Attorney Jessica Paluch-Hoerman, founder of TruLaw, has over 28 years of experience as a personal injury and mass tort attorney, and previously worked as an international tax attorney at Deloitte. Jessie collaborates with attorneys nationwide — enabling her to share reliable, up-to-date legal information with our readers.
This article has been written and reviewed for legal accuracy and clarity by the team of writers and legal experts at TruLaw and is as accurate as possible. This content should not be taken as legal advice from an attorney. If you would like to learn more about our owner and experienced injury lawyer, Jessie Paluch, you can do so here.
TruLaw does everything possible to make sure the information in this article is up to date and accurate. If you need specific legal advice about your case, contact us by using the chat on the bottom of this page. This article should not be taken as advice from an attorney.
Question: Who qualifies to file an Eaker Air Force Base PFAS lawsuit?
Answer: Individuals who consumed PFAS-contaminated drinking water at Eaker Air Force Base and subsequently experienced health problems may be eligible to file a lawsuit.
The Eaker Air Force Base PFAS Lawsuit investigation addresses concerns regarding persistent chemical compounds in groundwater and drinking water surrounding the former military installation in Arkansas.
TruLaw is currently conducting an investigation into a potential Eaker Air Force Base PFAS Lawsuit.
On this page, we’ll discuss the Eaker Air Force Base PFAS lawsuit, health risks associated with PFAS exposure at Eaker Air Force Base, how a PFAS contamination attorney from TruLaw can help you, and much more.
PFAS contamination at Eaker Air Force Base in Blytheville, Arkansas has reached alarming levels, far exceeding the EPA’s 2024 drinking water standard of 4 parts per trillion (ppt).
Testing revealed PFOA levels 29,000 times higher and PFOS levels 41,000 times higher than the EPA’s threshold, with combined levels 70,000 times above the limit.
This extreme contamination is primarily attributed to the historical use of aqueous film-forming foam (AFFF) in firefighting activities since the 1970s.
PFAS, known as “forever chemicals,” persist in the environment and human body for decades, posing significant health risks to those exposed.
Potential health effects linked to PFAS exposure include:
We understand the severity of this situation and its impact on military personnel, their families, and local residents who relied on the base’s water supply.
Our team at TruLaw is committed to holding manufacturers accountable for the spread of these harmful chemicals and seeking justice for those affected.
If you or a loved one experienced health effects due to PFAS drinking water contamination at Eaker Air Force Base, you may be eligible to seek compensation.
Contact TruLaw using the chat on this page to receive an instant case evaluation and determine whether you qualify to join others in filing an Eaker Air Force Base PFAS lawsuit today.
Our PFAS attorney at TruLaw is dedicated to supporting clients through the process of filing a PFAS exposure lawsuit.
With extensive experience in handling similar cases, Jessica provides personalized support and advocacy to clients affected by chemical exposure from PFAS contamination at Eaker Air Force Base.
We understand the challenges and health concerns that PFAS exposure can cause and are committed to simplifying the legal steps of seeking the compensation you deserve.
Meet our lead PFAS attorney:
At TruLaw, we believe financial concerns should never stand in the way of justice.
That’s why we operate on a contingency fee basis—with this approach, you won’t face any upfront costs for your legal representation.
Our fee is only collected if we are successful in securing compensation on your behalf.
This arrangement not only removes the financial risk of pursuing your case, it allows us to focus our resources on achieving a positive outcome in your case by:
Our investment in representing you demonstrates our unwavering commitment to seeking the compensation you deserve.
If you or a loved one suffered health effects related to PFAS exposure at Eaker Air Force Base, you may be eligible to seek compensation.
Contact TruLaw using the chat on this page to receive an instant case evaluation and determine whether you qualify to join others in filing a Eaker Air Force Base PFAS Lawsuit today.
Historical application of aqueous film-forming foam (AFFF) during firefighting training exercises and emergency responses represents the primary source of PFAS contamination at the installation.
Testing performed at Eaker Air Force Base revealed PFAS concentrations vastly exceeding the Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) current advisory threshold of 4 parts per trillion (ppt) for drinking water.
