Tepezza Lawsuits: Important Updates on Hearing Loss Claims
- Last Updated: June 12th, 2025
Attorney Jessica Paluch-Hoerman, founder of TruLaw, has over 28 years of experience as a personal injury and mass tort attorney, and previously worked as an international tax attorney at Deloitte. Jessie collaborates with attorneys nationwide — enabling her to share reliable, up-to-date legal information with our readers.
Legally Reviewed
This article has been written and reviewed for legal accuracy and clarity by the team of writers and legal experts at TruLaw and is as accurate as possible. This content should not be taken as legal advice from an attorney. If you would like to learn more about our owner and experienced injury lawyer, Jessie Paluch, you can do so here.
Fact-Checked
TruLaw does everything possible to make sure the information in this article is up to date and accurate. If you need specific legal advice about your case, contact us by using the chat on the bottom of this page. This article should not be taken as advice from an attorney.
Key takeaways:
- The outcomes of these Tepezza lawsuits, which involve pretrial proceedings in federal courts, have varied, ranging from settlements outside of court.
- Several recent rulings related to Tepezza litigation, lawsuit, have clarified various aspects of MDL procedures and state law tort claims.
- Recent Tepezza lawsuits have important implications for patients, healthcare providers, and pharmaceutical manufacturers.
Tepezza Lawsuits: Important Updates on Hearing Loss Claims
In recent years, there has been a significant increase in the number of tort cases against Tepezza, a prescription drug manufactured by a prominent drug manufacturer.
This surge in lawsuits has had a notable impact on the drug manufacturer’s overall drug portfolio within the pharmaceutical industry.
These legal actions have prompted a closer look at the safety and effectiveness of the drug, causing worry among both patients and healthcare professionals, including doctors in the medical community.
The concerns are primarily focused on adverse reactions and related side effects.
The manufacturers of Tepezza, a prescription drug in their drug portfolio, have been confronted with numerous product liability lawsuits.
Plaintiffs claim various side effects and insufficient warnings related to the medication, which is used for health problems and administered through injections.
The outcomes of these Tepezza lawsuits, which involve pretrial proceedings in federal courts, have varied, ranging from settlements outside of court to full-fledged trials with lawyers and a judge.
Table of Contents
Tepezza Lawsuit Updates Timeline
The Tepezza hearing loss MDL grew by 4 new cases between May and June, bringing the total to 221 lawsuits filed in federal court.
This steady rise follows increased activity around expert discovery, as both sides prepare to argue whether Tepezza causes permanent hearing damage.
Plaintiffs claim that Horizon Therapeutics failed to adequately warn patients about the risk of irreversible hearing loss following Tepezza infusions used to treat thyroid eye disease.
Upcoming court motions are expected to focus on scientific evidence related to ototoxicity, which could significantly shape future bellwether trial selection and litigation strategy.
You may be eligible to file a Tepezza Lawsuit if you or a loved one took Tepezza and subsequently suffered permanent hearing loss or tinnitus.
Contact TruLaw for a free legal consultation today, or use the chatbot on this page to see if you qualify for a Tepezza Lawsuit instantly.
The Tepezza lawsuit continues to grow as more patients come forward with claims of hearing loss and tinnitus after using the thyroid eye disease drug.
Plaintiffs allege that Horizon Therapeutics failed to properly warn about the potential for permanent auditory damage.
In the past month, 4 new cases have been added to the Tepezza multidistrict litigation (MDL), bringing the total number of filings in 2025 to 17.
This steady increase reflects rising awareness among patients who experienced unexpected and irreversible side effects.
The litigation remains active as evidence is gathered to support claims of manufacturer negligence and failure to disclose known risks.
You may be eligible to file a Tepezza Lawsuit if you or a loved one took Tepezza and subsequently suffered permanent hearing loss or tinnitus.
Contact TruLaw for a free legal consultation today, or use the chatbot on this page to see if you qualify for a Tepezza Lawsuit instantly.
Tepezza Lawsuit filings continued to grow in April 2025, reaching a total of 213 cases.
This marks an increase of 6 new filings compared to the 207 cases reported in March, according to the JPML.
The lawsuits involve claims that Tepezza, a treatment for thyroid eye disease, caused permanent hearing loss and other auditory issues.
As more individuals become aware of these potential side effects, the number of filings is expected to rise.
The continued growth in litigation underscores the importance of holding manufacturers accountable for alleged failure to warn patients of serious risks.
You may be eligible to file a Tepezza Lawsuit if you or a loved one took Tepezza and subsequently suffered permanent hearing loss or tinnitus.
Contact TruLaw for a free legal consultation today, or use the chatbot on this page to see if you qualify for a Tepezza Lawsuit instantly.
In March 2025, the Tepezza litigation experienced an increase in new filings, reaching 207 cases, up by 4 from the 203 cases reported in February 2025.
February had seen a smaller increase of 3 cases compared to the previous month.
This steady rise suggests that the litigation continues to gain attention from individuals impacted by the potential side effects of Tepezza, a drug used to treat thyroid eye disease.
As more plaintiffs come forward, the litigation offers individuals the chance to seek compensation for injuries related to the use of Tepezza.
You may be eligible to file a Tepezza Lawsuit if you or a loved one took Tepezza and subsequently suffered permanent hearing loss or tinnitus.
Contact TruLaw for a free legal consultation today, or use the chatbot on this page to see if you qualify for a Tepezza Lawsuit instantly.
In February 2025, the number of Tepezza lawsuits grew to 203, an increase of 3 cases from the 200 reported in January 2025.
Plaintiffs claim that Tepezza caused severe and lasting hearing loss, a side effect that was not adequately disclosed by the manufacturer.
The modest increase in filings indicates that more individuals experiencing adverse effects from the drug are pursuing legal action.
You may be eligible to file a Tepezza Lawsuit if you or a loved one took Tepezza and subsequently suffered permanent hearing loss or tinnitus.
Contact TruLaw for a free legal consultation today, or use the chatbot on this page to see if you qualify for a Tepezza Lawsuit instantly.
The Tepezza multidistrict litigation (MDL) is progressing toward its initial bellwether trials, set to begin in March 2026.
These early trials aim to evaluate how juries respond to evidence and arguments in lawsuits alleging that Horizon Therapeutics failed to warn users of Tepezza about the risk of permanent hearing loss.
Key Timeline of Events:
- January 2025: Both sides submitted proposed lists of four cases for the first bellwether trials, along with memorandums justifying their choices.
- March 2026: The first bellwether trial will commence, with the court selecting four cases from the proposed lists to move forward.
The outcomes of these trials, while not binding on other claims, are expected to play a critical role in shaping settlement discussions.
Average verdict amounts in these cases will serve as benchmarks for resolving additional lawsuits.
Judge Durkin has mandated quarterly settlement talks to encourage resolution before trial.If no settlement is reached after the bellwether trials, individual cases may return to federal district courts nationwide for separate trials.
