decades in firefighting operations and training exercises, leading to widespread contamination of soil and groundwater. Legal issues surrounding water contamination near Cannon Air Force Base have also emerged, particularly focusing on a lawsuit that claims the military contaminated local dairy farms with harmful forever chemicals.

Several major manufacturers and chemical companies face legal action for their role in PFAS contamination.

Primary PFAS Manufacturers include, but are not limited to:

  • 3M Company
  • DuPont (and its spinoff, Chemours)
  • Tyco Fire Products
  • Chemguard
  • Kidde-Fenwal
  • National Foam
  • Buckeye Fire Equipment

These companies manufactured PFAS chemicals despite allegedly knowing about their potential health risks.

The lawsuits argue that these manufacturers continued producing and selling PFAS-containing products without adequate warnings about their dangers or proper guidance for safe disposal.

Official EPA and Military Reports on Scott AFB PFAS

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and Department of Defense (DoD) have conducted extensive investigations into PFAS contamination at Scott Air Force Base.

These investigations reveal concerning levels of PFAS chemicals in both on-base and off-base water sources, prompting expanded testing requirements and remediation efforts. Aqueous Film Forming Foam (AFFF), historically used by military installations for firefighting during training exercises and emergency responses, has significantly contributed to groundwater contamination and environmental concerns.

According to official reports, the Air Force Civil Engineer Center (AFCEC) has identified multiple areas of concern where firefighting activities may have contributed to PFAS contamination.

The DoD announced in 2024 that it would stop buying firefighting foams containing PFAS chemicals and halt their use altogether by the end of the year, marking a significant shift in military policy.

Timeline of PFAS Investigation at Scott AFB

The investigation into PFAS contamination at Scott AFB spans several decades, beginning with the use of Aqueous Film Forming Foam (AFFF) in firefighting operations.

The Air Force has documented extensive use of these chemicals in training exercises, emergency responses, and fire suppression systems throughout the base.

Recent years have seen increased scrutiny and more comprehensive testing efforts as understanding of PFAS risks has grown.

Key events in the investigation of PFAS contamination at Scott AFB include:

  • 1970s-2020s: Use of AFFF containing PFAS in firefighting operations and training exercises
  • 2015: Initial PFAS testing conducted by Air Force Civil Engineer Center
  • 2020:Illinois EPA recommends expanded testing of water supplies
  • 2024: Implementation of new EPA drinking water standards affecting base operations
  • 2024: DoD announces complete phase-out of PFAS-containing firefighting foam

Expert Testimonies and Scientific Evidence

Environmental scientists and health experts have provided extensive documentation of PFAS contamination at Scott AFB through comprehensive studies and analysis, highlighting the serious health consequences associated with PFAS exposure.

Their findings demonstrate not only the presence of these chemicals but also their movement through groundwater systems and potential impact on surrounding communities.

Multiple independent laboratories have confirmed these results, providing crucial evidence for ongoing investigations.

Scientific studies and expert findings indicate:

  • Groundwater sampling results: PFAS levels thousands of times higher than EPA safety standards
  • Contamination spread: Documented movement beyond base boundaries through groundwater
  • Environmental persistence: Studies confirm long-term presence of PFAS in local ecosystems
  • Health impact correlation: Medical experts link local health issues to PFAS exposure
  • Independent verification: Laboratory testing confirms multiple PFAS compounds present

The Air Force continues to work with federal and state agencies to assess and address PFAS contamination, though cleanup efforts face significant challenges due to the chemicals’ persistence in the environment.

Do You Qualify for a Scott Air Force Base PFAS Lawsuit?

Individuals who were exposed to PFAS-contaminated water at Scott Air Force Base may be eligible to file a claim for compensation.

The qualification process requires documenting both exposure to contaminated water and diagnosis of qualifying health conditions.

Legal experts emphasize that successful claims typically require establishing a clear connection between time spent at Scott AFB and subsequent health issues.

The statute of limitations varies by state, so timely action is important for preserving legal rights.

To determine eligibility, attorneys will review your connection to Scott AFB and medical history to evaluate the strength of your potential claim.

Steps to Take If You’ve Been Exposed to PFAS

The first step for anyone potentially exposed to PFAS at Scott AFB is to document their exposure history and seek appropriate medical evaluation.

Early detection and documentation of health issues can be crucial for both medical care and legal claims.