According to information gathered by the Environmental Working Group (EWG), PFAS measurements at Eaker AFB include:
These concerning measurements highlight the urgent necessity for remediation efforts and enhanced accountability.
PFAS contamination at these concentrations presents substantial risks to neighboring communities, service members, and surrounding ecosystems dependent on nearby water resources.
Exposure to such extreme PFAS levels can lead to serious health consequences, including cancer, liver damage, immune system impairment, and developmental issues in children.
Residents and former base personnel who depended on the water supply for consumption, food preparation, and other daily activities may have unknowingly experienced prolonged exposure to these harmful substances.
The data emphasizes the importance of addressing PFAS contamination at Eaker AFB to safeguard public health and restore environmental safety.
Remediation initiatives at Eaker Air Force Base target extensive PFAS contamination in groundwater and soil resulting from historical firefighting foam (AFFF) usage.
The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and Department of Defense (DoD) are working jointly on remediation approaches by incorporating advanced filtration technologies such as granular activated carbon and reverse osmosis to reduce PFAS concentrations.
Monitoring programs have been established to regularly assess water supplies and ensure public safety while long-term solutions are developed.
These efforts aim to restore environmental integrity, minimize health risks, and ensure responsible parties are held accountable for contamination.
The dangerously elevated PFAS levels at Eaker AFB have been connected to serious health concerns, including specific cancers, liver damage, and immune system suppression.
Extended exposure through contaminated water increases the risk for residents, military personnel, and their families.
PFAS contamination at Eaker Air Force Base extends beyond human health, profoundly affecting local ecosystems.
These chemicals remain in soil and water, impacting wildlife and potentially disrupting food chains.
The lasting environmental consequences emphasize the urgent requirement for effective cleanup measures.
Local communities and advocacy organizations are working to increase awareness about the PFAS crisis at Eaker AFB.
Legal actions against responsible manufacturers and agencies seek to obtain compensation for affected individuals and fund comprehensive cleanup programs.
These initiatives strive to ensure accountability and promote sustainable solutions for PFAS contamination.
PFAS, or per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances, represent a category of synthetic chemicals valued for their resistance to heat, water, and oil.
Known as “forever chemicals,” PFAS do not naturally degrade and persist in the environment and human body for decades.
These compounds have been extensively employed in industrial applications and consumer products, including non-stick cookware, water-resistant fabrics, food packaging, and firefighting foams, particularly in high-risk settings like military installations and airports.
PFAS contamination extends well beyond Eaker Air Force Base, affecting hundreds of military installations across the United States.
The widespread use of AFFF firefighting foam has created a national crisis of contamination at bases operated by all branches of the armed forces.
Additional military installations that contain PFAS contamination include, but are not limited to:
Testing at these facilities has revealed PFAS levels that frequently exceed safety standards by significant margins.
The Department of Defense faces growing pressure to expedite cleanup efforts, provide alternative water sources for affected communities, and take responsibility for decades of contamination.
Coordinated remediation plans now represent one of the largest environmental cleanup challenges in U.S. military history.
Eaker Air Force Base PFAS water contamination lawsuits are being filed by individuals across the country who were exposed to dangerous levels of PFAS chemicals in the water supply near the base.
TruLaw is currently accepting clients for the Eaker AFB PFAS lawsuit.
A few reasons to choose TruLaw for your Eaker Air Force Base PFAS lawsuit include:
If you or a loved one suffered health problems due to exposure to PFAS chemicals in the water at Eaker Air Force Base, you may be eligible to seek compensation.
Contact TruLaw using the chat on this page to receive an instance case evaluation that can determine if you qualify to join others in filing an Eaker Air Force Base PFAS Lawsuit today.
PFOA levels at Eaker Air Force Base are 116,000 PPT, which is 29,000 times higher than the EPA’s 2024 drinking water standard of 4 parts per trillion. PFOS levels measure 164,000 PPT, exceeding the EPA threshold by 41,000 times.
If you or family members were exposed to PFAS contamination at Eaker Air Force Base, you may be eligible to seek compensation through a lawsuit.
