Attorney Jessica Paluch-Hoerman, founder of TruLaw, has over 28 years of experience as a personal injury and mass tort attorney, and previously worked as an international tax attorney at Deloitte. Jessie collaborates with attorneys nationwide — enabling her to share reliable, up-to-date legal information with our readers.
This article has been written and reviewed for legal accuracy and clarity by the team of writers and legal experts at TruLaw and is as accurate as possible. This content should not be taken as legal advice from an attorney. If you would like to learn more about our owner and experienced injury lawyer, Jessie Paluch, you can do so here.
TruLaw does everything possible to make sure the information in this article is up to date and accurate. If you need specific legal advice about your case, contact us by using the chat on the bottom of this page. This article should not be taken as advice from an attorney.
Question: What is the Muñiz Air National Guard Base PFAS lawsuit?
Answer: The Muñiz Air National Guard Base PFAS lawsuit involves toxic exposure claims against chemical manufacturers for contaminating drinking water and groundwater at and around the Puerto Rico Air National Guard facility in Carolina, Puerto Rico.
These PFAS water contamination claims allege that companies such as 3M, DuPont, and Chemours knowingly manufactured and sold dangerous PFAS chemicals used in firefighting foam (AFFF) and other products while concealing health risks from military personnel and nearby communities.
On this page, we’ll discuss this question in further depth, major defendants in PFAS water contamination litigation, health risks associated with PFAS exposure, and much more.
The contamination at Muñiz Air National Guard Base has spread beyond the installation’s boundaries, affecting groundwater and drinking water supplies in surrounding Carolina neighborhoods and potentially impacting thousands of residents.
Department of Defense investigations confirmed PFAS levels at the base exceeded federal health advisory limits, with contamination linked to decades of firefighting foam use during training exercises and emergency responses at the adjacent Luis Muñoz Marín International Airport.
Legal experts allege the contamination has damaged natural resources, polluted surface water, and created long-term environmental hazards requiring extensive remediation efforts that could cost millions of dollars.
If you or someone you love has cancer from exposure to contaminated water near Muñiz Air National Guard Base, you may be eligible to seek compensation.
Contact TruLaw using the chat on this page to receive an instant case evaluation that can help you determine if you qualify to file a PFAS Water Contamination Lawsuit today.
Located at Luis Muñoz Marín International Airport in Carolina, Puerto Rico, Muñiz Air National Guard Base serves as the home of the 156th Airlift Wing, providing strategic airlift capabilities throughout the Caribbean region.
For decades, the base has relied on Aqueous Film Forming Foam (AFFF) containing toxic PFAS chemicals for firefighting training exercises and emergency response operations, leading to environmental contamination that now threatens service members and surrounding communities.
Recent testing has revealed combined PFAS levels reaching around 3,000 times higher than the Environmental Protection Agency’s 2024 maximum contaminant levels of 4 ppt.
Environmental testing conducted in 2019 revealed alarming concentrations of PFAS chemicals at Muñiz ANGB, with PFOS measured at 11,000 ppt and PFOA at 2,300 ppt (representing levels 2,750 and 575 times higher than the EPA’s legally enforceable standards).
These measurements place Muñiz among the most severely contaminated military installations in the United States and its territories, highlighting the urgent need for remediation and medical monitoring for exposed populations.
PFAS levels detected at Muñiz Air National Guard Base include, but are not limited to:
The persistence of these “forever chemicals” means that contamination will continue affecting human health and the environment for decades without aggressive intervention.
Each military service member, civilian employee, and family member who consumed contaminated water or worked with AFFF faces heightened risks of developing serious health conditions linked to PFAS exposure.
The primary source of PFAS contamination at Muñiz Air National Guard Base stems from decades of using AFFF for aircraft fire suppression systems and regular firefighting training exercises at designated burn pits throughout the installation.
Since the 1970s, military firefighters have conducted routine training drills using these fluorinated foams to combat potential aircraft fuel fires, releasing thousands of gallons of PFAS-laden runoff into the environment.
PFAS chemicals from foam applications have infiltrated soil and groundwater systems through multiple pathways, including direct application during training, equipment testing, hangar deluge system discharges, and emergency response incidents.
The unique chemical properties of PFAS compounds – designed to resist heat, water, and oil – make them extraordinarily persistent in the environment, earning them the designation of “forever chemicals” that accumulate rather than break down naturally.
