Attorney Jessie Paluch, founder of TruLaw, has over 25 years of experience as a personal injury and mass tort attorney, and previously worked as an international tax attorney at Deloitte. Jessie collaborates with attorneys nationwide — enabling her to share reliable, up-to-date legal information with our readers.
This article has been written and reviewed for legal accuracy and clarity by the team of writers and legal experts at TruLaw and is as accurate as possible. This content should not be taken as legal advice from an attorney. If you would like to learn more about our owner and experienced injury lawyer, Jessie Paluch, you can do so here.
TruLaw does everything possible to make sure the information in this article is up to date and accurate. If you need specific legal advice about your case, contact us by using the chat on the bottom of this page. This article should not be taken as advice from an attorney.
On this page, we’ll provide an overview of the El Toro Air Station lawsuit, plaintiffs impacted by PFAS contamination at El Toro Air Station, the legal basis of the El Toro toxic contamination lawsuit, and much more.
Key aspects of the El Toro Air Station lawsuit include, but are not limited to:
If you or a loved one has suffered from health issues or property damage due to toxic contamination from the former El Toro Air Station, you may be entitled to compensation.
Contact TruLaw using the chat on this page to receive an instant case evaluation and see if you qualify to file an El Toro Air Station lawsuit.
Extensive environmental investigations have been conducted at the former Marine Corps Air Station El Toro in Irvine, California, since the late 1980s.
These investigations, conducted under the Navy’s Installation Restoration Program (IRP), have revealed significant contamination at the site, particularly at IRP Site 1, which includes the Explosive Ordnance Disposal (EOD) Training Range and the Adjacent Property.
The discovery of hazardous substances, including naphthalene and munitions and explosives of concern (MEC), has given rise to potential legal claims against the parties responsible for the contamination.
Plaintiffs allege that improper disposal practices and failure to remediate the site adequately have led to ongoing health risks and property damage.
Environmental investigations at the former Air Station El Toro have been ongoing since the base’s closure in 1999.
The Navy’s IRP has identified numerous contaminants, including volatile and semivolatile organic compounds, perchlorate, explosives residues, metals, and dioxins/furans, in the soil gas and groundwater at the site.
The Environmental Protection Agency has been working closely with the Navy to oversee the cleanup efforts at the Marine Corps Air Station.
The presence of these hazardous substances has led to a range of legal claims against the U.S. Navy and other potentially responsible parties.
Plaintiffs allege negligence, failure to warn, and environmental laws such as CERCLA and RCRA violations.
Many of these claims stem from the discovery of abandoned wastewater treatment lines and underground storage tanks that have contributed to the contamination at the site.
The toxic exposure at the former Marine Corps Air Station El Toro has affected a wide range of individuals, including military personnel, their family members, and nearby residents.
These plaintiffs have suffered from various health issues and economic losses due to the contamination.
The plaintiffs in the El Toro Air Station lawsuit include, but are not limited to:
The contamination has affected not only those who served at the Marine Corps Air Station but also the surrounding community, as the toxic chemicals have spread through soil and groundwater.
Residents near the former El Toro Air Station may have been exposed to contaminants such as naphthalene through soil and groundwater contamination.
These individuals may be experiencing health issues related to their exposure and are seeking compensation through the lawsuit.
Groundwater contamination has been a significant concern for the community, as it has the potential to impact the water supply for nearby households.
Former employees at El Toro Air Station, especially those involved in EOD training, may have been directly exposed to hazardous materials, including munitions and explosives.
These workers are among the plaintiffs alleging health issues due to occupational exposure.
Military members who served at the Corps Air Station El Toro may have been exposed to toxic chemicals without proper protection or warning.
The El Toro Air Station Lawsuit seeks to hold the responsible parties accountable for the widespread contamination and the resulting harm to plaintiffs.
The defendants include the U.S. Navy and other entities involved in the operations at the base.
As the primary operator of the El Toro Air Station, the U.S. Navy is a key defendant in the lawsuit.
Plaintiffs allege that the Navy was negligent in its handling of hazardous materials and failed to remediate the contamination properly, leading to ongoing health risks.
The Navy’s use of underground storage tanks and improper disposal practices have been cited as significant contributors to the contamination.
In addition to the U.S. Navy, other parties may be liable for the contamination at El Toro Air Station, including contractors involved in waste disposal or companies that manufacture the hazardous substances used at the site.
Identifying all potentially responsible parties is important for plaintiffs seeking comprehensive remediation and compensation.
The Environmental Protection Agency has been working to identify and hold accountable all parties responsible for the pollution at the site.
The toxic exposure at the former Marine Corps Air Station El Toro has led to a wide range of injuries and losses for the plaintiffs.
These injuries include both physical health conditions and emotional distress resulting from the contamination.
Plaintiffs in the El Toro lawsuit claim a range of injuries, including:
The health conditions claimed by plaintiffs are severe and often require long-term medical treatment.
Some of the most common illnesses reported include lung cancer and breast cancer, which have been linked to exposure to volatile organic compounds and other toxic chemicals found at the site.
