Uber Sexual Assault Lawsuit

A female Uber driver in Nashville has filed a federal lawsuit alleging she was sexually assaulted by a passenger during a September 2024 ride from Millersville to Hendersonville.

According to the complaint, the driver pressed the app’s emergency button but received no assistance.

She further claims Uber failed to warn drivers of high-risk rider pairings and neglected to provide protective measures such as in-car cameras or real-time monitoring.

Filed in the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee, the lawsuit seeks damages and structural reforms to Uber’s safety protocols.

Uber has declined to comment on pending litigation, stating only that it remains committed to improving safety on its platform.

The case joins a growing wave of lawsuits challenging rideshare companies over their duty to protect drivers from harm.

A San Francisco County jury returned a verdict in favor of Uber in the first bellwether trial, finding the company negligent but determining that its negligence did not cause the plaintiff’s alleged injuries.

The decision followed three weeks of testimony and several days of deliberations.

The ruling represents an early win for Uber in the broader litigation and provides a preview of how juries may respond to evidence in upcoming cases.

Attorneys for the plaintiffs stated they will continue pursuing claims in future trials, emphasizing that the verdict offers insight into Uber’s defense strategy and the jury’s evaluation of the evidence.

The Uber sexual assault lawsuit grew between September and October, with filings rising from 2,583 to 2,721 cases.

The litigation centers on allegations that Uber failed to implement adequate safety measures to prevent sexual assaults and physical attacks by drivers.

Plaintiffs argue that background checks and in-app safety features were insufficient, leaving passengers at risk.

The steady increase in claims highlights the ongoing visibility of the MDL and the continued efforts of survivors pursuing justice.

With key motions and discovery underway, the case remains active in federal court.

If you or a loved one were sexually assaulted, sexually battered, or faced any other form of sexual misconduct from an Uber driver, you may be eligible to file an Uber Sexual Assault Lawsuit.

Contact TruLaw for a free consultation. 

Use the free and confidential chatbot on this page to find out if you qualify to file a claim instantly.

Uber’s handling of sexual assault reports is now under congressional investigation.

On Wednesday, a House oversight subcommittee opened an inquiry into how the company identifies, responds to, and discloses incidents of sexual assault and misconduct.

The investigation follows a New York Times report showing Uber received nearly 400,181 sexual assault or misconduct complaints between 2017 and 2022, an average of one every eight minutes, far exceeding the 12,522 serious incidents previously disclosed.

Updated data presented in court indicates that by 2024, the number has risen to more than 558,000 reports.

The company already faces more than 3,000 lawsuits nationwide, including the first bellwether trial in California, where closing arguments concluded this week in a case involving a woman who says she was assaulted by her Uber driver in 2016.

The congressional letter, led by Rep. Nancy Mace, criticizes Uber for failing to adopt safety tools such as in-car video recording or gender-based ride-matching, despite internal testing showing they were effective.

Lawmakers also accused the company of failing to warn users about known risks.

Uber maintains that over 99.9% of rides occur without incident and says many reports involve less severe conduct, such as inappropriate comments or flirting.

Critics argue the disparity in disclosures, combined with resistance to stronger safeguards, reflects deeper accountability issues within the company.

With litigation accelerating and public scrutiny mounting, Uber’s liability remains under intense examination.

Uber Technologies Inc. has asked the San Francisco Superior Court to enforce protective orders in coordinated Uber sexual assault lawsuits involving more than 700 plaintiffs.

In a motion filed September 22, 2025, Uber requested that Judge Ethan P. Schulman compel plaintiffs’ counsel to certify they had no role in disclosing sealed materials to The New York Times.

The company points to an August article quoting sealed filings and describing internal investigative documents, which Uber argues could only have come from an unauthorized disclosure in violation of protective orders issued in 2022 and amended in March 2025.

Uber stated that its internal review confirmed the leak was not caused by a docketing error and accused plaintiffs’ counsel of failing to investigate or provide direct assurances when asked to certify compliance on August 1.

According to the motion, the disclosure threatens the confidentiality of future productions, risks tainting jury pools, and undermines the integrity of ongoing proceedings.

The request comes as the first bellwether trial in the coordinated litigation proceeds.

The plaintiff, identified as Jessica C., alleges she was sexually assaulted by an Uber driver in 2016 and brings claims of general negligence, common carrier negligence, and related theories.

Testimony so far has included competing expert analyses of Uber’s safety practices and sexual misconduct data.

The coordinated proceedings are captioned In re: Uber Rideshare Cases, Case No. CJC-21-005188, and Jane Doe LSA 78 v. Uber Technologies Inc. et al., Case No. CGC-21-592427, in San Francisco Superior Court.

The motion underscores the central role of protective orders in large-scale litigation and highlights the potential consequences of violating confidentiality requirements.

The federal judge overseeing more than 3,000 Uber sexual assault lawsuits has ordered that two bellwether cases be transferred to the Western District of North Carolina.

These cases will remain part of the first trial wave under the multidistrict litigation (MDL) centralized in the Northern District of California before Judge Charles Breyer.

The Uber sexual assault lawsuits involve allegations that passengers were harassed, assaulted, kidnapped, or raped by drivers. Plaintiffs claim Uber conducted only minimal background checks, failed to require in-vehicle cameras, and neglected to provide sexual assault prevention training for drivers. Attorneys argue the company prioritized profits at the expense of passenger safety.

The first bellwether trial is scheduled to begin January 7, 2026, in California federal court.

In a September 16 order, Judge Breyer directed that two additional cases be sent to North Carolina while still proceeding under his oversight.

In parallel, approximately 600 Uber sexual assault lawsuits are pending in California state court. The first state trial began on September 8, 2025, in San Francisco Superior Court.

That case, filed by Jessica C., alleges she was sexually assaulted by an Uber driver in December 2019 and developed post-traumatic stress disorder.

Attorneys presented Uber’s internal records showing more than 85,000 passenger sexual assault reports in a single year and argued the company underreported incidents.

The trial also highlighted Uber’s delay in launching a driver gender selection option for female passengers, despite internal discussions years earlier.

Uber launched a limited “Women Rider Preference” pilot program in Los Angeles, San Francisco, and Detroit in 2024, following Lyft’s rollout of a similar feature in 2023.

Uber is facing increased legal scrutiny as the first bellwether trial in the sexual assault litigation begins in California state court.

The lawsuit, filed by a woman identified as Jessica C., accuses Uber and its subsidiary Raiser LLC of negligence for failing to implement safety measures, including a women-only driver option long requested by riders.

Key Allegations and Internal Records

• Plaintiff’s attorneys presented testimony from Uber Group Product Manager Rebecca Payne, who admitted that she would feel unsafe driving at night without a women-only filter.
• Internal company records dating back to 2016 revealed repeated user requests for a female driver preference.
• Uber’s safety team supported the idea, but executives delayed implementation due to legal risks, public image concerns, and fear of violating anti-discrimination laws.
• Records also show the program launched successfully in Australia in 2022, where a less litigious environment made rollout easier.

Safety Concerns and Company Response

• Uber was aware of data showing women were four times more likely to report sexual assault when matched with male drivers.
• Leadership hesitated to introduce the program in the U.S., citing regulatory scrutiny, rider wait times, and inclusivity concerns for nonbinary and transgender users.
• In June 2024, Uber launched a limited “Women Rider Preference” pilot in Los Angeles, San Francisco, and Detroit after surveys showed 72% of women would wait longer and 52% would pay more for a female driver.
• Plaintiffs argue the years-long delay demonstrates negligence, while Uber maintains that sexual assaults are rare and broader safety measures remain a priority.

Litigation Status

• The case is part of the Judicial Council Coordination Proceedings (JCCP), consolidating more than 500 sexual assault lawsuits against Uber.
• Jessica C.’s lawsuit alleges negligence, common carrier negligence, and failure to act on known risks.
• As the first bellwether trial, the outcome is expected to influence the trajectory of hundreds of related claims in the Uber sexual assault lawsuit.

Uber Senior Vice President Gus Fuldner testified Monday that passengers use the rideshare service “at their own risk,” citing language from Uber’s terms and conditions.