You may be eligible to file a Tepezza Lawsuit if you or a loved one took Tepezza and subsequently suffered permanent hearing loss or tinnitus.
Contact TruLaw for a free legal consultation today, or use the chatbot on this page to see if you qualify for a Tepezza Lawsuit instantly.
The number of Tepezza Lawsuits in the multidistrict litigation (MDL) increased from 191 in December 2024 to 200 in January 2025, reflecting an addition of 9 new cases.
Tepezza, a medication prescribed for thyroid eye disease, has been associated with hearing loss and other significant side effects, leading to ongoing lawsuits filed by affected individuals.
The rise in case filings demonstrates the growing number of people reporting adverse hearing-related effects after using the drug.
These lawsuits center on allegations that Horizon Therapeutics, the drug’s manufacturer, failed to sufficiently warn patients about the risk of permanent hearing loss and other auditory complications linked to Tepezza use.
You may be eligible to file a Tepezza Lawsuit if you or a loved one took Tepezza and subsequently suffered permanent hearing loss or tinnitus.
Contact TruLaw for a free legal consultation today, or use the chatbot on this page to see if you qualify for a Tepezza Lawsuit instantly.
In November, the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation (JPML) reported 191 case filings for the Tepezza lawsuit.
By December, the number of filings had increased to 195, showing a growth of 4 cases.
The Tepezza lawsuit involves claims that the drug, prescribed for thyroid eye disease, has caused severe hearing-related side effects.
Plaintiffs argue that Horizon Therapeutics, the manufacturer, failed to adequately warn patients and healthcare providers about the risks of hearing loss and tinnitus associated with Tepezza use.
Hearing loss and tinnitus can have a significant impact on daily life, making it challenging for those affected to maintain their quality of life and overall well-being.
You may be eligible to file a Tepezza Lawsuit if you or a loved one took Tepezza and subsequently suffered permanent hearing loss or tinnitus.
Contact TruLaw for a free legal consultation today, or use the chatbot on this page to see if you qualify for a Tepezza Lawsuit instantly.
A federal judge overseeing the Tepezza multidistrict litigation (MDL) has reprimanded both parties for improper conduct during depositions.
The litigation involves claims that Horizon Pharmaceuticals’ treatment for thyroid eye disease, Tepezza, causes hearing loss.
Plaintiffs assert that the company failed to disclose safety risks when seeking FDA approval and continued to sell the drug despite knowing of its potential for permanent harm.
In a ruling issued by U.S. Magistrate Judge M. David Weisman, requests for sanctions from both sides were denied.
Horizon accused plaintiffs’ attorneys of canceling depositions without valid reasons, while plaintiffs alleged that Horizon’s legal team obstructed the process with excessive objections.
Judge Weisman criticized both parties, noting that their actions led to unnecessary costs for both sides.
The judge specifically called out plaintiffs’ attorneys for providing documents and calculations to assist witnesses in answering questions during depositions.
He also criticized Horizon’s legal team for making inappropriate objections to foundational questions.
Judge Weisman warned that continued misconduct could lead to reduced deposition time or the exclusion of specific attorneys from further participation in the case.
The MDL, which is centralized in the Northern District of Illinois, focuses on allegations that Tepezza was defectively designed and that Horizon failed to adequately warn about its risks.
The litigation raises concerns about hearing loss associated with the drug, with plaintiffs seeking accountability for the harm they claim to have suffered.
You may be eligible to file a Tepezza Lawsuit if you or a loved one took Tepezza and subsequently suffered permanent hearing loss or tinnitus.
Contact TruLaw for a free legal consultation today, or use the chatbot on this page to see if you qualify for a Tepezza Lawsuit instantly.
The Tepezza Lawsuit centers on claims that the thyroid eye disease drug Tepezza has led to severe hearing-related side effects.
Plaintiffs assert that Horizon Therapeutics, the drug’s manufacturer, did not adequately warn patients and healthcare providers about the risks of hearing loss and tinnitus associated with Tepezza.
In October, 178 cases were filed in the Tepezza lawsuit, rising slightly to 180 in November with 2 new cases.
Hearing loss and tinnitus can severely impact daily life, posing challenges to maintaining quality of life and overall well-being for those affected.
You may be eligible to file a Tepezza Lawsuit if you or a loved one took Tepezza and subsequently suffered permanent hearing loss or tinnitus.
Contact TruLaw for a free legal consultation today, or use the chatbot on this page to see if you qualify for a Tepezza Lawsuit instantly.
The Tepezza Lawsuit addresses claims that the drug, used for treating thyroid eye disease, can lead to permanent hearing loss and severe auditory complications.
Plaintiffs assert that Tepezza’s manufacturers did not provide sufficient warnings about the risks of hearing damage, leaving patients unaware of the potential long-term harm.
In September, 173 Tepezza lawsuits were reported by the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation (JPML).
By October, that number rose to 178, indicating an increase of five cases.
Patients who have used Tepezza report experiencing issues such as hearing loss and tinnitus, which can severely affect their overall quality of life.
You may be eligible to file a Tepezza Lawsuit if you or a loved one took Tepezza and subsequently suffered permanent hearing loss or tinnitus.
Contact TruLaw for a free legal consultation today, or use the chatbot on this page to see if you qualify for a Tepezza Lawsuit instantly.
The Tepezza Lawsuit, which claims that the drug Tepezza has led to severe hearing loss and other auditory problems in patients, continues to experience a rise in case filings.
In August 2024, there were 150 active cases, but by September, this number had increased to 173.
This rise in filings indicates that more patients are becoming aware of the potential risks linked to Tepezza, a medication commonly used to treat thyroid eye disease.
Plaintiffs allege that Horizon Therapeutics, the maker of Tepezza, did not sufficiently warn about the risk of hearing damage, which has significantly affected their quality of life.
You may be eligible to file a Tepezza Lawsuit if you or a loved one took Tepezza and subsequently suffered permanent hearing loss or tinnitus.
Contact TruLaw for a free legal consultation today, or use the chatbot on this page to see if you qualify for a Tepezza Lawsuit instantly.
The Tepezza Lawsuit is ongoing
The Tepezza Hearing Loss lawsuit involves claims against Horizon Therapeutics regarding the thyroid eye disease drug Tepezza.
Plaintiffs allege that Tepezza causes hearing loss and other auditory issues.
In July, there were 138 filings in the Tepezza Hearing Loss lawsuit.
By August, this number increased to 150 filings.
The rise in filings indicates growing awareness of the potential hearing-related side effects of Tepezza, prompting more individuals to seek legal recourse.
Tepezza, intended for treating thyroid eye disease, has been reported to cause hearing loss and tinnitus in some patients.
These auditory issues can significantly impact quality of life, leading affected individuals to file lawsuits against Horizon Therapeutics for failing to adequately warn about these risks.
