Attorney Jessie Paluch, founder of TruLaw, has over 25 years of experience as a personal injury and mass tort attorney, and previously worked as an international tax attorney at Deloitte. Jessie collaborates with attorneys nationwide — enabling her to share reliable, up-to-date legal information with our readers.
This article has been written and reviewed for legal accuracy and clarity by the team of writers and legal experts at TruLaw and is as accurate as possible. This content should not be taken as legal advice from an attorney. If you would like to learn more about our owner and experienced injury lawyer, Jessie Paluch, you can do so here.
TruLaw does everything possible to make sure the information in this article is up to date and accurate. If you need specific legal advice about your case, contact us by using the chat on the bottom of this page. This article should not be taken as advice from an attorney.
Eight-hours is all it took for a St. Louis jury to hand Johnson & Johnson their largest legal setback yet for their talc-based products – a $4.69 billion verdict for the role J&J played in asbestos-induced ovarian cancer of 22 women.
Unlike prior talcum trials, the Ingham v. Johnson & Johnson jury was the first to hear evidence that Johnson & Johnson covered up evidence that their “sacred cow” product contained asbestos fibers for more than 40 years.
Medical experts testified that asbestos, a known carcinogen, is intermingled with mineral talc, which is the primary ingredient in Johnson & Johnson’s Baby Powder and Shower to Shower products.
Plaintiffs’ experts explained to the jury that asbestos fibers and talcum particles have been found in the ovarian tissue of many of the women filing talcum lawsuits against J&J.
According to Robert Dassow, a lawyer on the St. Louis talcum powder trial team, the jury was extremely attentive during the entire six-week trial.
They listened intently to the testimony of asbestos and cancer doctors who explained the path to an ovarian cancer diagnosis through years of unknowing asbestos exposure through the use of J&J’s products.
In the end, the six men and six women jury unanimously agreed that J&J hid evidence of the potential harm that could be caused by their products, according to Dassow.
Mark Lanier, lead lawyer in the St. Louis trials, encouraged jurors to send J&J a message about their continued conduct.
Lanier did not give the jury guidance as to an appropriate number that could both compensate a family for the devastating ovarian cancer diagnosis and act as punishment to the corporation responsible.
Instead, the jury found their own way to send this message.
The jury compensated each of the 22 women $25 million for the suffering they experienced from their diagnosis with ovarian cancer.
The jury then came back with $4.14 billion in punitive damages, which they arrived at by multiplying a single year of talcum powder sales by the roughly 40 years since the company reported their products did not contain asbestos.
Susanne Scovern, another lawyer on the plaintiffs’ trial team, said this verdict sends a clear message to J&J.
“Our team of lawyers are not backing away from this fight – we believe that women deserve to know the truth about the products they use on a daily basis. “
“This extremely thoughtful St. Louis jury listened to the evidence presented to them from both sides and found that J&J chose profits over safety,” claimed Ms. Scovern.
“We expect J&J will appeal this verdict, but that will not thwart our efforts to seek justice for our clients with new trials scheduled in courtrooms across the country.
We look forward to holding J&J accountable to the brave women who suffered ovarian cancer without knowing that their potential “silent killer” was baby powder. “
Johnson & Johnson continues to deny their product caused any harm – noting that the company “remains confident that its products do not contain asbestos and do not cause ovarian cancer.”
But, juries continue to disagree with this statement and punish J&J for this denial.
Prior to the St. Louis verdict, J&J racked up $867 million in losses in previous verdicts.
Many of these prior verdicts have been overturned upon appeal by Johnson & Johnson.
News of this unprecedented verdict caused the J&J stock price to correct during trading on Friday the 13th, falling in price by 1.43%.
Statements issued by J&J indicate, that despite the clear message sent by the St. Louis jury, J&J will fight the verdict as they have done with previous talcum verdicts.
Experienced Attorney & Legal SaaS CEO
With over 25 years of legal experience, Jessie is an Illinois lawyer, a CPA, and a mother of three. She spent the first decade of her career working as an international tax attorney at Deloitte.
In 2009, Jessie co-founded her own law firm with her husband – which has scaled to over 30 employees since its conception.
In 2016, Jessie founded TruLaw, which allows her to collaborate with attorneys and legal experts across the United States on a daily basis. This hypervaluable network of experts is what enables her to share reliable legal information with her readers!
Here, at TruLaw, we’re committed to helping victims get the justice they deserve.
Alongside our partner law firms, we have successfully collected over $3 Billion in verdicts and settlements on behalf of injured individuals.
Would you like our help?
At TruLaw, we fiercely combat corporations that endanger individuals’ well-being. If you’ve suffered injuries and believe these well-funded entities should be held accountable, we’re here for you.
With TruLaw, you gain access to successful and seasoned lawyers who maximize your chances of success. Our lawyers invest in you—they do not receive a dime until your lawsuit reaches a successful resolution!
Do you believe you’re entitled to compensation?
Use our Instant Case Evaluator to find out in as little as 60 seconds!
Camp Lejeune’s water contamination issue spanned several decades starting in the 1950s. Exposure to these chemicals has been linked to various serious health issues, including cancer, organ diseases, and death.
Research is increasingly suggesting a link between the use of Tylenol during pregnancy and the development of neurodevelopmental disorders, such as autism and ADHD, in infants.
Legal action is being taken against manufacturers of Aqueous Film-Forming Foam (AFFF), a chemical used in fighting fires. The plaintiffs allege that exposure to the foam caused health issues such as cancer, organ damage, and birth and fertility issues.
Here, at TruLaw, we’re committed to helping victims get the justice they deserve.
Alongside our partner law firms, we have successfully collected over $3 Billion in verdicts and settlements on behalf of injured individuals.
Would you like our help?
According to the FDA, 20-ounce packages of “King Kullen Broccoli Cutlets with Bread Crumbs and Parmesan” have been recalled by New Haven, Connecticut-based Gracie’s Kitchen due to the potential presence of undeclared sesame and wheat. Individuals who live with allergies to either allergen are advised
The FDA is warning consumers of a Class I recall of Boston Scientific’s Obsidio Comformable Embolic because the device has been shown to present a risk for increased bowel ischemia when used for lower GI (gastrointestinal) bleeding, or acute colonic bleeding. As a pre-mixed embolic
Animal nutrition business Cargill has announced a recall of Nutrena Country Feeds Meat bird 22% Crumble (RV) because the product after the product was found to be missing Vitamin D, according to the FDA. Growing birds who consume a diet lacking in the vitamin can