When asked if he personally agreed with that statement, Fuldner confirmed that he did.

Jurors also heard testimony about Uber’s 2019 safety report, which disclosed only five categories of sexual misconduct cases, despite advocacy groups urging disclosure across all 21 categories the company had identified.

Fuldner admitted he oversaw the decision to limit the report, defending it as a way to focus on the most severe incidents.

The testimony further addressed Uber’s limited progress on expanding dash cam use and in-app audio recording.

Fuldner said ongoing technical and logistical challenges have slowed implementation, even after years of internal discussion.

Uber’s attorneys countered by highlighting the company’s safety measures, including background checks, GPS tracking, and app-based safety features.

They noted that the accused driver had passed Uber’s screening before being deactivated after the alleged assault.

The plaintiff, identified as Jessica C., alleges she was assaulted in December 2019 when she was 18 years old. She is expected to testify later this week.

The trial continues on Tuesday in San Francisco Superior Court.

Uber Senior Vice President Gus Fuldner testified Monday that passengers use the rideshare service “at their own risk,” citing language from Uber’s terms and conditions.

When asked if he personally agreed with that statement, Fuldner confirmed that he did.

Jurors also heard testimony about Uber’s 2019 safety report, which disclosed only five categories of sexual misconduct cases, despite advocacy groups urging disclosure across all 21 categories the company had identified.

Fuldner admitted he oversaw the decision to limit the report, defending it as a way to focus on the most severe incidents.

The testimony further addressed Uber’s limited progress on expanding dash cam use and in-app audio recording.

Fuldner said ongoing technical and logistical challenges have slowed implementation, even after years of internal discussion.

Uber’s attorneys countered by highlighting the company’s safety measures, including background checks, GPS tracking, and app-based safety features.

They noted that the accused driver had passed Uber’s screening before being deactivated after the alleged assault.

The plaintiff, identified as Jessica C., alleges she was assaulted in December 2019 when she was 18 years old. She is expected to testify later this week.

The trial continues on Tuesday in San Francisco Superior Court.

A 23-year-old Sacramento woman has sued Uber, accusing the company of negligence and failure to protect her after she was allegedly abandoned by a driver and later sexually assaulted.

According to the lawsuit, the plaintiff requested an Uber after a May 28, 2025 concert in downtown Sacramento, but instead of driving her home to Rosemont, the driver allegedly left her in a high-crime neighborhood.

Stranded without her phone or keys, she was approached by a man and woman who offered her a ride, then took her to an apartment where she was assaulted at knifepoint.

She escaped the following morning and sought medical care.

The complaint argues that Uber has long been aware of similar incidents but failed to properly train and supervise its drivers.

It also claims Uber provided only a generic email response with hotline numbers after the plaintiff reported the assault.

Sacramento police are investigating. Uber described the allegations as “heartbreaking” but declined to comment further.

The plaintiff seeks damages for physical, emotional, and psychological injuries, raising questions about corporate negligence, duty of care, and ride-share safety policies.

A San Francisco judge has barred jurors from reviewing internal Uber messages in which a company executive said he “trashed rape victims” while responding to media inquiries.

On the second day of the bellwether trial, Judge Ethan P. Schulman ruled that the Slack messages sent by Uber Communications Director Andrew Hasbun would be excluded, finding them unduly prejudicial and unrelated to the plaintiff’s specific claims.

Plaintiffs argued the messages showed Uber’s dismissive stance toward assault complaints and were relevant to punitive damages.

Uber’s attorneys countered that the remark referred to correcting inaccuracies in a news story and did not apply to the case.

Judge Schulman sided with Uber, calling the evidence a potential “side show.”

Jurors, however, did hear about Uber’s communications practices, including a 2017 strategy document on presenting the company’s $5 million pledge to anti-assault groups while minimizing the impact of sexual assault statistics.

Hasbun also acknowledged internal debates over wording in Uber’s 2019 safety report, which plaintiffs contend downplayed the seriousness of sexual assaults.

This case, brought by plaintiff Jessica C., is the first of more than 500 coordinated lawsuits in California state court accusing Uber of failing to protect passengers from driver assaults.

The first bellwether trial in the coordinated Uber sexual assault litigation has begun in San Francisco Superior Court, where hundreds of survivors have brought claims against the company.

The plaintiff, identified as Jessica C., alleges she was assaulted in December 2019 when her Uber driver went off-route, restrained her, groped her, and made threatening sexual advances during a ride to the airport.

Her attorneys claim Uber allowed the driver to continue working for three more years because the assault was not reported through the company’s system at the time.

They argue that Uber placed profit and growth ahead of safety by rejecting stricter measures such as in-car cameras and fingerprint-based background checks.

The legal team also points to Uber’s internal records, which they say show over 70,000 sexual violence incidents in 2017 and more than 85,000 in 2024, far higher than the figures Uber disclosed publicly.

Uber’s defense maintains the platform is statistically very safe, with only 0.0002% of rides involving a serious incident, and argues the company has implemented strong safety tools and appropriate driver screening.

More than 500 cases remain active in California state court under the Judicial Council Coordination Proceedings (JCCP), while federal litigation is ongoing, with some bellwether claims partially dismissed in July.

The outcome of this first trial is expected to influence whether Uber pursues settlements or continues contesting claims in the broader litigation.

The first bellwether trial in the Uber sexual assault multidistrict litigation has been postponed to early 2026.

U.S. District Judge Charles Breyer moved the trial date from December 8, 2025, to January 7, 2026, citing ongoing disputes over discovery.

The case centers on plaintiff Jaylynn Dean, who alleges that an Uber driver in Arizona raped her in November 2023.

Attorneys for both sides told the court they require additional time to address evidence concerns, including questions about missing smartphone data.

Uber is currently defending more than 2,500 lawsuits in the Northern District of California, with plaintiffs claiming the company failed to safeguard riders from sexual assault and harassment.

The bellwether outcomes will be closely watched, as jury reactions may influence settlement discussions.

If the parties cannot resolve the litigation after bellwether trials, Judge Breyer has signaled he may remand individual cases back to federal courts nationwide.

Pending Uber sexual assault lawsuits increased between August and September, rising from 2,513 to 2,583 cases — an addition of 70 new filings in one month.

These lawsuits, which may be consolidated into multidistrict litigation (MDL), allege that Uber failed to implement proper safety measures to protect passengers from sexual assault and harassment by drivers.

Plaintiffs argue that the company’s background checks and reporting systems were inadequate, allowing preventable incidents to occur.

If you or a loved one were sexually assaulted, sexually battered, or faced any other form of sexual misconduct from an Uber driver, you may be eligible to file an Uber Sexual Assault Lawsuit.

Contact TruLaw for a free consultation. 

Use the free and confidential chatbot on this page to find out if you qualify to file a claim instantly.

Uber has alleged that multiple plaintiffs in the ongoing sexual assault multidistrict litigation (MDL) submitted falsified ride records to support claims.

In a recent court filing, the company identified at least 33 lawsuits that it says are based on rides that never occurred, citing altered or fabricated ride receipts.

These allegations will be reviewed as part of the MDL’s discovery process, during which both sides present evidence and challenge the validity of claims.

If any lawsuits are found to be based on fraudulent documentation, they are expected to be dismissed.

Submitting false evidence in federal court is a serious offense and may result in criminal or civil penalties in addition to case dismissal.

This marks the first formal instance in which Uber has contested the legitimacy of specific claims in the MDL.

Plaintiffs’ leadership has not yet responded to the company’s accusations.

August 1st, 2025: August 2025 JPML Numbers

The Uber sexual assault MDL grew by 154 cases between July and August, increasing from 2,359 to 2,513 total filings.

Plaintiffs continue to allege that Uber failed to implement sufficient safety protocols and did not adequately respond to known risks of sexual assault.

Discovery efforts remain active as the litigation advances.

If you or a loved one were sexually assaulted, sexually battered, or faced any other form of sexual misconduct from an Uber driver, you may be eligible to file an Uber Sexual Assault Lawsuit.

