Attorney Jessica Paluch-Hoerman, founder of TruLaw, has over 28 years of experience as a personal injury and mass tort attorney, and previously worked as an international tax attorney at Deloitte. Jessie collaborates with attorneys nationwide — enabling her to share reliable, up-to-date legal information with our readers.
This article has been written and reviewed for legal accuracy and clarity by the team of writers and legal experts at TruLaw and is as accurate as possible. This content should not be taken as legal advice from an attorney. If you would like to learn more about our owner and experienced injury lawyer, Jessie Paluch, you can do so here.
TruLaw does everything possible to make sure the information in this article is up to date and accurate. If you need specific legal advice about your case, contact us by using the chat on the bottom of this page. This article should not be taken as advice from an attorney.
An ultra-processed foods lawsuit against Coca-Cola, General Mills, and other major food companies has emerged with plaintiffs claiming these major food corporations knowingly sold harmful products linked to type-2 diabetes, hypertension, fatty liver disease, and other serious health conditions in children.
TruLaw is providing instant case evaluations for the ultra-processed foods lawsuit using the chat on this page to help you learn more about your eligibility to join others seeking compensation today.
On this page, we’ll answer this question in further depth, health risks behind the Ultra-Processed Foods Litigation, filing an Ultra-processed Foods Lawsuit, and much more.
Ultra-processed foods like Cinnamon Toast Crunch and Diet Coke contain artificial ingredients linked to serious health problems, yet food manufacturers continue marketing them as convenient options.
Public health expert Dr. Chris van Tulleken from University College London has publicly compared ultra-processed food manufacturers to “Big Tobacco” for using similar techniques to sell potentially harmful, addictive products.
The ultra-processed foods lawsuit allegations include, but are not limited to:
If you or a loved one has developed health problems after regularly consuming ultra-processed foods, you may qualify to seek compensation for medical expenses and suffering.
Contact TruLaw using the chat on this page to receive an instant case evaluation that can determine your eligibility to join others in filing an Ultra-Processed Foods Lawsuit today.
With extensive experience in consumer protection cases, Jessica Paluch-Hoerman works with litigation leaders and nutritional scientists to prove how ultra-processed food products cause consumer harm.
TruLaw focuses on securing compensation for medical expenses, damages to health, and long-term care costs from food manufacturers who misrepresented products’ health impacts and concealed harmful ingredients.
We understand the health impacts and nutritional harm that Ultra-Processed foods have on your life and provide the personalized guidance you need when seeking justice.
Meet our lead Ultra-Processed Foods attorney:
At TruLaw, we believe financial concerns should never stand in the way of justice.
That’s why we operate on a contingency fee basis—with this approach, you won’t face any upfront costs for your legal representation.
Our fee is only collected if we secure compensation on your behalf.
This arrangement allows us to focus on achieving a positive outcome in your case by:
Our digital-first approach simplifies the legal process of qualifying and filing your claim, providing you with the knowledge and confidence needed to make informed decisions about your case.
If you or a loved one experienced health issues related to consuming ultra-processed foods, you may be eligible to seek compensation.
Contact TruLaw using the chat on this page to receive an instant case evaluation and determine whether you qualify to join others in filing an Ultra-Processed Foods lawsuit today.
The Ultra-Processed Foods Lawsuit targets major food corporations including Kraft Heinz, Mondelez, Coca-Cola, PepsiCo, and Nestle for their role in the chronic disease epidemic affecting Americans.
Filed in December 2024, this groundbreaking legal action addresses how these companies manufacture and market products containing high fructose corn syrup, hydrogenated fats, and other harmful ingredients linked to fatty liver disease, cardiovascular problems, and childhood obesity.
The lawsuit specifically alleges these corporations knowingly designed addictive food products while failing to disclose their connection to serious health risks.
Ultra-processed foods dramatically increase type 2 diabetes risk through multiple mechanisms.
According to the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, these products create dangerous blood sugar spikes followed by insulin surges, gradually damaging the body’s ability to properly regulate glucose.
Studies cited in the Ultra-Processed Foods Lawsuit show children who regularly consume these products have up to 2-3 times higher risk of developing prediabetes before adulthood.
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention reports particularly alarming trends among minority youth, with rates of new-onset type 2 diabetes increasing most dramatically among populations targeted heavily by ultra-processed food marketing.