PFAS contamination at Muñiz ANGB extends beyond the immediate firefighting training areas to affect multiple zones across the installation, including aircraft hangars, maintenance facilities, and administrative buildings where personnel work and live.
Testing has identified contamination plumes in groundwater systems that flow beneath the base, potentially affecting drinking water wells and surface water bodies used by both military and civilian populations.
The base’s location within Luis Muñoz Marín International Airport creates additional contamination concerns, as PFAS-laden groundwater can migrate through Puerto Rico’s porous limestone geology, potentially reaching nearby residential communities in Carolina and surrounding municipalities.
The island’s tropical climate, characterized by heavy rainfall and frequent storms, accelerates the spread of contamination through surface runoff and infiltration.
The unique hydrogeological features may create preferential flow paths that extend the contamination’s reach far beyond the base boundaries.
If you or a loved one served at Muñiz Air National Guard Base and developed cancer or other serious health conditions after PFAS exposure, you may be eligible to pursue financial compensation.
Contact TruLaw using the chat on this page to receive an instant case evaluation and determine whether you qualify to join others in filing a Muñiz Air National Guard Base PFAS lawsuit today.
Pursuing a PFAS lawsuit for exposure at Muñiz Air National Guard Base involves specific legal procedures designed to help victims secure fair compensation while holding responsible parties accountable for environmental contamination.
The litigation landscape has evolved with multidistrict litigation (MDL) consolidation streamlining thousands of similar cases, creating opportunities for both individual plaintiffs and groups to seek justice efficiently.
The journey toward compensation begins with a free consultation where experienced PFAS attorneys review your military service history, medical records, and exposure timeline to determine the strength of your potential claim.
During this consultation, legal teams assess whether your time at Muñiz ANGB and health conditions meet the criteria for litigation, providing honest assessments about case viability and potential outcomes.
The PFAS lawsuit filing process follows these sequential steps:
Most PFAS attorneys work on a contingency fee basis, meaning clients pay no upfront costs and legal fees only come from successful settlements or verdicts, typically ranging from 33-40% of the total recovery.
This arrangement ensures that military families and veterans can pursue justice regardless of their current financial situation, with law firms advancing all case costs including expert witnesses, medical evaluations, and litigation expenses until resolution.
PFAS lawsuit compensation encompasses both economic damages that reimburse specific financial losses and non-economic damages that address the broader impact of toxic exposure on victims’ lives.
Economic damages include quantifiable costs such as past medical expenses for cancer treatment or thyroid medication, future medical care projections, lost wages during treatment periods, and diminished earning capacity for those unable to return to previous employment levels.
Recoverable damages in PFAS lawsuits fall into these primary categories:
Non-economic damages recognize the profound personal toll of PFAS-related illnesses, compensating for physical pain, emotional suffering, loss of enjoyment of life, and the psychological impact of cancer diagnoses or chronic health conditions.
In cases involving particularly egregious conduct by PFAS manufacturers like 3M, DuPont, and Chemours, who allegedly knew about health risks but continued producing and selling AFFF, courts may award punitive damages designed to punish corporate wrongdoing and deter future environmental contamination.
The PFAS litigation landscape has consolidated into a multidistrict litigation (MDL) in the District of South Carolina, where Judge Richard Gergel oversees thousands of cases involving AFFF contamination at military bases nationwide (including air force base installations).
Recent developments include preliminary approval of massive settlements, with 3M agreeing to pay between $10.3 and $12.5 billion to resolve water supplier claims, while DuPont, Chemours, and Corteva reached a combined $1.185 billion settlement for public water systems.
Individual personal injury cases follow a different track from water supplier settlements, with bellwether trials scheduled for October 2025 serving as test cases that will influence future settlement values and litigation strategies.
Based on similar toxic exposure litigation patterns, individual PFAS settlements are projected to range from $75,000 to $180,000 for mid-tier cases involving conditions like ulcerative colitis or immune disorders.
In contrast, top-tier cases involving kidney cancer, testicular cancer, or other severe conditions may achieve settlements of $150,000 to $375,000 or more, depending on factors such as age at diagnosis, exposure duration, and impact on quality of life.
The settlement ranges mentioned above represent general projections based on historical patterns in similar chemical exposure litigation.
These figures are preliminary estimates provided by legal experts and should not be interpreted as guaranteed outcomes.