Important actions for those exposed to PFAS include:

  • Medical screening: Schedule comprehensive health evaluations
  • Water testing: Request testing of current water sources if you live near the base
  • Exposure documentation: Record dates and duration of time spent at Scott AFB
  • Symptom tracking: Keep detailed records of any health changes or concerns
  • Healthcare provider communication: Inform your doctors about potential PFAS exposure

Taking these steps promptly can significantly strengthen your claim and ensure you receive appropriate medical care.

Many PFAS-related health conditions develop gradually, making early documentation and ongoing monitoring essential for establishing the connection between exposure and health impacts.

Collecting Medical Records for a PFAS Claim

Proper documentation is essential for building a strong PFAS lawsuit case.

Medical records can serve as evidence linking exposure to health conditions and documenting the progression of related medical issues.

The documentation process should be thorough and ongoing.

Required documentation typically includes:

  • Service records: Proof of military service or employment at Scott AFB
  • Residency verification: Evidence of living on or near the base
  • Medical diagnoses: Records of qualifying health conditions
  • Treatment history: Documentation of ongoing medical care
  • Expert opinions: Statements from healthcare providers about PFAS-related conditions

Working with experienced attorneys can help ensure all necessary documentation is properly collected and organized.

Legal teams often have established relationships with medical experts who understand PFAS exposure and can help strengthen the connection between contamination and health issues in your claim.

Scientific Research on PFAS at Scott AFB

Recent scientific studies have revealed significant health and environmental concerns about PFAS contamination at military installations like Scott Air Force Base.

Research conducted by environmental agencies and independent laboratories continues to provide new insights into the extent and impact of these forever chemicals.

Multiple studies have documented the persistence of PFAS in both soil and groundwater systems around the base.

The scientific community continues to investigate the long-term effects of PFAS exposure, with new findings regularly emerging about these chemicals’ behavior in the environment.

Environmental Impact of PFAS Contamination at Scott AFB

Environmental scientists have conducted extensive studies to assess the full scope of PFAS contamination in the Scott AFB region.

Their research has revealed complex patterns of chemical migration through soil and groundwater systems, with implications for both the base and surrounding communities.

Key environmental findings include:

  • Soil contamination: High concentrations in former firefighting training areas
  • Groundwater movement: PFAS migration through underground water systems
  • Surface water impact: Contamination of local streams and water bodies
  • Ecological effects: Impact on local wildlife and plant ecosystems
  • Persistence rates: Long-term chemical stability in the environment

Recent environmental assessments have shown that PFAS chemicals continue to persist in the ecosystem, creating ongoing challenges for remediation efforts.

Ongoing Monitoring and Testing of PFAS Levels

Regular testing and monitoring programs have been established to track PFAS levels at and around Scott AFB.

These programs use advanced analytical methods to measure contamination levels and assess the effectiveness of remediation efforts.

Current monitoring activities include:

  • Quarterly water testing: Regular sampling of groundwater wells
  • Soil sampling: Ongoing assessment of contaminated areas
  • Migration tracking: Monitoring of PFAS movement patterns
  • Treatment evaluation: Testing effectiveness of remediation methods
  • Public water monitoring: Regular testing of municipal water supplies

The results of these ongoing monitoring efforts help guide cleanup strategies and inform public health decisions.

Scientists continue to refine their testing methods and expand monitoring locations to ensure comprehensive coverage of affected areas.

TruLaw: Accepting Clients with PFAS Water Contamination Lawsuit Claims

PFAS water contamination lawsuit claims are being filed by individuals and communities across the country who have been exposed to toxic PFAS chemicals in their drinking water.

TruLaw is currently accepting clients with PFAS water contamination lawsuit claims.

A few reasons to choose TruLaw for your PFAS water contamination lawsuit include:

  • If We Don’t Win, You Don’t Pay: The PFAS lawyers at TruLaw and our partner firms operate on a contingency fee basis, meaning we only get paid if you win.
  • Expertise: We have years of experience handling environmental contamination cases similar to the PFAS water contamination lawsuits, which helps us anticipate what we can expect to see in your case and the regulations we will be required to meet.
  • Successful Track Record: TruLaw and our partner law firms have helped our clients recover billions of dollars in compensation through verdicts and negotiated settlements.

If you or your community has been exposed to PFAS chemicals in your drinking water, you may be eligible to seek compensation.

Contact TruLaw using the chat on this page to receive an instant case evaluation that can determine if you qualify to join others in filing a PFAS water contamination lawsuit claim today.

Frequently Asked Questions

  • What are the new EPA drinking water standards for PFAS chemicals?