You may be eligible to file a Tepezza Lawsuit if you or a loved one took Tepezza and subsequently suffered permanent hearing loss or tinnitus.
Contact TruLaw for a free legal consultation today, or use the chatbot on this page to see if you qualify for a Tepezza Lawsuit instantly.
Horizon Therapeutics Files Motion to Dismiss Tepezza Hearing Loss Bellwether Claims
Horizon Therapeutics recently moved to dismiss several claims in the Tepezza hearing loss bellwether trials within the federal MDL.
The MDL includes about 140 product liability lawsuits, alleging that Tepezza, a thyroid eye disease treatment, causes permanent hearing damage.
Horizon Therapeutics contends that the FDA’s approval of Tepezza’s label in January 2020 should preempt these claims.
They argue that the label warnings, approved by the FDA, were sufficient, and plaintiffs have not presented “newly acquired information” to support their claims.
Horizon seeks dismissal of 11 bellwether claims for lacking plausible strict liability or negligent design defect arguments.
Nine claims are challenged on federal preemption grounds, and five are targeted for alleged fraudulent misrepresentation.
In the MDL, Judge Thomas Durkin oversees coordinated discovery and early trial dates, intended to assess jury responses to the evidence and testimony.
Twelve bellwether cases have been selected for early trials, with the first scheduled for March 2026.
If the court does not dismiss all bellwether claims, discovery will continue, and the initial group of 12 claims will be narrowed to four for trial dates set in March, May, June, and August 2026.
These trials will help gauge the strengths and weaknesses of the allegations that Horizon failed to warn about the risk of hearing loss and did not instruct doctors to perform hearing tests during treatment.
The results of these bellwether trials will significantly impact settlement discussions, and if no resolution is reached post-trials, individual cases may be remanded for separate trial dates across U.S. District Courts.
You may be eligible to file a Tepezza Lawsuit if you or a loved one took Tepezza and subsequently suffered permanent hearing loss or tinnitus.
Contact TruLaw for a free consultation today, or use the chatbot on this page to see if you qualify to file a Tepezza Lawsuit instantly.
Quarterly mediation sessions for Tepezza hearing loss lawsuits will commence next month as ordered by the court.
These discussions aim to explore potential settlements and avoid numerous individual trials.
Horizon Therapeutics faces nearly 140 product liability claims, alleging failure to warn users about the risk of hearing loss associated with Tepezza (teprotumumab-trbw), a treatment for thyroid eye disease.
The number of claims is expected to grow, potentially reaching several hundred before the first trials in March 2026.
In July 2023, the FDA updated Tepezza’s prescribing information to include warnings about severe and permanent hearing loss.
The new label advises doctors to assess patients’ hearing before, during, and after Tepezza infusions.
Plaintiffs argue that earlier warnings could have prevented their permanent hearing loss.
A multidistrict litigation (MDL) was established last year, centralizing Tepezza lawsuits before U.S. District Judge Thomas Durkin in the Northern District of Illinois.
A bellwether program will involve 12 representative cases undergoing case-specific discovery, with early trials helping to predict jury responses to evidence and testimony.
The first bellwether trial is set for March 9, 2026, with additional trials scheduled every two months.
Magistrate Judge M. David Weisman ordered the commencement of quarterly Tepezza settlement talks starting on or around August 1.
These mediation sessions aim to reach a global settlement agreement, resolving many or all claims.
The parties will meet at least once every 90 days. Core fact discovery is set to close on December 20, 2024, with the first four bellwether cases proposed by January 17, 2025.
The outcomes of bellwether trials will influence Tepezza settlement negotiations, impacting the potential compensation Horizon may need to pay.
You may be eligible to file a Tepezza Lawsuit if you or a loved one took Tepezza and subsequently suffered permanent hearing loss or tinnitus.
Contact TruLaw for a free consultation today, or use the chatbot on this page to see if you qualify to file a Tepezza Lawsuit instantly.
The Tepezza Hearing Loss Lawsuit is ongoing, and our lawyers are still accepting cases from those affected by hearing loss linked to the thyroid eye disease drug Tepezza.
Tepezza lawsuits involve claims of tinnitus, hearing loss, and other severe auditory problems resulting from the use of Tepezza.
The core arguments in the Tepezza Hearing Loss lawsuits involve:
- Failure to Warn: Plaintiffs argue that the manufacturers did not provide adequate warnings about the risk of hearing loss associated with Tepezza.
- Negligent Design: The formulation of Tepezza contributes to an increased risk of hearing issues, including tinnitus and permanent hearing loss.
- Lack of Adequate Instructions: Lawsuits claim that the manufacturers failed to provide proper instructions on how to mitigate the risk of hearing loss while using Tepezza.
Healthcare professionals recommend the following precautions for those using Tepezza:
- Monitor Auditory Health: Schedule regular hearing exams to detect and address any early signs of hearing issues.
- Report Symptoms Promptly: Immediately inform your healthcare provider if you experience tinnitus, hearing loss, or other auditory symptoms.
- Discuss with Your Doctor: Talk to your healthcare provider about the potential hearing risks and ways to mitigate them while undergoing treatment with Tepezza.
You may be eligible to file a Tepezza Lawsuit if you or a loved one took Tepezza and subsequently suffered permanent hearing loss or tinnitus.
Contact TruLaw for a free consultation today, or use the chatbot on this page to see if you qualify to file a Tepezza Lawsuit instantly
The Hair Relaxer Lawsuit is ongoing.
The Hair Straightener lawsuit involves claims that certain hair straightening products contain harmful chemicals linked to cancer.
This lawsuit seeks to hold manufacturers accountable for the health risks associated with these products.
In June, there were 8,170 Hair Straightener lawsuit filings.
By July, this number increased to 8,192.
Hair straighteners contain toxic chemicals that can cause cancer by disrupting hormonal functions and damaging cellular DNA.
Prolonged exposure to these chemicals has led to serious health issues, prompting more individuals to join the Hair Straightener lawsuit.
The Hair Straightener lawsuit aims to hold manufacturers responsible for the harm caused by these dangerous products.
Affected individuals should consult a Hair Straightener lawsuit lawyer.
If you think your uterine cancer was caused by frequent exposure to hair-relaxing products, you deserve a chance to hold the manufacturer accountable for their negligence.
Contact TruLaw for a free, no-risk consultation to find out whether you have a case.
The Tepezza lawsuit is ongoing.
The Federal Tepezza hearing loss litigation is moving toward its initial bellwether trials, scheduled between March 9, 2026, and August 24, 2026.
These trials will be crucial in shaping potential jury responses and advancing settlement discussions in the Tepezza lawsuit against Horizon Therapeutics.
Central allegations in the Tepezza lawsuit claim the pharmaceutical company failed to adequately warn users about the risk of permanent and irreversible hearing loss associated with Tepezza, a thyroid eye disease treatment.