Contact TruLaw using the chat on this page to receive an instant case evaluation specific to your circumstances.
If you or a loved one served at Muñiz Air National Guard Base and are concerned about PFAS exposure, taking action now can protect your health and legal rights for the future.
Contact TruLaw using the chat on this page to receive an instant case evaluation and determine whether you qualify to join others in filing a Muñiz Air National Guard Base PFAS lawsuit today.
The scientific community has established clear links between PFAS exposure and serious health consequences that can manifest years or decades after initial contact with contaminated water.
These “forever chemicals” accumulate in the human body over time, with half-lives ranging from several years to over a decade, meaning that even limited exposure at Muñiz Air National Guard Base could lead to long-term health impacts.
Being aware of these risks is vital for service members, civilian employees, and families who may have unknowingly consumed PFAS-contaminated water or worked with firefighting foams containing these toxic substances.
According to the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR) and recent epidemiological studies, PFAS exposure has been definitively linked to several types of cancer, with kidney cancer and testicular cancer showing the strongest associations, particularly with PFOA exposure commonly found in AFFF.
The National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (NASEM) has classified these cancer risks as having “sufficient evidence of an association,” meaning the scientific consensus supports a causal relationship between PFAS exposure and cancer development.
Medical conditions meeting PFAS lawsuit criteria feature these evidence-based diagnoses:
Beyond cancer risks, PFAS chemicals directly cause immune system dysfunction, reducing the body’s ability to fight infections and decreasing antibody responses to vaccines – particularly concerning for military personnel who require robust immune protection.
Thyroid disorders represent another major health concern, as PFAS disrupts hormonal regulation, leading to hypothyroidism, hyperthyroidism, and other endocrine system dysfunctions that affect metabolism, energy levels, and overall health.
Recent research has identified additional health impacts from PFAS exposure that extend beyond the primary conditions, including reproductive complications such as decreased fertility, pregnancy-induced hypertension, low birth weight, and preeclampsia in women exposed to contaminated water.
Studies from the Environmental Working Group have documented significantly reduced infant birth weight associated with maternal PFAS exposure, with each 1 ng/mL increase in blood PFOA or PFOS levels corresponding to measurable reductions in fetal growth.
Cardiovascular effects represent an emerging area of concern, as PFAS exposure correlates with increased cholesterol levels, elevated triglycerides, and changes in bile acid metabolism that may predispose individuals to heart disease later in life.
Neurological research suggests potential links between PFAS exposure and developmental delays in children, cognitive impairment, and behavioral changes, though these associations require further investigation to establish definitive causal relationships.
Pregnant women and developing fetuses face exceptional vulnerability to PFAS exposure because these chemicals readily cross the placental barrier, accumulating in fetal tissue and potentially disrupting developmental processes during gestation.
Studies have detected PFAS in cord blood samples, demonstrating direct fetal exposure that can impact growth, immune system development, and long-term health outcomes for children born to mothers who consumed contaminated water at military installations.
Children represent another high-risk population due to their higher water consumption relative to body weight, developing organ systems, and longer lifetime exposure potential compared to adults who encounter PFAS later in life, with research showing increased risk of health issues throughout their development.
Long-term base residents and workers, including military families who lived on Muñiz ANGB for extended periods, face cumulative exposure risks as PFAS bioaccumulates in their bodies over years of consuming contaminated water, potentially reaching threshold levels that trigger serious health problems decades after initial exposure.
Determining eligibility for a PFAS lawsuit related to Muñiz Air National Guard Base exposure requires meeting specific criteria regarding time spent on or near the installation and documented health conditions linked to PFAS contamination.
Legal requirements extend beyond active-duty military personnel to encompass family members, civilian employees, contractors, and residents of nearby communities who relied on contaminated water sources.
To qualify for a PFAS lawsuit related to Muñiz ANGB contamination, individuals generally must demonstrate at least one cumulative year of residence or employment on the base or within one mile of the installation after 1970, when AFFF use became widespread.
This timeframe requirement recognizes that PFAS exposure effects are dose-dependent and that meaningful contamination levels typically result from sustained contact with affected water sources rather than brief visits or temporary assignments.
Categories of individuals who may qualify for PFAS litigation include, but are not limited to:
Temporary duty assignments, deployments, and training rotations count toward the cumulative exposure requirement when properly documented, allowing service members who spent non-consecutive periods at Muñiz ANGB to aggregate their total time.
