Attorney Jessica Paluch-Hoerman, founder of TruLaw, has over 28 years of experience as a personal injury and mass tort attorney, and previously worked as an international tax attorney at Deloitte. Jessie collaborates with attorneys nationwide — enabling her to share reliable, up-to-date legal information with our readers.
This article has been written and reviewed for legal accuracy and clarity by the team of writers and legal experts at TruLaw and is as accurate as possible. This content should not be taken as legal advice from an attorney. If you would like to learn more about our owner and experienced injury lawyer, Jessie Paluch, you can do so here.
TruLaw does everything possible to make sure the information in this article is up to date and accurate. If you need specific legal advice about your case, contact us by using the chat on the bottom of this page. This article should not be taken as advice from an attorney.
The Great Lakes Naval Station PFAS contamination lawsuit investigation focuses on forever chemicals found in drinking water and groundwater at and around the Illinois naval installation.
As part of a broader investigation into military sites in the Great Lakes region, the base has been identified as an area of significant concern for PFAS contamination.
Other military sites, such as Edwards Air Force Base and Wurtsmith Air Force Base, are also facing similar PFAS contamination issues due to the use of military firefighting foams.
Recent studies have revealed “dangerously” high levels of toxic PFAS chemicals in groundwater at military bases throughout the Great Lakes region, raising serious concerns about potential health impacts on service members, civilian employees, and nearby residents.
Legal action is being investigated for individuals who consumed PFAS-contaminated drinking water at Great Lakes Naval Station and subsequently developed health problems.
The Illinois Environmental Protection Agency has established strict health-based guidance levels for PFAS compounds, setting limits of 2 parts per trillion (ppt) for PFOA and 14 ppt for PFOS.
These standards are significantly more stringent than previous federal guidelines, reflecting growing concerns about these chemicals’ health impacts on drinking water supplies and the urgent need for stringent testing and remediation efforts.
Current PFAS contamination data indicates:
The contamination has drawn particular attention due to the base’s location near Lake Michigan and its role in potentially affecting Great Lakes fish populations.
Studies have shown increasing PFAS concentrations in Great Lakes fish, with levels varying significantly across the region.
In April 2024, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) established the first-ever national, legally enforceable drinking water standards for PFAS chemicals.
These new regulations aim to protect public health by limiting exposure to these toxic substances, which have been linked to various serious health conditions.
The Illinois Environmental Protection Agency has implemented even stricter standards than federal guidelines, particularly for military installations like Great Lakes Naval Station.
These state-specific regulations reflect growing concerns about PFAS impacts on public health and the environment.
The EPA’s regulation requires public water systems to monitor for these chemicals and take immediate action when levels exceed these limits, with particular attention to areas near military installations where PFAS contamination is often most severe.
Scientific research has linked PFAS exposure to numerous serious health conditions, particularly concerning for communities around Great Lakes Naval Station where contamination has been documented.
According to medical studies and health agency documentation, PFAS exposure can lead to:
The severity and likelihood of these health effects correlate with both exposure levels and duration.
For communities around Great Lakes Naval Station, where PFAS contamination has been confirmed, these health risks require careful monitoring and medical attention.
Several major manufacturers and chemical companies face legal action for their role in PFAS contamination at military installations including Great Lakes Naval Station.
Primary PFAS manufacturers include, but are not limited to:
These companies manufactured PFAS chemicals despite allegedly knowing about their potential health risks.
The lawsuits argue that these manufacturers continued producing and selling PFAS-containing products without adequate warnings about their dangers or proper guidance for safe disposal.
Military installations like Great Lakes Naval Station used aqueous film forming foam (AFFF) containing PFAS chemicals from these manufacturers for decades in firefighting operations and training exercises, leading to widespread contamination of soil and groundwater.
The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and Department of Defense have conducted extensive investigations into PFAS contamination at Great Lakes Naval Station.
According to recent reports, the base is part of a broader military installation contamination crisis requiring immediate attention. The Environmental Working Group has been involved in analyzing and reporting PFAS contamination data across the United States.
In April 2024, the Department of Defense issued a memorandum prioritizing PFAS chemical cleanup on military bases, responding to the EPA’s new drinking water standards.
This directive specifically addresses contamination at installations like Great Lakes Naval Station.
The Illinois Environmental Protection Agency has completed comprehensive investigations of PFAS occurrence in community water supplies, including areas surrounding the naval station, as part of their statewide assessment program.