U.S. District Judge Thomas Durkin, overseeing the multidistrict litigation (MDL) in the Northern District of Illinois, has implemented a bellwether process.
This process involves selecting 12 representative cases for detailed discovery before the early trial dates.
The deadline for concluding fact discovery for these 12 cases is set for December 20, 2024.
Contact TruLaw for an instant case evaluation immediately to see if you qualify for a Tepezza Hearing Loss Lawsuit in as little as 60 seconds!
You might be entitled to compensation from the manufacturer for the harm you’ve suffered and losses you’ve incurred.
The Tepezza Hearing Loss Lawsuit is actively progressing, and our legal team is still welcoming new clients.
The latest data from the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation (JPML) shows that there are currently 120 Tepezza lawsuits grouped in the Tepezza MDL, with an addition of seven new cases since May 1st.
A growing number of patients are initiating claims due to severe adverse effects experienced from using Tepezza, a drug prescribed for Thyroid Eye Disease.
These lawsuits are raising alarms over hearing loss and other grave side effects associated with the drug.
Plaintiffs contend that they were inadequately warned about the potential risks of the treatment, which led to serious and unforeseen health complications.
If you or someone close to you has experienced hearing loss (either permanent or partial), tinnitus, or other auditory damage after taking Tepezza, you might be eligible to initiate a Tepezza Lawsuit.
For a no-cost consultation, contact us, or use the chatbot on this page to instantly check if you qualify to file a Tepezza Lawsuit.
The Tepezza Hearing Loss Lawsuit is active, and our attorneys are currently accepting new cases.
Tepezza, a medication for Thyroid Eye Disease, has been associated with severe side effects, including hearing loss and tinnitus.
Horizon Therapeutics, the drug’s manufacturer, is accused of failing to sufficiently inform patients about the potential for hearing damage linked to Tepezza use.
Patients have experienced both sudden and gradual hearing loss after beginning their treatment with Tepezza, with some cases resulting in permanent impairment.
The drug is thought to diminish blood flow to the auditory system, harming the vital hair cells in the inner ear that are crucial for hearing.
This vascular effect can lead to significant, and sometimes permanent, hearing loss.
Critical evidence in Tepezza hearing loss claims often includes medical records documenting hearing conditions before and after starting Tepezza, results from audiometric tests, and details of the Tepezza dosage and treatment duration.
Our Tepezza legal team estimates that settlements could range from $75,000 to over $200,000, varying with individual circumstances and the progression of the lawsuit.
If you or someone close to you has experienced permanent or partial hearing loss, tinnitus, or other auditory damage after using Tepezza, you might be eligible to file a Tepezza Lawsuit.
For a free legal consultation use the chatbot on this page to instantly check your eligibility to file a Tepezza Lawsuit.
The Tepezza litigation continues, with 113 cases currently active in the Tepezza Marketing, Sales Practices, and Products Liability Litigation, as stated in the latest filings.
This past month saw the addition of 12 new cases to the multidistrict litigation (MDL).
The legal claims assert that Tepezza, a treatment for thyroid eye disease, is linked to severe side effects, including hearing loss and other auditory complications.
Plaintiffs argue that Horizon Therapeutics, the manufacturer of Tepezza, did not sufficiently inform patients and healthcare providers about these potential risks.
If you or someone close to you has experienced hearing loss or other hearing issues as a result of using Tepezza, please contact us today for a free consultation.
Additionally, you can obtain an instant case evaluation using the chatbot on this page.
The Tepezza lawsuit proceedings are advancing.
According to the latest updates from the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation (JPML), the Tepezza MDL currently comprises 101 pending lawsuits.
An increasing number of patients have reported severe adverse effects following their Tepezza treatment for Thyroid Eye Disease.
Links between Tepezza and hearing loss, along with other serious side effects, have raised patient concerns regarding the safety of this treatment.
The basis of Tepezza lawsuits is the assertion that patients were not sufficiently informed about the drug’s potential hazards, leading to unforeseen and severe health issues.
For those who have encountered health problems after Tepezza treatment, consulting with a legal expert might be a vital step.
Contact our law firm for a complimentary consultation, or use the chatbot on this website for a free case review and to check your eligibility for the Tepezza Lawsuit.
The Tepezza Lawsuit is ongoing.
The Tepezza MDL has seen a notable increase, with 117 new lawsuits added over the past month, bringing the total from 8,217 as of February 1st to 8,334 by March 1st.
This rise reflects escalating concerns about the adverse side effects potentially linked to Tepezza, a medication prescribed for Thyroid Eye Disease (TED).
The Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation (JPML) is keeping a vigilant eye on the growing number of legal claims filed against Horizon Therapeutics, the drug’s manufacturer.
Plaintiffs in the Tepezza litigation contend that Horizon Therapeutics did not fulfill its duty to sufficiently inform both patients and healthcare professionals about the drug’s potential risks, particularly the risk of hearing loss.
These lawsuits aim to hold the company accountable for its alleged oversight and the resultant harm to patients.
Individuals who have suffered adverse effects potentially due to Tepezza are encouraged to explore their legal options.
TruLaw is offering free consultations to those who believe they may have a claim in the Tepezza lawsuit.
For those seeking immediate information or assistance in determining their eligibility to participate in the litigation, a ChatBot feature is available on the firm’s webpage for quick and accessible support.
The Tepezza hearing loss class action MDL has maintained its sluggish pace since its inception six months ago.
Within this timeframe, only 33 new cases have been added to the Tepezza MDL.
Notably, in the past month, no new cases have been introduced into the MDL, further highlighting the ongoing slow start of the litigation.
The next status hearing for the MDL is scheduled for March 6, 2024.
This hearing will likely play a crucial role in determining the future direction and pace of the litigation.
Over the past month, three additional cases alleging hearing loss related to Tepezza have been added to the ongoing class action MDL.
This brings the total number of cases within the Tepezza MDL to 74, with one additional case, Ingram v. Horizon, filed in 2024, which makes the true count 75.
Despite the growing number of cases, legal experts suggest that this MDL might not balloon into massive litigation, potentially expediting settlements and offering better outcomes for affected individuals.
Attorneys involved in the Tepezza hearing loss litigation have jointly requested a 60-day extension from the presiding U.S. District Judge.
This extension is sought to allow for a thorough review of medical records and critical documents, crucial for selecting cases for the Initial Bellwether Discovery Pool.
The outcomes of these test trials will significantly impact settlement amounts, underscoring the importance of accurate case selection.
Despite the six-month consolidation of litigation before Judge Thomas Durkin, progress within the MDL has been notably slow.
Plaintiffs’ attorneys are actively pushing for advancement, opposing Horizon’s attempts to delay case management conferences.
These conferences serve as vital platforms for resolving disputes and advancing litigation.
Plaintiffs argue that any delay only prolongs the already sluggish pace of the MDL, urging for continued momentum and judicial intervention.