Plaintiffs allege that exposure to contaminants like naphthalene has led to various health problems, including respiratory illnesses, cancer, and neurological disorders.
These conditions may be chronic and require ongoing medical treatment.
The contaminated groundwater and soil gas at the site have been identified as potential sources of these toxic chemicals.
In addition to health effects, plaintiffs are seeking compensation for economic damages and property value losses.
These losses may include decreased home values, medical expenses, and lost wages due to illness or inability to work.
The groundwater contamination has also led to concerns about the long-term economic impact on the surrounding communities.
The El Toro Air Station Lawsuit is built upon a strong legal foundation.
Plaintiffs assert various causes of action against the defendants.
These legal theories are rooted in both common law principles and specific environmental statutes.
The El Toro lawsuit is based on several legal theories, including negligence, failure to warn, and willful disregard for human health and the environment.
Plaintiffs argue that the defendants had a duty to handle hazardous substances properly and warn residents and employees of potential risks.
The lawsuit alleges that the Navy and other defendants failed to meet these obligations, resulting in widespread toxic exposure.
Plaintiffs also allege that the defendants violated environmental laws, such as CERCLA and RCRA.
These statutes impose strict liability on parties responsible for releasing hazardous substances into the environment.
The Environmental Protection Agency has been involved in enforcing these laws and overseeing the cleanup efforts at the site.
Filing a toxic exposure claim at El Toro Air Station requires careful consideration of legal deadlines and strategic decisions about how to pursue the case.
Plaintiffs must be vigilant in protecting their rights and building a strong case against the defendants.
To pursue an El Toro Air Station toxic exposure lawsuit, plaintiffs must:
Maneuvering through the intricacies of a toxic exposure claim can be challenging, but with the help of experienced attorneys, plaintiffs can seek the justice and compensation they deserve.
The El Toro Air Station Lawsuit has the potential to provide relief for the many individuals who have suffered from the site’s contamination.
Plaintiffs need to consult with an experienced attorney to ensure timely filing of their claims, as statutes of limitations and filing deadlines vary depending on the specific cause of action and jurisdiction.
These deadlines can be pivotal in preserving a plaintiff’s right to seek compensation for their injuries and losses related to the toxic exposure at the Marine Corps Air Station El Toro.
Plaintiffs may be able to join existing lawsuits or file their own claims.
Joining forces with other plaintiffs can strengthen numbers and shared resources, but individual circumstances may warrant a separate legal action.
Experienced attorneys can help plaintiffs evaluate their options and choose the best path forward in pursuing their toxic exposure claim.
Pursuing a successful El Toro Air Station Lawsuit requires a strategic approach to building a compelling case against the defendants.
Plaintiffs must be able to demonstrate the link between the contamination and their injuries and present strong evidence to support their claims.
To succeed in an El Toro toxic exposure lawsuit, plaintiffs must:
Building a strong case often involves working with experts in various fields, such as medicine, toxicology, and environmental science.
These experts can help plaintiffs establish the connection between the toxic chemicals found at the site and the health conditions and losses suffered by the plaintiffs.
One key aspect of the case will be demonstrating the extent of the groundwater contamination and its impact on the surrounding community.
This may involve data analysis from groundwater monitoring wells and other environmental testing.
Another important factor will be showing the harm caused by PFAS exposure, a type of chemical that has been linked to various health problems and has been found at the site.
Plaintiffs must show that they were exposed to hazardous substances from the El Toro Air Station and that this exposure caused their injuries.
This often requires extensive evidence and expert testimony.
Medical records showing diagnoses of conditions like lung cancer or breast cancer can be powerful evidence in these cases, particularly when combined with expert opinions linking these conditions to the toxic chemicals found at the site.
Expert witnesses, such as toxicologists, epidemiologists, and environmental scientists, play a crucial role in toxic exposure litigation by providing scientific evidence and opinion to support the plaintiffs’ claims.
These experts can help explain the scientific issues involved in the case and provide credible testimony about the health effects of exposure to the hazardous substances found at the Marine Corps Air Station El Toro.
The El Toro Air Station lawsuit allows plaintiffs to seek compensation for the losses they have suffered as a result of toxic exposure.
With the help of experienced attorneys like those at TruLaw, plaintiffs can pursue the full range of damages available in these cases.
With the help of TruLaw’s experienced attorneys, plaintiffs in the El Toro Air Station lawsuits may be entitled to various forms of compensation, including:
These damages can provide important support for plaintiffs who have suffered significant losses due to the contamination at the site.
Compensation can help cover the costs of medical treatment, make up for lost income, and provide some measure of relief for the physical and emotional distress caused by the toxic exposure.
TruLaw’s attorneys have extensive experience handling toxic exposure cases and can guide plaintiffs through every step of the legal process.
TruLaw’s team is dedicated to fighting for the rights of those harmed by the contamination at the El Toro Air Station, from investigating the claim and gathering evidence to negotiating with defendants and representing plaintiffs in court.
TruLaw’s attorneys can help plaintiffs assess their losses and pursue the full amount of damages to which they are entitled, including economic and non-economic losses.