Contact TruLaw for a free consultation. 

Use the free and confidential chatbot on this page to find out if you qualify to file a claim instantly.

On July 28, 2025, U.S. District Judge Charles Breyer held a case management conference to discuss progress in the Uber sexual assault multidistrict litigation (MDL).

These conferences allow the court and attorneys to organize the timeline and next procedural steps in large, complex lawsuits.

During the meeting, Judge Breyer extended the deadline for attorneys to submit proposals on the order of bellwether trials to August 12, 2025.

Lawyers must also indicate whether they believe these trials should take place in different federal districts across the country.

The next case management conference is set for August 22, with a joint management statement due two days earlier.

The upcoming decisions about bellwether trial order carry significant weight. These early trials will set the tone for the litigation, helping to test legal strategies and evaluate the strength of the evidence.

Favorable verdicts for plaintiffs could increase pressure on Uber to reach broader settlements. Conversely, early defense wins may complicate resolution efforts.

As the bellwether process moves forward, the outcomes will be closely watched by all parties involved and could directly influence the pace and structure of any future settlements.

A federal judge has rejected Uber’s attempt to remove upcoming bellwether cases from the sexual assault multidistrict litigation (MDL), clearing the way for those trials to proceed.

Uber had sought to exclude individual sexual assault lawsuits from the bellwether process, claiming they should be handled outside the MDL structure.

The court disagreed, ruling that the selected cases will remain within the MDL and advance toward trial.

Bellwether trials are expected to begin before the end of 2025 and will play a critical role in shaping the trajectory of the litigation by evaluating key legal issues and potential settlement values.

Although Uber is likely to continue challenging the decision, the ruling significantly narrows the company’s legal options and brings the first group of cases closer to the courtroom.

A federal judge in Ohio has asked the state’s Supreme Court to determine whether Uber and Lyft’s mobile applications qualify as “products” under the Ohio Product Liability Act (OPLA).

This request arises from a personal injury case involving a car accident where the rideshare driver was using one of the apps at the time.

At issue is whether the app’s design could expose the companies to liability under OPLA, which covers defective product claims in Ohio.

Uber and Lyft contend that their digital platforms are intangible and thus not subject to product liability rules.

The judge noted that even if the apps are not deemed products, the plaintiff might still pursue a design-defect claim through traditional negligence under common law.

This distinction could affect whether the plaintiff must meet OPLA’s higher standard or proceed with a more accessible negligence argument.

The Ohio Supreme Court has not yet decided whether it will accept the certified question.

A ruling could significantly influence how courts evaluate liability for software and app-based services.

U.S. District Judge Charles R. Breyer has denied Uber’s motion to dismiss all claims in the ongoing sexual assault multidistrict litigation (MDL), clearing the way for the first bellwether trial to begin on December 8, 2025.

The decision upholds the viability of five out of six initial bellwether cases selected earlier this year.

Plaintiffs have been granted permission to refile the sixth dismissed case, and both sides have been instructed to nominate a replacement within 14 days.

The MDL, currently centralized in the Northern District of California, includes more than 2,300 lawsuits.

Plaintiffs allege that Uber failed to implement adequate safety measures to prevent sexual assaults by drivers.

Accusations include insufficient background checks and the company’s decision not to adopt potential safeguards such as gender-based ride matching or in-car monitoring systems.

Although the judge dismissed certain portions of the complaints, the core allegations remain intact.

This ruling sets the stage for bellwether trials that could significantly influence jury outcomes and shape the trajectory of settlement discussions moving forward.

In the ongoing litigation against Uber involving allegations of sexual assault by drivers, a critical issue is now before the court: whether plaintiffs’ attorneys will be permitted to contact other passengers who may have reported misconduct by the same drivers.

A previous court order required Uber to disclose contact information for these individuals, who could serve as potential witnesses in the case.

However, Uber has filed an objection, urging the judge to overturn that order on the grounds that such outreach could infringe on passenger privacy.

While the judge considers the matter, both sides have proposed a contingency plan. If Uber’s objection is denied, the company would first send a notice to the affected passengers, informing them that their contact details may be shared with the plaintiffs’ legal team.

Passengers would then have seven days to object.

At this stage, the court has not ruled on Uber’s challenge, leaving the status of the contact plan uncertain.

It’s also unclear how many passengers may be involved or how many would opt out if notices are ultimately sent. For now, this aspect of the case remains paused, awaiting the judge’s decision.

As of July 2025, the multidistrict litigation (MDL) against Uber involving sexual assault allegations has grown to 2,359 pending cases—an increase of 184 filings since June. This marks one of the largest monthly upticks in the litigation this year.

Plaintiffs in the MDL allege that Uber failed to implement adequate safety protocols, including proper driver screening and monitoring, which they claim enabled a pattern of sexual assaults and other misconduct by drivers.

The recent surge in filings appears to be driven by heightened media coverage and awareness efforts, which have encouraged more survivors to come forward. Discovery is actively progressing, with both sides examining Uber’s internal safety procedures and its response to prior misconduct complaints.

If you or someone you know has experienced sexual assault, battery, or any form of sexual misconduct involving an Uber driver, you may be eligible to pursue legal action.

Contact TruLaw for a free, confidential consultation, or use the secure chatbot on this page to see if you qualify to file a claim.

On June 28, Judge Cisneros issued an order requiring Uber to more rigorously adhere to the Bellwether Deposition Protocol, following concerns raised in a June 23 status report regarding discovery delays.

Under the protocol, both sides must provide two potential deposition dates within five business days of a request.

In the event of a disagreement over compliance, the parties are instructed to submit a joint letter outlining the dispute.

The Court made clear that Uber is expected to comply with the protocol regardless of its view on a witness’s relevance.

The only acceptable delay is in cases where a former employee cannot be located despite reasonable, good-faith efforts.

Additionally, the judge approved a procedural timeline to address disputes concerning litigation funding subpoenas prior to the start of formal briefing.

On June 12, Magistrate Judge Lisa J. Cisneros directed third-party background check providers Chekr, Inc. and Accurate Background, LLC to produce records for Uber drivers named in six bellwether sexual assault cases slated for trial in December.

This decision grants a motion filed by plaintiffs in the ongoing federal Uber sexual assault multidistrict litigation (MDL), currently underway in the Northern District of California.

The requested documents are part of the discovery process and are expected to play a significant role in shaping the upcoming trials.

The background check vendors initially resisted disclosure, citing protections under federal law that categorize the documents as “consumer reports.”

However, Judge Cisneros ruled that such protections do not override a lawful court order, particularly when the records are considered critical to the litigation.

She emphasized that the records are “highly relevant” to the plaintiffs’ allegations.

The lawsuits accuse Uber of negligence in vetting drivers and failing to implement effective safety protocols, leading to assaults on passengers.

In response to privacy concerns, the court ordered that the documents be produced under an “attorneys’ eyes only” designation, barring wider access unless authorized.

These six bellwether cases—drawn from over 2,000 suits consolidated in the MDL—are set to begin trial on December 8, 2025.

The outcomes could influence future litigation strategy and potential settlement negotiations, as Uber continues to confront scrutiny over passenger safety practices.

The Uber Sexual Assault MDL grew by 113 cases between May and June, raising the total number of federal lawsuits to 2,175.

This represents one of the largest monthly increases so far, reflecting ongoing outreach and engagement from survivors and legal teams.

The litigation focuses on allegations that Uber failed to enforce adequate safety measures, allowing preventable assaults by drivers to occur.

Plaintiffs are pressing for access to internal Uber safety records and driver screening procedures as discovery disputes continue.

These issues may determine the scope of evidence allowed in early trial phases as the litigation moves forward.

If you or a loved one were sexually assaulted, sexually battered, or faced any other form of sexual misconduct from an Uber driver, you may be eligible to file an Uber Sexual Assault Lawsuit.

Contact TruLaw for a free consultation. 

Use the free and confidential chatbot on this page to find out if you qualify to file a claim instantly.

Colorado Governor Jared Polis has vetoed House Bill 1291, a widely supported rideshare safety proposal introduced after Democratic Representative Jenny Willford reported being sexually assaulted during a Lyft ride.