Special consideration applies to firefighters, aircraft maintenance personnel, and others who directly handled AFFF, as their occupational exposure may qualify them for claims even with shorter duration assignments due to the intensity of their contact with PFAS-containing foams.
Successful PFAS litigation requires documented diagnosis of specific health conditions scientifically linked to PFAS exposure, with certain cancers and chronic diseases receiving primary consideration based on epidemiological evidence.
Plaintiffs must provide medical records establishing both the diagnosis and treatment history, demonstrating that their conditions align with recognized PFAS-related health effects rather than unrelated medical issues.
Primary qualifying medical conditions for PFAS lawsuits include, but are not limited to:
Secondary conditions currently under consideration include liver cancer, pancreatic cancer, bladder cancer, and certain autoimmune disorders, though these may require additional supporting evidence to establish causation.
Medical experts recommend obtaining second opinions and comprehensive diagnostic testing to strengthen claims, particularly for conditions where the PFAS connection remains under scientific investigation but shows promising associations in recent studies.
If you served or lived at Muñiz Air National Guard Base and developed any of these qualifying conditions, you may be entitled to financial compensation for your medical expenses and suffering.
Contact TruLaw using the chat on this page to receive an instant case evaluation and determine whether you qualify to join others in filing a Muñiz Air National Guard Base PFAS lawsuit today.
Our PFAS Contamination attorney at TruLaw is dedicated to supporting clients through the process of filing a PFAS Contamination lawsuit.
With extensive experience in chemical exposure cases, Jessica Paluch-Hoerman and our partner law firms work with litigation leaders to prove how toxic PFAS chemicals in water supplies caused you harm.
TruLaw focuses on securing compensation for medical expenses, pain and suffering, property damage, lost income, reproductive harm, and ongoing health monitoring resulting from your PFAS exposure.
We recognize the health and environmental impacts of PFAS exposure on your life and provide the personalized guidance you need when seeking justice.
Meet our lead PFAS Contamination attorney:
At TruLaw, we believe financial concerns should never stand in the way of justice.
That’s why we operate on a contingency fee basis—with this approach, you only pay legal fees after you’ve been awarded compensation for your injuries.
If you or a loved one experienced health complications from exposure to PFAS-contaminated water that include forms of cancer, immune disorders, liver damage, or thyroid disease, you may be eligible to seek compensation.
Contact TruLaw using the chat on this page to receive an instant case evaluation and determine whether you qualify to join others in filing a PFAS Contamination Lawsuit today.
PFAS contamination lawsuits are being filed by individuals nationwide who experienced health problems from exposure to PFAS chemicals in drinking water on many military installations.
TruLaw is currently accepting clients for the PFAS contamination lawsuit.
A few reasons to choose TruLaw for your PFAS contamination lawsuit include:
If you or a loved one suffered health problems related to PFAS-contaminated water, you may be eligible to seek compensation.
Contact TruLaw using the chat on this page to receive an instant case evaluation that can determine if you qualify for the PFAS Contamination Lawsuit today.
Testing at Muñiz Air National Guard Base in Carolina, Puerto Rico revealed PFAS concentrations exceeding EPA health advisory levels of 70 parts per trillion.
Groundwater samples near aircraft hangars and fire training areas showed levels between 200-500 ppt, with some hotspots reaching 1,000 ppt due to decades of AFFF foam usage during firefighting training exercises since the 1970s.
PFAS lawsuit settlements typically range from $50,000 to $300,000 depending on cancer diagnosis, with testicular cancer cases averaging $250,000.
Puerto Rico veterans may also qualify for VA disability benefits at 10-100% ratings ($171-$3,737 monthly).
Settlement amounts increase with documented medical treatment duration, multiple PFAS-related conditions, and proof of on-base residency exceeding 6 months during contamination periods.
These estimates should not be taken as definitive expectations for your case.
For a personalized assessment of your potential claim value, contact TruLaw using the chat on this page.
Required documentation includes DD-214 service records showing assignment to Muñiz between 1970-2020, medical records diagnosing PFAS-linked conditions (kidney, testicular, liver cancer, or ulcerative colitis), base housing records or duty station orders, and water quality notices.
Puerto Rico residents should also gather utility bills, local medical treatment records in Spanish/English, and any base-issued health advisories regarding water contamination.
Yes, civilian employees, contractors, and family members who lived or worked at Muñiz for at least 30 days can file PFAS claims against chemical manufacturers like 3M and DuPont.