Contact TruLaw for an instant case evaluation to determine your qualification for joining the PFAS lawsuit.
Extended exposure to PFAS contamination can lead to serious health complications including specific cancers, liver damage, and immune system suppression.
Military personnel, their families, and nearby residents who consumed contaminated water may face these long-term health risks.
TruLaw operates on a contingency fee basis, meaning there are no upfront costs for legal representation.
The law firm only collects fees if they successfully secure compensation on your behalf.
The primary source of PFAS contamination at Eaker AFB is the historical use of AFFF firefighting foam since the 1970s.
This foam is used to combat petroleum-based fires that contain PFAS compounds that have seeped into soil and groundwater.
The Environmental Protection Agency and Department of Defense are implementing remediation initiatives using advanced filtration technologies like granular activated carbon and reverse osmosis.
Regular monitoring programs have been established to assess water supplies and ensure public safety.
Managing Attorney & Owner
With over 25 years of legal experience, Jessica Paluch-Hoerman is an Illinois lawyer, a CPA, and a mother of three. She spent the first decade of her career working as an international tax attorney at Deloitte.
In 2009, Jessie co-founded her own law firm with her husband – which has scaled to over 30 employees since its conception.
In 2016, Jessie founded TruLaw, which allows her to collaborate with attorneys and legal experts across the United States on a daily basis. This hypervaluable network of experts is what enables her to share the most reliable, accurate, and up-to-date legal information with our readers!
You can learn more about the PFAS Contamination Lawsuit by visiting any of our pages listed below:
Here, at TruLaw, we’re committed to helping victims get the justice they deserve.
Alongside our partner law firms, we have successfully collected over $3 Billion in verdicts and settlements on behalf of injured individuals.
Would you like our help?
At TruLaw, we fiercely combat corporations that endanger individuals’ well-being. If you’ve suffered injuries and believe these well-funded entities should be held accountable, we’re here for you.
With TruLaw, you gain access to successful and seasoned lawyers who maximize your chances of success. Our lawyers invest in you—they do not receive a dime until your lawsuit reaches a successful resolution!
Do you believe you’re entitled to compensation?
Use our Instant Case Evaluator to find out in as little as 60 seconds!
AFFF Lawsuit claims are being filed against manufacturers of aqueous film-forming foam (AFFF), commonly used in firefighting.
Claims allege that companies such as 3M, DuPont, and Tyco Fire Products failed to adequately warn users about the potential dangers of AFFF exposure — including increased risks of various cancers and diseases.
Suboxone Tooth Decay Lawsuit claims are being filed against Indivior, the manufacturer of Suboxone, a medication used to treat opioid addiction.
Claims allege that Indivior failed to adequately warn users about the potential dangers of severe tooth decay and dental injuries associated with Suboxone’s sublingual film version.
Social Media Harm Lawsuits are being filed against social media companies for allegedly causing mental health issues in children and teens.
Claims allege that companies like Meta, Google, ByteDance, and Snap designed addictive platforms that led to anxiety, depression, and other mental health issues without adequately warning users or parents.
Transvaginal Mesh Lawsuits are being filed against manufacturers of transvaginal mesh products used to treat pelvic organ prolapse (POP) and stress urinary incontinence (SUI).
Claims allege that companies like Ethicon, C.R. Bard, and Boston Scientific failed to adequately warn about potential dangers — including erosion, pain, and infection.
Bair Hugger Warming Blanket Lawsuits involve claims against 3M — alleging their surgical warming blankets caused severe infections and complications (particularly in hip and knee replacement surgeries).
Plaintiffs claim 3M failed to warn about potential risks — despite knowing about increased risk of deep joint infections since 2011.
Baby Formula NEC Lawsuit claims are being filed against manufacturers of cow’s milk-based baby formula products.
Claims allege that companies like Abbott Laboratories (Similac) and Mead Johnson & Company (Enfamil) failed to warn about the increased risk of necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) in premature infants.
Here, at TruLaw, we’re committed to helping victims get the justice they deserve.
Alongside our partner law firms, we have successfully collected over $3 Billion in verdicts and settlements on behalf of injured individuals.
Would you like our help?