The legislation aimed to strengthen protections for passengers by requiring more rigorous background checks for drivers, restricting certain driver-passenger interactions, and expanding the ability to record rides through audio and video tools.

The bill passed with bipartisan support and was seen as a critical measure for improving rider safety.

Governor Polis objected to the bill’s lack of clarity on recording guidelines and raised concerns about the short timeline for implementation.

He described the measure as “unworkable” due to its ambiguous language and potential privacy issues.

The veto followed significant lobbying from Uber and Lyft.

Uber warned that it might pull out of the Colorado market if the bill became law and also used its app to urge riders to oppose the proposal—actions that reportedly swayed the governor’s decision.

Willford, who is currently suing Lyft, criticized the veto as a setback for survivor-led reforms.

Along with other bill sponsors, she accused Polis of prioritizing the interests of tech corporations over public safety, despite their attempts to negotiate revisions to the bill.

Other survivors of assaults by rideshare drivers also pushed for the bill’s passage, stressing that their goal was to increase accountability, not to disrupt service or punish the industry.

Uber filed a motion requesting a federal judge in California to transfer 13 of the 20 scheduled bellwether trials in the sexual assault multidistrict litigation (MDL) to courts in other states.

The company argues that its user terms of service include a forum selection clause requiring legal proceedings to be held in the jurisdiction where the alleged incidents occurred.

Uber contends that riders agreed to these terms when they registered for the app, and that federal law supports the enforcement of such clauses.

The company has identified courts in states including Texas, Illinois, Arizona, Pennsylvania, and Georgia as appropriate venues for these relocated cases.

Meanwhile, plaintiffs in 16 of the cases have requested that the Northern District of California retain jurisdiction, citing the benefits of a centralized venue for ensuring procedural efficiency and consistency.

Despite this dispute, the court has already scheduled six bellwether trials to begin later this year.

These early cases are expected to have significant influence over the broader direction of the litigation.

The MDL centers on claims that Uber failed to take adequate action to prevent sexual assaults by drivers, even though internal records dating back to 2014 allegedly documented such incidents.

The Uber Sexual Assault lawsuit continues to grow as more survivors come forward with claims that they were sexually assaulted or harassed by drivers using the platform.

Plaintiffs allege that Uber failed to implement sufficient safety protocols to prevent these incidents and did not take adequate steps to protect passengers.

In the past month, 180 new cases have been added to the federal multidistrict litigation (MDL), bringing the total number of filings in 2025 to 575.

The increasing volume of claims highlights ongoing concerns about rider safety and corporate accountability.

As litigation advances, plaintiffs continue to seek justice and systemic changes to prevent future harm.

If you or a loved one were sexually assaulted, sexually battered, or faced any other form of sexual misconduct from an Uber driver, you may be eligible to file an Uber Sexual Assault Lawsuit.

Contact TruLaw for a free consultation. 

Use the free and confidential chatbot on this page to find out if you qualify to file a claim instantly.

This litigation, consolidated in a federal multidistrict litigation (MDL) in the Northern District of California, includes more than 1,900 lawsuits alleging that Uber failed to prevent sexual assaults, harassment, and rapes by its drivers.

To manage the volume of cases, Judge Charles R. Breyer has outlined a plan for five waves of bellwether trials, with each wave containing 20 representative cases selected by both plaintiffs and defense counsel.

Each case will be tried individually, as the court has denied requests for consolidated trials to ensure the integrity of the bellwether process.

If the first case in a wave settles, the next case will move forward to trial.

Earlier this month, Uber filed a renewed motion seeking the dismissal of certain bellwether cases.

The company aims to dismiss fraud, misrepresentation, and some product liability claims, along with claims tied to nonphysical injuries.

Plaintiffs have not yet filed their response.

These bellwether trials are intended to guide settlement discussions and overall litigation strategy.

While the verdicts will not be binding on other lawsuits, they are expected to strongly influence potential settlement values.

The lawsuits center on allegations that Uber failed to perform thorough background checks, did not install vehicle surveillance, did not offer gender-based driver preferences, and inadequately trained drivers regarding sexual misconduct prevention.

Plaintiffs argue that Uber’s 2014 introduction of “Safe Ride Fees” failed to result in real safety improvements for riders.

The outcomes of these first trials will play a crucial role in determining the future of hundreds of additional cases still pending nationwide.

If you or a loved one were sexually assaulted, sexually battered, or faced any other form of sexual misconduct from an Uber driver, you may be eligible to file an Uber Sexual Assault Lawsuit.

Contact TruLaw for a free consultation. 

Use the free and confidential chatbot on this page to find out if you qualify to file a claim instantly.

In the ongoing multidistrict litigation (MDL) involving Uber Technologies, Inc., plaintiffs are urging the court to allow several claims to be heard together during the first bellwether trial, scheduled for December 8, 2025.

The litigation currently includes more than 1,900 lawsuits filed by passengers who allege they were sexually assaulted, harassed, or raped by drivers using the Uber platform.

On April 1, 2025, plaintiffs submitted a request to U.S. District Judge Charles R. Breyer, who is presiding over the MDL in the Northern District of California, asking that the initial trial consolidate multiple plaintiffs’ cases.

According to the plaintiffs, this approach would improve trial efficiency and provide a better gauge of how jurors respond to recurring themes such as expert testimony on trauma and Uber’s passenger safety protocols.

Uber, however, opposes the idea, arguing that a combined trial could unfairly sway the jury.

The company insists each case must be considered individually, given the distinct facts involved in each alleged incident.

The MDL was formed in October 2023 to centralize and coordinate pretrial proceedings for these similar claims across the country.

The central allegation in all the lawsuits is that Uber failed to implement adequate safety measures—such as installing in-car cameras, conducting thorough background checks, or offering passengers control over driver gender.

Earlier in the process, Judge Breyer directed both sides to select 10 representative cases each to form a pool of 20 bellwether cases.

These are now undergoing discovery and expert evaluations.

A final decision on which case or cases will proceed to trial in December has not yet been made.

Alongside their request for a multi-plaintiff trial, plaintiffs are also asking the Court to set clear deadlines for final bellwether case selection and the close of discovery, aiming to keep the December trial timeline on track.

While verdicts in bellwether trials are not binding on the other MDL cases, they often influence settlement talks and may shape future compensation estimates.

If no broad settlement is achieved after the bellwether phase, unresolved cases may be sent back to their original federal courts for individual trials.

If you or a loved one were sexually assaulted, sexually battered, or faced any other form of sexual misconduct from an Uber driver, you may be eligible to file an Uber Sexual Assault Lawsuit.

Contact TruLaw for a free consultation. 

Use the free and confidential chatbot on this page to find out if you qualify to file a claim instantly.

Between March 2025 and April 2025, the Uber sexual assault litigation experienced its largest monthly increase, growing from 1,600 cases to 1,883, a jump of 283 cases.

This rise in filings highlights increasing concerns about safety and security, alongside a growing awareness of the legal consequences related to sexual assault incidents within ride-sharing services.

If you or a loved one were sexually assaulted, sexually battered, or faced any other form of sexual misconduct from an Uber driver, you may be eligible to file an Uber Sexual Assault Lawsuit.

Contact TruLaw for a free consultation. 

Use the free and confidential chatbot on this page to find out if you qualify to file a claim instantly.

The Uber Sexual Assault Lawsuit has reached a critical turning point.

In a landmark decision, the U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that over 1,600 sexual assault cases against Uber can be consolidated and heard before a single judge in San Francisco.

Uber attempted to block this move, citing a clause in its user agreement, but the court rejected that argument.

This decision paves the way for unified proceedings that could expose significant internal practices regarding rider safety.

The lawsuits allege that Uber failed to properly vet drivers, ignored reports of misconduct, and neglected to implement safety measures that could have prevented sexual assaults.

Legal experts say this ruling could influence future litigation against tech companies that rely on user agreements to limit liability.

If Uber is found liable, the outcome may lead to major operational changes, including stricter background checks and new in-app safety features.