Environmental agencies and military investigators have documented the progression of testing, analysis, and remediation efforts throughout several decades of operations at Great Lakes Naval Station.
Their findings continue to inform ongoing cleanup efforts.
Key events in the investigation include:
Environmental scientists and health experts have provided extensive documentation of PFAS contamination at Great Lakes Naval Station through comprehensive studies and analysis.
Scientific studies and expert findings confirm:
Recent environmental assessments conducted in early 2024 continue to guide remediation efforts, though cleanup plans face challenges due to the nature of PFAS contamination and the need for long-term monitoring.
Individuals who were exposed to PFAS-contaminated water at Great Lakes Naval Station may be eligible to file a claim for compensation.
The qualification process requires documenting both exposure to contaminated water and diagnosis of qualifying health conditions.
Recent investigations have confirmed widespread PFAS contamination in drinking water and groundwater systems around the base. Similar legal issues have arisen at Cannon Air Force Base, where lawsuits have been filed regarding PFAS contamination from military activities.
This contamination affects military personnel, civilian employees, and residents who lived or worked at or near Great Lakes Naval Station.
Legal experts are currently reviewing cases for individuals who may have been exposed to contaminated water through drinking, bathing, or other daily activities while at or near the base.
The first step for anyone potentially exposed to PFAS at Great Lakes Naval Station is to document their exposure history and seek appropriate medical evaluation. Early detection and documentation of health issues is important for both medical care and legal claims.
Important actions for those exposed to PFAS include:
Taking these steps promptly can significantly strengthen your claim and ensure you receive appropriate medical care.
Many PFAS-related health conditions develop gradually, making early documentation and ongoing monitoring essential for establishing the connection between exposure and health impacts.
Proper documentation is essential for building a strong PFAS lawsuit case.
Medical records serve as evidence linking exposure to health conditions and documenting the progression of related medical issues.
The documentation process should be thorough and ongoing.
Required documentation typically includes:
Working with experienced attorneys can help ensure all necessary documentation is properly collected and organized.
Legal teams often have established relationships with medical experts who understand PFAS exposure and can help strengthen the connection between contamination and health issues in your claim.
If you or your community has been exposed to PFAS chemicals in your drinking water, you may be eligible to seek compensation.
Contact TruLaw using the chat on this page to receive an instant case evaluation that can determine if you qualify to join others in filing a PFAS water contamination lawsuit claim today.
Recent scientific studies have revealed significant concerns about PFAS contamination at Great Lakes Naval Station, which has been designated as a Superfund site due to acute contamination issues. PFAS chemicals accumulate in the human body over time, leading to various adverse health effects, including cancers, thyroid diseases, and infertility.
Environmental agencies and research institutions continue to document the spread and impact of these toxic substances throughout the region.
The base’s proximity to Lake Michigan has drawn particular attention from researchers, as new studies have detected PFAS in Great Lakes precipitation.
This discovery has significant implications for understanding how these chemicals spread through the environment.
These findings will be a key topic of discussion at the 2024 Great Lakes PFAS Summit, where researchers, government officials, and environmental experts will gather to address the growing crisis.
Environmental scientists have documented widespread contamination affecting multiple ecosystems around Great Lakes Naval Station.
Their research reveals patterns of chemical migration through soil and groundwater systems, with significant implications for both human health and environmental welfare.
Key environmental findings include:
Recent assessments have confirmed that PFAS chemicals continue to spread through multiple environmental pathways, creating ongoing challenges for containment and remediation efforts.
The contamination affects both the immediate base area and broader Great Lakes ecosystem.
Four Great Lakes states have been selected to conduct annual testing of residents for environmental chemical exposure, marking a significant expansion of monitoring efforts.
Current monitoring activities include:
The Environmental Protection Agency and Navy continue to collaborate on cleanup efforts, though the task remains challenging due to PFAS’s persistence in the environment and the nature of the contamination.
PFAS water contamination lawsuit claims are being filed by individuals and communities across the country who have been exposed to toxic PFAS chemicals in their drinking water.
TruLaw is currently accepting clients with PFAS water contamination lawsuit claims.
A few reasons to choose TruLaw for your PFAS water contamination lawsuit include:
If you or your community has been exposed to PFAS chemicals in your drinking water, you may be eligible to seek compensation.
Contact TruLaw using the chat on this page to receive an instant case evaluation that can determine if you qualify to join others in filing a PFAS water contamination lawsuit claim today.