Unlike military personnel restricted by Feres Doctrine, civilians face fewer legal barriers.
Eligible parties include base housing residents, daycare workers, maintenance staff, and construction contractors exposed to contaminated water between 1970-2020.
Puerto Rico follows a one-year statute of limitations from discovery of PFAS-related illness, shorter than most states’ 2-5 year limits.
However, the discovery rule applies, meaning the clock starts when you connect your illness to PFAS exposure, not diagnosis date.
Veterans diagnosed years ago may still file if they recently learned about Muñiz contamination, but immediate legal consultation is recommended.
Contact the Puerto Rico Department of Health’s Environmental Health Division at 787-765-2929 for free PFAS testing if you lived within 3 miles of Muñiz.
Private testing costs $200-400 through certified labs like Eurofins or TestAmerica.
Request EPA Method 537.1 testing for 29 PFAS compounds.
Results above 70 ppt warrant medical screening and potential legal action through specialized PFAS attorneys.
Managing Attorney & Owner
With over 25 years of legal experience, Jessica Paluch-Hoerman is an Illinois lawyer, a CPA, and a mother of three. She spent the first decade of her career working as an international tax attorney at Deloitte.
In 2009, Jessie co-founded her own law firm with her husband – which has scaled to over 30 employees since its conception.
In 2016, Jessie founded TruLaw, which allows her to collaborate with attorneys and legal experts across the United States on a daily basis. This hypervaluable network of experts is what enables her to share the most reliable, accurate, and up-to-date legal information with our readers!
Here, at TruLaw, we’re committed to helping victims get the justice they deserve.
Alongside our partner law firms, we have successfully collected over $3 Billion in verdicts and settlements on behalf of injured individuals.
Would you like our help?
At TruLaw, we fiercely combat corporations that endanger individuals’ well-being. If you’ve suffered injuries and believe these well-funded entities should be held accountable, we’re here for you.
With TruLaw, you gain access to successful and seasoned lawyers who maximize your chances of success. Our lawyers invest in you—they do not receive a dime until your lawsuit reaches a successful resolution!
AFFF Lawsuit claims are being filed against manufacturers of aqueous film-forming foam (AFFF), commonly used in firefighting.
Claims allege that companies such as 3M, DuPont, and Tyco Fire Products failed to adequately warn users about the potential dangers of AFFF exposure — including increased risks of various cancers and diseases.
Depo Provera Lawsuit claims are being filed by individuals who allege they developed meningioma (a type of brain tumor) after receiving Depo-Provera birth control injections.
A 2024 study found that women using Depo-Provera for at least 1 year are five times more likely to develop meningioma brain tumors compared to those not using the drug.
Suboxone Tooth Decay Lawsuit claims are being filed against Indivior, the manufacturer of Suboxone, a medication used to treat opioid addiction.
Claims allege that Indivior failed to adequately warn users about the potential dangers of severe tooth decay and dental injuries associated with Suboxone’s sublingual film version.
Social Media Harm Lawsuits are being filed against social media companies for allegedly causing mental health issues in children and teens.
Claims allege that companies like Meta, Google, ByteDance, and Snap designed addictive platforms that led to anxiety, depression, and other mental health issues without adequately warning users or parents.
Transvaginal Mesh Lawsuits are being filed against manufacturers of transvaginal mesh products used to treat pelvic organ prolapse (POP) and stress urinary incontinence (SUI).
Claims allege that companies like Ethicon, C.R. Bard, and Boston Scientific failed to adequately warn about potential dangers — including erosion, pain, and infection.
Bair Hugger Warming Blanket Lawsuits involve claims against 3M — alleging their surgical warming blankets caused severe infections and complications (particularly in hip and knee replacement surgeries).
Plaintiffs claim 3M failed to warn about potential risks — despite knowing about increased risk of deep joint infections since 2011.
Baby Formula NEC Lawsuit claims are being filed against manufacturers of cow’s milk-based baby formula products.
Claims allege that companies like Abbott Laboratories (Similac) and Mead Johnson & Company (Enfamil) failed to warn about the increased risk of necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) in premature infants.
Here, at TruLaw, we’re committed to helping victims get the justice they deserve.
Alongside our partner law firms, we have successfully collected over $3 Billion in verdicts and settlements on behalf of injured individuals.
Would you like our help?