Parents involved in the UPF Lawsuit frequently report that their children’s diabetes diagnoses came as a shock, with many unaware that products marketed as “quick energy” or “convenient snacks” could contribute to permanent metabolic damage.
The litigation documents detail how manufacturers’ internal research identified blood sugar impacts but failed to communicate these risks while continuing to target young consumers.
The excessive sodium content in ultra-processed foods creates significant blood pressure risks, even in children.
The National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute confirms that high-sodium diets force the body to retain water to dilute the salt, increasing blood volume and pressure against arterial walls.
Medical records reviewed in the Ultra-Processed Foods Lawsuit reveal children as young as 10 developing hypertension after consistent ultra-processed food consumption.
Many ultra-processed products contain 2-3 times more sodium than recommended daily limits, with some children’s meals delivering an entire day’s sodium in a single serving.
The litigation documents how manufacturers could have reduced sodium content but chose not to, citing concerns about decreased “flavor impact” and “consumer acceptance.”
Parents joining the UPF Lawsuit report their children’s blood pressure normalized after significantly reducing ultra-processed food consumption, demonstrating the direct relationship between these products and hypertension.
Perhaps the most alarming condition highlighted in the Ultra-Processed Foods Lawsuit is NAFLD.
This disease occurs when excess fat accumulates in liver cells, causing inflammation and potentially permanent damage.
Research from the National Institutes of Health demonstrates that children with NAFLD show a distinctive pattern of liver injury that makes early detection challenging.
Ultra-processed foods contribute to NAFLD in the following ways:
Documents obtained during the Ultra-Processed Foods Lawsuit investigation suggest manufacturers were aware of potential liver impacts but conducted limited safety testing for these specific effects.
Unlike adult NAFLD, pediatric cases often begin with inflammation in the portal regions of the liver.
This different disease pattern means children can develop significant liver scarring before conventional tests detect problems.
The litigation presents evidence that some children developed advanced fibrosis (liver scarring) within just 2-3 years of regular ultra-processed food consumption.
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration has acknowledged gaps in monitoring these combined effects, as many ingredients are tested individually rather than in the complex mixtures found in finished products.
Parents participating in the UPF Lawsuit frequently report that medical professionals never warned them about these potential liver effects.
The process of filing an Ultra-Processed Foods Lawsuit requires understanding specific eligibility criteria and gathering appropriate medical documentation.
As litigation against food manufacturers continues to evolve, parents seeking justice for children harmed by these products need to navigate several important considerations.
Qualification for the Ultra-Processed Foods Lawsuit generally centers on demonstrating both exposure to ultra-processed foods and the development of related health conditions.
While specific criteria may vary as the litigation develops, current cases typically focus on:
Children diagnosed with specific conditions:
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention reports these conditions were once rare in children but have increased dramatically in parallel with ultra-processed food consumption.
Children diagnosed between the ages of 5-17 appear to have the strongest cases, particularly when medical records document the progression of the condition over time.
Parents or guardians must be able to demonstrate regular consumption of ultra-processed foods, which may include:
Importantly, the UPF Lawsuit does not require proof that these foods were the sole cause of health problems, only that they were a significant contributing factor.
The litigation recognizes the multifactorial nature of these conditions while acknowledging the substantial role of ultra-processed foods.
Building a strong Ultra-Processed Foods Lawsuit requires comprehensive medical documentation.
According to The National Institutes of Health, proper diagnosis of these conditions requires specific testing that should be reflected in medical records:
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration has established guidelines for added sugar content in foods, which can provide context for how certain products exceed recommended limits.
Medical timeline documentation can show the progression of the condition in relation to diet.
Records that demonstrate improvement in health markers after reduction or elimination of ultra-processed foods can significantly strengthen a case, as they establish a direct relationship between the products and the health condition.
Parents considering joining the UPF Lawsuit should gather all medical records before consultation with legal representation.
Ultra-processed foods at the center of lawsuits include mass-produced bread, breakfast cereals, carbonated drinks, processed meats (ham and sausages), ice cream, crisps, biscuits, fruit-flavored yogurts, instant soups, and certain alcoholic beverages like whisky, gin, and rum.
These are contrasted with minimally processed foods, which retain more of their natural state.
The Ultra-Processed Foods Lawsuit targets several food industry giants, including Kraft Heinz, Mondelez, Coca-Cola, PepsiCo, General Mills, Nestle, Kellanova, WK Kellogg Co., Mars, Post Holdings, and ConAgra Brands for their production and marketing of highly processed foods within the food and beverage industry.