Economic damages may include medical expenses, lost wages, and property damage, while non-economic damages may include compensation for pain and suffering, emotional distress, and loss of enjoyment of life.
In some cases, plaintiffs may also be able to recover punitive damages, which are designed to punish the defendants for particularly egregious conduct.
In cases of particularly egregious conduct, plaintiffs may seek punitive damages to punish the defendants and deter future wrongdoing.
Injunctive relief may also be sought to ensure proper remediation of the contaminated site.
These remedies can be important tools in holding the defendants accountable and ensuring that the community is protected from further harm.
The El Toro Air Station lawsuit represents an important fight for justice on behalf of those impacted by decades of toxic contamination.
If you believe you have been affected by the contamination at El Toro Air Station, contact TruLaw’s experienced toxic exposure attorneys to discuss your legal options and pursue the compensation you deserve.
With their help, you can hold the polluters accountable and seek the justice and closure you need to move forward with your life.
The Navy’s Installation Restoration Program has identified numerous volatile organic compound contaminants at the former El Toro Air Station, including semivolatile organic compounds, perchlorate, explosives residues, metals, and dioxins/furans in the contaminated soils and groundwater at the site.
These hazardous substances have given rise to potential legal claims against the parties responsible for the contamination.
The plaintiffs in the El Toro Air Station lawsuit include residents living near the former base, former employees, individuals who developed health issues due to exposure to contaminants, and military members and their families stationed at El Toro.
Plaintiffs in the El Toro lawsuit claim a range of injuries, including health conditions linked to toxic chemical exposure, such as respiratory issues, cancer, and neurological disorders.
Some of the most common illnesses reported include lung cancer and breast cancer, which have been linked to exposure to volatile organic compounds and other toxic chemicals found at the site.
The El Toro Air Station Lawsuit is based on several legal theories, including negligence, failure to warn, and willful disregard for human health and the environment.
Plaintiffs also allege that the defendants violated environmental laws such as CERCLA and RCRA, which impose strict liability on parties responsible for releasing hazardous substances into the environment.
The Navy, in collaboration with the Environmental Protection Agency, has implemented a groundwater cleanup system at the former El Toro Air Station to address the contamination caused by volatile organic compounds and other hazardous substances.
The remediation efforts aim to clean up the contaminated soils and groundwater and prevent further spread of the toxic chemicals to protect the health of nearby residents and the environment.
Experienced Attorney & Legal SaaS CEO
With over 25 years of legal experience, Jessie is an Illinois lawyer, a CPA, and a mother of three. She spent the first decade of her career working as an international tax attorney at Deloitte.
In 2009, Jessie co-founded her own law firm with her husband – which has scaled to over 30 employees since its conception.
In 2016, Jessie founded TruLaw, which allows her to collaborate with attorneys and legal experts across the United States on a daily basis. This hypervaluable network of experts is what enables her to share reliable legal information with her readers!
You can learn more about the El Toro Air Station Lawsuit by visiting any of our pages listed below:
Here, at TruLaw, we’re committed to helping victims get the justice they deserve.
Alongside our partner law firms, we have successfully collected over $3 Billion in verdicts and settlements on behalf of injured individuals.
Would you like our help?
At TruLaw, we fiercely combat corporations that endanger individuals’ well-being. If you’ve suffered injuries and believe these well-funded entities should be held accountable, we’re here for you.
With TruLaw, you gain access to successful and seasoned lawyers who maximize your chances of success. Our lawyers invest in you—they do not receive a dime until your lawsuit reaches a successful resolution!
Do you believe you’re entitled to compensation?
Use our Instant Case Evaluator to find out in as little as 60 seconds!
Camp Lejeune’s water contamination issue spanned several decades starting in the 1950s. Exposure to these chemicals has been linked to various serious health issues, including cancer, organ diseases, and death.
Research is increasingly suggesting a link between the use of Tylenol during pregnancy and the development of neurodevelopmental disorders, such as autism and ADHD, in infants.
Legal action is being taken against manufacturers of Aqueous Film-Forming Foam (AFFF), a chemical used in fighting fires. The plaintiffs allege that exposure to the foam caused health issues such as cancer, organ damage, and birth and fertility issues.
Here, at TruLaw, we’re committed to helping victims get the justice they deserve.
Alongside our partner law firms, we have successfully collected over $3 Billion in verdicts and settlements on behalf of injured individuals.
Would you like our help?
On Thursday, the FDA notified the public of a recall initiated by Abbott Diabetes Care Inc. of three lots of its FreeStyle Libre 3 sensor, which is a component of the company’s FreeStyle Libre 3 Continuous Glucose Monitoring System. The company says that the implicated
According to the FDA, Carson City-based company Sierra Stain LLC recalled three shades of water-based tattoo inks from its Bloodline brand due to the presence of high levels of microorganisms. Sierra Stain announced the recall on August 23, 2024. The recall pertains to three shades
The FDA recently notified the public of a recall issued by Inari Medical regarding updating instructions for use of its ClotTriever XL Catheter 30mm device after reports of injury and death. The recall does not involve the removal or discontinuation of the product itself, but