This ruling is a major victory for survivors seeking justice and a warning to other platforms about the limits of legal protections in their user agreements.

If you or a loved one were sexually assaulted, sexually battered, or faced any other form of sexual misconduct from an Uber driver, you may be eligible to file an Uber Sexual Assault Lawsuit.

Contact TruLaw for a free consultation. 

Use the free and confidential chatbot on this page to find out if you qualify to file a claim instantly.

In March 2025, the Uber Sexual Assault Lawsuit saw an increase in new filings, reaching 1,600 cases, up by 38 from the 1,562 cases recorded in February 2025.

February had seen a larger increase of 75 cases compared to the previous month.

Although the rise in March is slightly smaller, it still reflects ongoing awareness and legal action by individuals impacted by allegations of sexual assault during Uber rides.

These lawsuits involve claims of sexual assault, harassment, and other violent crimes committed by Uber drivers, as well as accusations against the company for failing to ensure rider safety.

Many focus on inadequate background checks, insufficient safety measures, and the company’s failure to effectively address complaints and prevent such incidents.

If you or a loved one were sexually assaulted, sexually battered, or faced any other form of sexual misconduct from an Uber driver, you may be eligible to file an Uber Sexual Assault Lawsuit.

Contact TruLaw for a free consultation. 

Use the free and confidential chatbot on this page to find out if you qualify to file a claim instantly.

Uber is currently facing a rising number of lawsuits related to sexual abuse and assault by its drivers, with over 1,500 cases filed across federal courts and additional claims in California state court.

These lawsuits accuse Uber of failing to implement essential safety measures, such as inadequate background checks and lacking security features like in-vehicle cameras, which could have prevented the assaults.

The lawsuits hold Uber accountable for the abuse, asserting the company has a duty to protect its passengers.

To consolidate the litigation, a multidistrict litigation (MDL) was formed in October 2023, with all cases centralized before U.S. District Judge Charles R. Breyer in California.

Judge Breyer has selected 20 lawsuits to serve as bellwether trials, helping to predict jury responses to recurring evidence and expert testimony in future cases.

Both plaintiffs and defendants have identified 10 cases each for preparation, which will undergo extensive discovery, including depositions and pretrial motions. 

The bellwether trials are set to begin on December 8, 2025. 

The results of these trials are expected to guide Uber in handling future settlements, as the company aims to avoid numerous individual trials.

If you or a loved one were sexually assaulted, sexually battered, or faced any other form of sexual misconduct from an Uber driver, you may be eligible to file an Uber Sexual Assault Lawsuit.

Contact TruLaw for a free consultation. 

Use the free and confidential chatbot on this page to find out if you qualify to file a claim instantly.

A Boston city councilor is urging “significant changes” following accusations of rape against an Uber driver.

Hermann Ngoufack Jiokeng, 39, was arrested Sunday in Boston’s Brighton neighborhood after a woman reported the assault during a ride from South Boston to her home.

Police later confirmed that Jiokeng was an Uber driver.

He is currently held pending a dangerousness hearing scheduled for Friday.

Boston City Councilor Ed Flynn stressed the need for stricter measures to prevent such violent crimes, proposing that ride-sharing company oversight be transferred to the Boston Police Department and that drivers undergo comprehensive background checks, including fingerprinting.

Currently, Uber conducts annual criminal background checks but does not require fingerprinting.

Flynn’s call for reform follows another alleged assault by Uber Eats driver Roiber Andres Rodriguez Melendez in Wilbraham.

Uber has since banned his account and pledged support to law enforcement.

If you or a loved one were sexually assaulted, sexually battered, or faced any other form of sexual misconduct from an Uber driver, you may be eligible to file an Uber Sexual Assault Lawsuit.

Contact TruLaw for a free consultation. 

Use the free and confidential chatbot on this page to find out if you qualify to file a claim instantly.

In February 2025, the number of Uber Sexual Assault Lawsuits reached 1,562, marking an increase of 75 cases from the 1,487 lawsuits filed in January 2025.

This surge shows the ongoing safety concerns within the ride-sharing industry, as plaintiffs accuse Uber drivers of sexual assault and harassment.

With more individuals stepping forward, the litigation continues to grow, with victims seeking justice and compensation for their traumatic experiences.

The rise in cases highlights the increasing awareness of these serious allegations and the public’s growing demand for accountability and enhanced safety protocols in the ride-sharing industry.

If you or a loved one were sexually assaulted, sexually battered, or faced any other form of sexual misconduct from an Uber driver, you may be eligible to file an Uber Sexual Assault Lawsuit.

Contact TruLaw for a free consultation. 

Use the free and confidential chatbot on this page to find out if you qualify to file a claim instantly.

The Uber Sexual Assault Lawsuit is ongoing. 

The Nevada Supreme Court has unanimously ruled against Uber’s attempt to cap contingency fees for attorneys at 20% in civil lawsuits.

Critics argued that this measure would have made it more difficult for victims, including survivors of sexual assault by Uber drivers, to secure legal representation.

The ruling blocks a proposed ballot initiative backed by Uber and Nevadans for Fair Recovery, with the court determining that the measure was “misleading and confusing.”

Survivors and legal advocates hailed the decision as a major victory for accountability in sexual assault cases against Uber.

While Uber denies wrongdoing in these lawsuits, opponents claim the initiative was a strategic effort to limit the company’s financial liability.

Had the court approved the proposal, it would have gone to the state legislature for consideration and could have taken effect as early as 2027.

If you or a loved one were sexually assaulted, sexually battered, or faced any other form of sexual misconduct from an Uber driver, you may be eligible to file an Uber Sexual Assault Lawsuit.

Contact TruLaw for a free consultation. 

Use the free and confidential chatbot on this page to find out if you qualify to file a claim instantly.

In the ongoing Uber sexual assault litigation, the court has rejected Uber’s efforts to limit the production of key documents created after November 2023.

A firm cutoff date of December 1, 2024, has been established for document discovery, with narrowly tailored requests for more recent materials allowed.

This decision highlights the importance of transparency and aims to prevent delays in uncovering information related to passenger safety policies.

The court also dismissed Uber’s attempts to delay depositions, stressing that discovery obligations must be met promptly, regardless of Uber’s coordination with state court proceedings.

If you or a loved one were sexually assaulted, sexually battered, or faced any other form of sexual misconduct from an Uber driver, you may be eligible to file an Uber Sexual Assault Lawsuit.

Contact TruLaw for a free consultation.

Use the free and confidential chatbot on this page to find out if you qualify to file a claim instantly.

The number of Uber Sexual Assault Lawsuits pending in multidistrict litigation (MDL) has risen from 1,459 in December to 1,487 in January 2025, marking an increase of 28 new cases.

Uber Sexual Assault Lawsuits involve claims of sexual assault, harassment, and other violent crimes committed by Uber drivers during rides, as well as accusations against the company for failing to ensure the safety of its passengers.

The increase in case filings suggests that victims are continuing to pursue legal action for incidents involving Uber, underscoring persistent concerns about the company’s responsibility to safeguard riders.

Many of the Uber Sexual Assault Lawsuits focus on allegations of insufficient background checks for drivers, inadequate safety measures, and the company’s failure to properly address complaints or prevent such incidents.

If you or a loved one were sexually assaulted, sexually battered, or faced any other form of sexual misconduct from an Uber driver, you may be eligible to file an Uber Sexual Assault Lawsuit.

Contact TruLaw for a free consultation.

Use the free and confidential chatbot on this page to find out if you qualify to file a claim instantly.

The federal litigation involving over 1,400 Uber driver sexual assault lawsuits is moving toward bellwether trials.

U.S. District Judge Charles R. Breyer has finalized the process for selecting early test cases.

Both parties must identify 10 cases each by February 14th, 2025, creating a group of 20 lawsuits for case-specific discovery and trial preparations.

Centralized in a Multidistrict Litigation (MDL) in the Northern District of California, the Uber Sexual Assault Lawsuits allege the company failed to implement adequate safety measures, enabling drivers to assault passengers.

Hundreds of related cases are also pending in California state courts.