The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) established the first national, legally enforceable drinking water standards for PFAS chemicals in April 2024.
The Illinois EPA has implemented even stricter standards, particularly for military installations like Great Lakes Naval Station.
PFAS exposure has been linked to multiple types of cancer, liver damage, heart complications, and immune system dysfunction.
Other serious health risks include developmental issues in children, reproductive problems, and thyroid disruption.
Major manufacturers including 3M Company, DuPont, and Tyco Fire Products face legal action for their role in PFAS contamination at military installations.
These companies manufactured PFAS chemicals despite allegedly knowing about potential health risks.
Individuals who were exposed to PFAS-contaminated water at Great Lakes Naval Station and have developed qualifying health conditions may be eligible to file a claim.
Qualification requires documenting both exposure to contaminated water and diagnosis of PFAS-related health conditions.
Essential documentation includes service records, residency verification, medical diagnoses, and treatment history related to PFAS exposure.
Working with experienced PFAS attorneys can help ensure all necessary documentation is properly collected and organized.
Immediate actions should include scheduling comprehensive medical screening and documenting your exposure history.
It’s important to maintain detailed records of health changes and inform healthcare providers about potential PFAS exposure.
Managing Attorney & Owner
With over 25 years of legal experience, Jessica Paluch-Hoerman is an Illinois lawyer, a CPA, and a mother of three. She spent the first decade of her career working as an international tax attorney at Deloitte.
In 2009, Jessie co-founded her own law firm with her husband – which has scaled to over 30 employees since its conception.
In 2016, Jessie founded TruLaw, which allows her to collaborate with attorneys and legal experts across the United States on a daily basis. This hypervaluable network of experts is what enables her to share the most reliable, accurate, and up-to-date legal information with our readers!
You can learn more about the PFAS Contamination Lawsuit by visiting any of our pages listed below:
Here, at TruLaw, we’re committed to helping victims get the justice they deserve.
Alongside our partner law firms, we have successfully collected over $3 Billion in verdicts and settlements on behalf of injured individuals.
Would you like our help?
At TruLaw, we fiercely combat corporations that endanger individuals’ well-being. If you’ve suffered injuries and believe these well-funded entities should be held accountable, we’re here for you.
With TruLaw, you gain access to successful and seasoned lawyers who maximize your chances of success. Our lawyers invest in you—they do not receive a dime until your lawsuit reaches a successful resolution!
Do you believe you’re entitled to compensation?
Use our Instant Case Evaluator to find out in as little as 60 seconds!
AFFF Lawsuit claims are being filed against manufacturers of aqueous film-forming foam (AFFF), commonly used in firefighting.
Claims allege that companies such as 3M, DuPont, and Tyco Fire Products failed to adequately warn users about the potential dangers of AFFF exposure — including increased risks of various cancers and diseases.
Suboxone Tooth Decay Lawsuit claims are being filed against Indivior, the manufacturer of Suboxone, a medication used to treat opioid addiction.
Claims allege that Indivior failed to adequately warn users about the potential dangers of severe tooth decay and dental injuries associated with Suboxone’s sublingual film version.
Social Media Harm Lawsuits are being filed against social media companies for allegedly causing mental health issues in children and teens.
Claims allege that companies like Meta, Google, ByteDance, and Snap designed addictive platforms that led to anxiety, depression, and other mental health issues without adequately warning users or parents.
Transvaginal Mesh Lawsuits are being filed against manufacturers of transvaginal mesh products used to treat pelvic organ prolapse (POP) and stress urinary incontinence (SUI).
Claims allege that companies like Ethicon, C.R. Bard, and Boston Scientific failed to adequately warn about potential dangers — including erosion, pain, and infection.
Bair Hugger Warming Blanket Lawsuits involve claims against 3M — alleging their surgical warming blankets caused severe infections and complications (particularly in hip and knee replacement surgeries).
Plaintiffs claim 3M failed to warn about potential risks — despite knowing about increased risk of deep joint infections since 2011.
Baby Formula NEC Lawsuit claims are being filed against manufacturers of cow’s milk-based baby formula products.
Claims allege that companies like Abbott Laboratories (Similac) and Mead Johnson & Company (Enfamil) failed to warn about the increased risk of necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) in premature infants.
Here, at TruLaw, we’re committed to helping victims get the justice they deserve.
Alongside our partner law firms, we have successfully collected over $3 Billion in verdicts and settlements on behalf of injured individuals.
Would you like our help?