The last week of 2023 saw no activity within the Tepezza hearing loss class action MDL, signaling a period of relative inactivity in the legal proceedings.
Over the past month, 12 new cases have been added to the Tepezza hearing loss class action MDL, increasing the total number of cases to 71.
This represents a significant surge compared to the previous month and signaling a rise in case filings.
A new plaintiff in the Tepezza MDL from Florida recently emerged.
According to the complaint, she underwent Tepezza infusions for thyroid eye disease spanning from August 2022 to April 2023.
Following her final Tepezza infusion, she contends that she experienced permanent hearing loss and tinnitus (ringing in the ears), as outlined in her Complaint.
Alleging negligence on the part of Horizon Therapeutics, the lawsuit claims the company failed to adequately warn both the plaintiff and her doctor about the potential risk of hearing damage associated with Tepezza.
Defendant Horizon Therapeutics USA, Inc. sought to dismiss Cynthia Williams’s complaint, arguing preemption under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6).
The central question revolved around whether federal law preempts pre-approval design defect claims.
Williams alleged that her hearing loss and tinnitus were a result of the drug’s design.
The Court’s verdict stated that Williams’s pre-approval design defect claims are not preempted.
The reasoning was that Horizon had the ability to create a safer product before seeking FDA approval without conflicting with federal requirements.
It was determined that Horizon had control over the drug’s design prior to FDA approval, thus indicating no conflict between federal and state laws.
However, the Court did grant the dismissal of Williams’s post-approval design defect claims on preemption grounds.
The question of whether her design defect claims should be dismissed on other grounds was left unaddressed in this opinion.
The Court emphasized that the debate over the application of Virginia or Illinois law was irrelevant to the preemption argument since federal law did not dictate the drug’s design prior to seeking FDA approval.
The decision referred to similar cases where pre-approval design defect claims were not preempted and contrasted them with a Sixth Circuit decision that reached different conclusions, explaining why it found the latter unpersuasive.
The Court also underscored that Horizon’s argument, suggesting that the biologic drug Tepezza was incapable of redesign, required further examination through discovery and was distinct from the preemption question.
The Court allowed the pre-approval design defect claims to proceed, reasoning that the defendant had control over the drug’s design before seeking FDA approval and could have designed a safer product without violating federal regulations.
This ruling favored Williams by permitting her pre-approval design defect claims to continue while dismissing the post-approval claims.
In the Tepezza hearing loss class action MDL, the judge has issued a Case Management Order outlining rules for selecting bellwether cases and conducting trials.
A total of 12 bellwether candidates will be chosen in 60 days.
Each side will pick 4 cases, and the remaining 4 will be randomly selected.
These 12 cases will then proceed to a fact-discovery process.
An important status conference within the Tepezza MDL, initially set for October 12th, 2023, has been rescheduled to October 19th, 2023.
During this conference, Judge Durkin is expected to offer guidance on electronic discovery procedures and address initial disputes between the involved parties regarding discovery regulations.
It’s worth noting that all legal representatives are required to attend this hearing in person.
An important status conference in the Tepezza MDL is scheduled for October 25, 2023.
During this conference, Judge Durkin will address electronic discovery protocols and address initial disputes between the parties concerning discovery rules.
Notably, all counsel are mandated to attend the hearing in person, indicating its importance in shaping the course of the lawsuit.
This week, the number o pending cases has increased from 41 in June to 54, marking a relatively modest rise.
Amgen Inc., a prominent global biopharmaceutical firm, has successfully brokered an agreement with the FTC, allowing it to proceed with its $27 billion acquisition of Horizon Therapeutics, the producer of Tepezza.
A status hearing took place in the class action lawsuit today wherein Tepezza’s legal team received instructions to submit a proposed agreed order addressing matters related to 502(d) and privileged materials.
They were also instructed to submit a protective order to the Court, with the intention of enabling Horizon’s attorneys to share documents and information during the discovery process while preserving their attorney-client privilege and work-product protection.
Plaintiffs in the class-action MDL are pressing for a speedy schedule to reach the initial round of bellwether trials.
According to the proposed bellwether schedule put forth by plaintiffs’ lawyers and discussed at a recent status conference, each side would pick three potential bellwether cases, subjecting them to a brief, 150-day case-specific discovery phase.
Following this, three out of the six lawsuits would be chosen for the first set of test trials.
In contrast, Horizon Therapeutics’ defense counsel has proposed a larger pool of 10 cases for bellwether discovery.
A new Tepezza lawsuit, Mhamdi v. Horizon Therapeutics USA, Inc., was recently filed in MDL by a Florida woman who claims to have suffered severe injuries, including permanent hearing loss and tinnitus, due to Tepezza infusions.
The plaintiff, who was diagnosed with thyroid eye disease and/or Graves’ Disease, received these infusions from August 2020 to February 2023.
The lawsuit alleges that neither the plaintiff nor her physicians were provided with any warnings or knowledge about the potential serious risks of permanent hearing loss or tinnitus associated with Tepezza.
In the past month, five additional hearing loss cases related to Tepezza have been moved into the recently established Tepezza class action MDL.
This development has increased the total number of pending cases to 46 in an MDL that has been in existence for only three months.
Judge Durkin held the first class action MDL status conference on June 28th.
The meeting brought together all parties and their attorneys to allow the judge to outline his strategy for effectively managing the lawsuits.
Moreover, Judge Dirken clarified the process for selecting lawyers to serve on the plaintiffs’ steering or executive committee.
U.S. District Judge Thomas Durkin recently issued a case management order in the Tepezza hearing damage MDL, scheduling the first status conference for June 28.
The conference will address the allowance of consolidated complaints involving multiple plaintiffs, potential evidence preservation orders, and the appointment of Tepezza lawyers to leadership positions.
Although Judge Durkin stated the final appointment of attorneys won’t take place until after the conference, he assured a decision can be expected promptly afterward.
A group of Tepezza attorneys filed a motion suggesting a list of attorneys including three co-lead counsel, one liaison counsel, and an executive committee comprising eight individuals, to take on leadership roles in the MDL case.
Horizon Therapeutics, the manufacturer of Tepezza, has filed a motion opposing the consolidation of Tepezza cases into an MDL.
Horizon argues that an MDL is unnecessary due to the limited number of pending cases and optimistically suggests that future Tepezza lawsuits will be few.
The JPML is set to hold a hearing on May 25, 2023, to determine whether the Tepezza cases in federal courts should be consolidated into a class action MDL.
The number of Tepezza hearing loss lawsuits being filed nationwide has significantly risen in the past six weeks.
Initially, there were only 18 pending cases across five federal districts when a motion for MDL consolidation was filed in March.
However, since then, seven additional Tepezza hearing loss lawsuits have been filed in federal courts across the country.
The Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation (JPML) is scheduled to review the possibility of creating a new class action MDL at the end of this month.
A new case study from Stanford University found that hearing loss is linked to dosage levels of Tepezza injections.
The study focused on a 64-year-old woman who experienced hearing loss in both ears after a full round of Tepezza injections.
However, when she was taken off the injections, her hearing problems went away.
When she tried a lower dose a year later, she did not experience the same hearing loss.
This case study strengthens the evidence of a direct connection between Tepezza and hearing loss.
There have been four new lawsuits filed alleging the permanent hearing damage caused by Tepezza injections.
Out of the 34 cases filed in federal courts, there have been 13 voluntary dismissals.
These dismissals indicate that there may have been settlements.
Nine Tepezza product liability lawsuits have been filed in federal courts, with the most recent being Diaz v. Horizon Therapeutics USA Inc. filed on February 14, 2023.
The plaintiff suffered permanent hearing loss and tinnitus after receiving Tepezza infusions and the complaint alleges that Horizon was aware of the drug’s potential for hearing loss.
Horizon Therapeutics filed a motion to dismiss the Tepezza hearing loss claims against it under the doctrine of federal preemption, arguing that the tort claims asserted by the Tepezza plaintiffs are preempted by federal law because the FDA regulated Horizon’s ability to change the warning label for Tepezza.
A motion to consolidate Tepezza Lawsuits into multidistrict litigation (MDL) has been filed on behalf of ten individuals who have suffered from hearing loss after taking Tepezza.
Attorneys representing the claimants have requested that all Tepezza Hearing Loss claims be consolidated before one judge in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois.
Tepezza lawsuits allege that Horizon Therapeutics knew or should have known about the risk of hearing loss from Tepezza, but failed to fully test the treatment and provide adequate warnings to users and the medical community.
Horizon has objected to the consolidation request, stating that the cases involve different facts and defenses that would not benefit from coordinated pretrial proceedings.
The number of Tepezza hearing loss lawsuits is expected to grow in the coming months as more patients discover that their hearing damage was caused by the drug.
Contact us for a free consultation, or use the chatbot on this page to see if you qualify for a Tepezza Lawsuit instantly.
Tepezza Lawsuit Review: Recent Cases and Their Resolutions
This section comprehensively reviews recent Tepezza lawsuits, including details about the plaintiffs’ claims and how they were resolved.
If you want information about Tepezza lawsuits, this page will give you all the details you need.
We will discuss the claims made by the plaintiffs and the outcomes of these cases.
If you have any questions or need further information, please don’t hesitate to contact our company.
We have conducted a thorough study of these lawsuits to provide accurate and relevant information.
Notable Tepezza Lawsuits
Tepezza, a medication used to treat thyroid eye disease, has faced legal challenges due to severe side effects reported by some patients.
There is a warning about the risk of hearing problems associated with Tepezza from Horizon Therapeutics.
Several notable cases highlight the concerns surrounding this drug:
- Thyroid Eye Disease Lawsuits: Numerous individuals have filed Tepezza lawsuits claiming that the medication caused significant vision loss, hearing damage, or other ocular and hearing problems.
- Warning: Permanent Hearing loss problems may also be associated with Tepezza use. These Tepezza hearing damage lawsuits allege that the new Tepezza class action lawsuit’s warning about the drug’s side effects and not treating thyroid eye disease were not adequately disclosed, leading to unexpected patient harm.
- Heart Problems Allegations: Some plaintiffs have brought lawsuits asserting that Tepezza infusions are responsible for cardiac issues they experienced after treatment.
These Tepezza class action lawsuit cases suggest that the drug may pose risks to heart health and demand compensation for resulting damages.
Resolutions of Tepezza Lawsuits
The outcomes of these Tepezza lawsuits, including TED, infusions, permanent, and class action, have varied, with different resolutions reached depending on the specific circumstances of each case.
Here are some resolutions of Tepezza lawsuits:
- Class action settlements: In certain instances, Tepezza lawsuits involving permanent eye disease have been resolved through settlements between the parties involved.
- Jury Verdicts: Other hearing loss lawsuit cases have proceeded to trial, where a jury determines whether the defendant should be held accountable for any disease or hearing damage caused by Tepezza.
Impact on Tepezza Patients
The ongoing litigation surrounding Tepezza raises concerns among current and prospective patients who may require this treatment for thyroid eye disease.
Especially those who have experienced hearing damage.
The hearing loss lawsuits have brought a new level of uncertainty.
Patients considering Tepezza injections must carefully evaluate the potential risks of hearing damage and hearing loss and the benefits based on the information available, including recent lawsuits and their outcomes.
It is important to clearly understand the potential consequences before proceeding with this treatment option.
Individuals who have already undergone Tepezza treatment should be aware of any symptoms or complications that may arise, including hearing loss.
It is important to stay informed about any potential risks and understand the steps to take if complications occur, as it may be relevant to a lawsuit.
Stay vigilant and keep an eye on for any changes in your health.
Tepezza Litigation Update: Outcomes of Recent Lawsuits
Stay up-to-date with this section that highlights the latest outcomes from ongoing or recently concluded Tepezza lawsuits related to horizon and hearing loss.
Favorable Judgments for Patients Affected by Alleged Adverse Reactions
In recent months, several Tepezza lawsuits related to adverse reactions and hearing loss have resulted in favorable judgments for plaintiffs.
The horizon for these cases looks promising.
These lawsuits represent a significant development in the ongoing litigation surrounding Tepezza, hearing loss, and its potential side effects.
The horizon for these cases is expanding as more individuals come forward with claims.
One such lawsuit involved a group of patients who filed tort claims against the pharmaceutical company responsible for manufacturing and distributing Tepezza, a medication used to treat hearing loss.
The patients sought compensation for the damages caused by the drug, which had unexpected side effects on their hearing.
This lawsuit brought the issue of hearing loss caused by Tepezza to the forefront, highlighting the potential risks and consequences that patients may face.
The plaintiffs in the Tepezza hearing loss lawsuits alleged that they suffered severe health complications from using the new Tepezza medication.
Leading to substantial physical, emotional, and financial burdens.
After careful consideration of the evidence presented during the lawsuit hearing, the court ruled in favor of the plaintiffs, awarding them compensation for their medical expenses.
Pain and suffering, and other damages incurred due to alleged adverse reactions to Tepezza.
This judgment sets an important legal precedent for Tepezza hearing loss lawsuits, signaling that Horizon patients affected by new Tepezza infusions may be entitled to seek justice through litigation.
Significant Legal Precedents Set by Recent Rulings
The outcomes of recent Tepezza lawsuits have also established significant legal precedents within the realm of multidistrict litigation (MDL) on the horizon for hearing loss.
MDLs are complex legal proceedings that consolidate multiple individual cases, such as the Tepezza hearing lawsuit, into one federal court for more efficient handling.
