Aortic Dissection Lawsuit Frequently Asked Questions

Written By:
Jessie Paluch
Jessie Paluch

Attorney Jessie Paluch, founder of TruLaw, has over 25 years of experience as a personal injury and mass tort attorney, and previously worked as an international tax attorney at Deloitte. Jessie collaborates with attorneys nationwide — enabling her to share reliable, up-to-date legal information with our readers.

This article has been written and reviewed for legal accuracy and clarity by the team of writers and legal experts at TruLaw and is as accurate as possible. This content should not be taken as legal advice from an attorney. If you would like to learn more about our owner and experienced injury lawyer, Jessie Paluch, you can do so here.

TruLaw does everything possible to make sure the information in this article is up to date and accurate. If you need specific legal advice about your case, contact us by using the chat on the bottom of this page. This article should not be taken as advice from an attorney.

Aortic Dissection Lawsuit Frequently Asked Questions

Lawyers are currently talking to individuals who experienced an aortic dissection and believe it may be related to a popular antibiotic they took such as Levaquin, Avelox, Cipro, Noroxin, Floxin or Factive.

Recent studies show a 2-fold increased risk of aortic dissection with use of these popular antibiotics.

Aortic dissection lawyers are filing lawsuits alleging that the public should have been warned of this serious life changing risk, so they could make an informed decision about its use.

Aortic Dissection
Table of Contents

Are the Aortic Dissection Lawsuits a “Class Action”?


Lawsuits being filed against the manufacturers of popular fluoroquinolones such as Levaquin, Cipro, Avelox, Floxin and Active are not class action lawsuits.

We often hear people refer to lawsuits where many people are injured as “class actions”, but that is not the case with the aortic dissection lawsuits.

Aortic dissection lawsuits are being filed on behalf of a large group of people all injured by the same or similar product – fluoroquinolones including Cipro, Levaquin, Avelox, Noroxin, Floxin and Factive.

Lawyers represent each of their clients separately because each person has a different set of injuries and a different medical history.

However, when a common drug injures a large group of people, plaintiff’s lawyers ask the court permission to file a “mass tort” action.

This means that individual cases are grouped together so the attorneys and judge can address common procedural issues initially, saving time for the injured parties and the court later.

Will You Sue My Doctor?


The aortic dissection lawsuits are product liability cases.

We are suing the manufacturers of the fluoroquinolones  – Levaquin, Avelox, Cipro, Noroxin, Floxin and Factive because we believe the manufacturers did not properly warn consumers of the risks of these drugs.

What Do I Need To Consider in Hiring a Lawyer?

It is very important that you do your research to make sure you are hiring a lawyer with mass tort experience.

Furthermore, there are a number of very important things that you need to consider when hiring a lawyer for your aortic dissection lawsuit.

  1. Does the lawyer you are considering have the resources to pursue a mass tort case?  Mass tort cases are very complex, time consuming and require a lot of resources – both time and money.  For this reason, there is a small amount of lawyers that actually lead these lawsuits and many other lawyers simply “refer” their cases to these lawyers.
  2. Geography – It is highly unlikely that the lawyers leading these mass tort cases will have an office close to you.  It is more important that you have access to the lawyer and their office via email and a phone number.  It is also very unlikely that you will need to be in a local court, so having an attorney near you is not necessary for that reason.
  3. Make sure you understand the way you will pay your lawyer.  You should want your lawyer invested in the outcome of your lawsuit so consider paying your lawyer a percentage of your verdict or settlement.  You may also need to pay expenses relating to the lawsuit so be sure you understand the expense allocations.

Written By:
Jessie Paluch
Jessie Paluch

Experienced Attorney & Legal SaaS CEO

With over 25 years of legal experience, Jessie is an Illinois lawyer, a CPA, and a mother of three.  She spent the first decade of her career working as an international tax attorney at Deloitte.

In 2009, Jessie co-founded her own law firm with her husband – which has scaled to over 30 employees since its conception.

In 2016, Jessie founded TruLaw, which allows her to collaborate with attorneys and legal experts across the United States on a daily basis. This hypervaluable network of experts is what enables her to share reliable legal information with her readers!

Camp Lejeune Lawsuit

Camp Lejeune’s water contamination issue spanned several decades starting in the 1950s. Exposure to these chemicals has been linked to various serious health issues, including cancer, organ diseases, and death.

Tylenol Lawsuit

Research is increasingly suggesting a link between the use of Tylenol during pregnancy and the development of neurodevelopmental disorders, such as autism and ADHD, in infants.

AFFF Lawsuit

Legal action is being taken against manufacturers of Aqueous Film-Forming Foam (AFFF), a chemical used in fighting fires. The plaintiffs allege that exposure to the foam caused health issues such as cancer, organ damage, and birth and fertility issues.

Do You
Have A Case?

Here, at TruLaw, we’re committed to helping victims get the justice they deserve.

Alongside our partner law firms, we have successfully collected over $3 Billion in verdicts and settlements on behalf of injured individuals.

Would you like our help?

Helpful Sites & Resources