The selected cases will file amended complaints by March 14, 2025, with discovery concluding by September 22nd, 2025.

Judge Breyer’s pretrial order includes deadlines for Daubert and dispositive motions by October 8th, 2025.

These bellwether trials are expected to offer insights into jury responses and potentially shape settlements or outcomes for the remaining lawsuits.

If you or a loved one were sexually assaulted, sexually battered, or faced any other form of sexual misconduct from an Uber driver, you may be eligible to file an Uber Sexual Assault Lawsuit.

Contact TruLaw for a free consultation.

Use the free and confidential chatbot on this page to find out if you qualify to file a claim instantly.

The Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation (JPML) reported 1,411 case filings in the Uber Sexual Assault lawsuit as of November, rising to 1,459 in December, with 48 new cases added.

This lawsuit involves allegations that Uber passengers were sexually assaulted by drivers and that the company failed to implement sufficient safety measures or properly screen drivers.

The increase in filings may be driven by greater awareness, media coverage, or additional individuals coming forward with claims.

The Uber Sexual Assault multidistrict litigation continues to expand as more plaintiffs seek accountability for the company’s alleged failure to protect its passengers.

If you or a loved one were sexually assaulted, sexually battered, or faced any other form of sexual misconduct from an Uber driver, you may be eligible to file an Uber Sexual Assault Lawsuit.

Contact TruLaw for a free consultation.

Use the free and confidential chatbot on this page to find out if you qualify to file a claim instantly.

Uber is currently entangled in extensive litigation, facing nearly 3,000 sexual assault lawsuits consolidated in both a federal multidistrict litigation (MDL) and California state court.

Plaintiffs argue that Uber’s platform has failed to adequately safeguard users from misconduct by drivers, alleging that Uber’s safety protocols are insufficient.

Uber is actively contesting the MDL’s centralized structure, a strategy designed to streamline cases with similar claims, like these sexual assault allegations.

Recently, Uber requested a filing deadline within the MDL to reduce the influx of new claims.

The company is also pushing for cases to be transferred from the MDL to local jurisdictions where incidents allegedly occurred, a move that could create logistical and financial obstacles for plaintiffs, potentially impacting their unified legal approach.

Uber asserts that its platform remains safe, stating that sufficient safety protocols are in place.

Nevertheless, Uber has also emphasized its ongoing efforts to enhance platform safety, suggesting an awareness of potential areas for improvement.

These actions appear to reflect both a focus on public perception and a strategic approach to managing liability in current and future litigation.

If you or a loved one were sexually assaulted, sexually battered, or faced any other form of sexual misconduct from an Uber driver, you may be eligible to file an Uber Sexual Assault Lawsuit.

Contact TruLaw for a free consultation.

Use the free and confidential chatbot on this page to find out if you qualify to file a claim instantly.

The Uber Sexual Assault Lawsuit involves claims from victims who report experiencing sexual assault or harassment during rides arranged through Uber’s platform.

Plaintiffs contend that Uber did not implement adequate safety measures to protect passengers, resulting in traumatic and life-altering incidents.

In October, 1,346 cases were filed related to the Uber Sexual Assault lawsuit.

By November, this number rose to 1,411, adding 65 new cases.

This increase reflects a growing awareness among victims and their pursuit of legal action to hold Uber accountable for alleged safety failures.

These cases emphasize the profound impact of sexual assault on victims’ physical, emotional, and mental well-being.

If you or a loved one were sexually assaulted, sexually battered, or faced any other form of sexual misconduct from an Uber driver, you may be eligible to file an Uber Sexual Assault Lawsuit.

Contact TruLaw for a free consultation.

Use the free and confidential chatbot on this page to find out if you qualify to file a claim instantly.

Uber has filed to dismiss a federal lawsuit initiated in July 2024, which accuses the rideshare company of negligence in a sexual assault case.

In their defense, Uber claims it is “not legally responsible” for crimes committed by individuals, arguing that simply using its platform does not make it liable for a third party’s actions.

Uber’s legal team compares this case to that of a computer manufacturer or Internet provider, who is not liable for crimes facilitated through their products, and insists Uber should not be held accountable for criminal actions taken by individuals using its app.

The lawsuit charges Uber with negligence and illegal sex trafficking, targeting both the company and unnamed drivers who allegedly transported the minors.

The plaintiffs assert that Uber ignored multiple warnings and failed to shield the children from a “real and present danger” of child sex trafficking.

They further allege that Uber’s drivers knowingly transported underage girls without adult supervision or parental permission.

Uber has moved the case from South Carolina state court to federal court in Columbia, where it has petitioned for dismissal.

The company is also requesting that references to its profits be excluded from the lawsuit, arguing that these details are intended to cast it in a negative light.

U.S. District Court Judge Mary Geiger Lewis has not yet ruled on Uber’s requests or the families’ latest filings, and mediation has been ordered, with both parties set to exchange records by mid-2025.

If you or a loved one were sexually assaulted, sexually battered, or faced any other form of sexual misconduct from an Uber driver, you may be eligible to file an Uber Sexual Assault Lawsuit.

Contact TruLaw for a free consultation.

Use the free and confidential chatbot on this page to find out if you qualify to file a claim instantly.

The Uber Sexual Assault lawsuit is ongoing. 

In the latest development within the Uber passenger sexual assault multidistrict litigation (MDL), a California federal magistrate judge recently denied Uber’s attempt to reclaim a “safety criteria” document that was inadvertently shared during pretrial proceedings.

Uber contended that this document, which outlined a policy update, was privileged since it was meant for review by in-house counsel for legal advice.

However, Judge Lisa J. Cisneros determined that the document’s primary purpose was driven by Uber’s communications and public policy teams, not specifically for legal counsel, negating Uber’s claim to privilege.

Judge Cisneros noted that the document was focused on “public outreach” around policy changes tied to California’s Proposition 47, which reclassified certain criminal offenses.

Although Uber’s in-house counsel reviewed the document after its creation, Judge Cisneros clarified that this later involvement didn’t make the document privileged.

“If the document was not privileged when Uber’s policy and communications teams created it, then merely sending a copy later for lawyers to review does not retroactively render it privileged,” she explained.

This ruling underscores the ongoing complexities of the MDL, where plaintiffs argue that Uber allowed drivers with past misconduct onto its platform, leading to incidents of sexual assault against passengers.

In recent months, U.S. District Judge Charles R. Breyer dismissed several claims within the MDL, though some were permitted to proceed with amendments.

Judge Cisneros also directed Uber and the plaintiffs to consult regarding two additional documents with attachments that Uber is trying to claim under privilege.

A resolution or further briefings on this issue are expected by mid-October.

If you or a loved one were sexually assaulted, sexually battered, or faced any other form of sexual misconduct from an Uber driver, you may be eligible to file an Uber Sexual Assault Lawsuit.

Contact TruLaw for a free consultation.

Use the free and confidential chatbot on this page to find out if you qualify to file a claim instantly.

The Uber Sexual Assault Lawsuit involves claims that the rideshare company failed to adequately protect passengers from sexual assault by drivers.

Plaintiffs argue that Uber did not implement sufficient safety measures, such as comprehensive background checks, to prevent these incidents and failed to take proper action when assaults were reported.

In September, the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation (JPML) reported 1,263 active Uber Sexual Assault lawsuits.

By October, the number of pending cases in the Uber Sexual Assault MDL increased to 1,346, adding 83 new cases.

Survivors of these assaults are seeking legal action against Uber, holding the company accountable for negligence in rider safety and seeking compensation for the harm they have suffered.

If you or a loved one were sexually assaulted, sexually battered, or faced any other form of sexual misconduct from an Uber driver, you may be eligible to file an Uber Sexual Assault Lawsuit.

Contact TruLaw for a free consultation.

Use the free and confidential chatbot on this page to find out if you qualify to file a claim instantly.

The Uber Sexual Assault Litigation, which involves claims of sexual assault by Uber drivers, has experienced a significant surge in case filings.

In August 2024, there were 387 active cases, but by September 2024, this number had dramatically increased to 1,263, marking a substantial rise in new filings.