These cases often involve claims related to hearing loss caused by the use of Horizon.
They allow plaintiffs with similar claims of hearing loss to pursue their Tepezza lawsuit collectively while still maintaining some degree of individuality.
Several recent rulings related to Tepezza litigation, and lawsuit, have clarified various aspects of MDL procedures and state law tort claims, including those involving hearing loss.
For instance, one lawsuit ruling determined that certain evidence obtained from medical experts would be admissible in future trials involving allegations of hearing loss against Tepezza.
This decision ensures that expert opinions can play a crucial role in supporting plaintiffs’ claims in a lawsuit.
Including the Tepezza hearing, and strengthens their chances of obtaining favorable outcomes, particularly in cases involving hearing loss.
Understanding the impact of recent Tepezza lawsuits in courts
Tepezza lawsuits related to hearing loss have significantly affected legal proceedings and discussions on product liability claims.
These lawsuit cases involve specialized lawyers representing plaintiffs and defendants in federal courts.
They focus on hearing loss and the Tepezza hearing.
District court judges play a crucial role in deciding whether the Tepezza hearing lawsuit cases involving hearing loss have enough evidence to proceed.
Federal preemption is a significant factor in a lawsuit, as it determines if federal law takes precedence over state law.
This can result in a loss for one party during the hearing.
These lawsuits have prompted regulatory agencies like the FDA.
Court decisions on Tepezza lawsuit may influence future litigation involving hearing loss and similar pharmaceutical products, which pharmaceutical companies will closely monitor.
Recent Tepezza Legal Developments: Case Summaries And Results
In recent times, there have been several notable legal developments surrounding hearing loss and Tepezza lawsuits.
These lawsuit cases have brought to light various plaintiff allegations and shed light on the outcomes of these Tepezza hearing legal actions.
Additionally, they have revealed potential connections between the use of Tepezza and hearing loss.
Understanding the key details from these Tepezza lawsuit cases is crucial for both patients and pharmaceutical companies in litigation.
This includes cases related to hearing loss.
Let’s delve into concise summaries of some recent Tepezza lawsuit cases and explore their implications for individuals with hearing loss.
Observing Patterns Across Legal Actions
By examining multiple legal actions related to Tepezza, certain patterns begin to emerge that could impact.
Both patients and pharmaceutical companies facing a lawsuit due to potential hearing loss.
Here are some of the patterns:
- Plaintiffs consistently allege in the lawsuit that they were not adequately informed about potential risks associated with Tepezza usage.
- Adverse health effects, such as vision impairment and cardiovascular complications, are commonly reported among the plaintiffs involved in the Tepezza hearing lawsuit.
- Courts have ruled in favor of plaintiffs during the lawsuit hearing when presented with substantial evidence linking Tepezza to the alleged adverse effects.
These patterns indicate a need for pharmaceutical companies to ensure proper warnings and patient education regarding potential side effects.
Especially in the context of a lawsuit or Tepezza hearing.
Patients who have experienced harm after using Tepezza may find solace.
Joining ongoing legal actions or seeking representation from specialized legal teams to support them during their lawsuit hearing.
Tepezza Class-Action Lawsuits: Recent Outcomes And Trends
The pharmaceutical industry has witnessed a surge in Tepezza class-action lawsuits, where groups of plaintiffs collectively seek compensation for alleged harm caused by the drug, particularly related to hearing.
Consolidation of individual claims into class actions
Tepezza, a thyroid eye disease drug, has been at the center of numerous class-action lawsuits due to reported side effects such as hearing loss.
The consolidation of individual Tepezza hearing claims into class actions offers several advantages for plaintiffs.
By joining forces with others who have experienced harm from Tepezza and attended the Tepezza hearing.
Individuals gain increased leverage against pharmaceutical companies.
Class actions also streamline legal proceedings by consolidating multiple hearing cases under one umbrella.
Allowing for more efficient use of hearing resources and avoiding duplication of hearing efforts.
Resolving Tepezza class-action lawsuits
Several outcomes have emerged in recent years.
At the same time, some hearing cases are still ongoing.
There have been instances where settlements or judgments have been reached in relation to these hearings.
These outcomes serve as important precedents for future litigation involving similar circumstances, particularly in the realm of hearing-related cases.
Emerging trends in Tepezza class-action lawsuits
As Tepezza class-action lawsuits continue to evolve, certain trends have emerged within this legal landscape.
These hearing trends provide insights into the direction these hearing cases are taking and the potential impact they may have on future hearing litigation.
Here are the following:
1. Increasing awareness and participation: With growing media coverage and public awareness, more individuals are coming forward to join class-action lawsuits.
2. Formation of multidistrict litigation (MDL): Given the volume of Tepezza-related hearing lawsuits, some cases have been consolidated into multidistrict litigation (MDL).
Exploring Recent Tepezza Case Results and Their Implications
Recent Tepezza lawsuits have important implications for patients, healthcare providers, and pharmaceutical manufacturers.
These lawsuits involve concerns related to hearings.
They could affect future prescribing practices and regulatory requirements for similar drugs, especially in the context of a hearing.
The hearing outcomes may lead to stricter guidelines and increased monitoring during clinical trials and post-market surveillance.
Additionally, these case results could impact public trust in pharmaceutical products, potentially affecting the reputation of the entire industry in terms of hearing.
To fully understand the implications of hearing, specific examples from recent hearing cases, clinical trials, and published hearing studies should be examined.
Detailed case reports in medical journals provide valuable insights into the risks associated with hearing Tepezza.
By analyzing these cases collectively, patterns may emerge that help identify common risk factors or warning signs for patients considering Tepezza treatment.
Tepezza Lawsuit Analysis: Recent Verdicts and Their Significance
In recent years, Tepezza lawsuits have made headlines as individuals seek compensation for alleged harm caused by the drug.
This section provides an analysis of recent verdicts in these lawsuits, focusing on their significance within the context of product liability law.
Evolving Standards for Assessing Drug Safety and Manufacturer Responsibilities
One of the key aspects to consider when analyzing Tepezza lawsuit verdicts is how they reflect evolving standards for assessing drug safety and manufacturer responsibilities.
As new information emerges about potential risks associated with a medication, juries may be more inclined to hold pharmaceutical companies accountable.
Recent verdicts in Tepezza hearing loss lawsuits suggest that juries are becoming increasingly aware of potential dangers associated with certain medications.
They are no longer solely relying on FDA approval as an indication of a drug’s safety but are instead considering additional evidence presented during trials.
This shift in mindset can have significant implications for both pharmaceutical companies and patients alike.
Insights into Potential Financial Implications for Pharmaceutical Companies
The jury awards or settlements reached in Tepezza lawsuits can provide insights into the potential financial implications faced by pharmaceutical companies.
When large sums are awarded to plaintiffs, it sends a message that negligence or inadequate warnings may result in substantial financial consequences.