    The EPA has established limits of 4 parts per trillion for PFOA and PFOS, and 10 parts per trillion for PFNA, PFHxS, and GenX chemicals.

    These first-ever national standards became legally enforceable in April 2024 and require public water systems to monitor and address excessive PFAS levels.

  • What health risks are associated with PFAS exposure?

    PFAS exposure has been linked to serious conditions including kidney cancer, testicular cancer, liver damage, and thyroid hormone disruption.

    The severity of health effects typically correlates with both the level and duration of exposure to these forever chemicals.

  • Which companies are facing legal action for PFAS contamination?

    Major manufacturers including 3M Company, DuPont, and Tyco Fire Products are facing lawsuits for producing PFAS-containing products.

    These companies allegedly continued manufacturing PFAS chemicals despite knowledge of potential health risks and failed to provide adequate warnings about their dangers.

  • How can I determine if I qualify for a Scott Air Force Base PFAS lawsuit?

    Eligibility requires documenting both exposure to contaminated water at Scott AFB and diagnosis of qualifying health conditions.

    Legal experts evaluate claims based on the clear connection between time spent at Scott AFB and subsequent health issues, with consideration for state-specific statutes of limitations.

  • What steps should I take if I've been exposed to PFAS at Scott AFB?

    Individuals should immediately schedule comprehensive health evaluations and maintain detailed records of exposure history and symptoms.

    It’s important to inform healthcare providers about potential PFAS exposure and request testing of current water sources if living near the base.

  • What documentation is needed for a PFAS claim?

    Essential documentation includes service records, residency verification, medical diagnoses, and ongoing treatment history.

    Working with experienced attorneys can help ensure proper collection of necessary documentation and connection with medical experts who understand PFAS exposure.

Published By:
Jessica Paluch-Hoerman
Jessica Paluch-Hoerman

Managing Attorney & Owner

With over 25 years of legal experience, Jessica Paluch-Hoerman is an Illinois lawyer, a CPA, and a mother of three.  She spent the first decade of her career working as an international tax attorney at Deloitte.

In 2009, Jessie co-founded her own law firm with her husband – which has scaled to over 30 employees since its conception.

In 2016, Jessie founded TruLaw, which allows her to collaborate with attorneys and legal experts across the United States on a daily basis. This hypervaluable network of experts is what enables her to share the most reliable, accurate, and up-to-date legal information with our readers!

AFFF Lawsuit

AFFF Lawsuit claims are being filed against manufacturers of aqueous film-forming foam (AFFF), commonly used in firefighting.

Claims allege that companies such as 3M, DuPont, and Tyco Fire Products failed to adequately warn users about the potential dangers of AFFF exposure — including increased risks of various cancers and diseases.

Suboxone Lawsuit

Suboxone Tooth Decay Lawsuit claims are being filed against Indivior, the manufacturer of Suboxone, a medication used to treat opioid addiction.

Claims allege that Indivior failed to adequately warn users about the potential dangers of severe tooth decay and dental injuries associated with Suboxone’s sublingual film version.

Social Media Lawsuits

Social Media Harm Lawsuits are being filed against social media companies for allegedly causing mental health issues in children and teens.

Claims allege that companies like Meta, Google, ByteDance, and Snap designed addictive platforms that led to anxiety, depression, and other mental health issues without adequately warning users or parents.

Vaginal Mesh Lawsuits

Transvaginal Mesh Lawsuits are being filed against manufacturers of transvaginal mesh products used to treat pelvic organ prolapse (POP) and stress urinary incontinence (SUI).

Claims allege that companies like Ethicon, C.R. Bard, and Boston Scientific failed to adequately warn about potential dangers — including erosion, pain, and infection.

Bair Hugger Lawsuit

Bair Hugger Warming Blanket Lawsuits involve claims against 3M — alleging their surgical warming blankets caused severe infections and complications (particularly in hip and knee replacement surgeries).

Plaintiffs claim 3M failed to warn about potential risks — despite knowing about increased risk of deep joint infections since 2011.

Baby Formula NEC Lawsuit

Baby Formula NEC Lawsuit claims are being filed against manufacturers of cow’s milk-based baby formula products.

Claims allege that companies like Abbott Laboratories (Similac) and Mead Johnson & Company (Enfamil) failed to warn about the increased risk of necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) in premature infants.

Do You
Have A Case?

Here, at TruLaw, we’re committed to helping victims get the justice they deserve.

Alongside our partner law firms, we have successfully collected over $3 Billion in verdicts and settlements on behalf of injured individuals.

Would you like our help?

Helpful Sites & Resources