This sharp increase suggests that more victims are coming forward to seek justice.

Plaintiffs in this litigation argue that Uber failed to implement adequate safety measures and background checks, leading to instances of sexual assault during rides.

These cases highlight the serious risks passengers face and the ongoing need for improved safety protocols within the rideshare industry.

The rise in filings underscores the importance of seeking legal representation if you or a loved one has been a victim of sexual assault while using Uber.

If you or a loved one were sexually assaulted, sexually battered, or faced any other form of sexual misconduct from an Uber driver, you may be eligible to file an Uber Sexual Assault Lawsuit.

Contact TruLaw for a free consultation.

Use the free and confidential chatbot on this page to find out if you qualify to file a claim instantly.

The Uber Sexual Assault Lawsuit is ongoing. 

In a significant development within the Uber driver sexual assault multidistrict litigation (MDL), U.S. District Judge Charles R. Breyer has dismissed several claims brought under Texas and California state laws.

The dismissal, issued on August 15, 2024, impacts numerous lawsuits among the over 400 filed across the United States that allege Uber’s failure to implement adequate safety measures led to widespread sexual assaults by its drivers.

Judge Breyer’s order highlights deficiencies in the master complaint and short-form complaints filed by plaintiffs, noting a lack of individualized allegations necessary to establish causation.

The judge emphasized that for the litigation to proceed, the complaints must include specific details linking the alleged assaults to Uber’s actions or inactions, such as inadequate background checks or failure to implement safety features within the app.

Despite the dismissal, the judge has allowed plaintiffs the opportunity to file amended complaints with more detailed allegations.

This decision gives plaintiffs a chance to address the court’s concerns by specifying how Uber’s alleged failures directly contributed to the individual assaults.

A case management conference is scheduled for August 29, 2024, where the court will discuss the timeline for filing these amended complaints and any subsequent challenges to the new pleadings.

This conference is expected to set the stage for how the litigation will proceed, particularly concerning the upcoming bellwether trials, which are designed to test key issues and evidence that could influence the resolution of the remaining cases.

If you or a loved one were sexually assaulted, sexually battered, or faced any other form of sexual misconduct from an Uber driver, you may be eligible to file an Uber Sexual Assault Lawsuit.

Contact TruLaw for a free consultation.

Use the free and confidential chatbot on this page to find out if you qualify to file a claim instantly.

The Uber Sexual Lawsuit is ongoing. 

Uber is currently pushing a ballot measure in Nevada that could significantly limit the legal fees lawyers can collect in lawsuits, a move that could make it harder for plaintiffs to file cases against the company.

This effort comes as Uber faces numerous lawsuits from customers who claim they were sexually assaulted or harassed by drivers.

The proposed measure, backed by Uber through a political action committee (PAC), seeks to cap contingency fees at 20%, down from the current 40% in some cases.

This cap would be the strictest in the country, potentially making it financially difficult for lawyers to take on complex cases against large companies like Uber.

Critics argue that the measure could effectively prevent victims from seeking justice, particularly in cases involving serious misconduct.

Uber has denied that the initiative is intended to reduce its legal exposure, stating that the goal is to ensure plaintiffs receive a larger share of any settlements.

The initiative mirrors past efforts by Uber and other companies to use ballot measures to alter laws in their favor, such as the successful 2020 California proposal that classified gig workers as independent contractors.

The Nevada measure has faced opposition from various groups, including those representing sexual assault survivors, who argue that it misleads voters and could hinder access to justice.

If you or a loved one were sexually assaulted, sexually battered, or faced any other form of sexual misconduct from an Uber driver, you may be eligible to file an Uber Sexual Assault Lawsuit.

Contact TruLaw for a free consultation. 

Use the free and confidential chatbot on this page to find out if you qualify to file a claim instantly.

The Uber Sexual Assault Lawsuit centers on claims that Uber failed to protect passengers from sexual assault by drivers.

Plaintiffs allege that Uber’s inadequate background checks and safety measures have resulted in numerous sexual assault cases.

In July, there were 321 filings in the lawsuit, which increased to 387 by August.

This rise suggests that more survivors are coming forward and seeking legal action against Uber for their experiences.

The company has faced criticism for its insufficient driver background checks and inadequate safety protocols, which have contributed to these incidents.

Victims report experiencing significant physical and emotional trauma, leading to legal actions against Uber for their failure to implement effective protective measures.

If you or a loved one were sexually assaulted, sexually battered, or faced any other form of sexual misconduct from an Uber driver, you may be eligible to file an Uber Sexual Assault Lawsuit. 

Contact TruLaw for a free consultation. 

Use the free and confidential chatbot on this page to find out if you qualify to file a claim instantly.

Uber is facing a lawsuit from two South Carolina families, alleging the company facilitated the transportation of their daughters to a house across state lines, where they were assaulted.

The lawsuit claims Uber drivers took the children to the perpetrator’s home without notifying their parents and returned them without raising concerns about the situation.

The lawsuit demands Uber enhance safety measures, including:

• Installing cameras in vehicles.
• Eliminating penalties for drivers who refuse to pick up unaccompanied minors.
• Implementing mandatory anti-trafficking training for all drivers.

It also highlights the need for Uber to adopt stricter safety protocols to prevent similar incidents in the future.

Uber responded to the lawsuit with a statement emphasizing their commitment to combating human trafficking.

The company outlined their ongoing efforts, including driver education and collaboration with law enforcement to address and report suspected trafficking cases.

The families aim to ensure that Uber takes responsibility and implements measures to protect children and prevent such incidents from happening again.

This lawsuit in South Carolina is individual and separate from the multidistrict litigation (MDL) filed against the rideshare company in California federal court.

If you or a loved one were sexually assaulted, sexually battered, or faced any other form of sexual misconduct from an Uber driver, you may be eligible to file an Uber Sexual Assault Lawsuit. 

Contact TruLaw for a free consultation. 

Use the free and confidential chatbot on this page to find out if you qualify to file a claim instantly.

Lyft has agreed to implement several safety and governance reforms to settle a shareholder lawsuit that accused the company’s officers and directors of failing to prevent sexual and physical assaults by drivers.

The preliminary settlement, reached in a California federal court, awaits a judge’s approval.

Key points of the settlement include:

• Enhanced Passenger Safety Features: Lyft will increase awareness of the “Alert 911 Silently” feature in its app for reporting misconduct and facilitate easier 24/7 access to live human support for reporting problems.
• Improved Training and Ethics Code: Lyft will enhance driver training and its code of business conduct and ethics.
• Three-Year Duration: These changes will be in effect for at least three years.
• No Direct Payment from Officers and Directors: The officers and directors will not pay any money to the company.
• Plaintiffs’ Legal Fees: Insurers will cover $700,000 to pay the plaintiffs’ legal fees.

Shareholders claimed that Lyft’s reputation suffered due to inadequate driver training and background checks, including for those with histories of sexual misconduct.

The lawsuit also alleged that Lyft concealed these issues before its March 2019 initial public offering (IPO) and hid defects in its electric bikes that led to injuries.

Many passengers have also accused Uber drivers of sexual assault, with over 300 lawsuits combined into a federal class action in San Francisco.

The number of plaintiffs could reach the thousands.

If you or a loved one has been affected by sexual assault as an Uber passenger, contact TruLaw today for a free consultation.

You can also use the chatbot on this page for an instant case evaluation.

In a significant development, the court overseeing the Uber Sexual Assault MDL has granted plaintiffs access to crucial documents and data on safety incidents within Uber, including GPS data and trip details.

This information is vital for identifying patterns of sexual assault and misconduct and understanding Uber’s awareness and response to these incidents.

Although access to all 800,000 user reports was denied, the specific data related to sexual assault and misconduct will offer valuable insights.

The Uber Passenger Sexual Assault MDL in California has experienced a 16% increase in cases, rising from 276 to 321 lawsuits.

If you or a loved one has been affected by sexual assault as an Uber passenger, contact TruLaw today for a free consultation.

You can also use the chatbot on this page for an instant case evaluation.

The Uber Sexual Assault lawsuit is ongoing. 