Consumers can avoid ultra-processed foods by basing their diet on whole foods such as fruits, vegetables, pulses, grains, and nuts.
Plant-based alternatives like mushrooms, jackfruit, beans, and tofu are not considered ultra-processed and provide healthier meal options compared to packaged snack foods.
The Ultra-Processed Foods Lawsuit primarily focuses on the health risks associated with these products, including increased risk of obesity, diabetes, cardiovascular issues, mental health disorders, and certain cancers.
Plaintiffs argue these companies failed to adequately warn consumers about these potential dangers.
In the Ultra-Processed Foods Lawsuit, the term follows the NOVA classification system, which defines these products as formulations of ingredients resulting from industrial processes with little or no whole foods.
The legal definition emphasizes additives and substances rarely used in home cooking, distinguishing them from minimally processed foods.
The Ultra-Processed Foods Lawsuit seeks various forms of compensation, including monetary damages for health issues linked to consumption, funds for medical monitoring programs, and potentially forcing companies to change labeling practices or reformulate products to reduce harmful ingredients.
Managing Attorney & Owner
With over 25 years of legal experience, Jessica Paluch-Hoerman is an Illinois lawyer, a CPA, and a mother of three. She spent the first decade of her career working as an international tax attorney at Deloitte.
In 2009, Jessie co-founded her own law firm with her husband – which has scaled to over 30 employees since its conception.
In 2016, Jessie founded TruLaw, which allows her to collaborate with attorneys and legal experts across the United States on a daily basis. This hypervaluable network of experts is what enables her to share the most reliable, accurate, and up-to-date legal information with our readers!
You can learn more about the Ultra-Processed Foods Lawsuit by visiting any of our pages listed below:
Here, at TruLaw, we’re committed to helping victims get the justice they deserve.
Alongside our partner law firms, we have successfully collected over $3 Billion in verdicts and settlements on behalf of injured individuals.
Would you like our help?
At TruLaw, we fiercely combat corporations that endanger individuals’ well-being. If you’ve suffered injuries and believe these well-funded entities should be held accountable, we’re here for you.
With TruLaw, you gain access to successful and seasoned lawyers who maximize your chances of success. Our lawyers invest in you—they do not receive a dime until your lawsuit reaches a successful resolution!
Do you believe you’re entitled to compensation?
Use our Instant Case Evaluator to find out in as little as 60 seconds!
AFFF Lawsuit claims are being filed against manufacturers of aqueous film-forming foam (AFFF), commonly used in firefighting.
Claims allege that companies such as 3M, DuPont, and Tyco Fire Products failed to adequately warn users about the potential dangers of AFFF exposure — including increased risks of various cancers and diseases.
Suboxone Tooth Decay Lawsuit claims are being filed against Indivior, the manufacturer of Suboxone, a medication used to treat opioid addiction.
Claims allege that Indivior failed to adequately warn users about the potential dangers of severe tooth decay and dental injuries associated with Suboxone’s sublingual film version.
Social Media Harm Lawsuits are being filed against social media companies for allegedly causing mental health issues in children and teens.
Claims allege that companies like Meta, Google, ByteDance, and Snap designed addictive platforms that led to anxiety, depression, and other mental health issues without adequately warning users or parents.
Transvaginal Mesh Lawsuits are being filed against manufacturers of transvaginal mesh products used to treat pelvic organ prolapse (POP) and stress urinary incontinence (SUI).
Claims allege that companies like Ethicon, C.R. Bard, and Boston Scientific failed to adequately warn about potential dangers — including erosion, pain, and infection.
Bair Hugger Warming Blanket Lawsuits involve claims against 3M — alleging their surgical warming blankets caused severe infections and complications (particularly in hip and knee replacement surgeries).
Plaintiffs claim 3M failed to warn about potential risks — despite knowing about increased risk of deep joint infections since 2011.
Baby Formula NEC Lawsuit claims are being filed against manufacturers of cow’s milk-based baby formula products.
Claims allege that companies like Abbott Laboratories (Similac) and Mead Johnson & Company (Enfamil) failed to warn about the increased risk of necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) in premature infants.
Here, at TruLaw, we’re committed to helping victims get the justice they deserve.
Alongside our partner law firms, we have successfully collected over $3 Billion in verdicts and settlements on behalf of injured individuals.
Would you like our help?