These verdicts serve as a deterrent, potentially prompting pharmaceutical companies to invest more resources into ensuring the safety and efficacy of their products.
It also highlights the importance of transparent communication regarding potential risks associated with medications.
Understanding Verdicts’ Impact on Product Liability Law
Analyzing recent verdicts in Tepezza lawsuits allows us to understand how they shape product liability law.
Each decision sets a precedent that future cases will likely reference, influencing how similar claims are evaluated by courts.
As more Tepezza lawsuits unfold, it is crucial to closely monitor any trends emerging from these cases.
The outcomes can provide valuable insights into how courts are interpreting product liability laws and holding manufacturers accountable.
Comparing Recent Tepezza Lawsuit Settlements And Judgments
Settlement amounts vs. jury verdicts
In recent Tepezza lawsuits, it is interesting to compare the settlement amounts awarded to plaintiffs with the judgments rendered by juries.
These legal disputes have resulted in various outcomes, shedding light on the factors influencing settlement negotiations between the parties involved.
Settlement payouts can vary significantly depending on the specific circumstances of each case.
While some plaintiffs may receive substantial financial compensation through settlements, others turn to a jury trial seeking higher payouts.
The analysis of these contrasting approaches provides valuable insights into the dynamics of Tepezza lawsuits.
Factors Influencing Settlement Negotiations
When considering settlement negotiations, several factors come into play.
One crucial aspect is the strength of the plaintiff’s claim and supporting evidence.
Cases with strong evidence are more likely to result in favorable settlements for plaintiffs as pharmaceutical companies may prefer avoiding negative publicity or prolonged litigation.
Another factor affecting settlements is state law tort claims.
Different states have varying laws regarding personal injury claims, which can impact settlement benefits.
Understanding these variations helps both parties assess potential outcomes and negotiate accordingly.
Mass tort cases involving Tepezza hearing loss lawsuits present unique challenges and opportunities for negotiation.
Consolidating multiple similar claims into multidistrict litigation (MDL) streamlines the legal process but also affects how settlements are reached.
The sheer number of cases involved can influence settlement discussions as pharmaceutical companies aim for resolution while managing their financial exposure.
Types of claims and payout potential
Certain types of claims may be more likely to result in higher payouts through either settlements or jury verdicts.
For instance, damage lawsuits related to hearing loss caused by Tepezza could potentially lead to substantial financial compensation.
Hearing damage lawsuits resulting from Tepezza usage raises significant concerns about potential negligence or inadequate warnings regarding side effects.
Plaintiffs who experience severe hearing loss may seek compensation for medical expenses, loss of income, pain and suffering, and diminished quality of life.
These factors contribute to the potential for higher payouts in settlements or jury verdicts.
It is worth noting that each case is unique, and outcomes can vary depending on the specific circumstances and evidence presented.
However, understanding the trends in recent Tepezza lawsuits provides a glimpse into the potential payout potential for different types of claims.
Conclusion
Our review of recent cases and their resolutions, along with updates on the outcomes of lawsuits, has shed light on the impact these legal battles have had in courts.
The analysis of case results, settlements, and judgments has provided valuable insights into the trends and implications surrounding Tepezza litigation.
If you or someone you know is considering legal action related to Tepezza, it’s crucial to stay informed about the latest developments and understand the potential outcomes.
Consulting with a qualified attorney who specializes in pharmaceutical litigation can provide guidance and support throughout the process.
Remember that every case is unique, so it’s essential to seek personalized advice based on your specific circumstances.
Tepezza Lawsuit Frequently Asked Questions
Managing Attorney & Owner
With over 25 years of legal experience, Jessica Paluch-Hoerman is an Illinois lawyer, a CPA, and a mother of three. She spent the first decade of her career working as an international tax attorney at Deloitte.
In 2009, Jessie co-founded her own law firm with her husband – which has scaled to over 30 employees since its conception.
In 2016, Jessie founded TruLaw, which allows her to collaborate with attorneys and legal experts across the United States on a daily basis. This hypervaluable network of experts is what enables her to share the most reliable, accurate, and up-to-date legal information with our readers!
Additional Tepezza Lawsuit resources on our website:
Here, at TruLaw, we’re committed to helping victims get the justice they deserve.
Alongside our partner law firms, we have successfully collected over $3 Billion in verdicts and settlements on behalf of injured individuals.
Would you like our help?
At TruLaw, we fiercely combat corporations that endanger individuals’ well-being. If you’ve suffered injuries and believe these well-funded entities should be held accountable, we’re here for you.
With TruLaw, you gain access to successful and seasoned lawyers who maximize your chances of success. Our lawyers invest in you—they do not receive a dime until your lawsuit reaches a successful resolution!
AFFF Lawsuit claims are being filed against manufacturers of aqueous film-forming foam (AFFF), commonly used in firefighting.
Claims allege that companies such as 3M, DuPont, and Tyco Fire Products failed to adequately warn users about the potential dangers of AFFF exposure — including increased risks of various cancers and diseases.
Depo Provera Lawsuit claims are being filed by individuals who allege they developed meningioma (a type of brain tumor) after receiving Depo-Provera birth control injections.
A 2024 study found that women using Depo-Provera for at least 1 year are five times more likely to develop meningioma brain tumors compared to those not using the drug.
Suboxone Tooth Decay Lawsuit claims are being filed against Indivior, the manufacturer of Suboxone, a medication used to treat opioid addiction.
Claims allege that Indivior failed to adequately warn users about the potential dangers of severe tooth decay and dental injuries associated with Suboxone’s sublingual film version.
Social Media Harm Lawsuits are being filed against social media companies for allegedly causing mental health issues in children and teens.
Claims allege that companies like Meta, Google, ByteDance, and Snap designed addictive platforms that led to anxiety, depression, and other mental health issues without adequately warning users or parents.
Transvaginal Mesh Lawsuits are being filed against manufacturers of transvaginal mesh products used to treat pelvic organ prolapse (POP) and stress urinary incontinence (SUI).
Claims allege that companies like Ethicon, C.R. Bard, and Boston Scientific failed to adequately warn about potential dangers — including erosion, pain, and infection.
Bair Hugger Warming Blanket Lawsuits involve claims against 3M — alleging their surgical warming blankets caused severe infections and complications (particularly in hip and knee replacement surgeries).
Plaintiffs claim 3M failed to warn about potential risks — despite knowing about increased risk of deep joint infections since 2011.
Baby Formula NEC Lawsuit claims are being filed against manufacturers of cow’s milk-based baby formula products.
Claims allege that companies like Abbott Laboratories (Similac) and Mead Johnson & Company (Enfamil) failed to warn about the increased risk of necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) in premature infants.
Here, at TruLaw, we’re committed to helping victims get the justice they deserve.
Alongside our partner law firms, we have successfully collected over $3 Billion in verdicts and settlements on behalf of injured individuals.
Would you like our help?