The lawsuit involves claims from individuals who have experienced sexual assault while using Uber services.

This lawsuit seeks to hold Uber accountable for passenger safety.

In June, there were 276 Uber Sexual Assault lawsuit filings.

By July, this number increased to 321.

Sexual assault during Uber rides causes severe trauma, leading to long-term psychological and emotional damage.

Victims often suffer from PTSD, anxiety, and depression, significantly impacting their quality of life.

This has led more individuals to join the Uber Sexual Assault lawsuit.

The lawsuit aims to hold the company accountable for failing to protect passengers.

Affected individuals should consult an Uber sexual assault lawyer.

If you or a loved one has been affected by sexual assault as an Uber passenger, contact TruLaw today for a free consultation.

You can also use the chatbot on this page for an instant case evaluation. 

The Uber Sexual Assault lawsuit is ongoing. 

The U.S. District Judge overseeing the Uber passenger sexual assault lawsuits has allowed the rideshare company to pursue an immediate appeal regarding the consolidation of cases into a federal Multidistrict Litigation (MDL).

Uber argues that the consolidation violated the “terms of service” agreed upon by riders. However, the court denied Uber’s request to stay all pretrial proceedings during the appeal.

Uber faces over 250 lawsuits from former passengers alleging sexual assault, attack, or rape by drivers.

Plaintiffs argue that Uber failed to implement sufficient safety measures to prevent such incidents.

Despite the introduction of “Safe Ride Fees” in 2014, plaintiffs claim that background checks remain superficial, and necessary steps, such as adding surveillance cameras or providing driver training on sexual assault and harassment, have not been taken.

The U.S. Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation established the Uber sexual assault lawsuit MDL in October 2023, consolidating cases before Judge Charles R. Breyer in the Northern District of California.

The MDL aims to facilitate coordinated discovery and conduct early “bellwether” trials to assess jury reactions to evidence and testimonies that may recur throughout the claims.

Uber opposes the MDL, arguing that plaintiffs forfeited their right to centralized proceedings under the app’s terms of service and sought to have the cases dismissed or returned to their original district courts, citing a “Non-Consolidation Clause.”

If an Uber driver has sexually assaulted you or someone you know, contact TruLaw using the chat on this page to seek justice.

The Uber Sexual Assault Lawsuit continues to unfold.

Recent updates from the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation (JPML) reveal that the Uber Technologies, Inc., Passenger Sexual Assault Litigation now encompasses 276 cases, with 24 new cases filed last month.

The lawsuits claim that Uber did not adequately vet its drivers nor enforce necessary safety protocols, which they argue led to sexual assaults on passengers.

As a result, an increasing number of survivors of such assaults involving Uber drivers are taking legal action to seek justice and compensation for their ordeals.

If you or someone you know has been affected by sexual assault as an Uber passenger, you might be eligible to join the Uber Sexual Assault Lawsuit. 

Contact us today for a no-cost consultation or use the confidential chatbot on this page for immediate case assessment.

The Uber Sexual Assault Lawsuit is ongoing.

In a significant development within the Uber Sexual Assault Mass Tort, Judge Charles R. Breyer of the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California rejected Uber’s effort to apply a non-consolidation clause from its user terms.

This clause sought to block the merging of numerous sexual assault lawsuits into a unified multidistrict litigation (MDL).

Judge Breyer’s ruling facilitates the collective progression of these cases in federal court as part of the Uber Sexual Assault MDL.

This MDL comprises more than 200 legal actions brought by individuals alleging sexual assault by both recognized and fraudulent Uber drivers.

These plaintiffs contend that Uber neglected its responsibility to ensure passenger safety, falsely advertising its services as secure.

The Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation consolidated these lawsuits in October 2023 to enhance procedural efficiency and judicial management.

Uber’s defense posited that the app’s terms prohibit “coordinated” legal actions, including MDLs.

Nevertheless, Judge Breyer concluded that such a clause obstructs the judiciary’s capacity to administer cases effectively.

He noted that while terms of use may incorporate arbitration clauses and class action waivers, they cannot deprive the court of its fundamental powers to control its docket.

This decision is seen as a triumph for the plaintiffs, reinforcing judicial authority and guaranteeing that their claims will be adjudicated, potentially accelerating the legal proceedings and enabling a more comprehensive examination of the allegations.

If you or someone you know has experienced sexual assault as an Uber passenger, you might be eligible to join the Uber Sexual Assault Lawsuit. 

Contact us today for a free consultation or utilize the confidential chatbot on this website for instant case evaluation.

The Uber Technologies, Inc., Passenger Sexual Assault Litigation remains active, with recent developments reported by the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation (JPML), currently, there are 252 pending cases.

In the last month, 32 new cases have been added to the multidistrict litigation (MDL).

The litigation asserts that Uber failed to properly vet its drivers and did not implement sufficient safety protocols to prevent sexual assaults.

It is alleged that this negligence by Uber has directly led to the injuries sustained by passengers.

Victims of sexual assault by Uber drivers are increasingly pursuing legal action to seek justice and compensation.

For more information on the Uber Sexual Assault Lawsuit and available legal options for survivors, please contact us today.

Additionally, you can utilize the chatbot on this page for a free, confidential case evaluation.

The litigation against Uber for sexual assault allegations continues to progress, drawing increased interest from both the public and legal sectors. 

Recent updates from the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation (JPML) indicate that there are now 230 pending lawsuits against Uber for sexual assault, with nine new cases filed in March.

This uptick in lawsuits reflects a growing awareness and support network for survivors, motivating more individuals to share their experiences.

Many of these legal claims involve allegations of passengers being assaulted by Uber drivers, highlighting significant concerns about the company’s safety protocols and driver vetting processes.

It’s vital for survivors to recognize that there are legal avenues available and that they are not alone in seeking justice.

Consulting with a legal professional can provide clarity on your rights and the steps you can take towards legal recourse.

Reach out to us for a complimentary consultation. 

Additionally, the confidential chatbot on this site offers a direct line to our attorneys for immediate assistance.

We are committed to supporting you through this process.

The Uber Sexual Assault Lawsuit is ongoing. 

The Uber Sexual Assault Litigation has seen a significant development, with the consolidation of 221 lawsuits into a Multi-District Litigation (MDL), marking a 30-case increase since February.

This MDL, monitored by the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation (JPML), highlights a notable escalation in legal actions directed against Uber, primarily focusing on the company’s alleged failure to implement sufficient measures to prevent sexual assaults by its drivers.

The core of these lawsuits centers on accusations of Uber’s negligence in ensuring the safety and security of its passengers.

As the JPML continues to oversee the expanding number of claims, the litigation emphasizes the growing concern over passenger safety within the rideshare industry.

Individuals who have suffered sexual assault while using Uber’s services might be eligible to join this legal action. 

Those affected are urged to reach out to TorHoerman Law for a complimentary consultation or to utilize the available chatbot on this page for immediate support and guidance in potentially participating in the Uber Sexual Assault Lawsuit.

The Uber Sexual Assault Lawsuit is ongoing.

The ongoing Uber Sexual Assault Litigation addresses claims against Uber Technologies, Inc., focusing on the safety of rideshare passengers.

With 191 cases currently pending, as reported in the latest filings by the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation (JPML), the litigation underscores the critical issue of passenger safety within the rideshare industry.

Multidistrict Litigations (MDLs) in the United States are established to efficiently manage multiple civil lawsuits that share common issues, facts, or defendants, particularly when the lawsuits stem from similar incidents, such as the alleged sexual assaults by Uber drivers.

This legal process consolidates related cases into one federal district court for all pretrial proceedings, aiming to streamline the litigation by centralizing the discovery process, minimizing repetitive efforts, and ensuring uniform rulings on pivotal legal questions.

The Uber Passenger Sexual Assault Litigation (MDL 3084) specifically accuses Uber of negligence in safeguarding its rideshare users.

Individuals who have experienced sexual assault as Uber riders might qualify to join the ongoing litigation. 

Those affected are encouraged to seek a free consultation from our law firm or to utilize the chatbot on this page for immediate assistance.